EDIT 6170 INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN Team Fraction Action: Kim Bennekin Nikki Garmany Rebekah Lowry Katy Miller Spring 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of the FCAT Explorer
Advertisements

An Instructional Design Model Kelly M. Hanley Northwestern State University ETEC ETEC Spring 2004
Professional Development on the Instructional Shift of Focus Lets Focus on Focus.
Data Analysis Training Objectives 1.Understand the purpose of interpreting and analyzing data 2.Learn and use general terminology associated.
A Framework for Instruction
October 16, 2012 Yargo Elementary School.  Mrs. Diane Bresson ◦ Principal  Mrs. Tonia.
Summarizing Passages: An Overlapping and Essential Literacy Skill Vicki Estrem, Minneapolis AE Stacy Hannigan, Metro North ABE Marn Frank, ATLAS.
Alternative Strategies for Evaluating Teaching How many have used end-of-semester student evaluations? How many have used an alternative approach? My comments.
SELECT MATH (GEOMETRY) BY Jean Etienne Linda Parker.
Middle School Quarter 2 Mathematics Overview 2010 – 2011.
CCS 2007 From DPI 4th grade indicators CCS 2007.
MLA POD TRAINING #3 JANUARY VIDEO DISCUSSION PROTOCOL 1) Select a discussion partner 2) Choose 2 of the Key Elements from your video notes and share.
The animation is already done for you; just copy and paste the slide into your existing presentation.
Assessing student learning. Diagnostic - The gathering of information at the outset of a course or program of study to provide information for both the.
+ Instructional Design Models TIE 300 Fall 2012 Online Module October 25, 2012.
What Parents Need to Know  TABS (Texas Assessment of Basic Skills)  TEAMS (Texas Educational Assessment of Minimum Skills)  TAAS (Texas Assessment.
Integrating Technology into the Classroom Design Team: The Design Divas Kristen Sabo, Kelly Neville, Candi Chandler, Leigh Davis Instructional Design EDIT.
Adding and Subtracting Fractions with Like Denominators.
1 Daily Planning for Today’s Mathematics Classroom Math 413 Professor Mitchell Concepts taken from Daily Planning for Today’s Classroom by Kay M. Price.
Planning for Distance Education Jim Lehman Educational Technology Purdue University.
Effective Instruction in Mathematics for the Junior learner Number Sense and Numeration.
EVIDENCE BASED WRITING LEARN HOW TO WRITE A DETAILED RESPONSE TO A CONSTRUCTIVE RESPONSE QUESTION!! 5 th Grade ReadingMs. Nelson EDU 643Instructional.
Working with Fractions
Barry Williams1 Welcome to Training and Development 518 Barry Williams Ph.D. Fall Semester Mondays 6 - 8:30 P.M.
PowerPoint Content Page: Slide 1: Title page Slide 2: Content Page Slide 3: Content Page Slide 4: Subject, Grade Level and TEKS Objective Slide 5: Lesson.
O Content Area: Mathematics O Grade Level: 2 O Summary: The purpose of this instructional PowerPoint is sharpen the students’ multiplication skills through.
Gabr’l Stackhouse April 25,  To strengthen the teaching and learning of addition and subtraction word problems in kindergarten, first, and second.
Teaching and Learning Plymouth Church. MATH DATA TEAMS MODEL.
Instructional Design Diana Fisher. Instructional Design Instructional Design (ID) is a dynamic process with constant movement back and forth between steps.
Instructional Design Aldo Prado. Instructional Design Instructional design is the process of easing the acquisition of knowledge and making it more efficient.
+ Instructional Design Models EDU 560 Fall 2012 Online Module November 13, 2012.
Measured Progress ©2011 ASDN Webinar Series Spring 2013 Session Four March 27, 2013 New Alaska State Standards for Math: Connecting Content with Classroom.
NTeQ: Designing an Integrated Lesson
Technology Matrix Mathematics Grade 4 Heather Ross December 1, 2010.
WHAT MATH DO STUDENTS LEARN? Fourth Grade. Focus on Understanding This year students will be learning the Mathematics Florida Standards (MAFS). One of.
Examining Technology Uses in the Classroom: Students Developing Fraction Sense by Using Virtual Manipulative Concept Tutorials Suh, J., Moyer, P. S., Heo,
8 th Grade Integers Natalie Menuau EDU Prof. R. Moroney Summer 2010.
Technology Matrix: Grade 4 Alexandra Wilson EDU 521 Fall 2010.
Opportunity Knocks! Robin Tillotson Ashley Padgett Lauretta Kloer.
KLC October 7, Mathematical Practices ELA cognitively complex skills 1.Analyze how and why individuals, events, and ideas develop and interact.
Analyze Design Develop AssessmentImplement Evaluate.
1 Math 413 Mathematics Tasks for Cognitive Instruction October 2008.
Increasing Independent Usage of Technology at Shiloh Elementary The “ADDIES” Melanie Argiro, Mary Forehand, Jean Pirkle Troy Perkins, Wanda Taylor EDIT.
Adding and Subtracting Fractions With different denominators.
Adding and Subtracting Fractions With different denominators.
Notes Over 8 – 5 Add. + Add the whole numbers. Add the fractions and reduce if needed.
Welcome to Unit 5 Fractions and Fraction Computation.
Adding and Subtracting Fractions
STEM Infusing Math and Science Across the Curriculum.
+ Instructional Design Models EDU 560 Fall 2012 Online Module November 13, 2012.
Welcome to the Make Math Meaningful Audio-Web Conference Jan. 27, 2004 Sheryl Beglinger Comprehensive Center Region VI
Instructional System Design Presented by Catherine Chacon.
Instructional Design Course Evaluation Phase. Agenda The Evaluation Process Expert Review Small Group Review The Pilot Feedback and Revision Evaluation.
Dick & Carey Instructional Design Model Sabri Elamin ED 6615.
Occoquan Elementary School Woodbridge, Va. EFFECTIVE ESOL STRATEGIES FOR MATH Designed by Brenda Huber Youliduzi Niyazi Gloria Xie.
Adding and Subtracting fractions Logan Chappell. Content Area: Mathematics Grade Level: 4 th Summary: The purpose of this PowerPoint is to show how to.
Dr. Judy BulazoMr. Andy Lucas Director Middle School Math of Curriculum Curriculum Leader.
OHIO LEARNING STANDARDS K-12 MATHEMATICS GRADE 3 BY: AMY FURMAN.
Collaborative Learning Community: Student Reflective Assessment: Part 1 Team Orange Tarica Miller Christina Mullikin,Michael Paekukui.
Day Three Activities Review Day One Lesson Review Day Two Lesson Day Three Lesson- Continue with Math Stations with Emphasis on Station 3 – At each station.
1 Number Talks. 2 What is a Number Talk? A Number Talk is a short, ongoing daily routine that provides students with meaningful ongoing practice with.
Dr. Sarah Ledford Mathematics Educator
Division 2 You can access the information on your handheld device by typing the above into your address bar.
New Developments in NYS Assessments
Teacher Training to Improve Student Learning
Foundations for primary grades Session FOUR
Adding and Subtracting Fractions
MATHEMATICS & ECONOMICS GRADES 3-5
Shana Holden-Murphy District Data Specialist Karla Browning
Carla Evans Gibson Lowry Marcie Opraseuth
Presentation transcript:

EDIT 6170 INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN Team Fraction Action: Kim Bennekin Nikki Garmany Rebekah Lowry Katy Miller Spring 2009

Goal Statement  The students in Mrs. Gebo’s fourth grade class at Barrow Elementary School will add and subtract fractions with like denominators with 85% accuracy on a written test.

Needs Analysis According to a survey done with the teacher and a pre-test given to participants, the learners must: 1. Have knowledge and proficiency in prerequisite skills. 2. Correct misconceptions about fractions in general. 3. Correctly understand addition of fractions. 4. Correctly understand subtraction of fractions.

Context Analysis 1. Course will be conducted at Bethlehem Elementary School, a fourth grade classroom. 2. Students will have access to computers and the Internet in order to view the instructional PowerPoint and view our video. 3. A computer area that is secluded from distractions within the classroom.

Course Design SWBAT demonstrate adding and subtracting fractions with the same and different denominators with 85% accuracy on written tests. SWBAT demonstrate adding and subtracting fractions with unlike denominators and simplified answers with 85% accuracy. SWBAT demonstrate adding and subtracting fractions with like denominators and simplified answers with 85% accuracy. SWBAT demonstrate reducing fractions with 85% accuracy on a written test. SWBAT state rules for reducing fractions. V1 Prerequisite Skills: Identifying fractions, understanding multiples of numbers, adding/subtracting whole numbers.

Unit 2 Design SWBAT demonstrate adding and subtracting fractions with the same & different denominators with 85% accuracy on written tests. SWBAT state rules reducing fractions. SWBAT demonstrate adding and subtracting fractions with like denominators and simplified answers with 85% accuracy on a written test. SWBAT choose the best method to add or subtract fractions with like denominators. SWBAT demonstrate subtracting fractions wit unlike denominators and simplify answers with 85% accuracy on a written test SWBAT demonstrate adding fractions with like denominators and simplify answers with 85% accuracy on a written test. Prerequisite Skills: Identifying fractions, understanding multiples of numbers, adding/subtracting whole numbers. A V1

Development of Instructional Media  We developed instructional media for Lesson 1 in Unit 2.  PowerPoint, Video, Website  These materials can be found at: 

Rationale for Media  Internet: access will be needed to view instructional video  Camtasia/Powerpoint/SMARTboard Technology: These products together simulate classroom settings but in a more intimate setting. Videos allow instructors to pause when needed to work at the appropriate pace.  Team Fraction Action Website: Provides a central location of all materials needed.  Paper Post Test: A delivery that is familiar to the learner and convenient for the instructor to score.

Formative Evaluation Summary  Subject Matter Experts  Two children’s mathematics professors; two experienced 4 th grade teachers  Reviewed content and instructional methods of lesson  One-to-One Evaluation  4 th grader from DeKalb County, GA  Pre/post-test quantitative data  Attitudinal responses form post-instruction questions  Small Group Evaluation  Four 4 th graders from Fayette County, GA  Provided qualitative data from post-instruction questions  Field Test  Completed instruction as planned in lesson design  Provided quantitative data from assessments  Insightful post-lesson discussion

Assessment Results of Field Test

Attitudinal Results of Evaluation  Enthralled within the technology as they progressed.  Wording of instructions was difficult to understand.  Feedback received boosted students’ confidece upon entering the post-test.  “The instruction was interesting and fun. I liked fitting the geometric figures together with smaller shapes.”

Suggestions for Revision  Pre-Instruction  More specific directions, especially moving between Internet links and PowerPoint  Instruction  Limit amount of time spent with geometrical shapes.  Use real world examples, possibly using graphics in the PowerPoint.  Shorten video to hold interest.  Assessment  Clarify instructions to specify that answers need to be simplified.

References  Arcytech. Pattern blocks: Exploring fractions with shapes. (n.d.). Retrieved April 6, 2009, from  Cool Math. (2009). Fractions: How to Add and Subtract Fractions When the Denominators are Different. Retrieved April 7, 2009, from different-denominators-01.htmlhttp:// different-denominators-01.html  Cool Math. (2009). Fractions: How to Subtract Fractions When the Denominators are the Same. Retrieved April 7, 2009, from denominators-01.htmlhttp:// denominators-01.html  Cool Math. (2009). Fractions: Simplifying (Reducing) Fractions. Retrieved April 7, 2009, from  Cool Math. (2009). Fractions: What are fractions? Retrieved April 7, 2009, from  Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2005). The systematic design of instruction (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

References, cont.  Georgia Department of Education. (2008). Georgia Performance Standards. Retrieved April 19, 2009, from  Help With Fractions. (2003). Finding The Least Common Multiple Is As Easy As One, Two…. Retrieved April 7, 2009, from  National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2002). Making Sense of Fractions, Ratios, and Proportions, 2002 Yearbook. Reston, VA: NCTM.  Rieber, L. (n.d.). Instructional Design Activity: Formative Evaluation. Retrieved April 26, 2009, from draft1&ida=formative%5Fevaluation draft1&ida=formative%5Fevaluation  Suh, j., Moyer, P., & Heo, H. (2005). Examining Technology Uses in the Classroom: Developing Fraction Sense. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 3(4), p