Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Presentation to Geneva Group - Paris Hans d’Orville Director, Bureau of Strategic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Mateja Bizilj PEMPAL BCOP KEY CONCEPTS AND APPROACHES TO PROGRAMS AND PERFORMANCE Tbilisi, June 28, 2007.
Advertisements

Linking regions and central governments: Indicators for performance-based regional development policy 6 th EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON EVALUATION OF COHESION.
Results Based Monitoring (RBM)
South Africas MTEF Effective expenditure for development Malawi Poverty Monitoring System Workshop July 2002.
Donald T. Simeon Caribbean Health Research Council
Strategic Planning An Overview. General Definition The process of strategic planning involves deciding where you want to go, how you want to be positioned,
Project Monitoring Evaluation and Assessment
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
RBM in the context of Operations and Programme and Project Management Material of the Technical Assistance Unit (TAU)
Logic Modeling for Success Dr Kathryn Wehrmann Illinois State University.
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
A Human Rights-Based Approach to Monitoring Session 6 (cont.)
Monitoring, Review and Reporting Project Cycle Management A short training course in project cycle management for subdivisions of MFAR in Sri Lanka.
Performance Management Upul Abeyrathne, Dept. of Economics, University of Ruhuna, Matara.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
Prepared by BSP/PMR Bureau of Strategic Planning Strategic thinking and planning Presentation by the Bureau of Strategic Planning (BSP) Leadership and.
Project Human Resource Management
Monitoring Evaluation Impact Assessment Objectives Be able to n explain basic monitoring and evaluation theory in relation to accountability n Identify.
CONCEPT PAPER RESULT BASED PLANNING. RESULT-ORIENTED PLANNING Overall Objective/ Goal Specific Objective/ Purposes Expected Result/ Output Activities.
This project is funded by the EUAnd implemented by a consortium led by MWH Logical Framework and Indicators.
ZHRC/HTI Financial Management Training
Results-Based Management
May 12 th Monitoring and Project Control. Objectives Anticipated Outcomes Express why Monitoring and Controlling are Important. Differentiate between.
Results Focus Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Joint Secretariat How to Apply Seminar 4th February 2015, Copenhagen, Denmark.
1 RBM Background Development aid is often provided on a point to point basis with no consistency with countries priorities. Development efforts are often.
Certificate IV in Project Management Introduction to Project Management Course Number Qualification Code BSB41507.
KEYWORDS REFRESHMENT. Activities: in the context of the Logframe Matrix, these are the actions (tasks) that have to be taken to produce results Analysis.
Mothers unwilling to go to clinics Low staff skills Inadequate number of clinics Shortage of drugs High infant mortality rates Commercial pressure for.
UNDAF M&E Systems Purpose Can explain the importance of functioning M&E system for the UNDAF Can support formulation and implementation of UNDAF M&E plans.
SESSION 3: FROM SETTING PRIORITIES TO PROGRAMMING FOR RESULTS.
Aaron Zazueta Chief Evaluation Officer 2013 EVALUATION IN THE GEF.
Screen 1 of 22 Food Security Policies – Formulation and Implementation Policy Monitoring and Evaluation LEARNING OBJECTIVES Define the purpose of a monitoring.
Monitoring and Evaluation
Results Focus Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Joint Secretariat 20th October 2015, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Community Planning 101 Disability Preparedness Summit Nebraska Volunteer Service Commission Laurie Barger Sutter November 5, 2007.
Results Based Management in Practice – Experiences and learning By Kai Matturi Knowledge & Learning Adviser Mary Banda, 37, in her field in May Mary.
Developing a Framework In Support of a Community of Practice in ABI Jason Newberry, Research Director Tanya Darisi, Senior Researcher
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Strategic Planning Crossing the ICT Bridge Project Trainers: Lynne Gibb Sally Dusting-Laird.
Application of Human Rights Principles in Results Based Management Muhammad Usman Akram, Evaluation Advisor Adapted from RBM training held for UNDP BRC.
Results Focus & Partnership Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Secretariat How to Apply Seminar 1st October 2014, Strathpeffer, Scotland.
Monitoring Afghanistan, 2015 Food Security and Agriculture Working Group – 9 December 2015.
Key Components of a successful Proposal OAS / IACML Workshop on Technical Assistance. San José, Costa Rica May 8, 2007 By: José Luis Alvarez R. Consultant.
HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE MONITORING. HOW TO USE THIS PRESENTATION This presentation contains a complete overview of all aspects of Response Monitoring Presenting.
Session 2: Developing a Comprehensive M&E Work Plan.
S3.1 session day 5 2 Programme management download resources from Approved by the Advisory Group: Programme management Programme and project.
Logical Framework Approach An Evaluation Toolbox Presentation
Folie 1 Sarajevo, October 2009 Stefan Friedrichs Managing Partner Public One // Governance Consulting Project Management in the Public Sector Monitoring.
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
Stages of Research and Development
Building an ENI CBC project
Country Level Programs
Understanding DWCPs, tripartite process and role of Trade Unions
Evaluation of Priority Gender Equality
Gender-Sensitive Monitoring and Evaluation
Gender-Sensitive Monitoring and Evaluation
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 2. Session 6. Developing indicators.
Strategic Planning for Learning Organizations
Introduction to Program Evaluation
Results Focus Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Joint Secretariat
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 7. Managers’ and stakeholders’ information needs.
Measuring Outcomes of GEO and GEOSS: A Proposed Framework for Performance Measurement and Evaluation Ed Washburn, US EPA.
Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Presentation to Geneva Group - Paris Hans d’Orville Director, Bureau of Strategic.
Understanding DWCPs, tripartite process and role of Trade Unions
Understanding DWCPs, tripartite process and role of Trade Unions
Results Based Management for Monitoring & Evaluation
OGB Partner Advocacy Workshop 18th & 19th March 2010
Project intervention logic
Integrating Gender into Rural Development M&E in Projects and Programs
Presentation transcript:

Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Presentation to Geneva Group - Paris Hans d’Orville Director, Bureau of Strategic Planning 15 June 2004

Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring (RBM) – a UNESCO-wide innovation – affects all activities, namely Major Programmes, Programmes, Subprogrammes, Main Lines of Action, Actions and Activities. What then is RBM? What do we wish to achieve ? What will we do to reach that goal ? How will we know whether we have achieved our goal ? RBM is a method to help reach and assess achievements

Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring RBM focuses on medium- term ways of identifying and showing managers and staff, as well as all stakeholders, how the implementation of programming actually makes a tangible difference.

Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Outcomes and Expected Results … Outcomes describe overall changes in situations and/or benefits to end users Expected Results describe a change in a situation and/or benefits to end-users/clients due to interventions of the Organisation. 31 C/4 Approved 31 C/5 Approved specific OUTCOMES must be formulated for each strategic objective and sub-objective, which gives the Major Programmes and Programmes their direction and programmatic guidance EXPECTED RESULTS are articulated especially at each main line of action. Outcomes are contained in the Medium-Term Strategy Results are contained in the Programme and Budget ( and further in Work Plans entered into SISTER )

Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Outcomes describe overall changes in situations and/or benefits to end users 31 C/4 Approved specific OUTCOMES must be formulated for each strategic objective and subobjective, which gives the Major Programmes and Programmes their direction and programmatic guidance Outcomes are contained in the Medium-Term Strategy

Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Expected Results describe a change in a situation and/or benefits to end-users/clients due to interventions of the Organisation. 31 C/5 Approved EXPECTED RESULTS are articulated especially at each main line of action. Results are contained in the Programme and Budget ( and further in Work Plans entered into SISTER )

Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring from objectives to outcomes - RBM Programming Cycle 1) Objectives and Expected Results 2) Strategies 3) Inputs 4) Outputs 6) Outcomes 5) Actual Results Performance Indicators Constant assessment and revision What do you intend to achieve or change? How does this relate to UNESCO’s priorities and themes? (C/5 focus) What approaches will you use? With whom do you intend to partner? How much financial/human resources will you require? How well did you do in terms of what you achieved, versus what you intended to achieve or to change? How do you measure it? What did you achieve in terms of the medium-term changes you sought? (C/4 focus) This diagram is for demonstrative purposes only and represents the relationship between the articulation of Expected Results and what is actually achieved as compared with what was intended.

Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Expected Result Describes a change in a situation and/or benefits to end-users/clients due to activities or interventions of the Organisation. Strategies Input Output Outcome Actual Result Performance indicators Means of verification Describe the broad ways in which one intends to work towards the achievement of an Expected Result. Inputs are human, financial and other resources necessary for achieving results and producing outputs Outputs are final products, services or general activities delivered to end users/ clients. Outcomes are overall changes in situations and/or benefits to end users/clients, either qualitative or quantitative. Actual Results are the collective assessment within the span of a biennium of the kind of, and degree of, change brought about in the field of action earlier articulated in the Expected Results set out for the MLA. Tools measuring whether and/or to what extent an expected result or outcome has been achieved The design of any indicator should specify how the required information will be gathered, checked, ascertained and built up into a significant indication. The corresponding resources should be foreseen from the outset, thereby making the indicator an effective one. Some Definitions…

Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Strategies Describes the broad ways in which one intends to work towards the achievement of an Expected Result.

Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Input Inputs are human, financial and other resources necessary for achieving results and producing outputs

Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Output Outputs are final products, services or general activities delivered to end users/ clients.

Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Outcome Outcomes are overall changes in situations and/or benefits to end users/clients, either qualitative or quantitative.

Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Expected Result Describes a change in a situation and/or benefits to end-users/clients due to activities or interventions of the Organisation.

Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Actual Result Actual Results are the collective assessment within the span of a biennium of the kind of, and degree of, change brought about in the field of action earlier articulated in the Expected Results set out for the MLA.

Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Performance indicators Tools measuring whether and/or to what extent an expected result or outcome has been achieved

Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Performance indicators Performance indicators are used to assess progress towards the achievement of Expected Results. Results, therefore, must be expressed and measured by Performance Indicators. Their primary use is to guide management and staff decision-making, and to enable sensitive, flexible and timely mid-course corrections to programming as well as assessments.

Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Direct statistical indicators show progress when expected results are cast in terms of readily quantifiable short-to- medium term changes. Care must be taken to ensure that the time span of the expected result lends itself to the collection of such data for use in review. Performance indicators

Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Proxy indicators are normally quantitative, but do not directly relate to the expected result. A Proxy is used to show “ progress. It should be used when getting the full data is too time- consuming, or when the timeliness of complete data would fall outside the need for Review. However, there must to be a prima facie connection between the proxy and the expected result. Performance indicators

Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Narrative indicators enable an organization to begin to explore complex interrelationships among factors without recourse to extremely expensive statistical research. In many instances where the expected result may be qualitative (changing attitudes, building capacities, etc), a non-statistical approach may be the only way possible to develop an indication of “progress”. Narrative indicators largely focus on the “process of change” - asking stakeholders what they did as a result of the assistance. Performance indicators

Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Means of verification The design of any indicator should specify how the required information will be gathered, checked, ascertained and built up into a significant indication. The corresponding resources should be foreseen from the outset, thereby making the indicator an effective one.

Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Some reflections on the Results – Outcome Continuum It is crucial that all results build a chain of meaningful achievements, bridging the gap between the permanent goals of UNESCO (i.e. its outcomes) and what the Organisation actually achieves in its current daily action (i.e. its expected results). 1. Making results fit together and add up into major outcomes for the Organisation as a whole is all what designing strategies is about. This is the core task of senior management, and indeed permeates all programme management. 2.

Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring The Importance of Main Lines of Action / MLA’s for Results Main Line of Action (MLA) is the place where outputs from actions and activities are aggregated and contribute to build up outcomes for major programmes. This is where the C/5 articulates expected results against which the Organisation’s action will be monitored and evaluated, where strategic and operational factors intersect. Main Lines of Action naturally work together to contribute to broader programme objectives. All MLAs need to take into account to what extent and how they relate to the strategic objectives of the medium term strategy ( C/4 ) and respond to the two cross-cutting themes.

Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring  Clearly quantifiable Expected Results - ones which set out concrete expected changes such as "increasing the number of qualified professionals from X to Y over a set period of time”.  Broad quantifiable Expected Results - such as changing participation rates in a population, for example increasing the population’s access to professional training from X to Y over a longer time frame.  More qualitative Expected Results - ones which articulate change in terms of building capacities, changing attitudes, altering personal or organizational behaviour. Expected results at the MLA level

Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring What are the Six Levels of Programming within which SISTER has been Designed? Major Programme Programme Subprogramme Main Line of Action Action Activity

Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring OUTCOMES Expected results Operational results MPPSPMLAActionActivity Goal Purpose Output Programme Goal Purpose Output Sub-Prog Goal Purpose Output MLA Goal Purpose Output Action Goal Purpose Output Activity Goal Purpose Output Nesting Logframes : the logic of SISTER support the RBM approach to programming