Revised August 2011 Growing Success: Use of “I” and “R”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An Introduction for the School Community
Advertisements

Presented by Hardy Murphy, Ph.D. Superintendent of Schools Evanston/Skokie School District 65 Professional Appraisal System.
___________________________ NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program North Carolina Alternate Assessment Academic Inventory.
___________________________ NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program North Carolina Alternate Assessment Academic Inventory.
August 8, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon Housson, Director Overview of.
1 SESSION 5- RECORDING AND REPORTING IN GRADES R-12 Computer Applications Technology Information Technology.
The SCPS Professional Growth System
REPORT CARDS IMPROVEMENTS GRADES 1–8
Trustee Gough Ward 3 Forum TDSB/Provincial Report Card
Overview for Parents and Guardians Fall 2010
Square Peg and Round Hole… As parents and educators, the change in grading systems requires a fundamental switch in our thinking… 4=A 1=F 2=D 3=B.
Program Planning January 8, Credit Threshold.
SACE Parents Information Slideshow. The South Australian Certificate of Education A qualification awarded to students who successfully complete their.
Year 10 Parents SACE Information Evening. The South Australian Certificate of Education A qualification awarded to students who successfully complete.
Teacher In-Service August, Abraham Lincoln.
Mesa County Valley School District #51 STANDARDS - BASED GRADING AND REPORTING
Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting
Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Changes to Assessing and Reporting Shawn Whyte Assessment Coach.
IMPROVEMENTS IN REPORTING IN GRADES 1–8 Qualitative Descriptors (Part A) OCTOBER 2013.
Assessment, Evaluation, and Reporting
Types of Courses Gr. 9 & 10. Four Types: Open [O] Locally-Developed [L] Applied [P] Academic [D]
Starting the SACE What you need to know. Stage 1 and Stage 2 There are two ‘stages’ of the SACE: Stage 1 is generally completed in Year 11 Stage 2 is.
“PD in a PowerPoint” Standards Based Grading & Reporting (SBGR)
$1 Million $500,000 $250,000 $125,000 $64,000 $32,000 $16,000 $8,000 $4,000 $2,000 $1,000 $500 $300 $200 $100 Welcome.
EDUCATIONAL PROFICIENCY PLAN
The teacher of each classroom is responsible for evaluating the individual student's progress toward the AKS as described in the guidelines below. Kindergarten.
Growing Success Overview
GUIDELINE DIRECTIONS ABOUT ACCOMMODATIONS AND MODIFICATIONS OF PROGRAMS TO MEET A STUDENT’S NEEDS.
Promotion Criteria Guidelines for Students with Disabilities in Grades 3-8 Summer 2012 Division of Students with Disabilities and English Language Learners.
I.E.P.sI.E.P.s Individual Education Plans Helping Students Achieve Success.
Individual Education Plan Overview Presented By: Pamela Cameron Winter 2013.
Carroll County Public Schools Gifted & Talented. On February 28 th, 2012, the Maryland State Board of Education approved regulations that set the minimum.
Report Cards 101. ELD Progress Report Cards Complete ELD portfolios. Only score the standards you have taught. Score individual standards on assessments/work.
Implemented: November Credit by Demonstrated Mastery (CDM) is the process where Buncombe County Schools shall, based on a body-of-evidence, award.
Other Measures of Student Academic Progress What should we know about how to include other measures of student academic progress? 0 August 2012.
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
Frequently Asked Questions: High School Mathematics October 2005.
Revised August 2011 Growing Success: Late & Missed Assignments.
Principles of Assessment
Science & Technology Grades Spring 2007
Awareness Session June 2010
1 Intro to Dual Credit Programs: Policy and Program Requirements, 2013 May 2013.
Individual Education Plan Overview Presented By: Pamela Cameron Fall 2014.
Ms. McNaught-Symmes Training in Gifted Education (specialist) from OECTA, York University as well as other professional institutions Experience teaching.
Standards Based Report Card Standards Based Report Card.
THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE. Teacher info  
Grading Policy Review, Recommendation and Rationale March 13, 2012 Mr. Ray Gravuer.
The Individual Education Plan (IEP) Toronto District School Board January 20, 2015.
Students with Exceptionalities
A PARENTS’S GUIDE TO RAINBOW TRACKER ASSESSMENT BEYOND LEVELS.
Session 13 Grading & Reporting. Provincial Report Versions There are 12 different report card templates that are organized in relation to the following.
GROWING SUCCESS Assessment, Evaluation, and Reporting in Ontario Schools First Edition Covering Grades 1-12.
PURPOSES OF CONTINUOUS ASSESSMENT Assessment is an integral part of teaching. Observation is your key assessment tool in the primary and junior grades.
» Students who meet the passing standard on STAAR must still meet all promotion requirements outlined in the district policy. We will review.
What Growing Success Means to Secondary. Agenda Overview of the policy document Fundamental Principles Assessment Learning Skills & Work Habits Evaluation.
Assessment, Evaluation, and Reporting
IT – Staffing and Support
Secondary Growing Success Professional Learning
Understanding Your Child’s Report Card
Growing Success: Assessment, Evaluation, and Reporting in Ontario Schools. First Edition, Covering Grades 1 to 12 With thanks to Ben Hazzard Program Consultant:
New Accountability System: District and Site Report Cards
Kim Miller Oregon Department of Education
Evanston/Skokie School District 65
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
Somerset Primary Data Report/SBG Information Session
Report Card Updates How confident are we that the grades assigned to our students are consistent, accurate, meaningful, and supportive of learning?
Standards Based Grading
Standards Based Report Cards Information October 30, 2018
Presentation transcript:

Revised August 2011 Growing Success: Use of “I” and “R”

Teachers may also use the codes “R” and “I”, when evaluating and reporting student achievement in Grades 1 to 6. For Grades 7 to 12, a student’s achievement of the overall curriculum expectations will be evaluated in accordance with the achievement charts in the provincial curriculum and will be reported using percentage marks. It is expected that both mathematical calculations and professional judgment will inform the determination of percentage marks. For Grades 7 and 8, teachers will use the code “R”, to indicate achievement below 50 per cent.

Use of “I” and “R” For Grades 9 to 12, teachers will use percentage marks to indicate achievement below 50 per cent. For Grades 7 to 10, teachers may use the code “I”. (“I” may not be used in Grades 11 and 12.) Both “R” and marks below 50 per cent signal that additional learning is required before the student begins to achieve success in meeting the subject/grade or course expectations. For Grades 1 to 10, the code “I” may be used in a mark book and/or on a student’s report card, including the final report card, to indicate that insufficient evidence is available to determine a letter grade or percentage mark (“I” may not be used in Grades 11 and 12).

Use of “I” and “R” “R” and percentage marks below 50 per cent indicate the need for the development of strategies to address the student’s specific learning needs in order to support his or her success in learning. When appropriate, parents will be consulted in this process. In Grades 1 to 8, students with an Individual Education Plan [IEP] who require modified or alternative expectations and beginning English language learners with modified expectations would rarely receive an “R”. For the report card, teachers will use their professional judgment to determine when the use of “I” is appropriate and in the best interests of the student. For example, teachers may find it appropriate to use “I” when evidence of a student’s achievement is insufficient because the student has enrolled in the school very recently or because there were issues or extenuating circumstances beyond the student’s control, such as protracted illness, that affected his or her attendance and/or ability to provide sufficient evidence of achievement of the overall expectations.

Use of “I” and “R ” In Grades 9 and 10, a student who receives an “I” on the final report card to indicate insufficient evidence will not receive a credit for the course. However, there may be instances where students in Grades 9 and 10 who receive an “I” on their final report card may be considered for credit recovery. These are cases where, in the professional judgment of the teacher, evidence of achievement is available for at least a few overall expectations, on the basis of which it is possible to identify the remaining expectations that must be addressed and to design a credit recovery program.