HZDR FLUKA activities in support of the MYRRHA Project Short summary with a focus on activation problems Anna Ferrari, Stefan Müller, Jörg Konheiser.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A case history of CFD support to Accelerator Driven System plant
Advertisements

Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
Didier De Bruyn & Rafaël Fernandez (SCKCEN), Luigi Mansani (Ansaldo), Antony Woaye-Hune (AREVA), Massimo Sarotto (ENEA) & Evaldas Bubelis (KIT) ICAPP’12.
MYRRHA within the EURATOM roadmap MYRRHA Accelerator 1st International design review, SCK-CEN (Brussels, BE), 12-13/11/2012 Roger GARBIL Acting Head of.
1 Activation problems S.Agosteo (1), M.Magistris (1,2), Th.Otto (2), M.Silari (2) (1) Politecnico di Milano; (2) CERN.
MYRRHA ADS, What’s that ? and what for ?
Energy deposition and neutron background studies for a low energy proton therapy facility Roxana Rata*, Roger Barlow* * International Institute for Accelerator.
Yoro TALL Santiago de Compostela (Spain) June 7 – 10, Second IP EUROTRANS Internal Training Course on Nuclear Data for Transmutation: status, needs.
May 17-19, 2000 Catalina Island, CA Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider Collaboration Meeting 1 Target Support Facility for a Solid Target Neutrino Production.
ADSR systems and their contribution to our energy needs Roger Barlow DIUS visit Manchester, 16 th September 2008.
Induced Activity Calculations in Support of D&D Activities at SLAC Joachim Vollaire, Radiation Protection Department.
Design on Target and Moderator of X- band Compact Electron Linac Neutron Source for Short Pulsed Neutrons Kazuhiro Tagi.
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association Institute for Nuclear and Energy Technologies.
Yacine Kadi Thorium Energy Conference 2013 Globe of Innovation, CERN, Switzerland October 31, 2013.
1 st EuCARD 2 annual meeting G Bellodi – CERN WP4 AccApplic Hamburg G Bellodi - CERN / EuCARD2 Annual meeting.
Introduction and Charge to the Review of ESS Target building and Instrument Hall design requirements Roland Garoby November 2014, Lund
Nuclear Data for ADS and Transmutation Joint TREND/SANDAT proposal for FP6 ADOPT- Meeting, Dec E. Gonzalez-Romero (CIEMAT) Introduction Sensitivity.
Nuclear Energy Options and Project-X Shekhar Mishra Fermilab Yousry Gohar ANL June 7 th 2010.
MA and LLFP Transmutation Performance Assessment in the MYRRHA eXperimental ADS P&T: 8th IEM, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA November 9-11, 2004 E. Malambu, W.
ELI-NP: the way ahead, March Anna Ferrari An overview of the shielding problems around high energy laser-accelerated beams Anna Ferrari Institute.
Copyright © 2012 SCKCEN Didier De Bruyn (SCKCEN), with contributions from Rafaël Fernandez (SCKCEN), Luigi Mansani (Ansaldo), Antony Woaye-Hune (AREVA),
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA Activities in the Area of Partitioning and Transmutation Alexander Stanculescu Nuclear Energy Department Nuclear.
Simulations of Accelerator Driven Systems (ADS) Aleksander Polanski Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia. The Andrzej Soltan Institute for.
The Proposed Materials Test Station at LANSCE Eric Pitcher Los Alamos National Laboratory Presented at the Workshop on High-Power Targetry for Future.
MATERIAL ISSUES FOR ADS: MYRRHA-PROJECT A. Almazouzi SCKCEN, Mol (Belgium) On behalf of MYRRHA-TEAM and MYRRHA-Support.
Radiation damage calculation in PHITS
Y. Romanets 1, R. Luis 1,J. Bermudez 3, J.C. David 5, D. Ene 5, I. F. Goncalves 1, Y. Kadi 2, C. Kharoua 2, F. Negoita 4, R. Rocca 2, L. Tecchio 3, P.
Monte Carlo methods in ADS experiments Study for state exam 2008 Mitja Majerle “Phasotron” and “Energy Plus Transmutation” setups (schematic drawings)
AN ALTERNATIVE PROPOSAL FOR A HIBRID REACTOR (SUB-CRITICAL FACILITY COUPLED WITH AN ACCELERADOR) Sergio A. Pereira and Adimir dos Santos.
ThEC13, Geneva, 28th-31st Oct., 2013 C. H. Pyeon, Kyoto Univ. 1 Cheolho Pyeon Research Reactor Institute, Kyoto University, Japan
Cristian Bungau ThorEA Meeting - Oxford - April 2010.
First radiological estimates for the HIRADMAT project H. Vincke and N. Conan 1.
Radiation Protection aspects for SHIP Doris Forkel-Wirth, Stefan Roesler, Helmut Vincke, Heinz Vincke CERN Radiation Protection Group 1 st SHIP workshop,
Nuclear Facilities Decommissioning & Design An introduction to SENAC activities JM. Dumas CEA Saclay, DSM/DAPNIA/SENAC, F Gif-sur-Yvette,
Characteristics of Transmutation Reactor Based on LAR Tokamak Neutron Source B.G. Hong Chonbuk National University.
Copyright © 2015 SCKCEN ADS accelerator developments presently on-going for MYRRHA and possibly for the Chinese-ADS Dirk Vandeplassche 1 Eucard-2 — APAE.
Mitja Majerle for the “Energy Plus Transmutation” collaboration.
Risk Analysis P. Cennini AB-ATB on behalf of the n_TOF Team  Procedure  Documents in preparation  Conclusions Second n_TOF External Panel Review, CERN,
1 Neutron Effective Dose calculation behind Concrete Shielding of Charge Particle Accelerators with Energy up to 100 MeV V. E Aleinikov, L. G. Beskrovnaja,
Study on the Neutronic Characteristics of Subcritical Reactors Driven by an Accelerated Pulsed Proton Beam Ali Ahmad.
NToF - Radiation Protection M. Brugger, P. Cennini, A. Ferrari, E. Lebbos, V. Vlachoudis CERN AB/ATB/EET.
Radiation protection and radiation safety issues for HIE-ISOLDE. FLUKA calculations Y. Romanets ISOLDE Workshop and Users meeting 2010 CERN, 8 December.
FLUKA for accelerator radiation protection –Indian perspective Sunil C Accelerator Radiation Safety Section Radiation Safety Systems Division, Bhabha Atomic.
Copyright © 2013 SCKCEN MYRRHA Design overview Didier De Bruyn (SCKCEN) LEADER technical workshop Petten, February 2013.
4th International Summer School « Nuclear Physics Methods and Accelerators in Biology and Medicine » Monte-Carlo simulations : FLUKA vs. MCNPX Maxime ODEN.
J. G. Weisend II for the ESS Team Energy Efficiency & Recovery at ESS.
A Low Power ADS Demonstrator Hywel Owen School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester.
Bob Cywinski International Institute for Accelerator Applications Why thorium? Why Accelerators? PASI 13 January 2012.
The 14 MeV Frascati Neutron Generator (FNG)
Neutron production and iodide transmutation studies using intensive beam of Dubna Phasotron Mitja Majerle Nuclear Physics Institute of CAS Řež, Czech republic.
Development of Cryogenic Moderators Using a Small Proton Accelerator Yoshiaki Kiyanagi*, Fujio Hiraga, Takashi Kamiyama, Akira Homma, Fumiyuki Fujita and.
EURISOL DS Task meeting Orsay, 07 Janvier Preliminary shielding assessment of EURISOL Post Accelerator D. Ene, D. Ridikas. B. Rapp.
MYRRHA Prof. Dr. Hamid Aït Abderrahim SCK•CEN
Tailoring the ESS Reliability and Availability needs to satisfy the users Enric Bargalló WAO October 27, 2014.
Ali Ahmad FLUKA code validation of nuclear data required for the spallation target design in Accelerator Driven Subcritical Reactors ThorEA Meeting – Daresbury.
EURISOL, TASK#5, Bucuresti, November 1 Preliminary shielding assessment of EURISOL Post Accelerator D. Ene, D. Ridikas. B. Rapp.
Study on IFMIF Beam-Target Interface
Study on Neutronics of plutonium and Minor Actinides Transmutation in Accelerator Driven System Reactor By Amer Ahmed Abdullah Al-Qaaod Ph.D student Physics.
Induced-activity experiment:
ADS reliability requirements
Analyses to Support Waste Disposition of SNS Inner Reflector Plug
Measurements and FLUKA Simulations of Bismuth and Aluminum Activation at the CERN Shielding Benchmark Facility(CSBF) E. Iliopoulou, R. Froeschl, M. Brugger,
Designing Safety into a High-power Neutron Spallation Source
Summary of session 5: Innovative Ideas and New R&D
Challenges and Perspectives of Accelerator Driven Systems (ADS)
The Frascati Neutron Generator
Ryuji Hosoyamada2, Hiroshi Iwase3, Hiroshi Nakashima1, and Koji Niita2
JOINT INSTITUTE FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH
Pebble Bed Reactors for Once Trough Nuclear Transmutation
Preliminary Study – Radiation induced activity in a SB Target
Presentation transcript:

HZDR FLUKA activities in support of the MYRRHA Project Short summary with a focus on activation problems Anna Ferrari, Stefan Müller, Jörg Konheiser Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf

A look at the MYRRHA project Framework of this work: CDT-FASTEF + MAXSIMA EU FP7 projects Goal: design a FAst Spectrum Transmutation Experimental Facility, able to demonstrate efficient transmutation of high level waste and associated technology Heart of the MYRRHA facility at SCK·CEN in Mol FASTEF + The MYRRHA construction could start in few (?) years MAXSIMA design (planned to be operational in 2023) In MYRRHA (Multi-purpose hybrid research reactor for high-tech applications): A LFR (Lead Fast Reactor) will operate both in critical and subcritical mode. Core power - 100 MW in critical mode in the FASTEF design: - 94 MW in subcritical mode An Accelerator Driven System with a 600 MeV proton beam will be provided by a LINAC A Compact Spallation Target will be provided, in LBE (Lead Bismuth Eutectic)

The general shielding problem 600 MeV Proton beam-line Target window zone Beam spot centre movement Reactor Spallation target LINAC tunnel Beam Dump Casemate The general shielding problem up to 4 mA current Analysis around the accelerator in: A. Ferrari, J.-L. Biarrotte et al., SATIF-11 Conf. Proc., OECD/NEA Nuclear Science 7157, 13-27 (2013)

Goal: Neutronics, shielding and activation analysis in support of the safety Key points: - Detailed characterization of the shielding and of the activation problems around the accelerator and around the core in both subcritical/critical modes - Definition of the shielding structures in the building areas not yet optimized (ex. Cover, Vertical containment beyond the 90 magnet) - Find activation problems that can have an impact on the design Method for the reactor analysis: combined use MCNPX and FLUKA. - MCNPX is the official tool used to characterize the MYRRHA cores FLUKA allows to evaluate the dose rates due to the activated materials and with the real geometry

The CDT model of the reactor containment system (ANSALDO) Hot LBE (350) Argon AISI 316L Concrete with SS content Nitrogen

The new MAXSIMA model

Components included in the model for MAXSIMA: Reactor vessel Reactor diaphragm Reactor cover Above core structures (ACSs) Primary pumps Primary heat exchangers In-vessel fuel handling machines Window target Silicium doping

A comparison Argon/Nitrogen as plenum gas: residual radiation Analyzed irradiation pattern: Medium term operation  1 cycle 90 d continuous irradiation, 1 week cooling Argon Nitrogen H*(10) rate (Sv/h) H*(10) rate (Sv/h) Production of Ar-37 (t1/2= 35 d) by neutron capture from Ar-36 Production of C-14 (t1/2 = 5700 y) by fast neutron activation from N-14 Residual activity in argon:  26 Bq/cm3 Residual activity in nitrogen:  0.3 Bq/cm3

Activation of the T91 window (FLUKA simulation) RN contribution to the total specific activity [Bq/cm3]- EOI 15 y Neutron fluence rate (n/cm2 per s) T91 samples Specific activity [Bq/cm3] EOI 90 days cooling 1 week 5 years 30 days 15 years cooling 1 year Exit window 4.50E+12 1.73E+12 6.95E12 3.28E+12 7.88E+12 2.34E+12 Hexagonal tube (central part) 2.91E+11 1.29E11 5.95E11 3.74E+11 6.70E+11 2.89E+11

In the frame of the European Projects CDT and MAXSIMA we widely used FLUKA to cope with activation problems. In the reactor analysis, a coupling MCNPX/FLUKA allowed us to perform calculations around the reactor core, which had an impact on the design ANSALDO is a fundamental partner in the MYRRHA Project. We had a fruitful collaboration in CDT and MAXSIMA ANSALDO is now in charge of the activation calculations for the MYRRHA Project (and not only!) and joined the community of the FLUKA users