National Center on AIM at CAST Inc. | 40 Harvard Mills Square, Suite 3 | Wakefield, MA 01880-3233 VOICE: (781) 245-2212 | TTY: (781) 245-9320 | ­­­FAX:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Program Evaluation: What is it?
Advertisements

Administrators Meeting April 21, Key Areas of Grant-Based Monitoring Schools to be Served Instructional Assessments Instructional Strategies and.
Virginia - March 2014 (Content adapted from 2014 MSRRC Forum) Preparing for the State Systemic Improvement Plan.
A Roadmap to Successful Implementation Management Plans.
AYP Regional Meetings In Need of Improvement Schools and Districts MDE School Improvement Division and Regional Service Cooperatives August/September 2010.
Implementation of the PA Core Standards. Effective Communication Guiding Principle 1 Design and establish systems of effective communication among stakeholders.
An Introduction to the “new” NCDB …a webinar for the National Deaf-Blind TA Network November 13, 2013 November 15, 2013 Presented by:
REL Appalachia and the Virginia Middle School Research Alliance Justin Baer, Director, REL Appalachia Virginia School-University Partnership Steering Committee.
State Systemic Improvement Plan: Preparing, Planning, and Staying Informed Presentation to Louisiana ICC July 10, 2013.
UNSW Strategic Educational Development Grants
Local Control and Accountability Plan: Performance Based Budgeting California Association of School Business Officials.
What You Will Learn From These Sessions
Office of Special Education & Early Intervention Services Webinar—General Information Training will begin in a moment; all phone lines are currently muted.
Learning Teaching Enhancing Supporting Sharing ISLN March, 2015.
Status of State Systems for the Provision of NIMAS and AIM in 2012: Highlights of Preliminary Findings Joy Zabala, Joanne Karger and.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Improving Educational Participation and Outcomes for ALL Students with Universal Design for Learning and–for some–Special Education Services Joy Smiley.
Presented at Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA, November 2011 Lessons Learned about How to Support Outcomes Measurement.
PHAB's Approach to Internal and External Evaluation Jessica Kronstadt | Director of Research and Evaluation | November 18, 2014 APHA 2014 Annual Meeting.
Results-Driven Accountability OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS 1.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
Effective dissemination and evaluation
 AKA CIPP  Evaluators: Elaine Carlson and Tom Munk  Assist in summative evaluation of the center  Helped develop standardized logic model  Helped.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Community-Engaged Scholarship. Community Engaged Scholarship “the application of institutional resources to address and solve challenges facing communities.
Outcomes of the 16 th Regional Disaster Managers Meeting held from 9 th – 11 th August 2010 Presentation to the Pacific Humanitarian Team Monday 6 th December.
Engagement as Strategy: Leading by Convening in the SSIP Part 2 8 th Annual Capacity Building Institute May, 2014 Joanne Cashman, IDEA Partnership Mariola.
Promoting a Culture of Evidence and Use of Data through Program Evaluation Session Theme 2 Presentation to: OSEP Project Directors’ Conference July 21,
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
National Consortium On Deaf-Blindness Families Technical Assistance Information Services and Dissemination Personnel Training State Projects.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Statewide Systems of Support Oregon School Improvement Facilitators Carol Larson, Willamette ESD Christina Reagle, Oregon Dept. of Education.
Strategic Plan Strategic Goals (Thrusts) 1. Achieve Performance Excellence CRJ uses metrics of performance to evaluate, manage and plan its.
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
Ruth Ryder SPDG National Meeting March 5-6, 2013 ESEA Flexibility and SPDG: What’s the connection?
DETERMINE Working document # 4 'Economic arguments for addressing social determinants of health inequalities' December 2009 Owen Metcalfe & Teresa Lavin.
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING.
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING.
Performance Based-Assessment Highlight on edTPA Greg Blalock, Columbus State University David Cihak, University of Tennessee, Knoxville Stacey Bock, Illinois.
Compliance Promotion Formalizing an Approach to Support Stakeholder Compliance.
Rex L. LaMore Michigan State University Center for Urban Affairs Community and Economic Development Program.
The partnership principle and the European Code of Conduct on Partnership.
11 The CPCRN, DCPC, NCI, and the Community Guide: Areas for Collaboration and Supportive Work Shawna L. Mercer, MSc, PhD Director The Guide to Community.
© 2007 SRI International CPATH Principal Investigators Meeting: Program Evaluation Update March 26, 2010 By the Center for Education Policy Dr. Raymond.
Kentucky’s Assistive Technology Outreach: Access Across the Commonwealth Laura Schluter Strickland, Ed.D., OTR/L Raleigh, NC February 14, 2007.
U.S. Department of Education Safeguarding Student Privacy Melanie Muenzer U.S. Department of Education Chief of Staff Office of Planning, Evaluation, and.
Welcome To Implementation Science 8 Part Webinar Series Kathleen Ryan Jackson Erin Chaparro, Ph.D University of Oregon.
Developing SEA Change’s Evaluation Plan
Leadership School Leadership Teams. Leadership Team Planning Objective: At the end of this section, you will have one SMART goal written and start on.
Multistate Research Program Roles & Responsibilities Eric Young SAAESD Meeting Corpus Christi, TX April 3-6, 2005.
WHAT A GREAT IDEA!! Focusing on Results and Using IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act) Part D Investments to Support Improved Outcomes for.
National Coordinating Center for the Regional Genetic Service Collaboratives ( HRSA – ) Joan A. Scott, MS CGC, Chief, Genetics Services Branch Division.
OSEP-Funded TA and Data Centers David Guardino, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
HRSA Early Childhood Comprehensive Systems (ECCS) Impact 2016 Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) Barbara Hamilton, Project Officer Division.
Monitoring & Evaluation Capacity Strengthening Workshop WORKSHOP INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW.
Committed to equipping, training, and empowering SNAP-Ed and EFNEP networks to go beyond direct education to include impactful PSE strategies that will.
Generate, An Automated federal Reporting Tool
Committed to equipping, training, and empowering SNAP-Ed and EFNEP networks to go beyond direct education to include impactful PSE strategies that will.
Is there another way besides accreditation?
Developing & Refining a Theory of Action
Farmers Market and Local Food Promotion Program Grant Writing Workshop
Health care for the Homeless Strategic Planning 2018
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Title Plans and Assurances Spoke Committee Presentation
Professional Learning Communities Kick-off Day
NC Preschool Pyramid Model Leadership Team Summit January 9-10, 2019
Facilitators: Jennifer Coffey, OSEP Project Officer
Access, Equity, and Progress
Presentation transcript:

National Center on AIM at CAST Inc. | 40 Harvard Mills Square, Suite 3 | Wakefield, MA VOICE: (781) | TTY: (781) | ­­­FAX: (781) | Web: NCAIM Evaluation Plan Highlights Brad Rose, Ph.D. and Joy Zabala, Ed.D., ATP

Purpose To ensure that all activities are of high-quality, useful to consumers, and represent effective, efficient use of resources To ensure that all project requirements are met To ensure that Center activities are producing the expected outcomes

What we’ll look at… The ways that the AIM Center assists states in the development of systems for the distribution of AIM How states are developing and/or improving their systems for the distribution of AIM

We’ll look at the ways that the NCAIM assists states in the development of systems for the distribution of AIM.

Formative and Summative Evaluation Formative evaluation activities will describe the process by which project activities were conducted. To measure the alignment of activities to goals To determine what changes need to be made to ensure that activities are producing expected outcomes Summative evaluation activities will measure the outcomes and impact of project activities..

Formative Questions – Process Did proposed activities and undertakings take place as planned? How did participants perceive the merit and worth of activity? What challenges occurred during implementation? What steps were taken to address challenges and lower barriers? How were activities refined and strengthened to best serve constituents and stakeholders?

Summative Questions – Impact and Outcomes Did the NCAIM provide Technical Assistance and Dissemination to support the development of expertise and capacity of state education agencies (SEAs) and local education agencies (LEAs) to develop effective distribution systems for AIM?

Summative Questions – Impact and Outcomes Did the NCAIM facilitate the collaborative Knowledge Development necessary to ensure planning and implementation of efficient and effective distribution systems for AIM?

Summative Questions – Impact and Outcomes Did NCAIM demonstrate the leadership and coordination required to engage both accessible instructional materials stakeholders and OSEP-funded projects in ensuring high-quality AIM Center products and services? Did stakeholders report Center activities to be of relevant, useful, and of high-quality?

We’ll look at how states are developing and/or changing their systems for the distribution of AIM over time.

Sharing your wisdom What data and evidence would be useful in describing a state’s status? - Questions to ask? - Evidence to seek? - How?

Albert Einstein Everything that can be counted does not necessarily count; everything that counts cannot necessarily be counted.