EC4MACS workshop, Paris, 8-9 March 2012 Gabriele Zanini, Luisella Ciancarella Technical Unit: Models, Methods and Technologies.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A 2030 framework for climate and energy policies Marten Westrup
Advertisements

Feichter_DPG-SYKL03_Bild-01. Feichter_DPG-SYKL03_Bild-02.
© 2008 Pearson Addison Wesley. All rights reserved Chapter Seven Costs.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1 Computer Systems Organization & Architecture Chapters 8-12 John D. Carpinelli.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Appendix 01.
Quality Education Investment Act of 2006 (QEIA) 1 Quality Education Investment Act (QEIA) of 2006 County Superintendents Oversight and Technical Assistance.
1 Dr. Peder Jensen Project Manager, Transport and Environment TERM TERM Transport and environment: on the way to a new common transport policy.
ActionDescription 1Decisions about planning and managing the coast are governed by general legal instruments. 2Sectoral stakeholders meet on an ad hoc.
M. Amann, I. Bertok, J. Cofala, F. Gyarfas, C. Heyes. Z. Klimont, W. Schöpp, W. Winiwarter The CAFE baseline scenarios: Emission projections.
L a n d e s u m w e l t a m t N o r d r h e i n – W e s t f a l e n Autorenname, Fachbereich Sabine Wurzler High population density and heavy industry:
| Folie 1 The Austrian strategy to reduce PM: perspectives and challenges Workshop on Plans and Programmes of Air Quality and National Emission.
Signatur A web-based tool to test Current and Future perspectives in Air Pollution Forward-Looking Information in Environment Assessment Copenhagen.
1 Dr. Peder Jensen Project Manager, Transport and Environment TERM TERM Transport and environment: on the way to a new common transport policy.
1 Background EEA A European Union institution Established by EU Regulation Staff: about 80 Budget: 22 Meuro Copenhagen EEA home page:
Purpose: Integrated assessment of options to control air pollution in Europe Model the full chain from sources to impacts Multi-effects: acidification,
1. 2 Why are Result & Impact Indicators Needed? To better understand the positive/negative results of EC aid. The main questions are: 1.What change is.
Institute for Environment and Sustainability1 POMI Kick-off Meeting 07/03/2008.
Duke Power Clean Smokestacks & Mercury Efforts April, 2004.
Break Time Remaining 10:00.
1 Methodology to model the future energy scenario for China Kejun JIANG Energy Research Institute, China UNFCCC Workshop on emissions.
Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) CAIR Requirements for SIPs Office of Air and Radiation March 2005.
Andrea Mariottini Riello Gas Boilers Division
1 AirWare : urban and industrial air quality assessment and management Release R5.3 beta DDr. Kurt Fedra Environmental Software & Services GmbH A-2352.
2013 Emissions Inventory Workshop EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS.
1 Meeting carbon budgets – 5th Progress Report to Parliament Committee on Climate Change, June If you want to tweet about this report.
Malta, 3rd October 2013 Conference on Implementation and Enforcement of Environmental legislation Actions and policies in the implementation of the Air.
Technical Guidance on Biomass Combustion John Abbott.
European Commission Directorate-General for Energy and Transport n° 1 Air Quality & CAFE AREHNA WORKSHOP Kos, 3-5 May 2003 Mrs Michèle LEPELLETIER.
EU Market Situation for Eggs and Poultry Management Committee 21 June 2012.
SCATTER workshop, Milan, 24 October 2003 Testing selected solutions to control urban sprawl The Brussels case city.
15. Oktober Oktober Oktober 2012.
1 Programmes containing measures to mitigate climate change (Decision 17/CP.8) Seoul, Rep. Of Korea 26 – 30 September 2005 Dominique Revet (UNFCCC)
Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) Reducing Regional Transport of Emissions and Helping States Achieve the PM2.5 and Ozone NAAQS Beth Murray Clean Air Markets.
TNO MACC-II European emissions Model-ready emission set for Jeroen Kuenen, Hugo Denier van der Gon, Antoon Visschedijk TNO, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Factor P 16 8(8-5ab) 4(d² + 4) 3rs(2r – s) 15cd(1 + 2cd) 8(4a² + 3b²)
SCATTER final seminar, Brussels, 9 November 2004 SCATTER Testing and evaluating potential solutions to control urban sprawl, through simulation.
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
Understanding Generalist Practice, 5e, Kirst-Ashman/Hull
Monitoring Team – Safer Streets.  Air Quality Introduction ◦ Brent ◦ Air quality Monitoring ◦ Previous Air Quality Action Plan  The revised.
Marion Wichmann-Fiebig II 5 Abteilungsleiterin „Luft“ 1 Review of the Gothenburg Protocol Link to potential PM control under CLRTAP: – Specifies control.
Summary of relevant information in the CAFE Position paper on PM Martin Meadows UNECE PMEG Berlin, 23 & 24 May 2005.
Workshop to Promote the Ratification of the UN-ECE CLRTAP HM Protocol May 2008, Yerevan, Armenia. 1 Additional technical measures, their reduction.
Workshop to Promote the Ratification of the UN-ECE CLRTAP HM Protocol May 2008, Yerevan, Armenia. 1 emissions reduction (and costs) The effectiveness.
An experience on modelling-based assessment of the air quality within the Air Quality Directive framework Ana Isabel Miranda, Isabel Ribeiro, Patrícia.
WP3: Fixing RES-H/C targets Lukas Kranzl, Andreas Müller RES-H Policy Kick-off, October 2008.
Directive 2008/50/EC of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe These slides do not provide a complete description of the requirements.
Model and Relationships 6 M 1 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
Air quality in Europe report. Air pollution impacts human health, contributes to climate change and damages ecosystems. Here are some of the pollutants.
The MINNI Project Italian Agency for New Technologies Energy and the Environment Long Range Transboundary Air Pollution Convention TFIAM Meeting, Amiens,
1 Air quality management in the Netherlands PM 10 in the Rotterdam - Rijnmond Area Leo Sef vd Brussels 1/2 September.
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
Essential Cell Biology
Clock will move after 1 minute
Intracellular Compartments and Transport
PSSA Preparation.
1 Chapter 13 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy.
Energy Generation in Mitochondria and Chlorplasts
Murach’s OS/390 and z/OS JCLChapter 16, Slide 1 © 2002, Mike Murach & Associates, Inc.
Italian Agency for New Technology Energy and the Environment Italian-Polish workshop, Warsaw, 17th of March, 2006 The MINNI Project: An Integrated Assessment.
NIAM – IIASA 23 rd March 2009 Assessment with the Italian national IAM of technical and non-technical measures in the Regional Air Quality Management Plans.
IMPLEMENTATION OF EU AQ LEGISLATION IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC J. FIALA Czech Hydrometeorological Institute Prague, Czech Republic.
Simulation of European emissions impacts on particulate matter concentrations in 2010 using Models-3 Rob Lennard, Steve Griffiths and Paul Sutton (RWE.
Regional Air Quality Plans: assessment of plan efficacy through integrated assessment modelling and other local models G. Vialetto 1, G. Calori 3, I. D’Elia.
The application of Models-3 in national policy Samantha Baker Air and Environment Quality Division, Defra.
The implementation of regional air quality plans: nitrogen oxides and PM assessment through RAINS-Italy and local models TFIAM/COST729/NinE Workshop on.
SHERPA for e-reporting
Second Stakeholder Expert Group meeting 19-20/01/2012
ENEA, National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable
Presentation transcript:

EC4MACS workshop, Paris, 8-9 March 2012 Gabriele Zanini, Luisella Ciancarella Technical Unit: Models, Methods and Technologies for the Environmental Assessment, Bologna, Italy. Modelling the PM 10 and NO 2 concentrations in Italy. The role of the national integrated assessment model MINNI in support of the request of time extensions

EC4MACS workshop, Paris, 8-9 March 2012 National Integrated Model supporting International Negotiation on atmospheric pollution Project Leader: Gabriele Zanini Workgroup: ENEA (UTVALAMB-AIR, UTTAMB-ATM, UTMEA-TER), Arianet srl The MINNI Project RAIL ATM

EC4MACS workshop, Paris, 8-9 March 2012 RAMS, LAPS Emission Manager SURFPRO Meteo Turbolence Parameters FARM Emissions ECMWF FieldsLocal Data Emission Inventories (EMEP, ISPRA and GAINS) Spatial and temporal info Concentrations and Depositions Atmospheric Transfer Matrices EMEP IC e BC Fields METEO Subsystem EMISSION Subsystem CHEMICAL TRANSPORT Subsystem GAINS MODEL CHAIN

EC4MACS workshop, Paris, 8-9 March 2012 METEOROLOGY: 1999, 2005: 20km res. RAMS (nudging) 4km res. LAPS (diagnostic) 2003, 2007: RAMS (nudging) at 20km and 4km res. EMISSIONS: EMEP + National Inventory (ISPRA) (top-down approach)+ Regional Inventories (GAINS methodology) IC/BC: EMEP concentration fields AIR QUALITY: 20km and 4 km res. FARM One-way nested MODEL SIMULATIONS

EC4MACS workshop, Paris, 8-9 March D meteorological fields 3D concentration fields for the main pollutants Years: 1999, 2005, 2003, 2007 Temporal resolution: 1 hour Spatial resolution: 20 km, 4 km Vertical grid: 12 levels (up to 4 km) levels (up to 10 km) 2005, 2003, 2007 MINNI AVAILABLE OUTPUTS

EC4MACS workshop, Paris, 8-9 March 2012 The project aims to provide decision makers with a scientific support instrument for developing and assessing the effectiveness of air quality policies at international, national and regional scale. Studies and analysis of the atmospheric processes Processing and assessing alternative emission scenarios - present and or future Environmental and health impact scenario Meteorological and chemical database for Air Quality studies, intercomparisons, boundary and initial conditions for downscaling MINNI OBJECTIVES

EC4MACS workshop, Paris, 8-9 March 2012 Both inventories, national and local, follow the EMEP-CORINAIR Methodology and the SNAP (Selective Nomenclature for Air Pollution) classification scheme in 11 main classes Harmonization efforts between national and local emission inventories are in progress The recent Italian decree n. 155/2010, implementing the European Directive 2008/50/CE, confirms that air pollution prevention, improvement and preservation management is assigned to the Italian administrative Regions but in a coherent national frame Regions are in charge to elaborate Air Quality Plans in order to meet established environmental target EMISSION INVENTORIES

EC4MACS workshop, Paris, 8-9 March 2012 THE ROLE OF GAINS_ITALY   Non Energy Activity Level Scenario   Energy Activity Level GAINS Italy   Control Strategy (Emission Control Technologies)   Emission Scenarios   Deposition Maps   Concentration Maps   Health and Environmental Impact Indicators GAINS-ITALY RESOLUTION=> 20 ITALIAN ADMINISTRATIVE REGIONS (NUTS2)

EC4MACS workshop, Paris, 8-9 March 2012 RAIL ATM  GAINS IS AN EMISSION MODEL AND NOT AN EMISSION INVENTORY. DUE TO ITS TECHNOLOGICAL SETTING, EMISSIONS DO NOT FOLLOW SNAP CLASSIFICATION (SOFTWARE RAIL MATCHES THE TWO CLASSIFICATION SCHEMES)  EMISSION PROJECTIONS ARE BASED ON A REFERENCE YEAR WHICH HAS TO BE SIMILAR BETWEEN STATE AND REGIONS  GAINS NEEDS A FIRST CALIBRATION FOR THE REFERENCE YEAR TO REPRODUCE NATIONAL EMISSION INVENTORY (FIRST STEP) AND REGIONAL EMISSION INVENTORIES (SECOND STEP) HARMONIZATION EMISSIONS IN GAINS-ITALY

EC4MACS workshop, Paris, 8-9 March 2012 MINNI AND REGIONAL AIR QUALITY PLANS MINNI supported the assessment of the first “generation” of Italian Regional Air Quality Management Plans (AQMPs) in years (D’Elia et al. “Technical and Non-Technical Measures for air pollution emission reduction:The integrated assessment of the regional Air Quality ManagementPlans through the Italian national model”, Atmospheric Environment 43 (2009), 6182–6189) The assessment included both technical and non technical measures and was carried out with the RAINS-Italy model comparing the Current LEgislation (CLE) scenario and an alternative scenario containing all the measures adopted by Regional administrations to pursue compliance with air quality standards The target year, 2010, was set and the efficacy of all AQMPs measures was assessed in terms of SO2, NOx and PM10 emissions avoided and PM10 concentration reductions together with the improvements of the health impact indicator, the Life Expectancy Reduction (LER), defined as months lost attributable to PM2.5 concentrations

EC4MACS workshop, Paris, 8-9 March = Urban Waste incineration with heat recovery; 2 = Biogas recovery in agricultural and in farming sectors; 3 = District heating Plant with waste and biomass; 4 = Photovoltaic; 5 = Wind; 6 = Hydroelectric; 7 = Geothermic Well; 8 = High efficiency domestic boilers; 9 = Energy efficiency in building; 10 = Residential heating accountability; 11 = Heat pumps; 12 = Solar heating systems; 13 = Regulation of some fuel use; 14 = Incentives for shift to natural gas in domestic boilers; 15 = Efficiency improvements in fireplaces and stoves; 16 = Low emission zones; 17 = Road traffic restriction; 18 = Pollution charge; 19 = Car sharing; 20 = Motorway speed limits; 21 = Bike sharing; 22 = Incentives for new cars; 23 = Incentives for new diesel heavy duty; 24 = Opening new rail lines; 25 = Opening new underground lines; 26 = Cycle paths; 27 = Sea motorway; 28 = Bus investment (new buses, service extension, frequency increase); 29 = Antiparticulate filter; 30 = Incentives for biofuel public transport; 31 = New methane service stations; 32 = Incentive for hydrogen cars; 33 = Rationalising load transport in urban area; MINNI AND REGIONAL AIR QUALITY PLANS

EC4MACS workshop, Paris, 8-9 March 2012 Emission Scenarios in support to PM 10 time extension Regional emission trends between 2011 and 2005 with measures adopted in Regional Air Quality Management Plans

EC4MACS workshop, Paris, 8-9 March 2012 MINNI AND REGIONAL AIR QUALITY PLANS

EC4MACS workshop, Paris, 8-9 March 2012 Emission Reduction Tests In order to achieve the compliance with the PM 10 limit values in all national territory some further emission reduction hypothesis have been tested. In particular the abatements regard primary PM 10 emissions and some precursors emissions in 2011 year. The resulting concentrations were simulated with MINNI model. Reduction hypotheses

EC4MACS workshop, Paris, 8-9 March Scenarios PM 10 annual mean concentrations in a subset of regional background (red-circled) and traffic stations Emission reductions Annual Limit Value: 40 µg/m3 Annual Limit Value statistically estimated to comply also with daily limit value in 2011: µg/m3

EC4MACS workshop, Paris, 8-9 March Scenarios PM 10 annual mean concentrations in a subset of regional background stations Emission reductions Annual Limit Value: 40 µg/m3 Annual Limit Value statistically estimated to comply also with one day limit value in 2011: µg/m3

EC4MACS workshop, Paris, 8-9 March 2012 Form 3A: Quantitative source apportionment REGIONS Form 2: Description of the exceedance of the limit value Form 5A: Details of measures implemented before the original date of compliance Form 4B: Baseline level for extended deadline for compliance Form 3B: Reflection on the failure to deliver compliance by the original deadline Form 4A: Baseline level for original deadline for compliance MINNI MINNI support to NO 2 time extension notifications

EC4MACS workshop, Paris, 8-9 March 2012 NO 2 Regional Source Apportionment a. a.Emission variation (-20%) b. b.Model run at national scale with 20 km spatial resolution, for 1 winter and 1 summer period c. c.Calculation of mean concentrations  with reference to base run This for: Each Region separately (“regional” runs) … variation  i All Regions jointly (“control” run) … variation  N The percentage contribution of each Region i is estimated as  i /  N Base run: 2008 national emission inventory at activity level (Institute for Environmental Protection and Research- ISPRA)

EC4MACS workshop, Paris, 8-9 March 2012 Northern Italy NO 2 Regional Source Apportionment

EC4MACS workshop, Paris, 8-9 March 2012 Sistema MINNI NO 2 Regional Source Apportionment Central Italy and Sardinia

EC4MACS workshop, Paris, 8-9 March 2012 Sistema MINNI NO 2 Regional Source Apportionment Southern Italy

EC4MACS workshop, Paris, 8-9 March 2012 NO 2 Transboundary Source Apportionment

EC4MACS workshop, Paris, 8-9 March 2012 NO 2 Sectorial Source Apportionment a. a.Emission variation (-20%) b. b.Model run at national scale with 4 km spatial resolution, for 1 winter and 1 summer period c. c.Calculation of mean concentrations variation  with reference to base run This for: Each Sector separately (“sectorial” runs) … variation  i All Sectors jointly (“control” run) … variation  N The percentage contribution of each Sector i is estimated as  i /  N

EC4MACS workshop, Paris, 8-9 March 2012 NO 2 Sectorial Source Apportionment Cluster of activities: Road transport (SNAP group 07) Residential (SNAP group 02) Sea traffic and inland navigation (SNAP sub-groups ) Other transports ( SNAP sub-groups 8.x) Energy and industrial combustion, waste disposal ( SNAP groups 01, 03, 04, 09)

EC4MACS workshop, Paris, 8-9 March 2012 NO 2 annual mean Northern Italy

EC4MACS workshop, Paris, 8-9 March 2012 NO x total emissions: sectorial share Northern Italy

EC4MACS workshop, Paris, 8-9 March 2012 NO 2 – Sectorial source apportionment Road transport (07) contribution % Variation  i Northern Italy

EC4MACS workshop, Paris, 8-9 March 2012 contribution % Variation  i NO 2 – Sectorial source apportionment Residential (02) Northern Italy

EC4MACS workshop, Paris, 8-9 March 2012 Sistema MINNI NO 2 – Source apportionment settoriale – Nord Italia Trasporti marittimi e navigazione interna ( ) contribution % Variation  i

EC4MACS workshop, Paris, 8-9 March 2012 Sistema MINNI NO 2 – Source apportionment settoriale – Nord Italia Other mobile emissions (8.x) contribution % Variation  i

EC4MACS workshop, Paris, 8-9 March 2012 Form 4A: Baseline level for original deadline for compliance Which NO 2 annual average concentrations are expected in 2010? And in 2015? Form 4B: Baseline level for extended deadline for compliance 20x20 km 2 resolution

EC4MACS workshop, Paris, 8-9 March 2012 NO 2 annual average concentrations with bottom-up emissions (GAINS_Italy)

EC4MACS workshop, Paris, 8-9 March : NO2 annual average concentrations (4km x 4km)(20km x 20km)

EC4MACS workshop, Paris, 8-9 March 2012 NO 2 annual average concentrations with bottom-up emissions (GAINS_Italy) Percentage relative variation in 2015 NO2 annual mean concentration Compared to 2005

EC4MACS workshop, Paris, 8-9 March NO 2 exceedences of the annual average concentrations at monitoring stations (current measures)

EC4MACS workshop, Paris, 8-9 March NO 2 exceedences of the annual average concentrations at monitoring stations (current measures)

EC4MACS workshop, Paris, 8-9 March NO 2 exceedences of the annual average concentrations at monitoring stations (current measures)

EC4MACS workshop, Paris, 8-9 March NO 2 exceedences of the annual average concentrations at monitoring stations with additional measures

EC4MACS workshop, Paris, 8-9 March NO 2 exceedences of the annual average concentrations at monitoring stations with additional measures

EC4MACS workshop, Paris, 8-9 March NO 2 exceedences of the annual average concentrations at monitoring stations with additional measures