Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction  Federal law requires DPI to monitor programming and implementation of the ESEA requirements, Title specific.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Procedures for ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Effective July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2014 Monitoring For Results.
Advertisements

NCLB Consolidated Monitoring Integrated Approach to Title III Monitoring.
Private Non Profit Wild West Texas YSLETA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT El Paso, Texas Federal and State Programs 2013.
PACTS Online Tools Adriana Golumbeanu, Loretta Brown and Randall Richardson Office of Federal Programs.
Coordinating Equitable Services for Private Schools Christine T. Miller Red Clay Consolidated School District December 7, 2010 DSU – Martin Luther King.
NCLB Monitoring NCLB/ESEA Cycle Legal Requirement: EDGAR Part 80.40(a)—monitor subgrant activities to assure compliance with applicable.
Title I A Requirements under NCLB Public Law Office of Federal Programs September 2014 Oklahoma State Department of Education.
An Introduction To Special Education Produced by WSPEI Funded by the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Title III Program and Funding Michele Anberg-Espinosa Bilingual/Migrant.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
Wisconsin Statewide Title I Network CESA #1 and the Wisconsin DPI
1 Monitoring Review: What Every New Coordinator Should Know Victoria Rankin and Greta Colombi, NDTAC.
LEA Federal Program Monitoring/Review Presented by: Kelly Iorfida and Norma Hull Division of Federal Programs Department of Education.
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) & ESEA Consolidated Application April 2009 — Part 2 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
Verification Visit by the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) September 27-29, 2010.
Subrecipient Monitoring FY15 of Education Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Federal Programs Federal Programs Office of Titles I, II, III,
ESEA Title II-A Non-public Schools Equitable Services Repayment to Participating Schools Office of Consolidated Planning & MonitoringOffice of Consolidated.
Title I, Part A Fiscal Requirements for Comparability FY Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Title I, IIA, VI, & X December 2012.
Virginia Department of Education Coordinators’ Academy July 22 – July 24, 2015.
OFFICE OF FIELD SERVICES SPRING PLANNING WORKSHOP 2012.
Speed Bumps on the Fiduciary Road Title I Administrative Meeting Timonium Maryland April 14, 2010 Cvieta Jovanovich.
Fall 2012 LEP Coordinator Meeting Helga Fasciano Section Chief, K-12 Programs Federal Update.
Successful Program Implementation: Meeting Compliance Statutes Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Title.
TITLE I COMPARABILITY Determinations & Reporting Title I Technical Assistance Session School Improvement Grant Programs October 6, 2011.
ESEA APPLICATION TRAINING 2013 Equitable Participation Rules for Title I Private School Students Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction 1.
A Catalyst for Program Improvement Federal Monitoring: Added Value.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Bilingual Coordinators Network September 16, 2010 Sacramento,
1 NCLB Title Program Monitoring NCLB Title Program Monitoring Regional Training SPRING 2006.
Statewide System of Support The Ohio Story: Federal Response.
A District Coordinator’s Guide WHAT TO EXPECT DURING CONSOLIDATED MONITORING David Millanti Audit and Compliance Branch Manager Kentucky Department of.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
NCLB Monitoring September 19, 2012 Webinar.
Procedures for ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Effective July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2014 Monitoring For Results Reviewed & Revised with COP April 2011.
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
What to Expect When You Are Expecting Consolidated Monitoring: Every Step of the Way Office of Federal Programs Oklahoma State Department of Education.
ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Office of Federal Programs December 10, 2013.
Providing Equitable Services to Non-Public Schools Title I, II, and III.
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 6 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
Federal Programs and the ESEA Flexibility Waiver Titles I, II, VI and X.
On Site Review Process. 2 Overview of On Site Review Materials and Process.
1 New Coordinator Orientation Lauren Amos, Katie Deal, and Liann Seiter.
Title I, Part A COMPARABILITY. What is the purpose of Comparability? To ensure that participating Title I schools receive the same level of services from.
Title I, Part A Preparing for Federal Program Monitoring Lynn Sodat Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability.
South Hunterdon Regional School District Consolidated Monitoring Report (CMR) Presentation to the SHRSD Board of Education on October 26, 2015 Audit from.
Subrecipient Monitoring FY14 Oklahoma State Department of Education Federal Programs Office of Titles I, II, III, VI and X.
1.  Understand ESEA and the purpose of Title I, Part A Programs and Services  Understand how to communicate and plan with private schools  Understand.
1 Restructuring Webinar Dr. Zollie Stevenson, Jr., Ph.D. Director Student Achievement and School Accountability Programs Office of Elementary and Secondary.
Title I Equitable Services to Non-public Schools.
Title I and Title II Funds Private School Expenditures.
TITLE IIA, IMPROVING TEACHER QUALITY FEDERAL PROGRAM MONITORING AND SUPPORT DIVISION FALL PANC Conference October 4, 2015.
Preparing for Title IIA Monitoring Review (FY15) November 9, 2015 Deborah Walker Meagan Steiner David LeBlanc.
A Principal’s Guide to Title I, Part A and LAP Requirements
ESSA Updates: Non-public / Private Schools Equitable Services
Excess Costs IDEA-B Requirement
ESEA Consolidated Pre-Monitoring Meeting
MEGA Conference Mobile, AL July 12, 2016
Excess Costs IDEA-B Requirement
Equitable Services Under ESSA
Kim Miller Oregon Department of Education
ESEA Consolidated Monitoring
Title I Program Monitoring: Common Findings from FY18
Equitable Services to Eligible Non-Public Schools
FY19 Federal Grant Monitoring: Titles I, II, IV
Preparing for Title IIA Monitoring Review (FY15)
Preparing for Federal Program Monitoring Title I, Part D, Subpart 2
ESL/Title III Consultants
Title I, Part A Preparing for Federal Program Monitoring
Preparing for Federal Program Monitoring Title I, Part D, Subpart 1
FY20 Consolidated Grant Application - Overview
Presentation transcript:

Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction

 Federal law requires DPI to monitor programming and implementation of the ESEA requirements, Title specific requirements and fiduciary requirements.  ESEA consolidated monitoring process includes  Title I-A, Title I-C, Title I-D, Title II-A and Title III-A

 DPI uses the ESEA application to monitor all LEAs at a base level. Examples include:  Annual private school consultation within the district via the private school affirmation forms uploaded to the application  Ranking schools for Title I –A based on poverty data  Using funds for allowable costs  Each year DPI selects LEAs to participate in a more in-depth, on-site monitoring process.

 Pilot year for new process  LEAs with large ESEA allocations that have not been monitored in several years (or ever); and  New LEAs

 Letter ( ) from Mike Thompson  Guidance document  guidance.pdf guidance.pdf  ESEA Consolidated and Title Specific Requirements  Requirement  Required documentation  Guiding questions

 DPI Google Docs Repository

 LEAs will have from the time a visit is scheduled up to four weeks prior to the visit to upload documentation.  DPI staff will review the materials prior to the on-site visit.

 DPI will address any questions that were unanswered from the initial document collection.  Not all guiding questions in the guidance document will be asked.  DPI staff is always interested to hear about promising practices which can be shared with other LEAs.

 Preliminary findings will be presented at the conclusion of the on-site visit.  A written report will be sent to the LEA within six weeks after the visit. The report may include: ▪ Corrective Action; ▪ Recommendations; and/or ▪ Commendations regarding programming.