1 Arkansas Grade Inflation Report Office of Public School Academic Accountability Arkansas Department of Education Dr. Charity Smith Assistant Commissioner.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GAP Kids or Gray-area Kids ? Defining who they are under No Child Left Behind (NCLB)? Why this group of students exists? What are the consequences of being.
Advertisements

Lynda Lupp Richard Maraschiello Amy Morton Adam Schott John Weiss.
End-of-Course and Common Exams: Grading Rationale and Delay Parent Advisory Council January 22, 2013.
1 Transition to FCAT 2.0, End-of-Course Assessments, and School Accountability and Beyond Dr. Karen Schafer October, 2010 Secondary Curriculum.
NCLB and MSIP Accountability for End-of-Course Assessments DRAFT – October 2008 Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Becky Odneal.
EOC Exam Policies Chaparral Star Academy. E ND -O F -C OURSE E XAM O VERVIEW !!!! IMPORTANT UPDATE !!!!! On November 30, 2012, Commissioner of Education.
ALTERNATE PERFORMANCE BASED ASSESSMENT The Rubric for End of Course Assessments
Texas State Accountability 2013 and Beyond Current T.E.A. Framework as of March 22, 2013 Austin Independent School District Bill Caritj, Chief Performance.
Download and print the following files: 2008 Appeals Data.ppt 2008 Appeals Data.ppt 2008 Corrections Instructions.doc 2008 Corrections Instructions.doc.
1 Academic Performance of English Language Learners on Grades 3-8 ELA Tests (2007 to 2009) David Abrams Assistant Commissioner Office of Standards, Assessment.
2010 California Standards Test (CST) Results Lodi Unified School District Prepared by the Assessment, Research, and Evaluation August 17, 2010 Board Study.
State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness.
STAR 2010 September 10, Agenda New in 2010 Interpreting reports Comparing results Appendixes A-G 2.
Accountability Services North Carolina Department of Public Instruction January 14, 2015 School Performance Grades.
Understanding Quick Scores & This Year’s ChangeUnderstanding Quick Scores & This Year’s Change Dr. Nakia TownsDr. Nakia Towns Assistant Commissioner for.
Arkansas Department of Education Hope Allen, Director of Assessment
Academic State of the District A Presentation to the Board of Education October 21, 2010 Mr. Joseph C. Bond Superintendent of Schools Dr. Joan K. Lange.
School Progress Index 2012 Results Mary Gable- Assistant State Superintendent Division of Academic Policy Carolyn Wood - Assistant State Superintendent.
LOUISIANA STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION JOHN WHITE Tracking Readiness: Measuring High School Effectiveness in Louisiana National Conference on Student.
Arizona’s Federal Accountability System 2011 David McNeil Director of Assessment, Accountability and Research.
Student Achievement in Chicago Public Schools
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007.
Proposed Three Point Data Check System for Adequate Yearly Progress Dr. Charity Fleming Smith, Assistant Commissioner Arkansas Department of Education.
It all pays off in the end. What Students Should Know About Success in School & TAKS.
Warren Roane Jamie Hicks Mary Kay Gianoutsos Humble ISD Warren Roane Jamie Hicks Mary Kay Gianoutsos Humble ISD EOC and Algebra I: A District Perspective.
How to calculate your GPA
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
No tests are dropped No tests are given over No extra time is given Calculators can be used Partial Credit is given Non – calculator No partial credit/multiple.
MCAS 2007 October 24, 2007 A Report to the Sharon School Committee and Dr. Barbara J. Dunham Superintendent of Schools Dr. George S. Anthony Director of.
Annual Measurable Objectives (trajectory targets).
Academic Excellence Indicator System Report For San Antonio ISD Public Meeting January 23, 2006 Board Report January 23, 2006 Department of Accountability,
Priority Schools September 25, Support Team Ms. Annette Barnes, Assistant Commissioner for Public School Accountability Mr. Elbert Harvey, Coordinator.
Focus Schools September 25, Support Team Ms. Annette Barnes, Assistant Commissioner for Public School Accountability Mr. Elbert Harvey, Coordinator.
PED School Grade Reports (with thanks to Valley High School) ACE August 3, 2012 Dr. Russ Romans District Accountability Manager.
ESEA Flexibility: Achievement Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 4 of 8.
Focus Schools September 25, Support Team Ms. Annette Barnes, Assistant Commissioner for Public School Accountability Mr. Elbert Harvey, Coordinator.
Understanding AzMERIT Results and Score Reporting An Overview.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
1 Mississippi Statewide Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress Model Improving Mississippi Schools Conference June 11-13, 2003 Mississippi Department.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California English Language Development Test (CELDT) Program.
Rhonda Sims, Associate Commissioner Jennifer Stafford, Director Office of Assessment and Accountability Monthly DAC Webcast February 11, 2016 KDE:OAA:DSR:
Presentation to the Nevada Council to Establish Academic Standards Proposed Math I and Math II End of Course Cut Scores December 22, 2015 Carson City,
School Accountability and Grades Division of Teaching and Learning January 20, 2016.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Accountability Update School Grades Technical Assistance Meeting.
FLORIDA STATE EOC EXAMS. **Districts will select testing dates. REQUIRED TESTING Students enrolled in the Florida Public Schools are required to participate.
End of Course Exams  In February, 2007 the Missouri State Board of Education approved End of Course (EOC) exams.  WHY?
Regional Assessment Network (RAN) Update Chun-Wu Li, Ph.D. Assessment and Accountability Services Division of Educational Services November 21, 2014.
Division of Academic Services/Special Programs SGO 2.1 Guidelines
February 2012 State Board Ruling: School Grade Calculations
PARCC Results Summary Report.
WorkKeys February 19 – 21, 2013 Online
Teacher SLTs
Freshman Parent Presentation
Overview Page Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Teacher SLTs
Assistant Commissioner Office of Standards, Assessment and Reporting
Growth Models Oklahoma
Average is Officially Over!
2013 School Performance Grades Update
Gifted Data Reporting Oct.2017
Teacher SLTs
2012 FCAT Results and Accountability Update
Assessment & Achievement |
City Schools Grading and Reporting Policy Background
School Improvement Ratings Rule 6A , F.A.C.
Irvington Public Schools
Teacher SLTs
Teacher SLTs
Presentation transcript:

1 Arkansas Grade Inflation Report Office of Public School Academic Accountability Arkansas Department of Education Dr. Charity Smith Assistant Commissioner December 2009 Data Sources: APSCN, Local School Districts, NORMES and Triand Data Contractor: NORMES

2 The Executive Summary Arkansas Annotated Code § directs the Office of Public School Academic Accountability to report to the State Board and the General Assembly by high school the number of students in which more than twenty percent (20%) of the students received a letter grade of “B” or above but did not pass the End- of-Course assessment on the first attempt. For the school year a total of 58 high schools were identified.

3 Grade Inflation Defined Grade inflation has been redefined by state law to reflect the use of End-of-Course test (EOC) grades in place of the ACT scores. Please reference Arkansas Annotated Code § for details. Student grades were supplied by schools to the ADE APSCN Data System for Algebra and Geometry EOC courses. The number of students with a B grade or higher are included in grade inflation for each school.

4 Student Grade Calculations A single course grade was extracted from the grade data set provided by schools to the ADE for each student in the data set for algebra and geometry courses only. An average grade was calculated for students with multiple semester or quarter grades for the same course. Student course grades were converted to a 4 point scale. Therefore, a letter grade of B is a = F 1= D 2=C 3=B 4=A

5 The Grade Inflation Rate: End- of-Course Assessments The Grade Inflation Rate is based on grades for algebra and geometry courses matched to students' performance level on the algebra and geometry End- of-Course assessments (EOCs). Students are categorized as having a B grade or higher, and as scoring proficient or not proficient. Grades for students with multiple grades for the course were calculated as the average of all grades provided for the student in each course.

6 Sources of Data-Grades Several schools did not have grades in the APSCN data set. A Triand data set was provided by ADE to obtain grade data for the following schools that were missing grade data in APSCN. These schools are listed below: Van Buren ( , , ) Bearden High School, ( ), Marked Tree High School ( ), Covenant Keepers Charter School ( ), Hughes High School ( ), Beebe High School ( ), and Prairie Grove High School ( ). A student data file with course grades for these schools was obtained from Triand and provided to NORMES by the ADE.

7 Process for Calculations The student grade file was merged with the student test file from post appeals, Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) data. Students were matched by LEA and 10 digit unique ID. The final data set for calculating grade inflation included all students with an average grade of B or higher.

8 Calculating Grade Inflation Grade inflation was calculated by dividing the number of students with a B grade or higher that were not proficient on the EOC by the number of students with a B grade or higher. This proportion is multiplied by 100 to produce the percentage grade inflation rate. \\ The rate represents the percent of students with a B grade or higher that did not receive a proficient or higher score on the EOC. Students with Course Grade ≥ 3.0 and Not Proficient * 100 = Grade Inflation Rate Students with Course Grade ≥3.0.

9 Final Data Calculation Student grade data were merged with student End-of-Course exam data for algebra and geometry. Students were categorized as having a B grade or higher, and as scoring proficient or not proficient. The final data set for calculating grade inflation included all students with an average grade of B or higher.

10 Recommendations The Department will make research-based recommendations to the superintendent and local school board of directors that will improve classroom instruction and student performance on End-of-Course Assessments.

11 Notes: Special Thanks Sources of Data-End-of-Course Proficiency Levels Grades data is made available for school and district personnel to check the grade inflation rates on the ED.STATS portal and in EGuide. Sources of Data-Grades Student data for calculating grade inflation were provided by ADE in an APSCN file containing course grades for courses with and End-of-Course test. Special Thanks to Denise Arola and the NORMES staff. Data Sources: APSCN, Local School Districts, NORMES and Triand

12 The Report File The attached report file identifies each high school in Arkansas where grade inflation occurs including schools with inflation rates of 20% or higher.