Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee March 14, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Radio Maria World. 2 Postazioni Transmitter locations.
Advertisements

Números.
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
Meaningful Use and Health Information Exchange
SKELETAL QUIZ 3.
PDAs Accept Context-Free Languages
Reflection nurulquran.com.
EuroCondens SGB E.
Worksheets.
& dding ubtracting ractions.
Addition and Subtraction Equations
Multiplication X 1 1 x 1 = 1 2 x 1 = 2 3 x 1 = 3 4 x 1 = 4 5 x 1 = 5 6 x 1 = 6 7 x 1 = 7 8 x 1 = 8 9 x 1 = 9 10 x 1 = x 1 = x 1 = 12 X 2 1.
Division ÷ 1 1 ÷ 1 = 1 2 ÷ 1 = 2 3 ÷ 1 = 3 4 ÷ 1 = 4 5 ÷ 1 = 5 6 ÷ 1 = 6 7 ÷ 1 = 7 8 ÷ 1 = 8 9 ÷ 1 = 9 10 ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = 12 ÷ 2 2 ÷ 2 =
1 When you see… Find the zeros You think…. 2 To find the zeros...
EQUS Conference - Brussels, June 16, 2011 Ambros Uchtenhagen, Michael Schaub Minimum Quality Standards in the field of Drug Demand Reduction Parallel Session.
Create an Application Title 1Y - Youth Chapter 5.
Add Governors Discretionary (1G) Grants Chapter 6.
CALENDAR.
CHAPTER 18 The Ankle and Lower Leg
Summative Math Test Algebra (28%) Geometry (29%)
The 5S numbers game..
突破信息检索壁垒 -SciFinder Scholar 介绍
A Fractional Order (Proportional and Derivative) Motion Controller Design for A Class of Second-order Systems Center for Self-Organizing Intelligent.
The basics for simulations
A sample problem. The cash in bank account for J. B. Lindsay Co. at May 31 of the current year indicated a balance of $14, after both the cash receipts.
© 2010 Concept Systems, Inc.1 Concept Mapping Methodology: An Example.
PP Test Review Sections 6-1 to 6-6
TCCI Barometer March “Establishing a reliable tool for monitoring the financial, business and social activity in the Prefecture of Thessaloniki”
Dynamic Access Control the file server, reimagined Presented by Mark on twitter 1 contents copyright 2013 Mark Minasi.
TCCI Barometer March “Establishing a reliable tool for monitoring the financial, business and social activity in the Prefecture of Thessaloniki”
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 7 Modeling Structure with Blocks.
Progressive Aerobic Cardiovascular Endurance Run
Visual Highway Data Select a highway below... NORTH SOUTH Salisbury Southern Maryland Eastern Shore.
MaK_Full ahead loaded 1 Alarm Page Directory (F11)
TCCI Barometer September “Establishing a reliable tool for monitoring the financial, business and social activity in the Prefecture of Thessaloniki”
When you see… Find the zeros You think….
ARRA Meaningful Use Update Mount Auburn Hospital Information Systems Update March 2011.
2011 WINNISQUAM COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=1021.
Before Between After.
2011 FRANKLIN COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=332.
ST/PRM3-EU | | © Robert Bosch GmbH reserves all rights even in the event of industrial property rights. We reserve all rights of disposal such as copying.
2.10% more children born Die 0.2 years sooner Spend 95.53% less money on health care No class divide 60.84% less electricity 84.40% less oil.
Foundation Stage Results CLL (6 or above) 79% 73.5%79.4%86.5% M (6 or above) 91%99%97%99% PSE (6 or above) 96%84%100%91.2%97.3% CLL.
Subtraction: Adding UP
Numeracy Resources for KS2
1 Non Deterministic Automata. 2 Alphabet = Nondeterministic Finite Accepter (NFA)
Static Equilibrium; Elasticity and Fracture
Resistência dos Materiais, 5ª ed.
PSSA Preparation.
& dding ubtracting ractions.
Lial/Hungerford/Holcomb/Mullins: Mathematics with Applications 11e Finite Mathematics with Applications 11e Copyright ©2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
UNDERSTANDING THE ISSUES. 22 HILLSBOROUGH IS A REALLY BIG COUNTY.
Chart Deception Main Source: How to Lie with Charts, by Gerald E. Jones Dr. Michael R. Hyman, NMSU.
1 Non Deterministic Automata. 2 Alphabet = Nondeterministic Finite Accepter (NFA)
Introduction Embedded Universal Tools and Online Features 2.
úkol = A 77 B 72 C 67 D = A 77 B 72 C 67 D 79.
Schutzvermerk nach DIN 34 beachten 05/04/15 Seite 1 Training EPAM and CANopen Basic Solution: Password * * Level 1 Level 2 * Level 3 Password2 IP-Adr.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee June 5, 2013.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee January 14, 2014.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Jason McNamara Technical Director for Health IT.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee December 4, 2013.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Robert Anthony HIT Policy Committee March 7, 2012.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee August 7, 2013.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee July 9, 2013.
Presentation transcript:

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee March 14, 2013

Registration and Payment Data 2

Active Registrations Active Registrations – January

Medicaid Incentive Payments 4 Medicaid Incentive Payments – January 2013 (Both MU and AIU) For final CMS reports, please visit:

EHR Incentive Programs 5 EHR Incentive Programs – January 2013 Totals

6 EHR Incentive Programs – January 2013 Totals EHR Incentive Programs

January – By the Numbers 7

January – By the Numbers 8

January – By the Numbers 9

January – By the Numbers 10

January – By the Numbers Over 73% of all eligible hospitals have received an EHR incentive payment for either MU or AIU Over 73% have made a financial commitment to put an EHR in place Approximately 35% or 1 out of every 3 Medicare EPs are meaningful users of EHRs Approximately 40% -- 2 out of every 5 Medicare and Medicaid EPs have made a financial commitment to an EHR 58% of Medicare EPs receiving incentives are specialists (non primary care) 11

Medicare & Medicaid Payments for February Medicare & Medicaid Payments for February 2013 DRAFT ESTIMATES ONLY

Medicare & Medicaid Payments for February Medicare & Medicaid Payments for February 2013 DRAFT ESTIMATES ONLY

EHR Incentive Programs Attestation Data 14

Providers Included This data-only analysis shows our earliest adopters who have attested, but does not inform us on barriers to attestation. At the time of the analysis 190,260 EPs had attested 190,047 Successfully 213 Unsuccessfully (231 EPs have resubmitted successfully) 2,738 Hospital had attested All successfully 15

Highlights On average all thresholds were greatly exceeded, but every threshold had some providers on the borderline Drug formulary, immunization registries and patient list are the most popular menu objectives for EPs Advance Directives, Clinical Lab Test Results, and Drug Formulary for hospitals Transition of care summary and patient reminders were the least popular menu objectives for EPs Transition of Care and Reportable Lab Results for hospitals Little difference between EP and hospitals Little difference among specialties in performance, but differences in exclusions and deferrals 16

90 Day Performance Data 17

EP 2011 vs Days Core Objective Performance Number of Attestations57,652132,395 CPOE for Medication Orders84.0%81.5% Maintain Problem List96.4%96.8% ePrescribing79.2%83.0% Active Medication List97.1% Medication Allergy List96.4%96.6% Record Demographics90.5%92.2% Record Vital Signs90.2%91.2% Record Smoking Status89.6%91.9% Electronic Copy of Health Information96.3%97.3% Clinical Summaries78.5%80.6%

EP 2011 vs Days Menu Objective Performance Clinical Lab Test Results91.5%93.0% Patient Reminders61.6%62.3% Patient Electronic Access72.8%74.3% Patient-Specific Education Resources49.1%51.2% Medication Reconciliation89.4%90.1% Transition of Care Summary89.0%91.6% Immunization Registries Data Submission37.5%35.5% Syndromic Surveillance Data Submission6.2%6.3%

Hospital 2011, 2012, and 2013, 90 Days, Core Objective Performance Number of Attestations8331, CPOE for Medication Orders86.9%84.2%82.3% Maintain Problem List95.7%94.9%95.5% Active Medication List97.6%97.9%97.6% Medication Allergy List97.9%98.0% Record Demographics97.0%96.2%97.2% Record Vital Signs94.0%92.2%91.2% Record Smoking Status94.9%92.8%93.1% Electronic Copy of Health Information95.0%96.3%93.3% Electronic Copy of Discharge Instructions95.0%95.3%94.8%

Hospital 2011, 2012, and 2013, 90 Days, Menu Objective Performance Advance Directives96.1%95.5%97.0% Clinical Lab Test Results96.1%94.9%95.4% Patient-Specific Education Resources74.1%72.4%72.7% Medication Reconciliation87.5%84.3%87.6% Transition of Care Summary80.2%83.1%79.5% Immunization Registries Data Submission51.9%53.3%64.8% Reportable Lab Results to Public Health Agencies17.6%14.8%6.7% Syndromic Surveillance Data Submission18.7%21.6%19.6%

Returning Providers Performance Data 22

EP 1 st vs. 2 nd year Core Objective Performance Number of Attestations57,65244,087 CPOE for Medication Orders84.0%88.0% Maintain Problem List96.4%97.4% ePrescribing79.2%83.7% Active Medication List97.1%97.8% Medication Allergy List96.4%97.3% Record Demographics90.5%94.2% Record Vital Signs90.2%93.3% Record Smoking Status89.6%93.6% Electronic Copy of Health Information96.3%97.4% Clinical Summaries78.5%84.4%

EP 1 st vs. 2 nd year Menu Objective Performance Clinical Lab Test Results91.5%92.6% Patient Reminders61.6%68.5% Patient Electronic Access72.8%76.6% Patient-Specific Education Resources49.1%61.0% Medication Reconciliation89.4%90.2% Transition of Care Summary89.0%91.1% Immunization Registries Data Submission37.5%41.3% Syndromic Surveillance Data Submission6.2%6.5%

Hospital1 st vs. 2 nd year Core Objective Performance Number of Attestations CPOE for Medication Orders86.9%85.2% Maintain Problem List95.7%95.2% Active Medication List97.6%97.7% Medication Allergy List97.9%97.8% Record Demographics97.0%96.9% Record Vital Signs94.0%92.5% Record Smoking Status94.9%93.6% Electronic Copy of Health Information95.0%96.9% Electronic Copy of Discharge Instructions95.0%94.9%

Hospital1 st vs. 2 nd year Menu Objective Performance Advance Directives96.1%95.8% Clinical Lab Test Results96.1%95.6% Patient-Specific Education Resources74.1%72.3% Medication Reconciliation87.5%84.7% Transition of Care Summary80.2%81.8% Immunization Registries Data Submission51.9%58.2% Reportable Lab Results to Public Health Agencies17.6%13.8% Syndromic Surveillance Data Submission18.7%16.8%

Aggregate Performance Data 27

EP Quality, Safety, Efficiency, and Reduce Health Disparities 28 ObjectivePerformanceExclusionDeferral Problem List 97%N/A Medication List 97%N/A Medication Allergy List 97%N/A Demographics 92%N/A Vital Signs 91%9%N/A Smoking Status 92%0.3%N/A

EP Quality, Safety, Efficiency, and Reduce Health Disparities 29 ObjectivePerformanceExclusionDeferral CPOE 83%19%N/A Electronic prescribing 82%21%N/A Incorporate lab results 93%4%36% Drug-formulary checks N/A15% Patient lists N/A 28% Send reminders to patients 63%0.5%81%

EP Engage Patients and Their Families 30 ObjectivePerformanceExclusionDeferral E – Copy of Health Information 97%70%N/A Office visit summaries 81%2%N/A Patient Education Resources 53%N/A53% Timely electronic access 74%1%66%

EP Improve Care Coordination 31 ObjectivePerformanceExclusionDeferral Medication reconciliation 90%3%54% Summary of care at transitions 91%3%84%

EP Improve Population and Public Health 32 ObjectivePerformance*ExclusionDeferral Immunizations37%44%19% Syndromic Surveillance6%24%70% *Performance is percentage of attesting providers who conducted test

EH Quality, Safety, Efficiency, and Reduce Health Disparities 33 ObjectivePerformanceExclusionDeferral Problem List 95%N/A Medication List 98%N/A Medication Allergy List 98%N/A Demographics 97%N/A Vital Signs 93%N/A Smoking Status 93%0.5%N/A

EH Quality, Safety, Efficiency, and Reduce Health Disparities 34 ObjectivePerformanceExclusionDeferral CPOE 85%N/A Advance directives 96%0.5%10% Incorporate lab results 95%N/A15% Drug-formulary checks N/A 16% Patient lists N/A 41%

EH Engage Patients and Their Families 35 ObjectivePerformanceExclusionDeferral E – copy of health information 96%66%N/A E – copy of discharge Instructions 95%62%N/A Patient education resources 73%N/A60%

EH Improve Care Coordination 36 ObjectivePerformanceDeferral Medication reconciliation85%73% Summary of care at transitions82%92%

EH Improve Population and Public Health ObjectivePerformance*ExclusionDeferral Immunizations55%13%33% Reportable Lab Results15%5%80% Syndromic Surveillance20%3%77% 37 *Performance is percentage of attesting providers who conducted test

For questions, please contact: Robert Anthony Office of E-Health Standards and Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 38