PROFESSIONAL GROWTH PLAN: DEVELOPMENT SEPTEMBER 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

Instructional Coaching at Westminster
Session Learning Target You will gain a better understanding of identifying quality evidence to justify a performance rating for each standard and each.
Data Team Training Data & Deliberate Practice September, 2013.
Performance Appraisal Systems
The Rubric Reality Cobb Keys Classroom Teacher Evaluation System.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A new model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The correlation.
Planning, Implementing and Evaluating Continuous School Improvement Using the High Quality Standards for Schools Federal Programs Fall Directors Conference.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The FEAPs as a.
Math Content Network Update The Power of Mistakes Student Engagement Culture of Learning Growth Mindset Congruent Tasks.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals II
Blended Learning Rubric BMS Faculty Meeting – September 10.
PROPOSED MULTIPLE MEASURES FOR TEACHER EFFECTIVENESS
EDUCATOR EVALUATION August 25, 2014 Wilmington. OVERVIEW 5-Step Cycle.
Professional Learning Communities in Schools Online Workshop.
Assessment Human Society and Its Environment 7-10 © 2007 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training.
Student Assessment Inventory for School Districts Inventory Planning Training.
 Teacher and administrator evaluations are governed by Florida Statute and State Board Rule 6A  The Florida Department of Education and.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Increasing the Accountability of Teachers to Reach all Students and their Needs Raymon J. Smith References.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Performance Appraisal Systems. Desired Outcomes By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following: A new model for teacher evaluation.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Becoming a Teacher Ninth Edition
Leveraging Educator Evaluation to Support Improvement Planning Reading Public Schools Craig Martin
The Third Year Review A Mini-Accreditation Florida Catholic Conference National Standards and Benchmarks.
Connecting the Dots BISD’S LEARNING PLATFORM AND ESTABLISHING EXPECTATIONS FOR LEARNING RUBRIC.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Brevard Public Schools September/October 2012
Goals and Self- Assessment Admin Observation Student Course Feedback Peer Observation Community Feedback.
OAC Principals Collaborative Professional Learning Opportunities What can one teacher do? What can one administrator do? What can one school do? Fall Webinar.
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) “101”
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Introduction to Working Portfolios Educator Effectiveness System Training.
 In Cluster, all teachers will write a clear goal for their IGP (Reflective Journal) that is aligned to the cluster and school goal.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Implementing Formative Assessment Online Professional Development What Principals Need to know.
Special School District of St. Louis County Scott Crooks – Amber Del Gaiso –
Geelong High School Performance Development & Review Process in 2014.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
Professional Development PLC Lead Training Cultural Shifts: Rethinking what we do and why we do it Together, we can make a difference.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Writing a Professional Development Plan.  Step 1–Identify Indicators to be Assessed  Step 2 –Determine Average Baseline Score  Step 3 –Develop a Growth.
Self Reflection and Professional Growth Synergy of Two Measures of Effectiveness.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.
Using Student Assessment Data in Your Teacher Observation and Feedback Process Renee Ringold & Eileen Weber Minnesota Assessment Conference August 5, 2015.
Springfield Public Schools SEEDS: Collecting Evidence for Educators Winter 2013.
Teacher Licensure PI-34 Wisconsin’s New Process. New License Stages  Initial Educator 5 year, non-renewable  Professional Educator 5 year renewable.
Designing Quality Assessment and Rubrics
EISD Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System T-TESS
AUGUST DESIRED OUTCOMES  An understanding of the two PGP options available for teachers  Knowledge of the Professional Growth Plan [PGP] Rubric.
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Development of Quality Initiatives on a Less-Travelled Path: The Online Fellows Program Judith A. Giering, Ph.D. Karyn E. Holt, Ph.D. Drexel University.
SOESD’s Teacher Evaluation & Support System
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Overview of Title III Plan, Data, and Review of Specially Designed Academic Instruction in English (SDAIE) for K-12 Administrators Session 1 Local District.
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
February 21-22, 2018.
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Presentation transcript:

PROFESSIONAL GROWTH PLAN: DEVELOPMENT SEPTEMBER 2011

We must have a passionate commitment to high standards and student success.

We must have a professional teaching culture marked by shared purpose, collaboration, innovative spirit, and continual learning.

We must revere data that provide feedback to students, inform programmatic and instructional decisions, and support focused intervention efforts.

We must commit to a relentless pursuit of teaching methodologies that foster student engagement, critical thinking, self-efficacy, and content mastery.

Desired Outcomes An overview of the Professional Growth Plan (PGP) Rubric for consistency in scoring An awareness of specific differences between ratings Practice in scoring PGPs

FACTS Due date – October 10 (initial conferences by Sept. 23) Plans must be personal and individualized PGPs do not have to relate to FCAT scores Resource Teachers - Role

FACTS Qualitative AND quantitative data for Distinguished, only Resources available PGP format on website Learning year

SCORING PGP - Total 18 points Development - Total 10 pts. for D   Development of Goal– 4   Work Plan Strategies – 4   Outcome Measures & Reflection – 2

SCORING Implementation - Total 8 pts. for D Collaboration and Mutual Accountability SEPARATE from PGP 2 pts. for meeting individual PGP target(s)

Elements I & III: Distinguished or Proficient? Multiple data sources And not Or Above and beyond STRETCH Specific

Review As a table, review sample for Elements I and III As a table, review sample for Elements I and III Determine how each bullet is addressed Determine how each bullet is addressed Be prepared to share whole group Be prepared to share whole group

Element II: Work Plan Strategies Quantitative AND qualitative data Quantitative AND qualitative data Clear, direct connection to PGP goal for D Clear, direct connection to PGP goal for D Defined, realistic timelines Defined, realistic timelines

Element II: Work Plan Strategies Clearly define elements…align with B.E.S.T. Clearly define elements…align with B.E.S.T. REFLECTION REFLECTION Multiple opportunities to receive feedback (peers admin.); strategies clearly defined Multiple opportunities to receive feedback (peers admin.); strategies clearly defined

Review As a table, review sample for Element II As a table, review sample for Element II Determine how each bullet is addressed Determine how each bullet is addressed Be prepared to share whole group Be prepared to share whole group

Practice Individually, silently, review PGP sample Individually, silently, review PGP sample Use Scoring and Feedback form for ratings and rationale Use Scoring and Feedback form for ratings and rationale Discuss with team Discuss with team

Practice Administrator completes Calculation Form Administrator completes Calculation Form If time, complete another sample If time, complete another sample

Additional Practice Options: Options: -Work on own PGP -Have a colleague do verbal +/ Δ Team works on another sample Team works on another sample

Next Steps Do a Q & A with faculty? Do a Q & A with faculty? Provide time for teachers to brainstorm strategies, share resource sites, share feedback on one another’s PGP Provide time for teachers to brainstorm strategies, share resource sites, share feedback on one another’s PGP Deliver presentation to faculty? Deliver presentation to faculty? Provide time on Oct. 7 after B.E.S.T. training? Provide time on Oct. 7 after B.E.S.T. training?

“Coming together is a beginning; keeping together is progress; working together is success.” -Henry Ford