Level 1 Recall Recall of a fact, information, or procedure. Level 2 Skill/Concept Use information or conceptual knowledge, two or more steps, etc. Level.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Depths of Knowledge and Reading
Advertisements

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education 2007 Mississippi Mathematics Framework Revised Training (Grades K-5) Day 1.
2007 Mississippi Mathematics Framework Revised Training (Grades 6-12)
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Depth of Knowledge. Why Depth of Knowledge? Mechanism to ensure that the intent of the standard and the level of student demonstration required by that.
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
Please print the three Cognitive Rigor Matrices full page. Thanks!
Science Break Out Session New Math and Science Teacher Dec 2008 Becky Smith.
An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Tammy Seneca, Ph.D.
Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium. Structure of the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics Research-based learning progressions Internationally.
Functions and Everyday Situations
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Depth of Knowledge in Math K-5 Math Back to School Conference
M ATH C OMMITTEE Mathematical Shifts Mathematical Practices.
ACOS 2010 Standards of Mathematical Practice
Standards Academy Grades 3 and 4 Day 1. Objectives Understand the Critical Areas of our grade levels. Examine the importance of vertical alignment across.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Categorizing Classroom Experiences
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Introduction to Depth of Knowledge
LinearRelationships Jonathan Naka Intro to Algebra Unit Portfolio Presentation.
Understanding Depth of Knowledge
PSLA 39 TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE APRIL 14, Carolyn Van Etten Beth Sahd Vickie Saltzer – LibGuide Developer.
DOK Depth of Knowledge An Introduction.
Number Sense Standards Measurement and Geometry Statistics, Data Analysis and Probability CST Math 6 Released Questions Algebra and Functions 0 Questions.
Welcome to the Data Warehouse HOME HELP COGNITIVE LEVELS Assessments COGNITIVE LEVELS.
The Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Matrix
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Quick Glance At ACTASPIRE Math
Standards for Mathematical Practice #1 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. I can: explain the meaning of a problem. choose the right.
NEW REALITY STUDENTS MUST HAVE HIGHER-ORDER THINKING SKILLS 1.
Language Objective: Students will be able to practice agreeing and disagreeing with partner or small group, interpret and discuss illustrations, identify.
Developing Assessments for and of Deeper Learning [Day 2b-afternoon session] Santa Clara County Office of Education June 25, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D.
Teachers Helping Teachers with Rigor/Depth of Knowledge / Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy Presented by NHCS Gifted Education Specialists.
Teachers Helping Teachers Align Units with the Common Core/ Depth of Knowledge / Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy September 24, 2012 Presented by Elin Reuben Karma.
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Depth of Knowledge and the Cognitive Rigor Matrix 1.
Selected Responses How deep does the question dig?????
By Benjamin Newman.  Define “Cognitive Rigor” or “Cognitive Demand”  Understand the role (DOK) Depth of Knowledge plays with regards to teaching with.
CONCEPTUALIZING AND ACTUALIZING THE NEW CURRICULUM Peter Liljedahl.
Major Science Project Process A blueprint for experiment success.
From Infusing Rigor & Research into Instruction and Assessment presentation USOE, Salt Lake City, UT February 25-26, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D. Center for.
BC Curriculum Revisions 1968 → what 1976 → what 1984 → what + how 1994 → what + how 2003 → what + how 2008 → what + how 2015 → how + what.
THE NEW CURRICULUM MATHEMATICS 1 Foundations and Pre-Calculus Reasoning and analyzing Inductively and deductively reason and use logic.
MATHEMATICS 1 Foundations and Pre-Calculus Reasoning and analyzing Inductively and deductively reason and use logic to explore, make connections,
Depth of Knowledge: Elementary ELA Smarter Balanced Professional Development for Washington High-need Schools University of Washington Tacoma Belinda Louie,
#1 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them How would you describe the problem in your own words? How would you describe what you are trying.
And PARCC
New Hope-Solebury School District. Develop a shared understanding of the concept of cognitive rigor Begin the conversation about Webbs’ Depth of Knowledge.
Understanding Depth of Knowledge. Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Adapted from the model used by Norm Webb, University of Wisconsin, to align standards with.
1 Cognitive Demand in Problems  Cognitive demand is a measure of what the instructional question (a question posed during class) or test item requires.
Depth Of Knowledge Basics © 2010 Measured Progress. All rights reserved. He who learns but does not think is lost. He who thinks but does not learn is.
The Role of the School Librarian & Media Specialist In the Student Learning Objectives (SLO) Process South Carolina Department of Education Steve Driscoll,
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Definitions & Examples
Depth of knowledge (dok)
About This Document The Cognitive Rigor (CR) Matrix (created by Karin Hess by combining Bloom’s Taxonomy and Webb’s Depth of Knowledge) is the primary.
Effective Questioning
Digging into Depth of Knowledge
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING PRACTICES
Preplanning Presentation
Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Levels
What is a Performance Task
The tasks follow 4 pathways identified on the CR Matrix.
How to NOT teach Photosynthesis
Norman L Webb.
Arroyo Valley High School August 19, 2013
Assessment In Mathematics
Hess Cognitive Rigor Matrix
Presentation transcript:

Level 1 Recall Recall of a fact, information, or procedure. Level 2 Skill/Concept Use information or conceptual knowledge, two or more steps, etc. Level 3 Strategic Thinking Requires reasoning, developing plan or a sequence ofsteps, some complexity, more than one possible answer. Level 4 Extended Thinking Requires an investigation, time to think and process multiple conditions of the problem.

Depth of Thinking (Webb) + Type of Thinking (Revised Bloom) DOK Level 1 Recall & Reproduction DOK Level 2 Basic Skills & Concepts DOK Level 3 Strategic Thinking & Reasoning DOK Level 4 Extended Thinking Remember -Recall conversions, terms, facts Understand -Evaluate an expression -Locate points on a grid or number on number line -Solve a one-step problem -Represent math relationships in words, pictures, or symbols - Specify, explain relationships -Make basic inferences or logical predictions from data/observations -Use models /diagrams to explain concepts -Make and explain estimates -Use concepts to solve non-routine problems -Use supporting evidence to justify conjectures, generalize, or connect ideas -Explain reasoning when more than one response is possible -Explain phenomena in terms of concepts -Relate mathematical concepts to other content areas, other domains -Develop generalizations of the results obtained and the strategies used and apply them to new problem situations Apply -Follow simple procedures -Calculate, measure, apply a rule (e.g., rounding) -Apply algorithm or formula -Solve linear equations -Make conversions -Select a procedure and perform it -Solve routine problem applying multiple concepts or decision points -Retrieve information to solve a problem -Translate between representations -Design investigation for a specific purpose or research question - Use reasoning, planning, and supporting evidence -Translate between problem & symbolic notation when not a direct translation -Initiate, design, and conduct a project that specifies a problem, identifies solution paths, solves the problem, and reports results Analyze -Retrieve information from a table or graph to answer a question -Identify a pattern/trend -Categorize data, figures -Organize, order data -Select appropriate graph and organize & display data -Interpret data from a simple graph -Extend a pattern -Compare information within or across data sets or texts -Analyze and draw conclusions from data, citing evidence -Generalize a pattern -Interpret data from complex graph -Analyze multiple sources of evidence or data sets Evaluate -Cite evidence and develop a logical argument -Compare/contrast solution methods -Verify reasonableness -Apply understanding in a novel way, provide argument or justification for the new application Create - Brainstorm ideas, concepts, problems, or perspectives related to a topic or concept -Generate conjectures or hypotheses based on observations or prior knowledge and experience -Develop an alternative solution -Synthesize information within one data set -Synthesize information across multiple sources or data sets -Design a model to inform and solve a practical or abstract situation