Benchmarking Industry – Science Relationships Based on the OECD report, March 2002 Presented by: Inês Costa Vanessa Figueiredo.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Using public procurement to foster research and innovation More Research and Innovation COM(2005) 488 of 12 October 2005 Commission communication to the.

Advertisements

Venturing into the European Research Area – some far-reaching speculations Wolfgang Polt Institute of Technology and Regional Policy - Joanneum Research.

The White Paper – a policy paper to contribute to the integration process of the WBC in the ERA Dr. Erika Rost, Dr. Andreas Kahle Federal Ministry of Education.

Romanian initiative in nanoscience and nanotechnology Dan Dascalu IMT-Bucharest.

Academic Network of European Disability experts (ANED) – VT/2007/005.

OECD World Forum Statistics, Knowledge and Policy, Palermo, November

European Research Policy: from coordination and cooperation to integration and the ERA Dr. Maria Nedeva MIoIR, MBS. The University of Manchester EULAKS.

European Economic and Social Committee Consultative Committee on Industrial Change "CCMI" P r e s e n t a t i o n of J á n o s T Ó T H Member of the EESC.

Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in the Seventh Framework Programme Coordination actions ICT Calls Jan- March 2012.

A NEW METRIC FOR A NEW COHESION POLICY by Fabrizio Barca * * Italian Ministry of Economy and Finance. Special Advisor to the European Commission. Perugia,

Regions for Economic Change: Networking for Results LMP Workshop 3C: When exchanging is good for innovation: Experiences from the Lisbon Monitoring Platform.

Lifelong Guidance: A Key to Lifelong Learning – EU Policy Perspective John McCarthy European Commission DG EAC Vocational Training Policy Unit.

J. David Tàbara Institute of Environmental Science and Technology Autonomous University of Barcelona Integrated Climate Governance.

University of Athens, GREECE Innovation and regional development : Prof. Lena J. Tsipouri.

Governance and the European Commissions 2020 strategy Caius Tudor Luminosu juris doctor, Politehnica University, Transport and Management Faculty, Chair.

EU – ACP PROGRAMME FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INNOVATIONS AND CAPACITY BUILDING (PSTICB) 9 ACP RPR 61.

Entrepreneurship and competitiveness for SMEs Dialogue between Brazil and the EU EU Enterprise and Innovation Initiatives Carl James.

6th EC Framework Programme for Research Scientific Support to Policies: “Integrating and Strengthening the European Research Area” Area (i) Policy-oriented.

DG RTD - Directorate K - Unit 2 : Competitiveness, economic analysis, indicators European Commission What about the Regions in EU Technology Policy? 13.

MIRA - WP 2 Observatory of Euro-Med S&T cooperation White Paper Coord. IRD (France) CNRS (Lebanon) MIRA Mediterranean Innovation and Research coordination.

FP7 Preparations ISTC meeting 31 March Content FP7 preparation approach and timetable Context for FP7 and for ICT in FP7 Research in New Financial.

NMP-NCP meeting - Brussels, 27 Jan 2005 Towards FP 7: Preliminary principles and orientations… Nicholas Hartley European Commission DG Research DG Research.

1 European Policies to Promote EST into the Market INSTITUTO SUPERIOR TÉCNICO RGESD - Research Group on Energy and Sustainable Development Maria da Graça.

The ECPG’s final report Structured in two parts: Three core principles for the next stage of cluster programmes Eight action proposals directed at both.

Regional Trajectories to the Knowledge Economy: A Dynamic Model IKINET-EURODITE Joint Conference Warsaw, May 2006.

Promoting University-Industry Collaboration Diponegoro University.

2013 EDITION Mr. Pierre Vigier Head of Unit Economic Analysis and Indicators.

Recommendations for Latvia’s NIS and un proposed Action Plan Valdis Avotiņš, LIDA ESTER 4th Meeting, Tel Aviv, January

Association for the Education of Adults EAEA European AE Research – Look towards the future ERDI General Assembly, 2004.

ESPON 2013 Programme Info Day on New Calls and Partner Café ESPON 2013 Programme: Progress and Prospects.

The New EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation EXCELLENT SCIENCE HORIZON 2020 Peter Fisch DG RTD A.5.

MEADOW: Guidelines for a European survey of organisations Nathalie Greenan CEE and TEPP-CNRS Exploring possibilities for the development of European data.

Entrepreneurship education in Engineering Schools. The need for promoting Knowledge Intensive Entrepreneurship Yannis Caloghirou Ioanna Kastelli Unit of.

1 Science and Society: EU Strategy and actions Dr. Rainer GEROLD Director Science and Society Research DG European Commission.

Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisation (RIS3) John Edwards European Commission Smart Specialisation Platform Casa Mateus, 19th May.

Work Programme for the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration "Integrating and strengthening the European Research.

European Commission Preparation of the Innovation Union Flagship Initiative European Commission Presentation to ERAC 11 June 2010.

Implementing the Lisbon Strategy The Role of Regions Kirsty Macdonald Head of Office Scotland Europa.

1 Master in Engineering Policy and Management of Technology S & T Policy BENCHMARKING INDUSTRY-SCIENCE RELATIONSHIPS OCDE – March 2002 Anabela Piedade.

1 National innovation systems Sub-regional seminar on the commercialization and enforcement of intellectual property rights Skopje, Macedonia April.

ESPON Seminar 15 November 2006 in Espoo, Finland Review of the ESPON 2006 and lessons learned for the ESPON 2013 Programme Thiemo W. Eser, ESPON Managing.

1 Analysing the contributions of fellowships to industrial development November 2010 Johannes Dobinger, UNIDO Evaluation Group.

THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA INSTITUTE OF MACROECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND DEVELOPMENT July 2007 Where is Lisbon? (and how far is it from Ljubljana)

TAFTIE Policy Forum “Measuring innovation” Can we measure innovation? Lessons from innovation scoreboards Hugo Hollanders.

Inception report: Feedbacks, problems and answers Van Hamme Gilles IGEAT-ULB Internal Meeting october.

Realising the European Union Lisbon Goal The Copenhagen process and the Maaastricht Communiqué: Martina Ní Cheallaigh DG Education and Culture.

Strengthening the Strategic Cooperation between the EU and Western Balkan Region in the field of ICT Research Key Barriers & Challenges in ICT Research:

ROMANIA MINISTRY OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION National Centre for Development of Vocational Education and Training Implementation Unit of Phare.

Measuring Sustainable development: Achievements and Challenges Enrico Giovannini OECD Chief Statistician June 2005.

A project implemented by the HTSPE consortium This project is funded by the European Union SECURITY AND CITIZENSHIP RIGHT AND CITIZENSHIP

E u r o p e a n C o m m i s s i o nCommunity Research Global Change and Ecosystems EU environmental research : Part B Policy objectives  Lisbon strategy.

Needs for changes and adjusting to them in the management of statistical systems Panel discussion Prospects and Risks for the Future: How to manage uncertainties.

1 EUROPEAN INNOVATION POLICY: Innovation policy: updating the Union’s approach in the context of the Lisbon strategy Thursday, 9 October 2003 Sofia, Bulgaria.

Enterprise Directorate General European Commission Kurt König Head of Unit “Communication and Awareness” Innovation Directorate

ESPON Workshop at the Open Days 2012 “Creating Results informed by Territorial Evidence” Brussels, 10 October 2012 Introduction to ESPON Piera Petruzzi,

Evaluating Research Dynamics Using Network Analysis (in the context of EU funded R&D) Frank Cunningham DG Information Society and Media European Commission.

Territorial impacts of globalization on European Regions Van Hamme Gilles IGEAT-ULB Internal meeting May 2010.

1 Framework Programme 7 Overview. 2 The Programmes within FP7 IDEAS European Research Counsel ERC PEOPLE Marie Curie Measures Initial Training Life-long.

DIME – Dynamics of Institutions and Markets in Europe Network of Excellence in Priority 7, area 1.1, §1.1.2: “ Knowledge dynamics and economic development.

Richard Escritt, Director – Coordination of Community Actions DG Research, European Commission “The development of the ERA: Experiences from FP6 and reflections.

Social Sciences and Humanities in Europe: New Challenges, New Opportunities “The influence of the Framework Programmes in Social Sciences and Humanities.

European Topic Centre on Sustainable Consumption and Production (ETC/SCP) Lars Fogh Mortensen, Head of Group Sustainable Consumption and Production.

Commitment 9: Set out EIT strategic agenda

I3U Commitment 27 “A – Public Sector Innovation Scoreboard B – Research Programme on Public Sector and Social Innovation“ Venue: Vienna, I3U Project Meeting.

Improving the Education of Teachers and Trainers

Izolda Bulvinaite, European Commission ,DG MARE, E1

The ERA.Net instrument Aims and benefits

The challenge of European Research

…and still actual for a post-2010 strategy!

Culture Statistics: policy needs

Presentation transcript:

Benchmarking Industry – Science Relationships Based on the OECD report, March 2002 Presented by: Inês Costa Vanessa Figueiredo

Introduction This report is a two year OECD project carried out under the guidance of the OECD’s Committee for Scientific and Technology Policy and Working Party on Technology and Innovation Policy; Report Goals  Analyses the changing role of industry-science relationships (ISR) in national innovation systems.  Proposes a conceptual framework for assessment of ISR.  Presents indicators on international differences in ISR configuration and intensity.  Identifies good practices for ISR improvement.  Case studies

Industry – Science Relationships The changing role Source: OECD

Benchmarking ISRs – Why? How? Increasing Importance of “Knowledge” in Innovation and Competition; Perceived Gap between Scientific Excellence and Industrial Competitiveness in Europe; Lack in Commercializing in Knowledge Potential at Science; Attempts to achieve greater degree of co-ordination and cohesion between national research and innovation policies; Comparing the relative efficiency of ISR in meeting the various stakeholders needs and to relate differences in performance to observable characteristics of IS links (policy focused) Nature and relative importance of channels interactions; Incentive structures; Institutional arrangements Dimensions of IS links characterization /evaluation

Availability of Benchmarking Indicators Source: OECD Benchmarking requires indicators, but the availability is still quite poor. Statistics must be used with care, because similar concepts may mean different things in different institutional scenarios.

Indicators of ISRs in selected countries Source: OECD

Case studies: France and U.K. Benchmarking ProcessComparative ISR indicators Source: OECD European Commission

Case studies: France and U.K. Policy Objectives and Instruments Source: OECD Developing a Benchmarking culture Comparison between ISRs in France and the United Kingdom showed that different combinations of actions can be used to build integrated policy instruments. So, it is important to promote a benchmarking culture among all stakeholders. Developing Benchmarking indicators Existing indicators: non suited for in dept international comparisons and not sufficient to inform a policy- oriented discussion. CIS contribution

Policy Conclusions Giving greater priority to basic and long term mission oriented research in government S&T programmers; Ensuring appropriate frameworks for intellectual property rights; Matching supply and demand for scientific knowledge; Improving the governance of universities and public laboratories; Safeguarding public knowledge; Promoting the participation of smaller firms; Attracting, retaining and mobilizing human resources; Improving the evaluation of research; Responding to Globalization; Building on existing innovative networks and clusters;

Questions for the masses… Isn’t there a need for a framework assessment of indicators on the subject, concerning all EU countries (with input)? Isn’t it a risky move to apply benchmarked indicators regardless of country perspective/framework? The previous question can not be applied also for the derivative policy conclusions of the report? Isn’t there a need for a in dept study of Portugal’s case?