New Elementary School Project Overview of Dept. of Ed Role  Project Review/Approval Cycle Project applications submitted to DOE – June 2004 DOE construction.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Planning and Development Committee West Corridor Update May 10, 2007.

Advertisements

Our Turn To Change The Future! Buckeye Locals 2009 Building Project Spring 2009.

Status Report on Administrative Response to December 11, 2006 Alleghany Co. School Board Resolution on Alleghany High School Presented by Dr. Robert P.

CRI- Common Review Initiative Reducing Lender Review Redundancy.

Critical Approval Commissioner/ State Board of Education Commissioner/ State Board of Education Concept Conference s Concept Review Review and Approval.

1 The K-12 Options Initiative A presentation to the Board of Education of the Oakland Unified School District Presented by Noah Bookman, Manager of Student.

Public Meeting to Review Proposed Four Seasons Agreement Between QAC Commissioners and K. Hovnanian September 17, :00 pm Kent Island High School.

North Saanich Middle School North Saanich Middle School Agenda Background from Previous Meeting History of Project Replacement or Upgrade School Site.

Asheville Regional Airport/City of Asheville Fire Station Feasibility Study Public Safety Committee June 25, 2012.

From US 17 to SR 11 and SR 11 to Cone Road FPID No

The Big Picture Brand-new library / media center building Brand-new kinder classroom building Brand-new kinder playground and covered pavilion Renovated.

WESTERN LOUDOUN SCHOOLS: ALTERNATE SITES May 26, 2009 Schoene/Engle McDonough Assemblage.

Bond Construction Update Citizen’s Oversight Committee Long Beach Community College District October 2008 EDUCATE  ENGAGE  EMPOWER 1.

SADDLEBACK VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET PLANNING.

I.The Building/Remodeling/ Renovating Project NSSED North Shore Academy (NSA) and Administration Office Building/Remodeling/Renovating Project.

What is a master plan? Creates the long-term vision for the University’s land and physical resources. Lays foundation for development plan, but is not.

Kittery Schools Reconfiguration Plan Update May 26, 2009.

Environmental Justice (EJ) & Community-Based Transportation Planning (CBTP) Grant Programs California Department of Transportation District 3 January 25,

June 29, Discuss preliminary vision for St. Vincent’s Open lines of communication Share information as previously committed Seeking your input in.

Neighborhood Preservation and Revitalization Division Board of County Commissioners March 10, Neighborhood Improvement Plan.

SAISD Federal Programs Department. Stage 1 of the Organization and Development Process Form the Planning Team 1 2.

1 Status Report on H. Ligarde Elementary School Parking Lot Facility Construction Department August 16, 2002.

Highway 169 Phase 2 (Part 2) – Cross Range Expressway April 30, 2014 Public Information Meeting Taconite Community Center.

US 1 COLLEGE PARK – SEGMENT 1 FROM COLLEGE AVE/REGENTS DRIVE TO MD 193 (UNIVERSITY BLVD) Presentation to College Park City Council August 5,

MSAD # PROPOSED BUDGET. MSAD #11 District Goals The budget was developed to ensure implementation of the district goals and to prepare students.

Long Range Facility Planning assisted by Silver Falls School District.

District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority Fort Stanton (CSO 006) Separation Project - Status and Coordination Update - for the Environmental Quality.

LOCKPORT CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT Washington Hunt Elementary School Michelle T. Bradley Superintendent of Schools Deborah Coder Assistant Superintendent for.

Capital Improvement Program. During the Annual Strategic Action Plan (SAP) evaluation, long-term needs and priorities are identified by City Council Capital.

Declining Enrollment Study September 2, Enrollment 1970 to 2014.

Missoula County Public Schools Overview of Planning January 2014.

BOND REFERENDUM PRESENTATION EASTCHESTER SCHOOL DISTRICT Dr. Walter Moran Superintendent of Schools.

Torrance Unified School District Bond Measure Y Bond Measure Z Quarterly Construction Update September 30, 2009.

Michigan Department of Education Office of Field Services Consolidated Application Schedule.

August 13, 2014 Information Technologies & Resources.

Lincoln Consolidated Schools Citizens Steering Committee Bond Issue Final Recommendation Board of Education Meeting October 18, :00 p.m.

Parks and Recreation Division December 15, 2009 PARK LAND ACQUISITION.

LOCAL OPTION SALES TAX FOR EDUCATION APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES SEPTEMBER 29, 2015.

DRAFT Inman Middle School Community Conversation February 19, 2015.

Elevating the Quality of Life in the District LAFAYETTE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL MODERNIZATION PROJECT UPDATE DECEMBER 15, 2015.

SACRED SPACES UPDATE November 20, /20/111.

Presentation to Board of Education 1 August 2014 Facilities Capital Plan Board of Education August 4, 2014 Stakeholder Engagement and Communications Services.

Presented by Ryan Garrison, Director of Technology Smart Schools Bond Act HUNT Engineers, Architects, Land Surveyors, P.C. Investment Plan Preliminary.

Building Project Community Meeting Fieldcrest High School February 18, :30 pm.

MENTAL HEALTH CLINIC Siting Process and Analysis.

MASON PUBLIC SCHOOLS Bond Committee Meeting #1 August 9, 2016.

SCHOOL #1 BALLOT QUESTION AND PROPOSAL Fall, 2016.

Presentation Overview

Four Winds Condominium Association August 2, 2017

UPDATE: 8/8/2011 Batavia City School District

Consolidated Bus Stops

VCSD Capital Project Community Forum

School #1 Ballot Question and Proposal

The Oakton Condominium Association September 12, 2017

Concept Plan for Proposed Park Near Hopewell School

I-66 Outside the Beltway Design Public Hearing Meetings November 13, 14 & Susan Shaw, P.E., Megaprojects Director Virginia Department of.

Urban Land Bank Demonstration Program

Consolidated Bus Stops

Consolidated Bus Stops

MSAD # PROPOSED BUDGET.

Village of Sherwood Stumpf Subdivision Paving and Drainage Improvements November 7, 2018.

Board Meeting Presentation February 20, 2018

Meadow Lake Boulevard Street Extension Project

Acquisition Details: Owners: James E Joyce Sr. Revocable Intervivos Trust and Gloria A Joyce Revocable Intervivos Trust Location: Section 27, Town of.

MSBA Feasibility Funding

Manilla Low Level Crossing Project

SSUSD Richmond Elementary Status to Board of Education May 2, 2019

Community Forum March 18, 2019.

Consolidated Bus Stops

Presentation transcript:

New Elementary School Project Overview of Dept. of Ed Role  Project Review/Approval Cycle Project applications submitted to DOE – June 2004 DOE construction team reviews all applications Review includes site visits/interviews Approval based on identified needs

New Elementary School Project FALMOUTH PROJECT SUBMISSIONS (66 school projects submitted State-wide)  Plummer-Motz School – State Rating #34  Middle School – State Rating # 65  Lunt School – State Rating #19 Schools ranked #1-17 receive initial funding

New Elementary School Project On The List  Revised DOE List in July 2006 – Additional Projects Approved (gets #19 on list for State funding)  Lunt Project (K-2 School)

New Elementary School Project DOE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS PROTOCOL  Build New vs. Renovation of Existing  Existing Site and Space Analysis/Adjacent Districts Analysis  Site Selection and Approval  Education Specifications  Building Concept and Design Approval  September 2008 referendum target

New Elementary School Project BUILD NEW vs. RENOVATE/ADDITION  Build New Based on Cost Estimate Comparisons  Project Scope Increased to Solve Elementary School Issues Pre-K to 5  Project Scope and Build New Approved by DOE

New Elementary School Project SITE SEARCH AND SELECTION  Current Site Analysis  New Site Search (Town-owned and Private Parcels)

New Elementary School Project CURRENT SITE (Lunt/PM)  Site development costs (ledge/slopes/storm water drainage)  Traffic issues/on-site congestion/proximity to roads  Student relocation/disruption/cost  Trail system disruption (requires re-location in kind per Federal grant)  Cost-benefit analysis (relocation $$ and educational disruption)  DOE not convinced best site for investment of State $$

New Elementary School Project NEW SITE SEARCH (considerations)  Availability  Purchasing and Development Costs  Suitability  Location/Sprawl Concerns  Need DOE “buy in”

New Elementary School Project Non-Town owned sites  Identified 13 parcels for further investigation (met minimum search criteria)  Advertised publicly for available land  Contacted identified parcel owners directly  Two sites available for sale, additional site would consider  Available parcels investigated, but eliminated from further consideration based on necessary site criteria guidelines (road access/shape of site/proximity to other schools)

New Elementary School Project Town Sites  All Town parcels reviewed/considered  Only HS/MS campus and Supt. Office parcel (Central Campus) met search criteria (size and shape, access to utilities & water, location, topography, etc.) and availability

New Elementary School Project CENTRAL CAMPUS (HS/MS Location)  Town-owned property (no site acquisition cost)  Efficiencies gained (education/operations)  Addresses existing traffic/safety concerns (MS/Woodville Rd.)  No student relocation issues during construction  DOE supportive of further investigation (estimate site development costs)

New Elementary School Project CONCERNS BEING ADDRESSED  Traffic (road improvements/student drop- off improvements/turning lanes/on-site road flow)  Fields (replacement plan/no loss of fields)  Grade K-12 on same campus (benefit for educational programming and itinerant staff).

New Elementary School Project CENTRAL CAMPUS (Superintendent’s Location)  Town-owned property (may complicate property transfer of RSU consolidation plan)  Efficiencies gained (more limited than MS/HS site)  Addresses existing traffic/safety concerns (MS/Woodville Rd.) but to lesser extent than MS/HS site design  No student relocation issues during construction  DOE supportive of further investigation (estimate site development costs)

New Elementary School Project CONCERNS REMAINING (Superintendent’s Site)  Traffic (design improvements more limited)  Efficiencies not maximized (2 campuses)  Proximity to Woodlands neighborhood  Management of stormwater (retention/treatment)  Grade K-12 on same campus (youngest students needing to access main campus via crossing road)  Wetlands impact  Limited parking  “Force fit” design

New Elementary School Project Ongoing Work of Committee/Architect/DOE  Site Assessment – Comparative Costs HS/MS Campus Site Superintendent’s Site  Traffic/Fields  Educational Program Specifications

New Elementary School Project TIMELINE/NEXT STEPS  Public Forum #4 (Straw Poll for Site Approval – March 5th, FHS at 7 PM)  Educational Specifications – Spring ‘08  Building Concept Design – Summer ‘08  Referendum (Sept 2008)  Effort to stay on timeline for Fall 2011 occupancy

New Elementary School Project Keeping in Touch With the Process  Building Committee communication s (sign on to School Board list serve at  School Construction information link at above website  Local newspaper articles/agendas  Principal notes  Local TV (agendas/live meeting broadcasts)