PRESENTED BY: LINDSAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT THOMAS L. ROONEY, SUPERINTENDENT LANA BROWN, DIRECTOR OF CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION High School Transition.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

RIDE – Office of Special Populations
9/22/04 Texas Teacher STaR Chart School Technology and Readiness Chart A Tool for Planning and Self-Assessing
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
WASC Review: Whats happened so far. May 19, 2008 In-service.
 New National Health Education Standards were adopted in 2007  SD used the National Standards as a model for the SDHES  SD DOE adopted the SDHES in.
It’s About the Journey.  An online vehicle for local curriculum  A link to SAS resources  A dynamic curriculum delivery system  A curriculum that.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
Orleans Southwest Supervisory Union. Assets Highly Qualified Teachers AWoD Understanding by Design DI AIMS Web RTI Writing Curriculum Math Curriculum.
Using Data to Support Statewide initiatives centered on Student Achievement A look at publically available data for use by RSA’s, Districts, and schools.
Goals of Title II, Part D of No Child Left Behind The primary goal of this part of NCLB is to improve student academic achievement through the use of technology.
Prepared by: Linda Iacobellis, BA Assistant Principal
Developed by ESC Region 12 in partnership with TEA. 9/01/04 Texas Teacher STaR Chart School Technology and Readiness
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Department of Assessment, Curriculum, and Instruction Kahle Charles, Director of Curriculum.
ENGAGING ADMINISTRATORS IN UNDERSTANDING AND SUPPORTING CONTEMPORARY SCIENCE EDUCATION 2010 Networking Forum Rodger W. Bybee Executive Director (Emeritus)
Pamela T. Moore Associate Superintendent, Teaching and Learning Services Pinellas County Schools The Florida Standards: What Every Parent Should Know.
21 st Century Assessment Peg Henson and Laura Snow SD Department of Education
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Intel® Education K-12 Resources Our aim is to promote excellence in Mathematics and how this can be used with technology in order.
Check-in on Curriculum Progress Next Steps.  Brings all of the pieces together.  Transparency  Creates curriculum conversation  A tool for the journey.
Getting Started with Odyssey Assessment Test Builder.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
The Common Core: Moving Ohio Forward Stan W. Heffner Superintendent of Public Instruction February 15, 2012.
Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development
Principal Professional Development September 26, SUSD Common Core PD 2013.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Planning Focus Workshop Facilitated by: Sandy Sanford.
Arlington Independent School District More Than A Remarkable Education Technology Overview Summer Leadership August 5, 2010.
Technology Integration Planning Guidelines for Development A Visual Guide Development of a Literacy Programme for Form One.
Power Point Introduction The new Oregon Diploma raises the rigor of educational requirements in order to ensure that students graduate with the skills.
Technology Use Plan Bighorn County School District #4 Basin / Manderson, Wyoming “Life-long learning through attitude, academics, and accountability.”
Company LOGO Presenter: Hlengiwe Mfeka – 03 July 2013.
The Instructional Decision-Making Process 1 hour presentation.
How Do We Do This? Educate all students: – Build upon prior knowledge and experience –Address a wide range of skill levels –Instruct utilizing various.
Oklahoma Academic Standards: What Career Tech Educators Need to Know For the Road Ahead Kerri White, Ed.D. Assistant State Superintendent Office of Educator.
Effective Coaching for Success Presenter: Dr. Wendy Perry 2015.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Kansas Common Core State Standards What do we need to know now? 1.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Darla Stynen. The subject matter I am teaching in my classroom, as prescribed by the school district.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
July 2013 Dr. Elizabeth Aitken, Senior Executive Director of Academics Mr. Ryan Imbriale, Executive Director of Digital Learning.
By Billye Darlene Jones EDLD 5362 Section ET8004-1B February, 2010.
Technology Action Plan By: Kaitlyn Sassone. What is Systemic Change? "Systemic change is a cyclical process in which the impact of change on all parts.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
2010 NATIONAL EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY PLAN Eva Perez EDIT 654 OL.
Math Study Group Meeting #1 November 3, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
Gifted and Talented Academy Year 2 Curriculum and Instruction Session 3
Name of School District | Date | Presenter’s Name | Curriculum Specialist Introduction to Pearson Forward.
What do you think should be the goal of technology in education?
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Long Range Technology Plan, Student Device Standards Secondary Device Recommendation.
Dr. Lois McKee- Assistant Principal Curriculum Mr. William Scales- Testing Coordinator The Florida Standards: What Every Parent Should Know Seminole High.
Angelina R. Morgante Raising Awareness EDU 620 Meeting Individual Student Needs With Technology Instructor: Deborah Moerland October 19, 2015.
Vikki Costa, Professor California State University Fullerton
Outcome: Participants will be able to identify and apply teacher behaviors that support a learner-centered environment. Indicator: Participants will explore.
Common Core State Standards
Khan Academy in the Classroom A Student-Centered Learning Approach
  Intended Competences in Primary Education Curriculum: Are we Jumping or Pushed? Wilberforce E Meena.
The Year of Core Instruction
PARCC Assessments Overview
An Introduction to the 8 Components of MCL
Model for Teaching with Technology
SIR Observation Preparation and Report Examples
Choi Wai Kit (Gavin) St. Margaret’s Girls’ College, Hong Kong
Grady Cluster Plan ( ) Grady HS Inman MS Centennial Hope-Hill Lin
Presentation transcript:

PRESENTED BY: LINDSAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT THOMAS L. ROONEY, SUPERINTENDENT LANA BROWN, DIRECTOR OF CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION High School Transition to Common Core in the Performance Based System

Performance based education is an innovative, student-centered approach to learning. In a performance-based system students work at their performance level and advance through the curriculum when they have demonstrated proficiency of the required knowledge or skills. Overview

 Guaranteed & Viable Curriculum  Comprehensive Assessment System  0-4 Scoring Scale  Electronic Scoring and Tracking System  System to Group Learners  Close Monitoring System Components of a Performance-Based System (PBS)

Traditional vs. Performance-Based Traditional (Time-based Learning) Traditional (Time-based Learning)  Movement based on time  Learning happens only in the classroom  Driven by textbooks  Teacher-centered decision making  Focus on learning in different subject areas  Teacher is the judge of quality  Focus on basic skills  Prepares learners for industrial- age jobs Performance-based Learning  Movement based on performance  Learning takes place anytime, any where  Driven by shared vision  Learner-centered decision making  Self, peers, teachers, administrators, other stakeholders judge student work  Focus on critical thinking and problem-solving skills  Prepares learners for 21 st century jobs

Electronic Assessment System Cross Curricular Unit Development and Application Level Performance Tasks Development of widespread, purposeful Technology usage Moving Lindsay High School into the Common Core System

Electronic Assessment Systems  100% of High School Assessments can be taken online  Results are automatically linked to the scoring and reporting system  Allows for immediate feedback to the learner, parent, and learning facilitator

Cross Curricular Unit Development and Application Level Performance Tasks  Ensures that reading/writing are used across disciplines  Learners study multiple learning targets across disciplines  Increases depth knowledge and addresses learning at application knowledge  Adding performance based tasks that require application level to curriculum and assessment

Developing the Use of Technology  Ensuring that every learner has access to a computer and the internet in school and at home  Ensuring that Learning Facilitators have the skills to use technology as an accelerator for learning  Using technology 24/7 as a tool for learning anywhere, anytime

The Performance Based System addresses the implementation of common core through the use of an electronic assessment system, cross curricular unit development, application level tasks and development of widespread, purposeful technology. Lindsay Unified School District