English Learner Accountability Component

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Completing the Classroom Teacher and Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluations for Presented by: The Office of Talent Development Employee Evaluations.
Advertisements

Changes To Florida’s School Grades Calculations Adopted By The State Board Of Education On February 28, 2012 Prepared by Research, Evaluation & Accountability.
2 EOC Graduation Policy High Stakes Policy District Test Coordinator Spring 2010 Pretest Workshop.
SAISD Board Report Office of Research and Evaluation
Overview of Wyoming Accountability in Education Act (WAEA)
2015 Goals and Targets for State Accountability Date: 10/01/2014 Presenter: Carla Stevens Assistant Superintendent, Research and Accountability.
 Gisela Feild Administrative Director Assessment, Research and Data Analysis July 2014.
Understanding the Pennsylvania School Performance Profile Introduction.
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
Title III Accountability. Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives How well are English Learners achieving academically? How well are English Learners.
1 School Grades & AMO Overview Paul Houchens Director Student Assessment & Research.
Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability Model June 2011.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
Pontotoc City School District. Pontotoc City School District believes LEARNING is a priority, a need, and a desire. To be successful, we must nurture.
College and Career Preparation 1 College and Career Preparation Lodi Unified School District September 2, 2008 Prepared by the Assessment,
Grades 6-8 MONITORING REPORT HIGHLIGHTS DECEMBER 2013.
Understanding the SPP September 26, > Purpose The PA School Performance Profile is designed to:  Provide a building.
PA School Performance Profile June /3/13. Your Role: Communicate the purpose and design of the proposed PA School Performance Profile (SPP) Create.
ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Accountability Services.
Using Data to Guide Decision-Making and Continuous Improvement.
July 2 nd, 2008 Austin, Texas Chrys Dougherty Senior Research Scientist National Center for Educational Achievement Adequate Growth Models.
Testing Coordinators: October 4, 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Academic Performance Index (API)
Changes to the School Grading. Student Assessment FCAT 2.0 in Reading and Mathematics Next Generation Sunshine State Standards (NGSSS) with new cut scores.
ELL AMAO and Grad Rate Data ELL Outcome Improvement Group Oregon Department of Education July 21, 2015.
PED School Grade Reports (with thanks to Valley High School) ACE August 3, 2012 Dr. Russ Romans District Accountability Manager.
Growth Model: A Way to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) The Effective Use of Data to Make AYP AERA CCSSO April 13, 2007.
MDE Accountability Update SLIP Conference, January 2016.
What are EXPLORE and PLAN?  The EXPLORE® program: 8th and 9th grades  The PLAN® program: 10th grade  Nationally normed tests that: are aligned to the.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
703 KAR 5:225 Next-Generation Learners Accountability System Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Support & Research KDE:OAA:DSR:cw,ko.
Accountability and School Grades FY 16 Charter Schools Principal’s Meeting March 17, 2016 Everglades Preparatory Academy.
School Accountability and Grades Division of Teaching and Learning January 20, 2016.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Accountability Update School Grades Technical Assistance Meeting.
November 2009 Copyright © 2009 Mississippi Department of Education 1 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Research and Statistics Mississippi.
Accountability and School Grades FY 17 Charter Schools Principal’s Meeting August 24, 2016 Pew Center.
A-F Report Card Law, Reporting Phases, and Indicator Descriptors.
Leader slts PRIOR TO : Principal set a minimum of two goals, which express an expectation of student growth. SPS available for use.
Communication Webinar:
Pathways to Graduation
Performance Wisconsin Student Assessment System
SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE 15/16 Calculations & Changes under ESSA
Beresford School District Report Card Data 16-17
Overview Page Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Welcome to the BT Super Conference
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Driving Through the California Dashboard
WIDA Standards for ELLs
HEADING (no smaller than 36 pts)
FY 11 School Grade Calculation
Kentucky’s New Accountability Model
Understanding Results
HEADING (no smaller than 36 pts)
New Accountability System: District and Site Report Cards
Milton Public Schools 2013 Accountability Status
Specifications Used for School Identification Under ESSA in
ESSA for AFESC Schools 2018 Under the reauthorization of ESEA, the federal government required each state to design an accountability system that met.
Texas State Accountability
School Performance Measure Calculations SY
Leader SLTs
Leader SLTs
Madison Elementary / Middle School and the New Accountability System
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
Presented by Joseph P. Stern
Driving Through the California Dashboard
Education and Accountability
Spencer County Public Schools
2019 Report Card Update Marianne Mottley Report Card Project Director
Secondary Data Presentation
Impact of EL Students and TELPAS Performance on State Accountability
Spring 2019 MCAS Grade 10 Annotated Parent/Guardian Reports
Presentation transcript:

English Learner Accountability Component Alan Burrow Executive Director Office of District and School Performance

MISSISSIPPI STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS 4 5 6 1 2 3 Every Community Effectively Uses a World-Class Data System to Improve Student Outcomes Every Student Graduates from High School and is Ready for College and Career All Students Proficient and Showing Growth in All Assessed Areas Every Child Has Access to a High- Quality Early Childhood Program Every School Has Effective Teachers and Leaders Every School and District is Rated “C” or Higher

EL Accountability Component

Mississippi English Learner Standards Las Links Domains: Overall – used for EL accountability component and student must achieve proficiency to exit EL program Reading – must achieve proficiency to exit EL program Writing – must achieve proficiency to exit EL program Speaking Listening

English Learner (EL) Component EL students should achieve English proficiency within 5 years of entering an EL program Students must have a valid Las Links Overall domain score for the current and prior year First year students are exempt from the EL component Students must meet FAY for current year, but not prior year Individual student scores will range between 0 and 1 A student who regresses on his/her EL assessment will receive a score of 0 A student progressing more than expected will receive a score 1

EL Component Scoring (years 2 – 4) Every eligible student receives an EL score based on his/her progress toward English proficiency. Points are calculated using the following steps: 1) 2) Goal = progress needed to meet English proficiency within established timeframe Exit = minimum Overall proficiency score needed by the required exit year Prior = prior year EL assessment score Current = current year EL assessment score Years = number of years left to exit program on time (based on prior year) 𝐺𝑜𝑎𝑙= 𝐸𝑥𝑖𝑡 −𝑃𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟 𝑌𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠 𝐸𝐿 𝑆𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑒=𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 𝑜𝑓 𝐶𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 −𝑃𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟 𝐺𝑜𝑎𝑙 𝑜𝑟 1

EL Component Scoring (Exit Year and Beyond) Goal for Exit year and beyond does not include a denominator: 1) 𝐺𝑜𝑎𝑙=𝐸𝑥𝑖𝑡−𝑃𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟 𝑬𝑳 𝑺𝒄𝒐𝒓𝒆=𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 𝑜𝑓 𝐶𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 −𝑃𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟 𝐺𝑜𝑎𝑙 𝑜𝑟 1 2) Exit = minimum Overall proficiency score needed Prior = prior year EL assessment score Current = current year EL assessment score

Las Links Overall Score Needed (Exit) Grade Overall Level 4 (Proficient) K 468 1 471 2 501 3 511 4 525 5 528 6 537 7 538 8 539 9 547 10 549 11 551 12 553

Example 1 Susan is a second year EL student in grade 3. She earned an Overall score of 470 (current). Last year, she earned a 450 (prior). Susan’s goal is to exit by the end of grade 6. This requires a score of 537 (exit). Based on her prior year information, Susan needs to grow by 87 points (537 – 450) over 4 years, or about 22 points per year, to exit the program on time Susan’s actual growth was 20 points (470 – 450) Her EL (progress-to-proficiency) score is 20 ÷ 22 = 0.909

Example 2 – Exit Year George is a fifth year EL student in grade 6. He earned an Overall score of 530 (current). He earned a 490 last year (prior) This is the year George should exit the EL program The Las Links proficiency level minimum for grade 6, Overall, is 537 (exit) George needed 47 points (537 – 490) from what he scored last year to reach English proficiency this year. He only grew by 40 points (530 – 490) George’s EL score is 40 ÷ 47 = 0.851

Points for Elementary/Middle – 700 Points including EL Reading Math Science English Learners Proficiency (95 pts.) Progress to Proficiency (35 pts.) Growth All Students   Lowest 25% Participation measured in all assessed subjects

Points for High Schools and Districts – 1,000 Points including EL Reading Math Other Subjects Graduation 4 year Acceleration College & Career Readiness English Learners Proficiency (95 pts.) Science (47.5 pts.) 4-Year Cohort Rate (190 pts.) Performance (23.75 pts.) ACT Math Progress to Proficiency (50 pts.) Growth All Students U.S. History Participation ACT Reading or English Lowest 25%   Participation measured in all assessed subjects

EL Accountability Component Score Only schools/districts with at least 10 eligible EL students will have an EL component included The average of the points earned for all EL students will be calculated for eligible schools/districts The established expectation: Schools/districts with a student average ≥ 0.90 will receive full accountability points for EL component Schools/districts < 0.90 student average will have their student average multiplied to the allowable EL points

Office of District and School Performance Contact Information C. Alan Burrow, Director Office of District and School Performance (601) 359-3514 aburrow@mdek12.org