STUDENT EQUITY PLAN CAMPUS-BASED RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LACCD Strategic Plan Internal Scan A. Enrollment Trends and Student Characteristics.
Advertisements

Perkins IV National Definitions and State Reporting: The Impact on Data Collection in Texas Gabriela Borcoman Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board.
Measuring Disproportionate Impact and Identifying Factors that Impact Hispanic Student Completion Rates Unpacking the Student Success Scorecard Matthew.
ACCJC’s Annual Report Institution-Set Standards REVISED March 19, 2014 PaRC Presentation E. Kuo Foothill IR&P.
California Community Colleges Student Success 2014 Scorecard 2014 Scorecard College of the Desert Board of Trustee Presentation Dec. 19, 2014.
Collaboration for Student Success and Equity Denise Noldon, Interim Vice Chancellor, Student Services and Special Programs and Pam Walker, Vice Chancellor,
Student Equity Plan Presented on Flex Day by Shauna Hagemann Faculty Co-Chair, Student Success Committee Counselor, DSPS Karen Rothstein Student Equity.
Professional Development Day Fall 2014 R. Brown, V. Martinez, K. Moberg, A. Ratto.
Success for All: Student Equity and the New Student Success and Support Program Strengthening Student Success Conference October 9, 2013.
Academic Attainment in California Community Colleges: Racial And Ethnic Disparities in the ARCC 2.0/Scorecard Metrics Tom Leigh Alice van Ommeren.
ARCC /08 Reporting Period Prepared by: Office of Institutional Research & Planning February 2010.
November 13, 2013 Contra Costa Community College District Board Review Achievement Gap Report & College Scorecards.
Student Services Support Program (SSSP) and Student Equity Plans ASCCC Leadership Institute 2015 Cheryl Aschenbach Cynthia Rico James Todd.
A 360˚Approach to Student Success & Support and Student Equity The Student Success and Support Program and Student Equity Program Plans Update Sacramento.
Presenters Rogeair D. Purnell Bri C. Hays A guide to help examine and monitor equitable access and success Assessing and Mitigating Disproportionate Impact.
Click to edit Master title style 1 What Data? California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office Dr. W. Charles Wiseley, “Chuck” Career Technical Education.
Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges, 2012 Report Riverside Community College District Riverside Community College District Teaching & Learning.
Student Equity Report Planning
Student Performance Profile Study: An Examination of Success and Equity Matt Wetstein, Interim Vice President of Instruction Office of Planning, Research,
Aggregated Core Indicator Data TOPs Code 12 – Performance Of All Voc Ed & Special Populations Students.
Kale Braden, ASCCC North Representative Michelle Grimes-Hillman, ASCCC Curriculum Committee Chair James Todd, Interim Vice-President, Student Services,
REPORT TO THE SAN LUIS OBISPO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES MARCH 7, 2012 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT INSTITUTIONAL.
1. ACCJC INSTITUTION-SET STANDARDS DISCUSSION 2 A “standard” is the level of performance set by the institution to meet educational quality and institutional.
Student Equity in California Community Colleges Dr. Craig Hayward, Director Lisa Nguyen, Senior Research and Planning Analyst Irvine Valley College.
Student Equity Plan. Project Overview What is the project about? Access and success Define the goal of this project o Action plans to address disproportionate.
Merritt College’s plan based on the principles Improve student access to college programs and services. Increase and balance student equity and diversity.
Student Equity Initiative & Plan Overview
 California community colleges serve over 2.9 million students each year  70 to 80% of students enrolled in California community colleges need developmental.
STUDENT EQUITY PLAN CAMPUS-BASED RESEARCH METHODOLOGY.
Student Equity Plan Tables Submitted 12/18/2015 in the SCC Student Equity Plan Katherine Zoloty SSSP & Student Equity Research Analyst.
Mallory Newell Office of Institutional Research and Planning
Sacramento City College’s 360˚Approach to Student Success & Support and Student Equity The Student Success and Support Program (SSSP) and Student Equity.
Creating a Blueprint For Student Equity and Student Success, Part 1.
Riverside City College Institutional Effectiveness Strategic Plan Update.
With Institutional and Program Level Data
SLOCCCD Board of Trustees Meeting November 2, 2016
Student Success Scorecard: 2016 Report
Student Equity Report
The U.S. Higher Education Landscape: Equity Lens Applied
Chancellor’s Office Data Resources for Student Success October 7, 2015
Student Success Scorecard and Institution-Set Standards 2014
SLOCCCD Board of Trustees October 1, 2014
2016 Taft College Student Success Scorecard
2017 Taft College Student Success Scorecard
Board of Trustees Review
SOCCCD Board of Trustees’ Meeting
Guiding Questions What are your general reactions to the data?
Student Success Scorecard & Other Institutional Effectiveness Metrics
IEPI – Participate | Collaborate | Innovate
To FYE… and Beyond Butte College.
2009 ARCC Report Findings October 5, 2009
Outcomes Data and Equity
Student Success Metrics
Presented To: College Planning Council
All Faculty Meeting Fast facts.
Student Success Metrics
Open House with the California Acceleration Project: Resources for Transforming Remediation Conference on Acceleration in Developmental Education June.
Student Success Metrics
SLOCCCD Board of Trustees October 7, 2014
Process for Local District Goal Setting
Disproportionate Impact Study
Student Equity Plan Process Skyline College
Vision for Success Local Goal Setting April 2019.
Presented To: College Planning Council
2010 ARCC Report Findings May 3, 2010
Vision for Success Local Goal Setting Advisory Council▪ April 19, 2019.
Glendale Community College: Statewide Accountability Reporting
Dean, Research, Planning & Institutional Effectiveness
Student equity GOALS June 11, 2019
Vision for Success Local Goal Setting Part 1
Presentation transcript:

STUDENT EQUITY PLAN CAMPUS-BASED RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

SUCCESS INDICATORS There are five success indicators outlined in the CCCCO Equity Plan with which to assess disproportionate impact: 1. Access; 2. Course completion; 3. ESL and Basic Skills Completion; 4. Degree and Certificate Completion; and 5. Transfer.

Disaggregated Subgroups To assess equity, analyses should use one or more of the following five disaggregated subgroups: 1. Gender ; 2. Ethnicity; 3. Age; 4. Disability status; and 5. Economically disadvantaged. In addition to these groups we have included Veteran and Foster Youth status.

Data Procedures

Proportionality Index The proportionality methodology compares the percentage of a disaggregated subgroup in an initial cohort to its own percentage in the resultant outcome group. Challenge: It does not specify at which point a proportionality index should be considered as a “disproportionate impact.” 80-Percent Rule The “80% Rule” methodology compares the percentage of each disaggregated subgroup attaining an outcome to the percentage attained by a reference subgroup. Challenge: It is not always clear that the highest performing group should be chosen as the reference group.

References Bensimon, E. M., & Malcom-Piqueux, L. (2014, March). Assessing ‘Hispanic Servingness’ at HSIs. Presented at the AAHHE Annual Conference, Costa Mesa, CA. Retrieved from link.   California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office (2013, October). Guidelines for Measuring Disproportionate Impact in Equity Plans (Revised July 2014). Retrieved from link. California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office. (2015, August). Student Equity Plan Template (Revised August 2015). Retrieved from link.

Disproportionate Impact Methodology The methodology that was used for this plan was the Proportionality Index, which is the California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office’s (CCCCO) preferred methodology (California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office, 2015). Professor Bensimon and her colleagues have determined that a disproportionate impact occurs when the proportionality index falls below the cutoff of .85 (California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office, 2015). The District considered institutional history, context, and local conditions in determining which disaggregated subgroups should be considered as disproportionately impacted. The District used its discretion to include all disproportionately impacted groups for each success indicator unless the group total number was below 20.

COHORT Proportionality Index 14 Females (52%) 4 Females (44%) PI = (44/52) = 0.85 5 Males (56%) 13 Males (48%) PI = (56/48) = 1.17 80-PERCENT RULE Female 4/14 = 28.57% *Male 5/13 = 38.46% 80 Percent Index 28.57/38.46 = 74.28%

Questions? Questions?