SRCDS: ESP Evaluation System

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Santa Rosa County District Schools Educational Support Evaluation System.
Advertisements

Santa Rosa County District Schools Evaluation Systems.
Infinite Campus Tutorial
Completing the Classroom Teacher and Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluations for Presented by: The Office of Talent Development Employee Evaluations.
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
Teacher Evaluation Update
Educator Evaluation Regulations, Mandatory Elements & Implementation MTA Center for Education Policy and Practice August 2014.
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
The Assistant Principal Pool Process 2014
Merit Award Program The School District of Lee County Merit Award Program Training November 2007.
Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System Orientation SY14-15 Evaluation Systems Office, HR John Adams, CHRO.
Professional Development and Appraisal System
I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=
I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=
1 Work Sampling Can provide information about men and machines in less time and lower cost. It has three main uses: 1.Activity and delay sampling To measure.
Mississippi Student Services Coordinators Appraisal Rubric (M-SSAR)
Student Learning Growth Details November 27 th and November 29th.
Collective Bargaining Retreat for Management Discussion of the Impact of Measuring Teacher and Leader Effectiveness on Collective Bargaining August 17,
State Board Mission, Goals, and Policies
Standards IV and VI. Possible Artifacts:  School Improvement Plan  School Improvement Team  North Carolina Teacher Working Conditions Survey  Student.
Summative Evaluation Configuration Washington Township Public Schools
GEA TOOL KIT PRESENTATION STAR ORULLIAN – EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR GRANITE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION.
Mohawk Jr-Sr High School PSSA/PVAAS Act 82 – New Teacher Evaluation Law Beginning in the school year, fifty percent (50%) of the evaluation.
New Hanover County Schools Board of Education Presentation November 19, 2013.
Inspecting the Boat What Is the Source of School Support Teams (SSTs)? PUBLIC LAW , JAN. 8, STAT NCLB (Handout 1)
35% Non-FCAT Teachers – Teacher Level Student Growth Component – 40% Bay District has adopted teacher-level student growth measures for those teachers.
Understanding How Evaluations are Calculated Professional Practices, Measures of Student Learning/ Outcomes- Calculating Scores & Translating SLOs/SOOs.
EISD Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System T-TESS
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Ash BUS 434 Week 3 Assignment Employee Relations Manager Paper Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
New Teacher Induction.
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
About the Study 1 Summary 2 Market Study Results 3 Recommendations 4.
Winding Your Way through Program Details: Titles II-A & VI
Wethersfield Teacher Evaluation and Support Plan
Low-Performing Schools Evaluation Requirements
Teacher Evaluation Process
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
What component is the greatest barrier for you as an evaluator?
Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation
Growth Models Oklahoma
CUR 723 Innovative Education-- snaptutorial.com
FY17 Evaluation Overview: Student Performance Rating
SDBQ reports Student Reports - Performance at a Glance
Overview This presentation provides information on how districts compile evaluation ratings for principals, assistant principals (APs), and vice principals.
Leon LEADS Leon Evaluation And Development System
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Reports for Data & Progress Monitoring
TFI Wordle This presentation is intended to introduce the PBISApps site and the types of data teams will be working with. The teams will take their first.
Ongoing Lead Evaluator
New Accountability System: District and Site Report Cards
Lead Evaluator for Principals Part I, Series 1
AchieveNJ: Teacher Evaluation Scoring Guide
Implementing the Specialized Service Professional State Model Evaluation System for Measures of Student Outcomes.
Understanding How Evaluations are Calculated
Maximizing RANDA Reports for Directors and Principals
Teacher Evaluation Process
Using the 4.0 Gradebook.
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Evaluation Information
Solving Equations 3x+7 –7 13 –7 =.
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Pike County Schools Certified Evaluation Annual Training
Example Make x the subject of the formula
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Setting up a gradebook Miranda Edmonds, M.Ed.
Presentation transcript:

Santa Rosa County District Schools Educational Support Evaluation System

SRCDS: ESP Evaluation System Educational Support Personnel Evaluation System The system reflects the Administrative and Instructional Evaluation System In addition to the Evaluation Data, the Educational Support Personnel Evaluation System includes school-wide “Studer” Parent & Student Survey data and Student Performance data. School Site administrators will review the evaluation system with all of their Educational Support Personnel during pre-planning.

SRCDS: ESP Evaluation System Section I: Self Assessment Looks and functions more like the Administrative and Instructional Evaluation System ESP will complete before the end of the first nine weeks 21 Indicators : (5 major areas) Dependability (5 Indicators) Quality/Quantity of Work (4 Indicators) Initiative (3 Indicators) Interpersonal/ Attitude (5 Indicators) Personal (4 Indicators) Page 6 In ESP manual Self Assessment provides ESPs an opportunity to review the areas they will be evaluated on prior to the end of year transfer period

SRCDS: ESP Evaluation System Section II: Supervisor Evaluation Same as Self Assessment (see Rubric) 5 Areas with 21 Indicators Ratings are: Highly Effective (HE) = 4.0 Effective (E) = 3.0 Needs Improvement (NI): (Comments Required) = 2.0 Unsatisfactory (U): (Comments Required) = 1.0 Rate each ESP on each of the indicators by marking one tally under the rating (HE, E, NI, U) Previous: 7 Areas with30 Indicators: NOW 5 Areas with 21 Indicators

SRCDS: ESP Evaluation System Section II: Overall Indicator Rating (there are 21): The number of tallies per rating will be multiplied by the rating value, added together, then divided by 21 (which is the # of indicators). Evaluation Summary HE (4.0) E (3.0) NI (2.0) U (1.0) Number of Indicators Marked 8 9 3 1 Evaluation Summary HE (4.0) E (3.0) NI (2.0) U (1.0) Number of Indicators Marked 8 X 4 = 32 9 X3 = 27 3 X2 = 6 1 x1 = 1 Overall Evaluation Score 32 + 27 + 6 + 1 = 66 66/21 = 3.14

SRCDS: ESP Evaluation System Section II: Supervisor Evaluation Scoring Overall Indicator Rating Calculation uses a scale to determine Overall Indicator Rating: Highly Effective: 4.00- 3.50 Effective: 3.49 – 2.25 Needs Improvement: 2.24 – 1.75 Unsatisfactory: Below 1.75 Example : 3.14 = Effective

SRCDS: ESP Evaluation System Section III: Surveys (Student and Parent) Same surveys used for Administration and Instructional Evaluations School wide results will be used. School wide surveys will count 10% The school wide student survey will count 5% The school wide parent survey will count 5% The Studer School Wide Surveys for both Parent and Student (5 point scale) will be converted to a Results Evaluation Score (4 point scale) Survey Results Evaluation Score 4.00 – 5.00 Highly Effective (4.0) 2.75 – 3.99 Effective (3.0) 2.00 – 2.74 Needs Improvement (2.0) Below 2.00 Unsatisfactory (1.0) The conversion is the same we do for the current Administration and Instructional Evaluations. Example: School Wide Parent Survey Result of 3.25 would equate to an Evaluation Score of Effective (3.0) School Wide Student Survey Result of 4.15 would equate to an Evaluation Score of Highly Effective (4.0)

SRCDS: ESP Evaluation System Section IV: Student Performance Will Count 10% of the total ESP observation The student performance formula for the ESP will be the same as their work site administrator. EX: The bookkeeper score at Holley Navarre Primary would use the same formula as the Principal at Holley Navarre Primary. The difference is that the score would only count 10% of the overall evaluation score. EX: A district maintenance worker or bus driver would use the same formula as the Assistant Superintendent for Administrative Services. The difference is that the score would only count 10% of the overall evaluation score.

SRCDS: ESP Evaluation System Section V: Overall Evaluation This section totals the previous four sections to identify an overall evaluation rating. Each section will be totaled and weighed using the assigned percentages. The overall evaluation score will use the following scale: Highly Effective (HE) 4.00 – 3.50 Effective (E) 3.49 – 2.25 Needs Improvement (NI) 2.24 – 1.75 Unsatisfactory (U) Below 1.75

SRCDS: ESP Evaluation System Section V: Overall Evaluation Type Score Weight Weighted Score Supervisor Evaluation (Section II) 3.14 0.80 2.51 Parent Survey (Section III) 3.0 0.05 0.15 Student Survey (Section III) 4.0 0.20 Student Assessment (Section IV) 1.88 0.10 0.19 TOTAL SCORE 1.00 3.05 TOTAL SCORE 3.05 Overall Evaluation Category Effective

SRCDS: ESP Evaluation System The Educational Support Evaluation System manual can be found on the district home page.