Pragmatics SPEECH ACTS & EVENTS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Speech Acts.
Advertisements

DOING THINGS WITH LANGUAGE
Review Exercises 1) Do the COMPONENTIAL analysis (not the compositional one) of the following words: hen b) rooster Componential analysis 2) Does ‘A’
Objectives You will demonstrate how to form Simple Future Tense.
SPEECH ACTS “Action speak louder than words” is a well-known proverb. However, it is not completely correct because speech is action and language can.
Lecture Six Pragmatics.
A CTING AND C ONVERSING Drs. Liliek Soepriatmadji, M.Pd.
Yule, Speech Acts Pertemuan 7 Matakuliah: G1042/Pragmatics Tahun: 2006.
CAS LX 502 7a. Speech acts Ch. 8. How to do things with words Language as a social function. — I bet you $1 you can’t name the Super Tuesday states. —You’re.
Yule, Politeness and interaction Pertemuan 9 Matakuliah: G1042/Pragmatics Tahun: 2006.
Presentation on Formalising Speech Acts (Course: Formal Logic)
ETHNOGAPHY OF COMMUNICATION: SECOND PART
Speech acts and events. Ctions performed To express themselves, people do not only produce utterances, they perform actions via those Utterances, such.
Macropragmatics Speech act theory.
Direct and indirect speech acts
Introduction to linguistics II
Pragmatics.
Speech Acts & Language Functions Pragmatics Not only language structure is rule governed – language use is, too Rules of language use are social: ”Is saying.
SPEECH ACT THEORY J. Austin & J.Searle
Advanced Spoken English Speech Act Theory What are Speech Acts? Speaking is performative Utterances are functional -Giving orders, instructions -Making.
PS429 Social and Public Communication PS429 Social and Public Communication Week 4 (25/10/2005) Reading group discussion.
Semantics 3rd class Chapter 5.
 We have been considering ways in which we interpret the meaning of an utterance in terms of what the speaker intended to convey.  However, we have.
6.3 Macropragmatics Speech act theory The cooperative principle The politeness principle.
Topic 9: perlocution and illocution
Yule, Speech Acts Pertemuan 8 Matakuliah: G1042/Pragmatics Tahun: 2006.
 Copyright 2004 Digital Enterprise Research Institute. All rights reserved. 1 Speech Acts and Communication Lars Ludwig.
Pragmatics. Pragmatics n Pragmatics studies how human communication functions.
Research Methods in Translation and Interpreting Studies Speech Acts.
Standards Of Textuality And Speech Acts.
Your host E. Aminudin Aziz. Austin’s observation on (many or even most) acts realised through speech  People do things with words  The idea sharply.
Speech Act. Speech act theory was proposed by John. L. Austin and has been developed by J. R. Searle. They believe that language is not only used to inform.
Critical Reasoning.
Speech Act Theory Mohammad Alipour Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran.
Pragmatics (1) Dr. Ansa Hameed.
Chapter 7 Pragmatics English Linguistics: An Introduction.
Speech Acts. HOW TO DO THINGS WITH WORDS Verificationist Holdovers According to verificationism, the meaning of a sentence is the set of experiences.
SPEECH ACTS Saying as Doing See R. Nofsinger, Everyday Conversation, Sage, 1991.
Speech Act Theory Instructor: Dr Khader Khader.  Outline:  How Speech Act Theory began  What is the theory about  Levels of performing speech acts.
Introduction to Linguistics
Speech Acts Actions performed via utterances e.g. You are fired
Discourse and Pragmatics Speech Acts Lecture 4: Paltridge, pp
Direct and indirect speech acts
PRAGMATICS 2.
Aristotel‘s concept to language studies was to study true or false sentences - propositions; Thomas Reid described utterances of promising, warning, forgiving.
Speech Acts: What is a Speech Act?
Utilization of Sentences Lec. 3
PERLOCUTIONS AND ILLOCUTIONS
Pragmatics within Linguistics
PRAGMATICS Prof. R. S. Pale
SPEECH ACT AND EVENTS By Ive Emaliana
LECTURE 9: Agent Communication
SPEECH ACT THEORY: Three Kinds of Act.
A Streetcar Named Desire
SPEECH ACT THEORY: Felicity Conditions.
Lecture 7 Speech Acts II.
SPEECH ACT THEORY: Direct and Indirect.
Speech Acts: some notes useful for the assignment
Speech Acts.
Welcome back!.
SPEECH ACTS AND EVENTS 6.1 Speech Acts 6.2 IFIDS 6.3 Felicity Conditions 6.4 The Performative Hypothesis 6.5 Speech Act Classifications 6.6 Direct and.
Week 9 language in context
SPEECH ACTS Saying as Doing
Pragmatics.
Semantics Seven kinds of speech acts
Pragmatics.
How To Do Things With Words
SPEECH ACTS Saying as Doing Professor Lenny Shedletsky
Direct and indirect speech acts
SPEECH ACT THEORY: Felicity Conditions.
Presentation transcript:

pragmatics SPEECH ACTS & EVENTS

SPEECH ACTS

Speech acts: Actions performed via utterances Locutionary acts Illocutionary acts Perlocutionary acts

Locutionary acts Performed via producing a meaning linguistic expression

Illocutionary acts Performed via the communicative force of an utterance

Perlocutionary acts Performed via the effect of the utterance on the hearer.

Problem The same utterance can potentially have quite different illocutionary acts How can speakers assume that the intended illocutionary act will be recognized by the hearer?

Solution Illocutionary Force Indicating Device (IFID) Felicity conditions

Illocutionary Force Indicating Device (IFID) Performative verbs Used in a simple positive present tense sentence 1st person singular subject I promise… I sentence you… I apologize…

Test of performative verbs I hereby V … I _______ name the ship ‘Elizabeth’. I _______ warn you not to sleep in class. I _______ believe that there’s no Santa Claus.

Felicity conditions The appropriate circumstances for the performance of a speech act to be recognized.

Felicity conditions “I promise to see you tomorrow’. General conditions The utterance is understood. Content conditions The content of the utterance is about a future event and the speaker is committed to the act. Preparatory conditions The event does not happen by itself. The event will have a beneficial effect. Sincerity conditions The speaker does have a genuine intention to carry out the future act. Essential conditions The utterance changes the speaker’s state from non-obligation to obligation

The performative hypothesis To assume that every utterance (U) underlies a clause that contains a performative verb, which make the illocutionary forces explicit. I (hereby) Vperformative you (that) U Open the door. Implicit/primary performatives I hereby order you that you open the door. Explicit performatives

Speech act classification Declarations Representatives Expressives Directives Commissives

Declarations The speech acts that change the state of the world via utterances. I now pronounce you husband and wife We find the defendant guilty.

Representatives The speech acts that states what the speaker believes to be the case or not. Statements of fact, assertions, conclusions, and descriptions The world is flat. It is a sunny day.

Expressives The speech acts that state what the speaker feels. Psychological stats (pleasure, pain, likes, joy, sorrow…) I am sorry. Congratulations.

Directives The speech acts used by the speaker to get someone else to do something. Commands, orders, requests, suggestions. Go away!

Commissives The speech acts that speakers use to commit themselves to some future actions Promises, threats, refusals, pledges. I can’t do that.