1. E X POST EVALUATION OF LEADER APPROACH DELIVERY – S LOVAK CASE Case study Nitra 2014

2. F IRST WEEK – INTRODUCTION Introduction to the country context Introduction to Leader approach in the EU rural policy. EU monitoring and evaluation system Leader in Slovak Republic and in Nitra region, guidelines

3. S ECOND WEEK – STRUCTURING, DEVELOPMENT EVALUATION TOOLS AND OBSERVATION 7 features of Leader – interactive session Developing evaluation tools: interviews and focus group screenplay Field research in Nitra, testing evaluation tools – two LAGs supported by Nitra regions

4. T HIRD WEEK – OBSERVATION AND ANALYSIS Field research in Rožnava and Levoča regions, interviews and focus groups – two LAGs supported by RDP Slovak Republic Synthetizing outcomes, preparing the PPT on outcomes and discussion

5. F OURTH WEEK – ANALYSING AND JUDGING Conducting the SWOT on delivery mechanisms for Leader in Slovakia, comparisons between two types of Leader delivery: SK and NR Conclusions and recommendations in relation to Leader approach delivery in SR Writing the final report Field trip Presentations in closing event of the Case study

6. O UTCOMES Final Report PPT s SWOT and conclusions and recommendations

7. F INAL REPORT There will be two reports in the Nitra Case study 2014: One prepared by the group of students conducting field research in Rožnava region One prepared by the group of students conducting field research in Levoča region

8. T HE STRUCTURE OF THE FINAL REPORT Introduction (1 page max reflecting objectives of the case study) The general description of the situation in Leader implementation with the focus on delivery mechanism (MA and LAG level, max 5 pages) Definition of 7 features of Leader and benchmarks (max 6 pages) Development of evaluation tools: interview and focus group screenplay (max 6 pages) Analysed and synthetized results of interviews and focus groups (max 10 pages) SWOT analysis of Leader delivery mechanism (max 4 pages) Conclusions and recommendations for Leader delivery mechanism for programming period of 2014 – 2020 (max 3 pages)

9. W HAT IS IMPORTANT FOR MARKING Willingness to learn and develop the topic Ability to work in teams Analytical skills Communication and ability to present research results

10. H OW WE WILL PROCEED

11. E VALUATION QUESTION “ To what extent is delivery mechanism (at RDP and LAG level) supporting the implementation of 7 features of Leader approach?”

12. Collecting information PPT on Leader EU, SK, guidance, EU evaluation Desk research, studying Leader guidance Defining key steps in delivering Leader at RDP and LAG levels Framing evaluation - defining seven features of Leader and criteria for success: benchmarks Linking seven features to steps in delivery mechanism Developing evaluation tools: interviews and focus groups Field research, conducting the evaluation, comparing two systems: SK and NR SWOT on delivery mechanism in relation to seven features of Leader, conclusions and recommendations Presentation of evaluation results