Best practice Mathematics Paddy Shevlin ETI.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Effective Self Evaluation – writing a good SEF
Advertisements

Key Stage 3 National Strategy
ProfessionalValues and Practice Look for differentiation. Monitor lesson plans (planning links). IEPs used Short evaluations should be encouraged (and.
Secondary Education Section Committee TEACHING AND LEARNING IN THE FOUNDATION SUBJECTS Geographical Association Conference 2002.
An Outstanding Lesson Plan on PowerPoint 4 part lesson plan…easily adapted to 3 !
Please view the PowerPoint in note form to read the comments attached to the slides and to see how the resources were used. Thanks.
Planning for Learning and Teaching, Assessment and Moderation
Reciprocal Teaching: Session 2. Aims of Session Opportunities to share experiences of RT so far – identify benefits & problems What are metacognitive.
GUIDED GROUP WORK IN MATHEMATICS
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson
© Myra Young Assessment All rights reserved. Provided for the use of participants in AM circles in North Lanarkshire Council.
Big Ideas, Learning Goals & Success Criteria
Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority
Key Stage 3 National Strategy Standards and assessment: session 2.
Playing board for the game Crooked rules
Key Stage 3 National Strategy Scientific enquiry Science.
Quality First Teaching In Any Subject From Good to Outstanding
© Cambridge International Examinations 2013 Component/Paper 1.
The “Highly Effective” Early Childhood Classroom Environment
The role of the mathematics subject leader in leading sustainable improvements Thursday 23 rd September 2010 Jo Lakey School Improvement Officer.
A DIFFERNET VIEW OF LEADERSHIP The Self-Evaluating Middle Manager
Who or what needs to be ready? Leaders Teachers Classroom support Administration Premises staff Children
7/14/20151 Effective Teaching and Evaluation The Pathwise System By David M. Agnew Associate Professor Agricultural Education.
Using an online learning community within Essential Skills tutor training to develop criticality of thought. Dr Irene Bell, Stranmillis University College.
Maths matters: the Northern Ireland experience Katrina Godfrey Department of Education.
Effective Questioning in the classroom
BOOK MONITORING NUMERACY STAFF INSET SCHOOL NAME DATE OF INSET.
Our Vision Bishops Lydeard Primary School. Improve the quality of teaching to good or better through:  Continuing Professional Development  North Somerset.
Strategic Plan 2012 Quality First Teaching 90% Good + Attendance 96% Science SC1 standards closer to age related in all year groups Progress of Vunerable.
New Teacher Preparation: Compass Teacher Evaluation
Please help yourself to a drink. We will start at 9.15a.m.
Using formative assessment. Aims of the session This session is intended to help us to consider: the reasons for assessment; the differences between formative.
1 “So who wants to lead a mathematics department?” Developing Future Secondary Subject Leaders for Mathematics – Collaborative Action Research Project.
Food For Thought “… twenty-first-century citizens need mathematics. But the mathematics that people need is not the sort of math learned in most classrooms.
Effective curriculum design and development Evidence from research For further school friendly resources visit For further.
Making Group Work Productive PowerPoints available at Click on “Resources”
Curriculum and Assessment in Northern Ireland
© Crown copyright 2008 Subject Leaders’ Development Meeting Mathematics Spring Term 2009 Session 1: APP and AfL.
 Participants will teach Mathematics II or are responsible for the delivery of Mathematics II instruction  Participants attended Days 1, 2, and 3 of.
Another New Framework Major Changes: No more satisfactory 2 strikes and you are out All criteria changed Very short notice No pre-inspection brief.
EDU 385 Education Assessment in the Classroom
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
Key Stage 3 National Strategy Foundation Subjects MFL: optional module 9.
Awareness Raising for Principals/ Senior Managers November 2010 New Statutory Assessment Arrangements from 2012/13.
Lesson observations: evaluating the quality of teaching and learning.
Action research projects This sequence may help you when planning your case study What does the data identify about this target group? What will.
Raising standards, improving lives The use of assessment to improve learning: the evidence 15 September Jacqueline White HMI National Adviser for Assessment.
Questioning for Engagement Success criteria All participants to develop at least one questioning strategy that leads to learner engagement and progress.
Copyright © 2008 by Educational Testing Service. All rights reserved. ETS, the ETS logo and LISTENING. LEARNING. LEADING. are registered trademarks of.
Primary.  There was a greater level of improvement in Literacy than Numeracy for both FSME and Non-FSME pupils.  Boys showed a greater level of.
Monitoring Practice Quality First Teaching High Quality Interventions.
Differentiation What is meant by differences between learners?
Assessment Without Levels Buckingham Primary School.
© Crown copyright 2008 Subject Leaders’ Development Meeting Spring 2009.
PROFILING AT STRATHGARVE PRIMARY. PROFILING  As teachers – through personal example and setting standards in our questioning and provision of feedback.
ICT Strategic Leader Forums Ian Brewer. ICT Strategic Leader Forums Outcomes Key outcomes: Improved capacity of Subject Leaders to ensure more effective.
The School Effectiveness Framework
© TNTP 2013 ACE Observer Training Burke For observers new to TNTP and the ACE Instructional Framework.
Principals’ Meeting September Agenda CASS model of support including: –Induction/EPD –Boards of Governors ESAGS Count, Read, Succeed Target-setting.
Key Stage 3 National Strategy Literacy in science.
Advancing teaching: inspiring able learners every day Meeting the Challenge 14 th November 2012.
© Crown copyright 2009 Slide /10 Teacher CPD programme – primary mathematics Strengthening mental, reasoning and communication skills in mathematics.
Mathematics intervention programmes Wave 2 and Wave 3.
Templars Primary School The development of whole school science planning.
Big Ideas, Learning Goals & Success Criteria
Personal Learning Planning Learning Logs and Pupil Achievement Folders
Ensuring support and challenge for all students in mixed attainment classes Helen
Why bother – is this not the English Department’s job?
Our Vision Bishops Lydeard Primary School
RBWM SCITT Mentor Meetings 2017.
Presentation transcript:

Best practice Mathematics Paddy Shevlin ETI

To start us thinking! A question (and an answer) What is the difference between numeracy and mathematics? ‘Numeracy is what you develop when you learn mathematics well’ Quote from Anita Straker

Useful ETI references/documents: Better Mathematics (2006) Commentary on post-primary mathematics teaching (2007) Follow-up to Better Mathematics (2010) Best Practice Survey (2013)

Better Mathematics (ETI 2006) identifies best practice Better Mathematics (ETI 2006) identifies best practice. Effective T&L is in place when teachers: ( Suggestion Use these as SC (success criteria) for TCN Share the intended learning with the pupils at the start of the lesson (1) Recap and link the work to previous learning, or set the work in an appropriate real-world context (2) Provide clear exposition involving, where appropriate, multiple explanations, with board-work modelling what the pupils should do (3) Use a variety of activities, including ICT and practical equipment, which entails the pupils working individually, in pairs or in groups (4)

More characteristics GP to use   Provide opportunities for the pupils to problem-solve Integrate, when appropriate, the use of effective mental mathematics strategies (5) Use skilful questioning, challenging the pupils’ understanding and requiring them to draw conclusions and justify their thinking (6) Highlight common misconceptions and exploit these in a sensitive way (7)

More characteristics GP to use Relate the ongoing work to other parts of the course to encourage the pupils to make interconnections and think of mathematics holistically. (8) Engage the pupils fully by ensuring that the lesson had appropriate pace, challenge and progression. (9) Teach step-by-step algorithms only when necessary. (10) Encourage the pupils to think and talk about how they learn and what they have learnt, often through appropriate plenary sessions at the end of lessons.(11)

ETI Best Practice Survey (ETI 2013) The mathematics section of the Best Practice Survey (2013) concludes: Many of the characteristics of good practice illustrated in the case studies are not new and can be best summed up by teachers having high expectations for what the pupils can achieve. This is mainly achieved by: having well-planned progression in the Schemes of Work; challenging questioning which involves all; and rigorous follow-through of support given to pupils.

Contexts for the learning- crucial for effective learning The use of interesting and meaningful contexts for the learning is important for the promotion of numeracy Key questions to ask and self evaluate as a mathematics department and an individual mathematics teacher When you the teacher are using a context as a backcloth for teaching a maths lesson, is it appropriate for the maturity and ability of the pupils? Is the context engaging the pupils, or is it too contrived?

The role of the teacher The role of the teacher when the pupils are engaging in mathematics is crucial Key questions (and statements below exemplify good practice) to ask during self-evaluation and to use for TCN: 12. Is she/he circulating the room, providing ‘scaffolding’ support? 13. Is s/he intervening at whole class level when there appears to be many of the pupils having the same difficulty? 14. Are the whole-class questions open, challenging and leading to mathematical thinking and discourse?

Well focused lessons The degree to which the focus of the lesson is on well-defined intended learning and has sharp success criteria including mathematical content , processes and skills is important. Key questions and for use as SC for TCN or other forms of SE Are the pupils clear about not only what they are doing but also what they will be able to do as consequence? (15) Does the plenary consolidate and build on the intended learning? (16) Is the plenary focused on success criteria and is differentiation taken into account when thinking of SC?(17) Is the quality of the mathematical discourse good, taking into account the maturity and ability of the pupils? (18)

ABOVE ALL THE BIG PICTURE Are all the pupils actively engaged in purposeful work through which they are learning appropriate mathematics?

Now comes the big challenge for you What can you as senior leaders do with this information ? Make improvements!Close the loop! Disseminate best practice Take action through self evaluation either by yourself or through your QACI ( Quality Assurance and Continous Improvement ) team

HOW? WHAT CAN I DO? TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE! TO IMPROVE THE PRACTICE! TO KNOW THAT I HAVE DONE THIS! (EVIDENCE!) NOT TO DESTROY ANOTHER RAIN FOREST!

Linkage of Indicators to use of TCN: hence DGP I have set out the possible SC for self evaluating best practice – or at least some of them Now further develop your self evaluation this year using TCN (or collegiate book monitoring or “the voice” (along with data if needed) to link indicators to self evaluation to DGP as just described

TCN proforma Focus of lesson: ------------ Quality Indicators: The pupils will be ------- well The pupils will be -------- accurately The pupils will be ------ Strengths (6) Suggested adjsts to learning (1) The pupils could be ---- Tear up after use

IF TCN A “ BRIDGE TOO FAR” AT THIS POINT USE ONE OTHER OF THE FOUR TYPES OF FIRST HAND EVIDENCE? WHAT ARE THEY? BUT REMEMBER TO “CLOSE THE LOOP” EVALUATE AGAIN TO SEE IF IMPROVEMENT!

The work in the books can be very informative: 1. Is the pupils’ self-marking being regularly monitored by the teacher? 2. Is there evidence that pupils’ errors are being identified and they are receiving feedback? 3. Is there evidence the pupils’ corrections are being monitored?