Law and Data: Voting Technology and the Law Henry E. Brady Class of 1941 Monroe Deutsch Professor of Political Science and Public Policy, University of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Voting and Elections CP Political Systems.
Advertisements

ELECTRONIC VOTING (HK) FEBRUARY 2004 COPYRIGHT © 2004 MICHAEL I. SHAMOS Electronic Voting: The Technology of Democracy Michael I. Shamos, Ph.D., J.D.
Making Sure Every Vote Counts in the Digital Era: The Need for Standards Mandating Voter-Verified Paper Ballots Sarah Rovito 2007 WISE Intern August 3,
Good or Bad?.  One of the closest contests in US history  Florida was the pivotal state  Neither Democrat Al Gore nor Republican George W. Bush had.
The Citizen in Government Electing Leaders ~~~~~ The Right to Vote
Will Your Vote Count? Will your vote count? Voting machine choices N.C. Coalition for Verified Voting Joyce McCloy Pros and Cons of voting.
2012 CIRCUIT COURT CLERK’S ASSOCIATION FALL MEETING BALLOT SPECIFICATIONS BALLOT ERRORS Dale R. Simmons, Co-General Counsel Indiana Election Division.
Beyond the Hanging Chad: The Promise and Performance of Electronic Voting November 29, 2005 Paul S. Herrnson University of Maryland National Science Foundation.
Political Participation in the USA In what ways can American citizens participate in politics?
What’s Wrong With the Election System? David Kimball University of Missouri-St. Louis December 5, 2002.
Electronic Voting: Danger and Opportunity J. Alex Halderman Department of Computer Science Center for Information Technology Policy Princeton University.
TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 Evaluating risk within the context of the voting process Ann McGeehan Director of Elections Office of the Texas Secretary of State.
By Varun Jain. Introduction  Florida 2000 election fiasco, drew conclusion that paper ballots couldn’t be counted  Computerized voting system, DRE (Direct.
1 J. Alex Halderman Security Failures in Electronic Voting Machines Ariel Feldman Alex Halderman Edward Felten Center for Information Technology Policy.
Properly Marking the Optical Scan Ballot For Idaho Optical Scan Counties.
Election Observer Training 2008 Elections Certification & Training Program
Do Voting Machine Cause Lost Votes? Spring 2012.
Ronald L. Rivest MIT Laboratory for Computer Science
Voting Machines Failing the World *Voting machines around the world are failing in Colorado as well as 34 other states. *This could be crucial in the upcoming.
Presentation by Christine McElroy
Electronic Voting: The 2004 Election and Beyond Flashback: Florida 2000.
Electronic Voting Linh Nguyen. Electronic Voting  Voting Technologies  The Florida 2000 Election  Direct Recording Electronic Devices (DREs)‏ - Diebold.
Voting Machines Failing the World The true issue for these electronic voting machines is that the government has not been a full out supporter of this.
The new FDR Wheelchair Statue at the FDR Memorial in Washington, DC.
Lecture 1 PS 120. Outline Distortions and political representation Measuring errors in the electoral process The VTP and a briefing of the work so far.
Voting and Elections.
Voting System Qualification How it happens and why.
Resolution Boards The Mississippi Secretary of State’s Office Elections Division 2012.
Let’s Not Forget About Accuracy Henry E. Brady Class of 1941 Monroe Deutsch Professor of Political Science and Public Policy University of California,
Voting and Elections Dennis & Patten Participation in Government Mepham High School.
States control most of election law and procedure Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted (R) Nationwide: 500,000+ office holders of over 90,000 positions!
Voting Systems.  DS200  DS850  AutoMARK Voting Equipment.
Election Administration. Ensuring legitimacy of the government Legitimacy: acceptance of the right of public officials to hold office and to promulgate.
E-Voting Dissent Sara Wilson, Katie Noto, John Massie, Will Sutherland, Molly Cooper.
Elections Americans vote at extreme levels –Elections are held almost everyday besides Sundays and holidays –500,000 office holders are elected in the.
Electronic Voting Ronald L. Rivest MIT Laboratory for Computer Science.
Digital Democracy: A look at Voting Machines Presented by Justin Dugger April 2003.
VOTING TECHNOLOGY Paper ballots used universally into 20 th century 1930s onwards –new technology available –long (and complex) ballots Lever machines.
Georgia Electronic Voting System Testing and Security Voting Systems Testing Summit November 29, 2005.
Electronic Voting: The 2004 Election and Beyond Prof. David L. Dill Department of Computer Science Stanford University
Elections and Campaigns Campaign and Election Reform.
Baker v Carr Bush V Gore The Fourteenth Amendment The Equal Protection Clause States’ election laws.
Voting System Grant Program. Help America Vote Act  Provides funding to help accomplish the various requirements of the Act.
Idaho Procedures M100 OPTICAL SCAN PRECINCT TABULATOR.
Election Technology and Problems in the Field
Political Process 3.6 Politics and Government. E- voting Electronic voting systems for electorates have been in use since the 1960s when punched card.
Computers in Society Electronic Voting. Team Projects What is your name? Application? Presentation? Copyright The software industry The open source business.
Chapter 10 Section 3. Voter Qualification  Each state determines qualifications for registering to vote and voting  States must follow certain guidelines.
Electronic Voting: Danger and Opportunity
WHAT CONSTITUTES A VOTE? Annual Training for County Election Officials
VVPAT Building Confidence in U.S. Elections. WHAT IS VVPAT ? Voter-verifiable paper audit trail Requires the voting system to print a paper ballot containing.
POLITICAL PROCESS Lana Bilani. Voting and elections Electronic voting is also known as e-voting.
Politics & Government Session 11 April 28, Federal Elections Senators & Representatives elected by plurality vote – the candidate winning the most.
Chapter 7: Elections.
“Suffrage” “Franchise”.
Evaluating risk within the context of the voting process
EVoting 23 October 2006.
E-voting …and why it’s good..
Con Electronic Voting Preston Pope, Zach White, Ankit Shrivastava, Max Alexander.
Election Audit?? What in the world?.
Voting.
Ronald L. Rivest MIT Laboratory for Computer Science
Texas Secretary of State Elections Division
Voting and Elections.
Texas Secretary of State Elections Division
The 2004 Ohio Presidential Election: Cuyahoga County Analysis
Texas Secretary of State Elections Division
Texas Secretary of State Elections Division
Voting and Elections.
Essential Question What are the procedures for voting?
Presentation transcript:

Law and Data: Voting Technology and the Law Henry E. Brady Class of 1941 Monroe Deutsch Professor of Political Science and Public Policy, University of California, Berkeley

Goals of the Voting Process: Protection of legal voting; prevention of illegal voting, Protection of legal voting; prevention of illegal voting, Accuracy in recording people’s voting intentions, Accuracy in recording people’s voting intentions, Security in counting people’s votes Security in counting people’s votes

Legal Concerns Fourteenth Amendment equal protection for all voters (Bush v. Gore) Fourteenth Amendment equal protection for all voters (Bush v. Gore) Voting Rights Act of 1973 and non-discrimination against minorities Voting Rights Act of 1973 and non-discrimination against minorities

Points of Vulnerability Marking the Ballot Marking the Ballot Mistakes: Errors by people, Voting equipment failures or poor programmingMistakes: Errors by people, Voting equipment failures or poor programming Fraud: Malicious programmingFraud: Malicious programming Counting the Ballots Counting the Ballots Mistakes: Poor counting; ballots read twice, poor programmingMistakes: Poor counting; ballots read twice, poor programming Fraud: False counts, ballots read twice, malicious programmingFraud: False counts, ballots read twice, malicious programming

Is Paper Trail the Answer? Is Paper Trail Necessarily Verified? Does it improve accuracy: making sure that voter intent is captured? Does it improve accuracy: making sure that voter intent is captured? Does it improve security: making sure that votes cannot be miscounted? Does it improve security: making sure that votes cannot be miscounted?

Getting Intent Wrong: Miscounted & Lost Votes From: Imperfect marks on ballots due to hanging chads, stray marks, etc. Imperfect marks on ballots due to hanging chads, stray marks, etc. Ballot format mistakes (“butterfly ballot”) Ballot format mistakes (“butterfly ballot”) Voting systems Problems: Voting systems Problems: Failing to record or to sense intended mark for a race (“unintentional undervotes”)Failing to record or to sense intended mark for a race (“unintentional undervotes”) Causing or sensing unintended multiple marks for a race (“unintentional overvotes”)Causing or sensing unintended multiple marks for a race (“unintentional overvotes”)

Persistent Question: Are Lost or Miscounted Votes… The Voter’s Fault or Intention? The Voter’s Fault or Intention? The Voting System’s Fault or Intention? The Voting System’s Fault or Intention?

Voter Errors

System Errors: The Butterfly Ballot

Enron Energy Traders on Voting Errors: KEVIN: So the rumor’s true? They’re [expletive] takin’ all the money back …you guys stole from those poor grandmothers in California? BOB: Yeah, Grandma Millie, man. But she’s the one who couldn’t figure out how to [expletive] vote on the butterfly ballot.

Types of Residual Votes Residual votes are sum of undervotes and overvotes: Residual votes are sum of undervotes and overvotes: Undervotes–no mark on a ballot for a race Undervotes–no mark on a ballot for a race Overvotes–marks for more than one race Overvotes–marks for more than one race

Presidential Residual Vote Rates for Major Voting Systems in 2000 Punchcards (435 counties) 2.6% Punchcards (435 counties) 2.6% Lever (323 counties) 1.7% Lever (323 counties) 1.7% Electronic (266 counties) 1.7% Electronic (266 counties) 1.7% Optical (1018 counties) 1.4% Optical (1018 counties) 1.4%

Are Residual Votes due to the Voter or to the Voting System? The Voter: The Voter: Voters intentionally overvote or undervoteVoters intentionally overvote or undervote Voters make mistakes that cannot be avoidedVoters make mistakes that cannot be avoided The Voting System: The Voting System: Voting systems fail to provide adequate feedback to check the intent of votersVoting systems fail to provide adequate feedback to check the intent of voters Voting systems are badly designed and avoidable mistakes occurVoting systems are badly designed and avoidable mistakes occur

Reducing Residual Vote Rate By Changing Systems—An Example Compare two adjacent counties in Illinois Compare two adjacent counties in Illinois One (St. Clair) stayed with Votomatic style punch-cards from 1996 to 2000 One (St. Clair) stayed with Votomatic style punch-cards from 1996 to 2000 The other (Madison) changed from Votomatic style punch-cards in 1996 to Optical Scan with precinct count and with notice of overvotes in 2000 The other (Madison) changed from Votomatic style punch-cards in 1996 to Optical Scan with precinct count and with notice of overvotes in 2000

Madison County St. Clair County Adjacent Illinois Counties— Stayed with Votomatic Punch Votomatic Punch in 1996 Optical Scan 2000

Madison County St. Clair County Adjacent Black Precincts in the Two Counties

Residual Vote Rate in Black Precincts Worse with Votomatic Style Punch But Same with Optical Scan

Residual Votes in Fresno County with Votomatic Punch in 1996

Residual Votes in Fresno County with Optical Scan Precinct in 2000

1996 and 2000 Side by Side

Why do Votomatic Style Punch- Cards Fail to Record Voter Intentions Accurately? No easy feedback No easy feedback Hard to align punchcard Hard to align punchcard Hard to calibrate to work right Hard to calibrate to work right No check of voter intention No check of voter intention Note: Other systems have some of these problems as well. Note: Other systems have some of these problems as well.

Whose Votes are Lost? Anyone using error prone voting systems Anyone using error prone voting systems Anyone using voting systems that fail to provide feedback to check voter intent Anyone using voting systems that fail to provide feedback to check voter intent Anyone whose personal characteristics makes it especially hard to use error prone systems that fail to provide feedback (the disabled, the elderly, those with low levels of education, etc.) Anyone whose personal characteristics makes it especially hard to use error prone systems that fail to provide feedback (the disabled, the elderly, those with low levels of education, etc.)

Does a Paper Trail Solve the Accuracy and Security Problems? Not with Votomatic style punchcards Not with Votomatic style punchcards Is optical scan a voter verified ballot? Is optical scan a voter verified ballot? Is a paper trail for a DRE a voter verified ballot? Is a paper trail for a DRE a voter verified ballot?