Keystroke analysis and implications for fieldwork WP3.3 – task 2 Johanna Bristle (SHARE, MEA) Verena Halbherr (ESS, GESIS) DASISH Final Conference – Gothenburg,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Figure 3.1. Relationship of Research Design to the Previous Chapters and the Marketing Research Process Figure 3.1Relationship to the Previous Chapter.
Advertisements

MICS 3 DATA ANALYSIS AND REPORT WRITING. Purpose Provide an overview of the MICS3 process in analyzing data Provide an overview of the preparation of.
Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Data Dissemination - Further Analysis Workshop Basic Concepts of Further Analysis MICS4 Data Dissemination and Further.
Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Data Interpretation, Further Analysis and Dissemination Workshop Basic Concepts of Further Analysis.
Requirements Analysis. Methods of Collecting System Requirements Interview people (individually) informed about the operations and issues of the current.
IASSIST / IFOD: Mobile Data and the Life Cycle – Tampere, Finland May 26-29, 2009 Lifecycle & Comparative Studies Metadata Needs of the Future CESSDA RI.
Making the Case for Metadata at SRS-NSF National Science Foundation Division of Science Resources Statistics Jeri Mulrow, Geetha Srinivasarao, and John.
WP 3: Survey Quality Eric Harrison City University London Knut Kalgraff Skjåk Norwegian Social Science Data Services IASSIST May May, Cologne.
Green jobs pilot surveys in Albania
Bill Edgar (Dundee University) Matt Harrison (RIS) Volker Busch-Geertsema (GISS) European Commission MPHASIS Mutual Progress on Homelessness through Advancing.
Data Service Infrastructure for the Social Science and the Humanities (DASISH): Improving Survey Quality in Cross-national Research Eric Harrison City.
Promoting Classroom Use of Public Opinion Data Developed by The Roper Center of the University of Connecticut Public Opinion.
NLSCY – Non-response. Non-response There are various reasons why there is non-response to a survey  Some related to the survey process Timing Poor frame.
Documentation and survey quality. Introduction.
Manual on Disability Statistics Central Statistics Office Ministry of Statistics & PI Government of India New Delhi.
MICS Survey Design Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop Overview of MICS Tools, Templates, Resources, Technical Assistance.
1 WORLD TOURISM ORGANIZATION (UNWTO) MEASURING TOURISM EXPENDITURE: A UNWTO PROPOSAL SESRIC-UNWTO WORKSHOP ON TOURISM STATISTICS AND THE ELABORATION OF.
WP7: Training modules Claudia Engelhardt, Timo Gnadt, Jens Ludwig Gothenburg, Final.
PRO ACTIN KICK-OFF MEETING PRO ACTIN Project 1 Introduction to PRO ACTIN objectives, deliverables and related methodologies. led by: Prof. Umberto Triulzi.
MICS4 Survey Design Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop Data Analysis and Reporting.
Case Studies: Statistics Canada (WP 11) Alice Born Statistics UNECE Workshop on Statistical Metadata.
1 1 Management Tools for Enhancing the Composition of Survey Response Q2008 European Conference on Quality in Official Statistics Rome, July 2008 Anne.
M ETADATA OF NATIONAL STATISTICAL OFFICES B ELARUS, R USSIA AND K AZAKHSTAN Miroslava Brchanova, Moscow, October, 2014.
Learning Objectives Problem Definition and the Research Process Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. CHAPTER Two.
European Conference on Quality in Official Statistics, Rome 8-11 July Satisfying User and Partner Needs- the Use of Specific Reviews at Eurostat.
Evaluating a Research Report
Exploratory Research Design Week 02
Curb-stoning, a Too Neglected and Very Embarrassing Survey Problem Comments Jaki S. McCarthy Senior Cognitive Research Methodologist US Department of Agriculture.
1 Monitoring & Evaluation Plan Bea iSTEP Monitoring – Why? Are we on the right track? Do we need corrective action? What are the problems? Are.
Human Computer Interaction
Eurostat Overall design. Presented by Eva Elvers Statistics Sweden.
UNICEF’s work and planned activities for the production of data on children with disabilities Claudia Cappa, Data and Analytics Section, UNICEF, NY.
Kick Off Meeting June WP6: Overview WP Leader: Province of Asti (in close collaboration with iMpronta) Importance of monitoring and evaluation:
DASISH Final Conference Common Solutions to Common Problems.
WHO and the Global Fund harmonized tool for Pharmaceutical Country Profiles Richard Laing & Enrico Cinnella, November 2011.
1 OECD Workshop on Business and Consumer Tendency Surveys, Rome, 19 September 2006 SESSION 1 RECENTLY DEVELOPED INTERNATIONAL GUIDELINES FOR OPINION SURVEYS.
BAIGORRI Antonio – Eurostat, Unit B1: Quality; Classifications Q2010 EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON QUALITY IN STATISTICS Terminology relating to the Implementation.
European Conference on Quality in Official Statistics Session 26: Quality Issues in Census « Rome, 10 July 2008 « Quality Assurance and Control Programme.
1 Improving Data Quality. COURSE DESCRIPTION Introduction to Data Quality- Course Outline.
“ BIRD Project“ 1 Broadband Access, Innovation & Regional Development” Broadband Access, Innovation & Regional Development” Project Description Ulrich.
Initial plans for WP 4 KickOff Meeting ICT-AGRI 2.
Using Client Satisfaction Surveys as a Quality Improvement Tool.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Reducing Non-Response Section B 1.
Conference on Data Quality for International Organisations, Newport, April Assessment of statistical data quality: The example of the Occupational.
Eric Balster, Maurice Martens CentERdata, Tilburg Translation Management Tool Ensuring cross cultural equivalence.
Pilot Census in Poland Some Quality Aspects Geneva, 7-9 July 2010 Janusz Dygaszewicz Central Statistical Office POLAND.
Practical Survey Design Strategies for Minimizing MSE Lars Lyberg and Bo Sundgren Statistics Sweden
United Nations Oslo City Group on Energy Statistics OG7, Helsinki, Finland October 2012 ESCM Chapter 8: Data Quality and Meta Data 1.
Good Practice in the Field of Health Promotion and Primary Prevention: Concept, Methods and Outputs Thomas Kunkel, MD, M.Sc. JA CHRODIS Work Package 5.
E X POST EVALUATION OF LEADER APPROACH DELIVERY – S LOVAK CASE Case study Nitra 2014.
ILPO 55 Needs and Gaps Analysis in Age management and Intergenerational activities.
FROM GAPS TO CAPS Risk Management Capability Based on Gaps Identification in the BSR Project Lead Partner: Fire and Rescue Department under the Ministry.
2050AP Project WP5: “Conclusions” UPM Madrid 11 de Octubre 2013.
Component D: Data Collection in Field Surveys Activity D.1: Management and monitoring of field interviewers Surveys Department EU Twinning Project.
   Tom W. Smith NORC at the University of Chicago
Component D: Data collection by field surveys
The other ESS the European Social Survey and the European Statistical System NTTS conference 2017 Ineke Stoop.
A model for Cross-national Questionnaire Design and Pretesting
WP 3: Data Quality Alexia Katsanidou
Survey phases, survey errors and quality control system
Survey phases, survey errors and quality control system
22 February, ITDG/DIME Item 2 – Progress and deployment
Assessing Quality of Paradata to Better Understand the Data Collection Process for CAPI Social Surveys François Laflamme Milana Karaganis European Conference.
WP7 – COMBINING BIG DATA - STATISTICAL DOMAINS
EHIS W2: Quality reports & analysis of microdata
Workshop on Health Statistics Context, Objectives & Organisation
Agenda item 5.2 Methodology
- Kick-off meeting - ERANET Cofund BlueBio WP4 (Leader: AEI)
UN-GGIM: Europe – Work Plan
Presentation transcript:

Keystroke analysis and implications for fieldwork WP3.3 – task 2 Johanna Bristle (SHARE, MEA) Verena Halbherr (ESS, GESIS) DASISH Final Conference – Gothenburg, 28 th Nov 2014

Introduction 2  Tools produce paradata, e.g. Fieldwork Monitoring Application produces contact data (task 1 of WP3.3)  Goal of task 2:  Analysing one type of paradata, namely SHARE keystroke data and ESS time stamp data  Inform cross-national fieldwork & derive lessons learned  Definition:  Paradata = data about the process of data collection  Keystroke data = actions on a keyboard and time stamps for each action taken are recorded and extracted

Deliverable D3.7  Structure of deliverable  Description of data and preparation  Diagnostic of keystrokes  Outliers and distribution  Measuring interview length  Using keystrokes in a survey`s life-cycle  Questionnaire development  Fieldwork monitoring  Post-survey quality assessment  Available on the website of DASISH beginning of 2015  Today: comparing the two surveys 3 Focus of poster Focus of this presentation

Interview length  Concept of interview length  Perspective of questionnaire development vs. interviewer and respondent 4

Measurement error in time stamps  Paradata is far from error-free  Technical errors or breaks produce outliers or missing data  Reporting error if interviewer is involved (rounding) 5

Cross-national interview length 6 Notes: SHARE: own analysis on panel single households in wave 5 ESS: Analysis by Loosveldt & Beullen round 5, all respondents.

Conclusions 1.Computerized data collection avoids interviewer-induced measurement error  Data quality of paradata  data quality of survey data 2.Cross-national & cross-survey comparison  Beyond survey-specific reasons (topic)  „Local survey culture“ (language) Potential of paradata  Pretest: check quality of new items  During fieldwork: real-time monitoring and interventions  Post-survey analysis: survey methodology & enhancing survey items Harmonization in terms of documentation, dissemination and tool development produces useful para- and metadata 7

Further reading and references  DASISH Deliverable 3.7 (forthcoming). Keystroke analysis and implications for field work. It will be available on  Loosveldt, G. and K. Beullens (2013). "'How long will it take?' An analysis of interview length in the fifth round of the European Social Survey." Survey Research Methods 7(2):  Kreuter, F. (2013). Improving Surveys with Paradata: Analytic Uses of Process Information. Hoboken, New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons. 8