Educational Trends and Mandates

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Special Education Curriculum Anthony Scorsone. Each child's IEP should state that the placement is the least restrictive environment for that particular.
Advertisements

What Every Principal Needs to Know About Special Education
Guidelines for IDEA Implementation Developed and Presented through Collaborative Efforts RIDE – Office of Special Populations Rhode Island Technical.
A Guided Tour of the 1% Exception Process From Documentation to Approval.
DRAFT Title I Annual Parent Meeting West Navarre Primary School Sept. 17, 2013 Sandi Eubanks.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA September 2003.
Title I & Title III Annual Parent Meeting
No Child Left Behind The reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), also known as the “No Child Left Behind Act,” will have.
Gifted Education and Response to Intervention Update on Gifted Education Workshop August 2013 Toddie Adams, Marshall County Schools.
Goals of Title II, Part D of No Child Left Behind The primary goal of this part of NCLB is to improve student academic achievement through the use of technology.
No Child Left Behind Act © No Child Left Behind Act ©Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
No Child Left Behind Act January 2002 Revision of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Education is a state and local responsibility Insure.
NCLB Basics From “What Parents of Students with Disabilities Need to Know & Do” National Center on Educational Outcomes University of Minnesota
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
Ensuring Effective Services to Immigrant &/or LEP/ELL Children & Families: It’s Right, & It’s the Law! © Statewide Parent Advocacy Network.
1 Supplemental Educational Services Office of Elementary and Secondary Education June 2002.
The Role of the Educator in the IEP Process. A Little History… The 70’s 1. Public Law : Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.
RtI Response to Intervention April 2, 2008 Board Presentation.
Thank you for joining us for Implementing an RTI Model The presentation will begin momentarily. RIGHT REASON TECHNOLOGIES YOUR SOLUTION FOR STUDENT SUCCESS.
No Child Left Behind The Basics Of Title 1 Every Child - Now! Focus on the critical nature of doing what’s right and what’s needed – today - to help every.
1 The History of Special Education Law Yell / The Law and Special Education, Second Edition Copyright © 2006 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Legal and Ethical Issues
National Center on Educational Outcomes June, 2004 How do we keep kids from being stuck in our gap? A frame, a series of discussion questions, and some.
Exceptionality and Special Education
Module 4 TED 356 Curriculum in Sec. Ed.. Module 4 Explain the current official federal and state standards, including professional and accrediting groups.
No Child Left Behind and Students with Disabilities Presentation for OSEP Staff March 20, 2003 Stephanie Lee Director, Office of Special Education Programs.
The 411 on IEPs and Section 504s Claudia Otto, Ph.D. Oklahoma Department of Career & Technology Education March 10, 2015.
Brief History of Education Reform A Move to Promote Equity and Equality.
High Stakes Testing EDU 330: Educational Psychology Daniel Moos.
Special Education in the United States Susie Fahey and Mario Martinez.
Special Education Briefing April 10, 2015 HAWAII STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HawaiiPublicSchools.org.
A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook.
Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.
Assessment in Early Childhood Legislation. Legislation for Young Children The need for measurement strategies and tests to evaluate federal programs led.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Standards The Achievement Gap The Debate Continues.
Title I Parent Information Session Applegate School Laura Donovan School.
Agenda (5:00-6:30 PM): Introduction to Staff Title I Presentation PTA Information Classroom visits (two 30 minute rotations)
Growth Model for District “X” Why Use Growth Models? Showing progress over time is a more fair way of evaluating It is not just a “snap shot” in time.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Special Education is not a place, it’s a service. Board Presentation November 28, 2011.
1 No Child Left Behind for Indian Groups 2004 Eva M. Kubinski Comprehensive Center – Region VI January 29, 2004 Home/School Coordinators’ Conference UW-Stout.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Chapter Two Policies, Practices, and Programs. Key Special Education Court Cases  Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas (1954)  PARC v. Commonwealth.
No Child Left Behind Education Week
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
WELCOME Title I School-wide Open House EWING PUBLIC SCHOOLS
No Child Left Behind Impact on Gwinnett County Public Schools’ Students and Schools.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Colorado Accommodation Manual Part I Section I Guidance Section II Five-Step Process Welcome! Colorado Department of Education Exceptional Student Services.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Legal Foundations of Special Education Special Education Paraprofessional Workbook Module 1.
Activity Get into groups of 3’s and try to answer the following questions, take 10 min. What does IDEA stand for? Define Least Restrictive Environment?
Partnering with Parents in using Federal Programs for Quality Education for all Students Federal Programs Department Parent Summit March 10, 2016.
American Institutes for Research
By : Debbie Charlesworth 2010 KINS-8431-NET (Curr Issues Trends in PE)
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Legal Foundations of Special Education
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
For Starters: It’s IDEIA !
Analysis of No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB)
Physical education, IF it is TAUGHT properly, is just as important as any other subject in the curriculum and can make just as valuable a contribution.
History of No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Ace it!SM Tutoring Teacher Training
Presentation transcript:

Educational Trends and Mandates

Mandates: Laws & Curriculum 1983: A Nation at Risk (National Commission on Excellence in Education, 1983). “Mediocre educational performance…act of war. We have…been committing…unthinking, unilateral educational disarmament. 1994: Goals 2000: Educate America Act - States were instructed to use the framework established by Goals 2000 to create world-class academic standards, provide support, and assess student progress (Lunenburg & Irby, 1999) 1995: NASPE - Moving into the Future: National Standards for Physical Education

Discussion Q What have you heard about NCLB? How has NCLB been both a positive and negative force in PE?

Mandates: Laws & Curriculum 2002: No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act (reauthorization of 1965 Elementary and Secondary Education Act) 1. Increased accountability – States were required to develop standards and align them with assessments. Students were tested in reading and math during grades 3-8 and once during high school. All schools and districts were required to achieve adequate yearly progress (AYP). Test data were publicly disclosed including group scores by socio-economic status, race, disability status, and language proficiency. School district data were disclosed on state report cards and corrective measures were instituted in schools that failed to make AYP. 2. Improved flexibility and local control - States and local communities were given more discretion about how federal dollars were spent. 3. More parental choice – Parents were given the option of transferring their children from failing schools to better performing public schools. Children who remaining in failing schools were eligible for supplemental educational services including tutoring, after school enrichment, and summer school. 4. Greater utilization of proven teaching methods

Mandates continued… Students with Disabilities PL 94-142 (FAPE, IEP, LRE) Section 504 of Rehabilitation Act IEP (performance, goals, services provided, transition, dates/duration, evaluation) Direct service (included in special education definition) Inclusion with support

Mandates continued… Legal Liability (covered more in O&A) Act as “reasonable & prudent” professional Unclear procedures Lack of supervision (Ithaca wall partition) Unsafe activities (steal the bacon soccer) Unanticipated performances (diss long jump) Skill discrepancy/entry level Equipment/facilities (pamper pole trapeze) Safety guidelines Age appropriate activities (3rd grade BB)

Mandates continued… State government Time allocated http://www.nasbe.org/index.php/prjects-separator/shs Click on “State School Health Policies Database” http://www.aahperd.org/naspe/ShapeOfTheNation/template.cfm?template=stateProfile_CT.html Summary of CT laws

Quasi-Mandate: Healthy People 2010 Healthy People 2010 provides a framework for prevention and promoting health. It is a statement of national health objectives designed to identify the most significant preventable threats to health and to establish national goals to reduce these threats.  http://www.healthypeople.gov/

Trends: Overweight and Obesity Epidemic Stats from National Center for Health Statistics (CDC)

Trends: Changing Demographics in the US Life expectancy – the US is 38th in the world ♀ 81 years ♂ 73 years Quality health and physical activity programs will increase for the growing population of older adults

Trends: Teaching to Diverse Student Populations Teaching to a diverse student population – How can physical educators ensure an equitable and positive experience regardless of diversity factors? Give some examples from the categories below…. Gender Race Culture Social Class Physical Ability Cognitive Ability Gifted/Talented At Risk Learning Style Melegrano example Glatthorn, A.A: Learning Twice

Other Trends in PE Physical activity and fitness programs Technology Community fitness programs, corporate fitness, older adult fitness, outdoor recreational activities, after-school physical activity programs for children, programs for individuals with disabilities and economically disadvantaged. Technology Gaming (Wii, DDR), fitness monitoring (polar HR, bioelectrical impedence), distance learning, e-mail, webquests, online textbooks

Future of PE Wellness based PE (wellness teachers) Adventure education, confidence building, trust formation, leadership development Fitness (region 15) Greater reliance on technology Embracing greater diversity of physical activity options more aligned with recreational trends