Action Items For Accountability 2015 URGENT and INTENSE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accountabil ity System Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performanc e Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 Overview.
Advertisements

Miami ISD Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)
Preparing for STAAR: End-of-Course Exams North East ISD Spring 2012 Version
Data Analysis State Accountability. Data Analysis (What) Needs Assessment (Why ) Improvement Plan (How) Implement and Monitor.
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) is the current state assessment program that began in spring For students in grades.
1 Accountability System Overview of the Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
Accountability preview Major Mindshift Out with the Old – In with the New TEPSA - May 2013 (Part 2) Ervin Knezek John Fessenden
Accountability Updates Testing & Evaluation Department May 21, 2014 Mission High School MISSION CISD DEIC MEETING.
Review of Performance Index Framework and Accountability Ratings RICHARDSON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT To serve and prepare all students for their global.
January 22, /25/ STAAR: A New Assessment Model STAAR is a clearly articulated assessment program. Assessments are vertically aligned within.
Texas State Accountability 2013 and Beyond Current T.E.A. Framework as of March 22, 2013 Austin Independent School District Bill Caritj, Chief Performance.
State Accountability Overview 2014 Strozeski – best guess.
Accountability Update Ty Duncan Coordinator of Accountability and Compliance, ESC
Burton Secondary EOC/STAAR Data INDEX 1 STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT STARR SATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE All Students=3-8 grades spring administration.
LINKING ACCOUNTABILITY AND INSTRUCTION Ty Duncan ESC 17 Coordinator of Accountability and #esc17
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
Kim Gilson Senior Consultant Data and Accountability Region 10 ESC
2015 Accountability Commissioner’s Final Decisions KIM GILSON SENIOR CONSULTANT, DATA AND ACCOUNTABILITY REGION 10 ESC
Accountability to Responsibility in a STAAR World! TEPSA Summer Conference 2014 Ty Duncan, ESC 17 on Twitter.
2014 Accountability System 2014 Accountability System Jana Schreiner Senior Consultant Accountability State Assessment
State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness.
The best and most sought-after school district where every student is future ready: ready for college, ready for the global workplace, ready for personal.
2015 Goals and Targets for State Accountability Date: 10/01/2014 Presenter: Carla Stevens Assistant Superintendent, Research and Accountability.
2014 Accountability System 2014 Accountability System Overview Kim Gilson Senior Consultant Data and Accountability
Index Accountability 2014 Created by Accountability and Compliance staff of Region 17 Education Service Center.
Module 4 TED 356 Curriculum in Sec. Ed.. Module 4 Explain the current official federal and state standards, including professional and accrediting groups.
Update on the State Testing Program November 14, 2011.
2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD September 9, 2013.
Instructional Leaders Advisory Tuesday, April 8, 2014 Region 4 ESC Accountability Update Richard Blair Sr. Education Specialist Federal/State Accountability.
STATE ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Back To School| August 19-22, 2013 Dean Munn Education Specialist Region 15 ESC.
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-7:00.
TASSP Spring 2014 Tori Mitchell, ESC 17 Specialist Ty Duncan, ESC 17 Coordinator Overview of 2014 Accountability
STAAR TEST Class of 2015 and beyond. What is STAAR? The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) is the new state assessment for students.
Timmerman Public Hearing February 4, :00-4:00.
1 Accountability System Overview of the PROPOSED Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
2015 Texas Accountability System Overview and Updates August 13, 2015.
HISD Becoming #GreatAllOver 1 Accountability Rating System Commissioner’s Final Rules 2014.
What are the STAAR Performance Standards? Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
Accountability to Responsibility in a STAAR World! Shauna Lane, ESC Specialist Ty Duncan, ESC 17 Coordinator
Warren Roane Mary Kay Gianoutsos Humble ISD Warren Roane Mary Kay Gianoutsos Humble ISD Best Laid Plans: EOC Projections, Results and Consequences Best.
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-4:00.
2015 Texas Accountability System La Porte Independent School District August 5, 2015.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
LOMA PARK ACCOUNTABILITY PARENT PRESENTATION September 24, 2015.
Testing Coordinators: October 4, 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Academic Performance Index (API)
Welcome to Abbett Elementary! Curriculum Night 2015.
Assigns one of three ratings:  Met Standard – indicates campus/district met the targets in all required indexes. All campuses must meet Index 1 or 2.
Accountability Update Ty
March 2013 Presenter: Nancy Webster Director of Instructional Measurement and Accountability.
Accountability 2013 Interpreting Your 2013 Accountability Report It’s Like Learning To Read All Over Again Ervin Knezek John Fessenden.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
Kingsville ISD Annual Report Public Hearing.
Subject Selection Miami Sunset Senior High School 10 th grade Presentation.
MEADOW WOOD ELEMENTARY. “GOOD IS THE ENEMY OF GREAT. AND THAT IS ONE OF THE KEY REASONS WHY WE HAVE SO LITTLE THAT BECOMES GREAT. WE DON'T HAVE GREAT.
Texas Turnaround Center Team Lead Meeting February 8-9, 2016.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
June 5, 2014 Accountability Update. Accountability Updates 110% for At-Risk, Criterion #4 Accountability Manual Updates.
2016 Accountability Texas Education Agency | Department of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting February 25, 2016.
Edgewood ISD of San Antonio Annual Performance Report February 9, 2012.
Every Student Matters Understanding the Indexes, the Tests, and Targeted Goal for STAAR 2016.
Accountability 2016 Shauna Lane, Educational Specialist
Sustaining and building on the excellence of LCPS
Bixby Public Schools OCCT Data and AYP/API December 12, 2011.
Data Review and Discussion David Holland
Bixby Public Schools OCCT Data and AYP/API September 13, 2010.
LISD Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)
Texas State Accountability
T = Texas A = Academic P = Performance R = Report
Presentation transcript:

Action Items For Accountability 2015 URGENT and INTENSE

2 To receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, all campuses and districts must meet the following targets on all indexes for which they have performance results in Accountability Manual Appendix L 2014 Accountability Targets [non-AEA Districts and Campuses] Index 1Index 2Index 3Index 4 All 4 components STAAR only District Campus: Elementary N/A12 Middle School 2827N/A13 High School/K-12 N/A315721

Subject Phase 1Phase 2 FinalLevel III Reading Grade 353%65%75%88% Grade 452%66%77%86% Grade 554%65%76%87% Grade 652%65%75%88% Grade 752%64%74%84% Grade 850%63%75%85% English I53%60%63%85% English II54%59%63%85% Math Grade 359%72%83%91% Grade 460%71%81%90% Grade 554%66%78%88% Grade 642%58%71%87% Grade 744%56%69%85% Grade 839%52%64%88% Algebra 137%50%61%83% Science Grade 559%70%80%91% Grade 856%65%74%78% Biology37%51%61%83% Social Studies Grade 850%62%73%83% US History41%53%65%81% Writing Grade 452%61%68%84% Grade 754%63%71%85% Index Index Index Index Index Index Index Index

2014 Accountability Card Sort

Index 4

Drivers  High end performance, not mere passing at low standards. Level III performance is just as important as “passing”, whatever that may be.  Special emphasis economically disadvantaged students and Level II performance.  Growth, you can “pass” and still fail in Index 2.  Final Recommended Standard is the goal. Phase- in is not extremely important in an Index system.

Action Item # 1: Changing the Questions The Teachers Ask When They Get Data!  How many Level III students do we have?  How many Level II students are just below Level III?  Are students making progress to the Level II Final Recommended Standard?  How am I going to differentiate to ensure all students make progress?

Action Item #2: Create Intervention/Enrichment for Level III students to keep them there!!  Level III is just as important as passing in this system.  Not maintaining Level III students in this system will negatively impact Index 1 and 3 and could lead to IR rating regardless of how many students “passed.”

Action Item #3: Creating a climate where teachers “grind” everyday!  Student growth is an everyday, all day affair.  Gaps in instruction no matter how small or inconsequential they may seem can make or break students with little background knowledge.  Teacher attendance and attention to each child is paramount for Index 2 and ELL success.