IQA Implementation As-Is Status May, 2009 Jed Heyes.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Advertisements

Welcome to the Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) module To move from one screen to the next please click the Next button on the bottom of the page or.
Changing focus from repetitive screening for Falls Risk to a model that supports Falls Prevention Historically for each new issue addressed, weve added.
Ensure Vendor/Engineer of Choice Product Quality
Chapter 7: Key Process Areas for Level 2: Repeatable - Arvind Kabir Yateesh.
Defense Contract Management Agency Quality Assurance Directorate Presented By: Michael Shields Executive Director, Quality Assurance March 15 th, 2011.
Draft Action Plan Update – Agenda Item No. 5D Central Valley Flood Protection Board.
Contractor Assurance System AC Overview October 13, 2009.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning objectives Introduction Functions of Regulatory Body (RB) on EPR Appraisal guidance: Part.
Infrastructure for Quality Assurance in Health Care.
Muscogee County School District Division of Academics (DOA) District Accreditation Module 4: Quality Assurance.
1 Approach to Implementing the QA Program Local Effort - Global Expectations Approach to Implementing the QA Program Local Effort - Global Expectations.
Assurance Council Brief Status of QA Implementation at Fermilab Tuesday Nov 11, 2008 Jed Heyes.
Stepan Potiyenko ISS Sr.SW Developer.
Chapter 11: Follow-up Reviews and Audit Evaluation ACCT620 Internal Auditing Otto Chang Professor of Accounting.
Project Execution.
Framework for the Service Acquisition Process Conduct Historical Analysis Define Stakeholder & Customer Needs 2. Review Current Strategy 3. Market Research.
Michael Solomon Tugboat Software Managing the Software Development Process.
Change Advisory Board COIN v1.ppt Change Advisory Board ITIL COIN June 20, 2007.
REVIEW AND QUALITY CONTROL
Objectives 4 Understand the ISO standards. Why are standards required? 4 Need standards to ensure that a term means the same for all 4 Need company standards.
 A project is “a unique endeavor to produce a set of deliverables within clearly specified time, cost and quality constraints”
PTCS Service Provider Review 0 Background RTF assumed responsibility for maintaining PTCS specifications in March 2003  Developed PTCS Service Provider.
INTEGRATION OF QA/ISM J. R. Yanek Chair, EFCOG ISM Working Group April 13, 2000.
MusalaSoft Quality Process Overview Damyan Kasapov, QA Engineer Tsvetelina Kovacheva, QA Engineer March 15, 2005.
Software Configuration Management (SCM)
1 Chapter 2 The Process. 2 Process  What is it?  Who does it?  Why is it important?  What are the steps?  What is the work product?  How to ensure.
1 TDG GENERAL POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEE 14 June, 2005 Ottawa, ON Agenda Item No. 9 TDG FEDERAL TICKETING INITIATIVE 1.
CMM Level 2 KPA’s CS 4320 Fall Requirements Management 1 Goals: – System requirements allocated to software are controlled using a baseline for.
Soft Tech Development Inc. 1 Software Project Tracking A CMM Level 2 Key Process Area Soft Tech Development Inc.
Installation and Maintenance of Health IT Systems
CD FY10 Budget and Tactical Plan Review FY10 Tactical Plans for Financial Management Valena Sibley October 8, 2009 Tactical plan nameDocDB# FY10 Tactical.
US Department of Energy (DOE) of the Quality Assurance Program of the XXX Program at the ZZZ Site Bob Blyth DOE-NE July xx, 200x DOE-NE Audit.
GLOBAL OPERATIONS UPDATE March 19, Quality Update 2007 CI Actions Q1 ISO Audits Standard practice Quality Organization realigned by Business & Region.
CMM Level 2: Repeatable Copyright, 2000 © Jerzy R. Nawrocki Quality Management.
Why Proposed TC Procedures? Define how TC reaches “completion” of what OASIS calls “Committee Specifications” TC procedures lead up to the OASIS process:
Project Life Cycle.
11 FSO Assessment of Fermilab QA Program Status September 14 – 18, 2009.
Using ISMS Principles and Functions in Developing an ARRA Readiness Review Process Presented by Linda K. Rogers Assessments & Readiness Programs Manager.
SMS Planning.  Safety management addresses all of the operational activities of the entire organization.  The four (4) components of an SMS are: 1)
Proposals for Incentives and Sanctions Tim Fowler NZQA August 2010.
QUALITY. QUALIDOC Web site: Telephone: 44+ (0) JEAN WHITE.
12/2/04Module 2D1 The NCSX Engineering Web – An Overview Part IV Engineering Management & Systems Engineering and Other.
Active Corrosion Process Nisource – COH/CKY. Objectives  Understanding the terminology –Active Corrosion –& Suspected Areas of “Active Corrosion”  Developing.
Mode2.com Requirements Definition one Design two Build three Sign Off & Launch four Website Development: Process Summary.
Implementation Status Presented to: Berkeley Site Office Implementer : Minh Huebner January 4, 2007 Office of Management and Budget Circular A-123 (Appendix.
Action Tracker · Status Report | Bill Moss, Assistant SecretaryOct 09, 2015 Aging & Long-Term Support Administration Background Strategic Plan Goal / Commitment.
Solving Cleanup Challenges Through Risk Reduction EM/RW Quality Assurance Activities Office of Standards and Quality Assurance (EM-64) April 15, 2009.
Due Process – ISSAIs and INTOSAI GOVs Roberto José Domínguez Moro Superior Audit Office of Mexico INTOSAI Working Group on Public Debt June 14, 2010.
WebAuditor Training Kit. Introduction-WebAuditor  Process Automation tool for automating all internal quality audit activities.  Web based tool with.
Research and Test Reactor Decommissioning Inspections Gerald A. Schlapper, PhD, PE, CHP Health Physicist Division of Nuclear Materials Safety Region I.
Introduction to the quality system in MOHE Prof. Hala Salah Consultant in NQAAP.
Software Engineering Lecture 9: Configuration Management.
6/6/ SOFTWARE LIFE CYCLE OVERVIEW Professor Ron Kenett Tel Aviv University School of Engineering.
E-Student Services MnOnline Council Updates – January 30, 2003 Information is posted at
Adaptive Software Development Process Framework. Version / 21 / 2001Page Project Initiation 2.0 Adaptive Cycle Planning 5.0 Final Q/A and.
Department of Defense Voluntary Protection Programs Center of Excellence Development, Validation, Implementation and Enhancement for a Voluntary Protection.
MODULE 6: PLANNING FOR GOVERNANCE AUDIT GOVERNANCE AUDITOR ACCREDITATION COURSE.
Issues that Matter Notification and Escalation
NIEP Evaluation PO&A “How-to” Guide and Issue Classification
THE SUPERFUND PROCESS Assessment and Listing
Global Grid Forum GridForge
MELD- Maharashtra V. Giriraj
FMEA.
Healey School Site Council Confirming the Initial Plan for
Nonconformance Tracking
Quality Assurance Session 6.
QA Reviews Lecture # 6.
Academics Advisory Committee.
Presentation transcript:

IQA Implementation As-Is Status May, 2009 Jed Heyes

2 As-Is Status – Field Work Complete

3 As-Is Status – Where Are We?  As-Is implementation field work 100% complete 4/30/09  Cleanup mode  Corrective Actions being reviewed and approved

4 As-Is Status – Focus on CAPs

5 As-Is Status – Next Steps  Corrective Action Plan being generated for delivery to DOE 6/15/09  As-Is Final Reporting  D/S/C finalizing individual reports  Site-wide roll-up  Review and reconcilliation of DOE 2006 QA Audit  Report on four risk areas (Document Control, Training, Item Control, and M&TE)

6 As-Is Status – Process Summary

7 As-Is Status – Preliminary CAP Summary

8 As-Is Status – Assurance Council Role  AC attention required to abate systemic risk posed by site-wide issues  Elevated CAP process  QARs/QAEs review all CAPs; propose elevation  CAP temporarily assigned to OQBP as AC Secretary  CAP brought to AC through the Chair o Chair decides whether they warrant AC attention o Chair assigns responsible organization and person  Chair brings CAPs to next AC for concurrence with assigned actions o OQBP places in IMS for tracking

9 Questions? As-Is Status – Questions