Long Beach School District Stakeholder Survey Results Results from 2013-2014 and 2014-2015 Parent, Student, and Staff Surveys.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
What is District Wide Accreditation? Ensure Desired Results Improve Teaching & Learning Foster a Culture of Improvement A powerful systems approach to.
What is District Wide Accreditation?
AdvancED District Accreditation Standards Assessment Report
Strategic Visioning Process Pleasant Valley District #62
Chad Allison May 2013  1-2 Formal Classroom Evaluations  Drop-in Visits.
Head of Learning: Job description
Paulding County School District Stakeholder’s Meeting
VISION To become a model for excellence in education Action Plans VISION To become a model for excellence in education on the local, state, national,
Accreditation Process Overview Presented By: The Saint John Vianney Accreditation Team Chris Gordon Pam Pyzyk Courtney Albright Dan Demeter Gloria Goss.
Support Professionals Evaluation Model Webinar Spring 2013.
Tennessee Instructional Leadership Standards and Administrator Evaluation
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS LEADERSHIP PROFILE REPORT March 19, 2015.
System Accreditation. An international institution that brings together three of the largest U.S.-based accreditation agencies: Southern Association of.
MARY BETH GEORGE, USD 305 PBIS DISTRICT COORDINATOR USD #305 PBIS Evaluation.
External Review Exit Report Midvale School District #433> December 3-4, 2014.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
NAUGATUCK HIGH SCHOOL STRATEGIC PLAN Presentation to Board of Education November 13, 2014 A collaborative effort between teachers, students, and administrators.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Bibb County Schools Standard 1: Vision and Purpose Standard: The system establishes and communicates a shared purpose and direction for improving.
Horizon Middle School June 2013 Balanced Scorecard In a safe, collaborative environment we provide educational opportunities that empower all students.
Coffee County School System Sept /Oct Coffee County Vision Project: “Charting Our Future”
Ensure All Students are Prepared for Success District and Schools’ SACS Accreditation Plans.
PAULDING COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT AdvancED EXTERNAL REVIEW REPORT.
Pontotoc City School District. Pontotoc City School District believes LEARNING is a priority, a need, and a desire. To be successful, we must nurture.
Title I Parent Meeting at Back-to-School Night Tri-Community Elementary School September 2, 2015.
AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Polk Pre-Collegiate Academy April 16– 17, 2014.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
External Review Exit Report Anderson School District 4 November , 2014.
AdvancED District Accreditation Standards Assessment Report TUSCALOOSA COUNTY SCHOOLS Where Students Learn, Grow, and Achieve.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Making Plans for the Future April 29, 2013 Brenda M. Tanner, Ed.D.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
Accreditation (AdvancED) STANDARD #1: PURPOSE AND DIRECTION Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna Boruch, Coordinator, School Improvement.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education.
AdvancEd Standards and Indicators November 19, 2012 Survey results.
Sailing To District Accreditation External Review: October 6-9, 2013… but the journey begins now!
SELF-ASSESSMENT SURVEY: TRADEWINDS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
October 20 th, Beliefs and Expectations for Site Council Seek and listen to the insights of all stakeholder perspectives and groups. Deal with issues.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Accreditation (AdvancED) STANDARD #2: GOVERNANCE & LEADERSHIP
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
School Improvement Plan & Accreditation
August 2, Welcome Who is the TSD Continuous Improvement Team ? What is the work of the TSD Continuous Improvement Team? What is.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Office of Service Quality
Accreditation (AdvancED) STANDARD #4: RESOURCES & SUPPORT SYSTEMS
Office of Service Quality
MAPLE VALLEY PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISTRICT PD January 18, 2016.
External Review Exit Report Towns County School System October 4-7, 2015.
All Surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart above (and on subsequent pages)
School Improvement Needs Assessment – © Iowa Association of School Boards Assessment Conducted by the Iowa Association of School Boards.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
External Review Report Westminster Public Schools April 24-27, 2016.
ADVANCED (SACS) SYSTEM SUMMARY FY15. STANDARD ONE INDICATORS 1.1-The system engages in a systematic, inclusive and comprehensive process to review, revise.
Prince William County Public Schools Strategic Plan “Providing a World-Class Education” Superintendent’s Advisory Council on Instruction November 14, 2013.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
Standard 1 Purpose and Direction
AdvancED Timeline Due Date AdvancED Accreditation Milestones
Accreditation External Review
Lake Sybelia Elementary
DISTRICT ACCREDITATION QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW
February 21-22, 2018.
Troy School District External Review Exit Report April 21-24, 2013.
Advanc-ed Accreditation standards
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
Presentation transcript:

Long Beach School District Stakeholder Survey Results Results from and Parent, Student, and Staff Surveys

Stakeholder Surveys  During the Fall-Spring Semesters of the school year, students, parents, and staff participated in the AdvancED Stakeholder Surveys online. They were invited to participate at home, and laptops were provided at each school site to give everyone an additional way to participate in the surveys. Letters were sent home and the surveys were also posted on each school and the district front page website with links to the surveys.  Throughout the month of August, 2014, students, parents, and staff participated in the AdvancED Stakeholder Surveys online. They were invited to participate at home, and laptops were provided at each school site to give everyone an additional way to participate in the surveys. Letters were sent home and the surveys were also posted on each school and the district front page website with links to the surveys.

Participation Rates:  In both stakeholder surveys, in each school, we had a minimum of the following participation rates:  Parent Surveys 20%  Student Surveys 40%  Staff Surveys 60%

Areas of Highest Level of Satisfaction  Overall Indicator 4.3 was rated the highest on the Parent, Staff, and Middle/High School Student Surveys. Indicator 4.3 states: The system maintains facilities, services and equipment to provide a safe, clean and healthy environment for all students and staff.

Indicators with High Rankings  Indicator 1.1 (Early Elementary and Elementary Student Surveys) “The system engages in a systematic, inclusive and comprehensive process to review, revise and communicate a system-wide purpose for student success.  Indicator 1.2 (Parent and Staff Surveys) “The system ensures that each school engages in a systematic, inclusive and comprehensive process to review, revise and communicate a school purpose for student success.”  Indicator 1.3 (Parent Survey) “The school leadership and staff at all levels of the system commit to a culture that is based on shared values and beliefs about teaching and learning and supports challenging, equitable educational programs and learning experiences for all students that include achievement of learning, thinking and life skills.”

Indicators with High Rankings  Indicator 2.1 (Staff Surveys) “The governing body establishes policies and support practices that ensure effective administration of the system and its schools.”  2.4 (Early Elementary Surveys) “Leadership and staff at all levels of the system foster a culture consistent with the system’s purpose and direction.”

Indicators with High Rankings  3.4 (Elementary Student Surveys) “System and school leaders monitor and support the improvement of instructional practices of teachers to ensure student success.”  3.8 (Early Elementary Student Surveys) “The system and all of its schools engage families in meaningful ways in their children’s education and keep them informed of their children’s learning progress.”

Indicators with High Rankings  4.1 (Middle/High School Student Surveys) “The system engages in a systematic process to recruit, employ and retain a sufficient number of qualified professional and support staff to fulfill their roles and responsibilities and support the purpose and direction of the system, individual schools and educational programs.”  4.3 (Parent, Staff, Middle/High School Student Surveys) Highest ranked indicator “The system maintains facilities, services and equipment to provide a safe, clean and healthy environment for all students and staff.”  4.4 (Early Elementary and Elementary Student Surveys) “The system demonstrates strategic resource management that includes long- range planning in support of the purpose and direction of the system.”

Indicators with High Rankings  5.4 (Middle/High School Students) “The school system engages in a continuous process to determine verifiable improvement in student learning, including readiness for and success at the next level.”

Areas with the Lowest Level of Satisfaction  Indicator 2.2 was the only score drop from the to Parent Surveys “The governing body operates responsibly and functions effectively.”  Indicator 4.5 was the only score drop from the to Early Elementary Student Surveys “The system provides, coordinates and evaluates the effectiveness of information resources and related personnel to support educational programs throughout the system.”  Indicator 3.2 was the only score drop from the to Elementary Student Surveys “Curriculum, instruction and assessment throughout the system are monitored and adjusted systematically in response to data from multiple assessments of student learning and an examination of professional practice.” There were no drops in any indicator scores on the Staff or Middle/High School Surveys

Implications of Stakeholder Perceptions  In comparing the data from the stakeholder survey responses to the stakeholder responses, there were no areas showing a trend of decreasing stakeholder satisfaction. In fact, almost every indicator saw an increase in stakeholder satisfaction. The implications are that parents, students, and staff overall are satisfied with all the indicators listed under each standard for school success.

Score Summaries of Stakeholder Surveys and Survey: Surveys Completed: Score: Surveys Completed Score: Parent Staff **Early Elementary Student **Elementary Student Middle/High Student1, **Early Elementary and Elementary Student Scores are based on a 3 point scale while the other surveys are based on a 5 point scale.