Cycle Five PLRD #25.  Cycle 1 – School Based Projects  Cycle 2 – Focus on Results  Cycle 3 – Assessment  Cycle 4 – 21 st Century Teaching and Learning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Advertisements

CASS Network of 21 st Century School Systems Rocky View School Division – February 15,2011.
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
21 st Century Learning Title I Technology Integration Specialists.
Instructional Leadership for the 21 st Century University of South Alabama in collaboration with Baldwin and Mobile County Public Schools.
A labama E ducational T echnology C onference 2012.
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
The Middle Leadership Development Pilot Further information:
TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
North Carolina Educational Technology Plan. GS115C Original legislation passed in 1994, with projected funding of $365M over 5 years Created the.
Enhancing Education Through Technology NCLB Title II Part D Cathy HigginsOffice of Educational Technology
Strategic Education Plan and Report Guide on the Side Within the Guide you will find:  Reflective Questions to consider during the development of your.
System Implementation and Monitoring Regional Session DAY ONE Fall, 2013 Resources are available at sim.abel.yorku.ca.
LITERACY STRATEGY P Loddon Mallee Region.
Creating a Roadmap for Change: Utilizing School Planning to Reculture Schools Darius S. Adamson, Sr. School Transformation Coach District and School Transformation.
UNDERSTANDING NBPTS STANDARDS
PORTFOLIO.
Alberta’s Kindergarten to Grade 12 Education System with Waldemar Riemer.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Alberta Initiative for School Improvement Improving Student Learning in Alberta.
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
Providence School Board September 10, 2012 Introductory Briefing Providence Public School District Comprehensive Information Technology Blueprint Center.
Common Core Standards Ready for College, Work, and Life  A framework around which teachers can create a collectively built body of effective knowledge.
6/2/20151 Making the Case for Online Professional Development Linda Pittenger Kentucky Department of Education Online Learning Institute 22 March 2006.
ESA Region 2 April st Century Skills: More Than Just Computers.
Discover Redesign #MFWHSR Focus for the Day Focus: Develop a Deeper Understanding of the Process and the Philosophy of Moving Forward.
INACOL National Standards for Quality Online Teaching, Version 2.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
Student-Focused System Leadership: Transformation Through Strategic Coherence BCSSA & BCASBO Fall Conference November 13th, 2014.
ELearning Planning Overview. Goals of eLearning Planning Guide Reduce planning time and effort Increase eLearning effectiveness through targeted improvement.
ASSESSMENT AND REPORTING– INFORMATION FOR STUDENTS Spring 2014.
Students Come First Big Picture.
Week 4 – Getting Ready for Online Survey or School ‘snapshot’
Summer Non-effective School Districts district staff issue a plethora of uncoordinated and often contradictory directives while presiding over resource.
March 6-7 Learning Symposium
INSTRUCTIONAL EXCELLENCE INVENTORIES: A PROCESS OF MONITORING FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Dr. Maria Pitre-Martin Superintendent of Schools.
PARENT COORDINATOR INFORMATION SESSION PARENT ACCOUNTABILITY Wednesday, July 20, 2011 Madelene Chan, Supt. D24 Danielle DiMango, Supt. D25.
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
Dr. Lorraine Boyle Bemidji State University Bemidji, MN Standards Aligned Curriculum Drive Authentic Tasks Measured through Assessment Processes Presented.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
Strategic Planning and Professional Learning Communities
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems Brevard Public Schools District Accreditation.
Leading at All Levels to Support MDC Implementation
Teacher competencies. Professional competence with ICT Draw on appropriate ICT applications to enhance personal and professional effectiveness  Using.
CESD Board and Admin Retreat March 20-22, FIND YOUR TEAM & TABLE:  Look at the icon on the left hand side of your nametag  your name is also on.
+ using Integrated Planning & Budget In a Participatory Governance Context Realizing our Foothill Vision 20/20.
Medicine Hat School District 76 Developing tomorrow’s citizens through improved learning, living and relationships Building Capacity Presentation to the.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Regional Director’s Meeting ePlanning Session. Aims of this session Ultranet update The eLearning planning matrix Where your school is Where your school.
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
Amy Alexander. Analyzing Effectiveness Participants’ Reactions Participants’ Learning Organization Support and Change Participants’ Use of New Knowledge.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
Friday Institute Leadership Team Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Jeni Corn, Director of Evaluation Programs Phil Emer, Director of Technology Planning.
STATE TECHNOLOGY PLAN DRAFT GOAL DEVELOPMENT. The five goals of the 2010 Plan are: 1. Teaching for Learning: Michigan students will have meaningful technology-enabled.
9 Common Characteristics of Successful Schools From: What we know about successful school leadership (2003). - American Education Research Association.
What does it mean to be a RETA Instructor this project? Consortium for 21 st Century Learning C21CL
Faculty Councils Brad Whittaker Director, Research Services and Industry Liaison Strategic Research Plan.
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
Curriculum Planning Modules Department of Education Curriculum Reform in Victorian Schools.
“We believe public education works” As public educators, we believe public education works. We reject the premise that education in Illinois has failed.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
Teacher Leaders A Discussion. Welcome back! O Pick a candy that best illustrates your level O – High school O – Middle O – Elementary O – K-12.
Long Range Technology Plan, Student Device Standards Secondary Device Recommendation.
 This template is just a starting place for your Educational Plan.  Please make sure you review the criteria and presentation targets.  The Ed. Planning.
Whole School & Classroom Data Analysis that will guide Mathematics direction for 2013.
North Carolina Standard for School Executives Standard 1 By: Barbara Bumgardner Aleen Besmer James Westbrook Kristy Christenberry.
Medicine Hat School District 76
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
February 21-22, 2018.
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Presentation transcript:

Cycle Five PLRD #25

 Cycle 1 – School Based Projects  Cycle 2 – Focus on Results  Cycle 3 – Assessment  Cycle 4 – 21 st Century Teaching and Learning  Cycle 5 – Student Engagement and Achievement

 21st Century Classroom Competencies

 Effective approaches to teaching and learning Development of planning documents and templates Development of ‘inquiry-based’ unit plans Collaborative unit plans built by our Colony teachers  Unanticipated results Parental buy-in on 21st century classroom competencies Positive PAT and Diploma results in VC classes  Improvements to Student Engagement

To improve student learning through initiatives that enhance student engagement and performance and reflect the unique needs and circumstances of each school and/or school authority.

 The development of the PLRD Student Engagement Model (correlates of effective schools) will drive all of our decisions regarding governance within Prairie Land Regional Division #25.

 Student Focused  School Community Engagement  Collaboration  Flexibility and Adaptability  Research-informed Practice (Action Research)  Building Capacity and Integrating Effective Practices  Sustainability and Integration  Innovation

Funding for PLRD …………$102,227 Deferred Revenue………………………….$122,695 Total Estimated Funding Level………$224,922

 Professional Development Thought Stream$3, PD 360$14,  School Allocations $73,  Staffing (1.25 FTE) $122,695 (deferred revenue)  Capacity Building 21st Century Leadership$9, Teacher Mentor Program$2,000.00

Altario5,000 BCCS5,000 Colonies6,000 Consort8,000 Delia6,000 Hanna Primary6,000 J.C.Charyk10,000 Morrin7,000 Veteran5,000 Youngstown5,000 Tech For Diversity Plan10,932

 What is the impact of PLRD’s 21 st century classroom competencies on student engagement and achievement? 21 st Century Classroom Competencies (PLRD #25) Affective and Cognitive Domains (Alberta Education)

 Academic results as stipulated by provincial exams, in addition to the Tell Them From Me Survey.  Provincial exam data from Cycle 4 will be used to get a more accurate picture of how PLRD classrooms are progressing throughout our AISI projects.  Community Engagement will need to be measured by the use of the Accountability Pillar and school anecdotal feedback.

 Individual schools will have the latitude of identifying their own measures from the TTFM surveys (as they relate to their identified question).  Individual schools will develop their own “dip-stick measures” that are aligned with their specific projects.  Community Engagement will need to be measured by the use of the Accountability Pillar and school anecdotal feedback.

 Which 21 st Century Classroom Competency will be your school focus?  Tentative Sub-question  Accountability Possible Data Collection Means and Measures Budget Allocations Community Engagement and Buy-in (what will it look like?)