On Responsible (research) and innovation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sustainable & Ethical Enterprise Development. Agenda Background Principles for Responsible Management Education SEED Institute programming SEED Alliance.
Advertisements

Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions.
LIVEABLE CITIES Liveable Cities and Towns; Contributing to the Thematic Strategy on the Urban Environment (Session B4) Allen Creedy, ethics etc…
ICT Work Programme NCP Infoday 23 June Maria Geronymaki DG INFSO.H.2 ICT for Government & Public Services Objective.
“Steering and Funding – The Governance of science systems” Sources Based ont the reports of the Ad Hoc Working Group Steering and Funding of Research Institutions.
EU Research and Innovation Policy
Policy Research and Innovation Research and Innovation A perspective Transport Research & Innovation - through collaboration to tomorrow.
History, Theory, and Philosophy of Science (In SMAC + RT) 7th smester -Fall 2005 Institute of Media Technology and Engineering Science Aalborg University.
Organizations and Organization Theory
Stefan Kuhlmann | STePS | April T HANKS FOR A R ELEVANT C ONTRIBUTION !  Perception and functioning of scientific research and technological innovation.
Promoting responsible innovation: constructive technology assessment and the Dutch experience Arie Rip (University of Twente) Excerpts from Contribution.
MEANS TO AN END: the OECD Approach for Effective Implementation of Public Procurement Systems Getting really strategic Paulo Magina Head of the Public.
Introduction to Organizations
The New EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation EXCELLENT SCIENCE HORIZON 2020 Peter Fisch DG RTD A.5.
Ministry of Education and Religious Affairs General Secretariat for Research and Technology EEA Financial Mechanism Research within Priority.
What is Responsible Research and Innovation? The term is new, so definitions are evolving. Current debates suggest that it includes the following 1.The.
Changing institutional landscapes for wind power implementation. an international comparison Aberdeen, February 21 st 2008 Seminar: “Explaining National.
Review of the Operational Policies and Guidelines: key issues from a civil society perspective Sven Harmeling, Germanwatch Held.
T RUST AND R ESPONSIBILITY FOR B IG D ATA P RACTICES Heike Felzmann Centre of Bioethical Research & Analysis; InPrime, Insight Centre for Data Analytics;
Towards a health ethics policy framework to analyse user fee exemptions Renaud Boulanger, Matthew Hunt, Valéry Ridde.
1 Chapter Introduction to Organizations ©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly.
Business Responsibility and Sustainability Dr Eshani Beddewela Week 04.
Policy Research and Innovation Research and Innovation Enhancing and focusing EU international cooperation in research and innovation: A strategic approach.
EU Projects – FP7 Workshop 6: EU Funding –What’s Next? Carolina Fernandes Innovation & Funding Manager GLE Group.
 RESPONSIBILITY: FP7 Co-ordination action  Aim: contribute to development of RRI Governance Framework for future European Commission (and eventually.
Rome © Campden & Chorleywood Mo. Kht 1 1 Networking of National Platforms of ”Food for Life” András Sebők*, Kitti Németh** Coordinators of the.
Working in Partnership
CSR and the ASEAN Community Jerry Bernas Program Director ASEAN CSR Network.
Models of Anticipation within the Responsible Research and Innovation Framework: the Two RRI Souls and the Challenge of Human Rights Daniele Ruggiu CIGA,
Responsible Research and Innovation Enhancing Responsible Research and Innovation through Curricula in Higher Education (EnRRICH)
Serving society Stimulating innovation Supporting legislation S3 DESIGN LEARNING WORKSHOP Chisinau, Moldova, 18 February, 2016 THE.
Public Relations DPR 3B Strategic contribution of Public Relations to other management functions Learning Unit 2.1 Student Manual pp August 2011.
A brief introduction to RRI and Res-AGorA Ralf Lindner Res-AGorA Workshop: RRI in the context of research performing institutions.
Engaging multiple actors and society in science, research and innovation within Horizon2020 science, research and innovation within Horizon2020 Engagement.
Challenge the future Delft University of Technology Responsibility issues in the governance of responsible innovation Ibo van de Poel, Philosophy.
RRI Showcase Knowledge for Climate. | Showcase Knowledge for Climate Knowledge for Climate  Large-scale, multi-actor research program  Aimed at knowledge.
Dr. Klaus Jacob Forschungszentrum für Umweltpolitik Freie Universität Berlin The Governance of Responsibility.
1 Chapter Organizations and Organization Theory Organization Theory and Design Twelfth Edition Richard L. Daft.
The EQAVET Framework – supporting quality and relevance of VET
Monitoring and Evaluating Rural Advisory Services
RUNNING AN EFFECTIVE FUND RAISING CAMPAIGN
Health Technology Assessment
“Self-Sustaining Innovation Ecosystems for European Leadership”
CILIP Performance Framework – Business metrics & KPI
Engaging multiple actors and society in science, research and innovation within Horizon2020 science, research and innovation within Horizon2020 Giuseppe.
RRI: A CROSSOVER PRINCIPLE?
LITHUANIAN RURAL PARLIAMENT April 24, 2015
Agenda Context Motivation Scope Main expected results.
Luisa PRISTA DG Research and Innovation
Why the Multistakeholder Approach Works
Principles for public-private partnerships – towards sustainability?
Tomorrow’s Australian Company
Cathy Hughes and Neil Crosby
Organizations and Organization Theory
Interpreting Foresight Process Impacts:
NGO priorities for environmentally sustainable aquaculture in the EU Ann Dom, Deputy Director Dublin workshop April 2014.
1 PIANC and the Environment Working WITH Nature
Advanced Management Control and Sustainable Development
Regional workshop on Approaches to the implementation and monitoring of community-based ecosystem approach to fisheries management (CEAFM): finding common.
Workshop 1: PROJECT EVALUATION
Directorate General Information Society & Media
Director «Components & Systems»
Conceptual Framework for Measuring Quality of Employment
On Responsible (research) and innovation
Organizations and Organization Theory
RESPONDING TO STUDENT VOICE: PRINCIPLES OF PRACTICE
Being a Local University: Towards New Assessment Tools and Indicators Dr John H Smith Senior Adviser, European University Association (EUA) Brussels Member,
Fostering Improved Training Tools for Responsible Research & Innovation
FIT4RRI Focus Group Meeting to discuss objectives related to embedding of RRI in monitoring system research. Mary Jane Monaghan Joseph Spencer.
Reviewing RIS3 in Catalonia
Presentation transcript:

On Responsible (research) and innovation Dr Kostas Iatridis School of Management, University of Bath, UK 20 February 2019

A governance framework for major challenges

A key aspect of EU H2020 100 projects funded €200 millions (out of €450 app.) 700 organizations 50 organizations with 3+ projects Mostly conceptual work, stakeholder dialogues, roadmaps and tools Main focus on Responsible Research rather than Innovation A key aspect of EU H2020

A key aspect of local funding bodies e.g. EPSRC

Responsible Research and Innovation is a transparent, interactive process by which societal actors and innovators become mutually responsive to each other with a view to the (ethical) acceptability, sustainability and societal desirability of the innovation process and its marketable products (in order to allow a proper embedding of scientific and technological advances in our society) (von Schomberg, 2011). Definition

Ethical acceptability suggests that innovation outcomes need to be in line with widely accepted norms and values in society. Sustainability focuses on environmental sustainability and eco-efficiency, and promotes a responsible use of natural resources during the innovation processes. Societal desirability proposes that innovation outcomes should contribute to the solution of key challenges facing humanity. RI principles

Anticipation: responsible innovation is predicated on the idea that it is possible, at least to some degree, to anticipate future outcomes of innovation and consequences (both intended and non-intended) for broader groups. Deliberation (inclusion): involving stakeholders in the innovation process. RI means

Reflexivity: implies that not only the means of achieving particular innovation goals, but also the ends that are to be achieved, are reflected upon. To ensure that this happens, auditing and reviewing mechanisms are needed. Responsiveness: suggests that during this process innovators should respond to newly emerging knowledge and perspectives. RI means

RI - Main characteristics Uncritical inclusion of stakeholders Might overlap with existing ethical frameworks Anticipation Reflexivity Inclusion Responsiveness Precautionary approach to research and innovation + Suspiciousness against science and its outcomes Misses out flexible, dynamic nature of corporate innovation Provides little guidance on how companies can balance private interests against public interests

Applying RI to your projects………