1. RRI Showcase Knowledge for Climate

2. | Showcase Knowledge for Climate Knowledge for Climate  Large-scale, multi-actor research program  Aimed at knowledge production for climate adaptation (societal challenge)  Co-creation of knowledge is central  Key figures:  2007-2014  50 million euro budget  Universities, research institutes, consultancies, municipalities, water boards, firms

3. | Showcase Knowledge for Climate Program level co-creation  Program level:  ‘safe haven’ for science-society interactions  support alternative research careers  Close association involvement of users in proposal phase and in the funded program:  User involvement in proposal phase  actual involvement during the program more likely  User involvement in proposal phase  financial contributions to the program more likely

4. | Showcase Knowledge for Climate Hotspot level  Hotspots:  vulnerable locations  transdisciplinary governance  projects

5. | Showcase Knowledge for Climate Example project https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4JIjuNMpkeI

6. | Showcase Knowledge for Climate Often-used definitions of RRI “Responsible Research and Innovation is a transparent, interactive process by which societal actors and innovators become mutually responsive to each other with a view to the (ethical) acceptability, sustainability and societal desirability of the innovation process and its marketable products (in order to allow a proper embedding of scientific and technological advances in our society).” (von Schomberg, 2011:9) “Responsible innovation means taking care of the future through collective stewardship of science and innovation in the present.” (Stilgoe et al., 2013:1570)

7. | Working definition(D1.1) Science Education Ethics Gender Equality Governance Public Engagement Open Access

8. | Developing the set of quality criteria and indicators review of policy and academic literature theoretical ideas, old and new insights stakeholder workshops across Europe in Fall 2014 practical activities, emerging insights RRI Rome declaration promising practice sheets collected by HUBs reality check Presentations and discussions in different forums across Europe, both scientific and practice oriented testing, feedback and adaptation

9. | engaged publics stakeholder learning engaged publics stakeholder learning responsible institutions ethically acceptable socially desirable sustainable grand challenges outcomes/impacts Conditions for the research and innovation system structures for governance structures for public engagement research integrity and research ethics science education science communication open access policy open and deliberative culture gender policy diversity policy stigma and discrimination policy Science Education Ethics Gender Equality Governance Public Engagement Open Access New working definition (D1.3 - adapted) process

10. | List of quality criteria Criteria formulated per process requirement Subcriteria and questions to think about it Relation to policy agendas and outcomes

11. | D1.3: This is not a checklist, but thinking tool! The prime importance of context Always keep the outcomes in mind 1.Evaluative framework to think about RRI initiatives A stimulus and inspiration to (re)shape research and innovation 2.Self-assessment tool(s) for those active in R&I/ RRI Quality criteria provide specific assistance to different stakeholders 3.Selection of promising practices for D1.4 Loose fit: how do practices incorporate criteria and indicators?