SEED MAT Mentor Training MAT Overview Roles and Responsibilities Internship Realities Internship Rotation Cycles Danielson Frameworks.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers August 2013 Training Module 2 The Delaware Framework Review and Components 1-5 Training for Teachers.
Advertisements

Chad Allison May 2013  1-2 Formal Classroom Evaluations  Drop-in Visits.
PORTFOLIO.
Charlotte Danielson’s The Four Domains of Teaching Responsibility
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
Co-Teaching as Best Practice in Student Teaching Conclusion 1.
Activity: Introducing Staff to Danielson’s Framework for Teaching
National Association for Sport and Physical Education (NASPE) PE Coordinator’s Mini-Conference Wednesday, March 14, 2012 Framework for Effective Teaching.
August 2014 The Oregon Matrix Model was submitted to USED on May 1, 2014 and is pending approval* as of 8/8/14 *Please note content may change Oregon’s.
UDL and Teacher Evaluation Dr. Katie Novak. UDL Planning: Hotel ADLER DOLOMITI in Val Gardena You want your learners to explore the Dolomitis. In this.
Matrix 101: The Oregon Matrix and Summative Evaluations Spring 2015 Technical Assistance Webinar.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Evaluating Teacher Performance: Getting it Right CPRE Annual Conference November 21-23, 2002 Charlotte Danielson
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Differentiated Supervision
The Framework for Teaching Introduction to the Concepts Charlotte Danielson
The Framework for Teaching
Teacher Evaluation Ashley Greene 10/29/13.
Your Mentoring Program: Step by Step including the Danielson Framework North Palos #117 Presenters: Marilyn Marino, NBCT – Mentor Coordinator David Creagan.
Webcast October 11, Felicia Cumings Smith Associate Commissioner.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
1 Ohio’s Entry Year Teacher Program Review Ohio Confederation of Teacher Education Organizations Fall Conference: October 23, 2008 Presenter: Lori Lofton.
Teachscape Overview John Monahan, Instructional Supervisor
Research-Based Cutting Edge Professional Development Communicate, Connect, Collaborate, Conceptualize, Create For Results Oriented Learning Experiences.
The Danielson Framework and Your Evaluation AK Teaching Standard DP_8c: Engages in Instructional Development Activities Danielson Domain 4e: Growing and.
General Instructions 1. Save the Power Pt template to your desktop and a flashdrive used only for your portfolio. Using SAVE AS rename the portfolio with.
An Effective Teacher Evaluation System – Our Journey to a Teaching Framework Corvallis School District.
Marco Ferro, Director of Public Policy Larry Nielsen, Field Consultant With Special Guest Stars: Tammy Pilcher, President Helena Education Association.
Teacher Induction Program Why you are here The Allegheny Intermediate Unit offers this program for our staff and those in school districts,
Your Name Teaching Portfolio (Begin Year-End Year)
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 10/12/2015pbevan 1.
Orientation Winthrop University-School Partnership Network Orientation.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 2 The Delaware Framework Review and Components 1-5 Training for Teachers.
The Danielson Framework Emmanuel Andre Owings Mills High School Fall 2013.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
Making a Difference in Heidi A. Ramírez, PhD Chief Academic Officer Milwaukee Public Schools.
Classroom Diagnostic Tools. Pre-Formative Assessment of Current CDT Knowledge.
Standards Aligned System What is SAS? A collaborative product of research and good practice Six distinct elements Clear Standards Fair.
Teacher Induction Program Why you are here The Allegheny Intermediate Unit offers this program for our teachers and those in school districts,
YEAR 1 INDUCTION Day One Workshop Pennsbury School District.
Teacher Effectiveness Who begins in ? Teaching Specialists Special Education Teachers English as a Second Language Teachers Gifted Teachers.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson Danielson’s Framework for Teaching Domain 3: Instruction Communicating Clearly and Accurately Using Questioning.
A Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson’s Model SHS – Professional Development 14 November 2012 ( Brenda Baker/Marnie Malone)
DPASII Criterion Rubrics for Teachers. Component 1: Planning and Preparation Criterion 1a: Selecting Instructional Goals ELEMENT Value, sequence and alignment.
Introduction to... Teacher Evaluation System Teacher Effectiveness 12/6/
Assessing Teacher Effectiveness Charlotte Danielson
Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements: Evidence.
FOUR DOMAINS Domain 4: Domain 1: Professional Planning & Responsibilities Preparation Domain 3: Domain 2: Instruction Classroom Environment.
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Laura Maly Bernard Rahming Cynthia Cuellar Rodriguez Explore Explore Explore Math Teacher Leaders October 18, 2011.
SEED MAT Mentor Training Fall 2015 MAT Overview Roles and Responsibilities Internship Realities Internship Rotation Cycles Assessment Changes.
Standards-Based Teacher Education Continuous Assessment of Teacher Education Candidates.
NM Teacher Evaluation Planning & Preparation Creating an Environment of Learning Professionalism Teaching for Learning Evaluation.
Enhancing R. Emmanuel-Cooke, Principal March 14, 2016 PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE A Framework For Teaching.
MSBSD Educator Evaluation
They said: We are afraid. Come to the edge, he said. They came.
Framework For Teaching (FFT)
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
They said: We are afraid. Come to the edge, he said. They came.
They said: We are afraid. Come to the edge, he said. They came.
The professional Route to Licensure “There IS room for excellence!”
Introduction to Core Professionalism
Presentation transcript:

SEED MAT Mentor Training MAT Overview Roles and Responsibilities Internship Realities Internship Rotation Cycles Danielson Frameworks

Admission to Program  Interns must  Pass Praxis CORE  Complete two UG courses in CIED. Foreign Language students must also complete a capstone course and pass the Oral Proficiency Interview. English students must have a course in Young Adult (Adolescent) Lit.  Complete undergraduate degree  Apply for admission to Graduate School  Earn 3.0 in last 60 hours of UG coursework  Take the GRE  Submit a portfolio with three letters of recommendation  Interview with faculty

Course Schedule for Program  Summer  Methods I  Issues and Principles in Secondary Education  Fall  Classroom Management for Secondary Education  Research Methods  Measurement and Evaluation  Methods II  Spring  Interdisciplinary Studies  Multicultural Issues  Curriculum Design  Literacies Across the Curriculum  Methods III

Faculty’s Role  Teach Coursework  Direct Action Research Projects  Advise  Guide Interns through Job Application Process  Provide Resources for Professional Development  Collaborate with Mentor and Supervisor

Supervisor’s Role  Serve as liaison between mentor, student, and faculty  Provide constructive feedback to interns  Conduct a minimum of three observations per semester:  two formative and one summative  Assess students on reflective quality of internship (interns submit reflection papers every 2-3 weeks to supervisor)

Mentor’s Role  To facilitate intern’s growth as a professional by providing guidance  In teacher-student interaction  In teacher-teacher interaction  In teacher-staff/administration interaction  In teacher-parent interaction  In teacher-community interaction  In classroom management  In lesson planning  In instructional design and delivery  In assessment  In integration of technology  In time management  In becoming a professional educator  To maintain communication with faculty and supervisor

Intern Reality Rotation One  Interns are…  Almost completely without significant classroom experience  5 weeks into a licensure and graduate program  Knowledgeable about the basics of lesson planning and instructional method  Dependent upon the mentor for a great deal of guidance

Intern Reality Rotation Two  Interns are…  19 weeks into a licensure and graduate program  Experienced in taking on all of the duties of their previous mentor  Trained in some advanced methods of instruction  Expected to assume the duties of their mentor in a shorter time span than Rotation #1  Still dependent upon the mentor for a great deal of support  Expected to be implementing the methods they are learning about in their methods courses  Expected to uphold the mentor’s classroom expectations while also finding their own way as a teacher  Dependent upon their mentor for guidance in becoming an independent educator  Conducting research for the completion of their degree requirements

New Rotation Schedule  Rotation #1 – Fall Semester  In-Service  End of UA Semester— December 12  Rotation #2 – Spring Semester  End of District Winter Break  End of UA Semester—May 1

First Rotation Cycle of Mentoring  In-Service  Introduce intern to faculty, staff, and administration  Familiarize intern with school context—routines, handbook, physical lay-out, procedures  Intern Observation—2-3 weeks  Intern becomes familiar with students and classroom routines  Intern notes your teaching style and classroom management  Intern provides bio for parents

First Rotation Cycle of Mentoring  Intern Participation—2-3 weeks  Intern co-teaches with mentor  Intern begins to assume responsibility for classes  Intern Immersion– 6-7 weeks  Intern assumes responsibility for all classes  Intern teaches one complete unit  Intern Release—2-3 weeks  Mentor resumes teaching responsibilities  Intern observes other classes before rotation ends

Second Rotation Cycle of Mentoring  Intern Observation—1-2 weeks  Intern becomes familiar with students and classroom routines  Intern notes your teaching style and classroom management  Intern provides bio for parents  Intern Participation—1-2 weeks  Intern co-teaches with mentor  Intern begins to assume responsibility for classes  Intern Immersion—8-10 weeks  Intern assumes responsibility for all classes  Intern teaches one complete unit  Intern Release—2-3 weeks  Mentor resumes teaching responsibilities  Intern observes other classes before rotation ends

Evaluation Forms  Formative Evaluation Form  Used to provide formative feedback during the rotation  Uploaded to Chalk and Wire by mentors mid- rotation  Fall – October 10  Spring – February 27

Evaluation Forms  Summative Evaluation Form  Used to provide formal assessment of intern performance  Uploaded to Chalk and Wire by mentors at end of each rotation  Fall – December 12  Spring – May 1

Performance Criteria  Criteria used to evaluate intern performance  Modeled after Arkansas DOE system for evaluating teacher performance  Performance criteria should be used to provide OBJECTIVE evaluation of intern performance.  Progression is expected – lower ratings in earlier evaluations is also expected  Perfect ratings indicate little room for improvement – this is not expected of interns

Danielson Domains  Domain 1: Planning and Preparation  Demonstrating knowledge of content and pedagogy  Demonstrating knowledge of students  Selecting instructional outcomes  Demonstrating knowledge of resources  Designing Coherent Instruction  Assessing student learning

Danielson Domains  Domain 2: The Classroom Environment  Designing an environment of respect and rapport  Establishing a culture for learning  Managing classroom procedures  Managing student behavior  Organizing physical space

Danielson Domains  Domain 3: Instruction  Communicating with students  Using questioning and discussion techniques  Engaging students in learning  Using assessment in instruction  Demonstrating flexibility and responsiveness

Danielson Domains  Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities  Reflecting on teaching in terms of accuracy and use in further teaching  Maintaining accurate records  Communicating with families  Participating in a professional community  Developing and growing professionally  Demonstrating professionalism

Thanks! We appreciate you! Freddie A. Bowles SEED program director