1. SSUSD Richmond Elementary Status to Board of Education May 2, 2019

2. Construction Management Financial Capabilities
Agenda
Problem / COA’s
Goals / Assumptions
Facility Condition
Construction Management
Financial Capabilities
Siting Options / Considerations

3. Goals / Assumptions Problem / COA’s Goals: Assumptions:
Provide modern facilities that enhance the learning environment
Create synergy between SSUSD operations and services
Maximize money available for new construction
Remain cognizant of NAWSCL’s future plans
Site new school on Federal Property but outside the perimeter fence
Assumptions:
New construction is more cost effective than renovation/modernization
Increased capacity will be based on Navy mission data
Need to satisfy Federal and State site selection criteria
Leverage Year SSUSD Facilities Master Plan (complete July 2019)

4. Facility Condition Problem / COA’s
Three Condition Assessments of Richmond Elementary
Assessment 1:
17 December 2010
Current Condition Index: 65% Q-3 Rating
Future Condition Index: 56% Q-4 Rating
Assessment 2:
23 February 2018
Current Condition Index: 56% Q-4 Rating
Future Condition Index: 42% Q-4 Rating
Cooperative Strategies Assessment:
15 Jan 2019
Facility Condition Index: 69.8%
Based on the current physical condition of Richmond Elementary, it is
recommended that SSUSD consider new construction vs modernization
FCI is defined as the ratio of current year required renewal cost to current building replacement value. Building condition is often defined in terms of the FCI as follows:(Good) 0 to 5 percent FCI,(Fair) 5 to 10 percent FCI (Poor) 10 to 30 percent FCI, (Critical) greater than 30 percent FCI. 

5. Construction Management
Problem / COA’s
Plan to utilize internal Director of Construction
Plan to utilize Owners Representative for Cost, Schedule,and Configuration Management
District has considered several construction management options
Construction Management At-Risk
Lease/Leaseback
Design/Bid/Build

6. Construction Management
Problem / COA’s
District is proposing Construction Management at-Risk
Legal counsel recommendation
Recommended by various experts in the field
Potential of eliminating overruns due to change orders
Pre-construction services available
Single payment to contractor
CM provides contractor's perspective during design
CM assists in the value engineering
CM performs quality control to reduce common design problems

7. Construction Management
Problem / COA’s
Construction Management over Prime
Recently completed modernization and new construction utilizing this
method
Perceived loss of district control and cost overruns
Do not plan to use this method at this time
Design/Bid/Build
Requires extensive management by District
District must accept Low Bidder
High probability of cost overruns (no collaboration)
Lease/Leaseback
Not supported by OEA

8. Financial Capabilities
Problem / COA’s
SSUSD Intends to Apply for Project Planning and Construction Grants
Project Planning Grant
SSUSD currently has $900K available for construction
SSUSD expects to receive $988K Office of Public School Construction (OPSC)
Funding for BHS Project (OEA Funded) in May 2019
SSUSD can meet 20% match for up to $8M DoD Planning Grant
Construction Grant
SSUSD expects to receive $12M OPSC Funding for MMS/BHS Projects in 2021
SSUSD could meet 20% match for up to $60M DoD Construction Grant

9. Six Potential Sites Identified
Siting Options
Six Potential Sites Identified
Current Richmond Site
Old Murray Middle School (MMS) Site
New Richmond Road Site
W of New MMS Site
N of New MMS Site
Vieweg Site

10. Potential Siting Options for a New Richmond Elementary1 2 6 5 4 3
Current Richmond Site
Old MMS Site
New Richmond Road Site
W of New MMS
N of New MMS
Vieweg Site
Vieweg Elem
Murray MS
Burroughs HS
Pierce Elem

11. Site Considerations Current Richmond Site
Funding required for Richmond demolition
Inside the Installation’s perimeter fence
Have installation access issues during construction
Addresses SSUSD zoning concerns/complications
Would have to house students during construction
Environmental remediation costs potential
Old Murray Middle School Site
Funding required for Richmond and MMS demolition
Addresses SSUSD Zoning Concerns / Complications

12. Site Considerations New Richmond Road Site
Money allocated for Richmond Demo only
Undisturbed land…may require full Environmental Impact Study*
Outside the Installation’s perimeter fence
Improves issues associated with installation access during construction
SSUSD zoning concerns/complications
2 elementary schools in proximity
West of New Murray Middle School Site
Some environmental remediation costs
Outside the installation’s perimeter fence
Addresses SSUSD zoning concerns/complications
Small footprint – would not be enough space
*All other sites have

13. Site Considerations
North of New Murray Middle School Site (South of Vieweg)
Money allocated for Richmond Demo only
High environmental remediation cost potential
Relocate installation perimeter fence
Outside the installation perimeter
Addresses SSUSD zoning concerns/complications
Vieweg Site
Money allocated for Richmond and Vieweg demolition
Outside the installation’s perimeter fence
Would have to relocate central kitchen
Would have to relocate SSUSD Adult School
Would have to relocate Curriculum & Instruction Department
Lose potential swing space for future facilities investments

14. Other Comments Problem / COA’s
SSUSD is well positioned for new school construction
Recent completion of a new middle school
Recent construction under DoD and State Regulatory Agencies
Recent contracts with architecture firms, construction management
firms, and various contractors
FCI is defined as the ratio of current year required renewal cost to current building replacement value. Building condition is often defined in terms of the FCI as follows:(Good) 0 to 5 percent FCI,(Fair) 5 to 10 percent FCI (Poor) 10 to 30 percent FCI, (Critical) greater than 30 percent FCI. 

15. Questions / Discussion