1. Summative Evaluation Configuration Washington Township Public Schools 2013-2014

2. Summative Weightings for Teachers with an SGP

3. Summative Weightings for Teachers without an SGP

4. Summative Weightings for Certified, Non-Classroom Staff

5. 43210 Formative Ratings Used for Each Domain Element InnovatingApplyingDevelopingBeginningNot Using Instructional Practice: Steps for Calculating the Status Score Step 1: Rate observed elements at each of the following levels: Innovating (4), Applying (3), Developing (2), Beginning (1), and Not Using (0)

6. Instructional Practice: Steps for Calculating the Status Score Step 2: Count the number of ratings at each level for each of the four domains Step 3: For each domain, determine the percentage of the total each level represents. (Automatically calculated on spreadsheet.)

7. Example Step 2: Count the number of ratings at each level for Domain 1 InnovatingApplyingDevelopingBeginningNot Using

8. FrequencyD1D2D3D4 Level 4 - Innovative12 Level 3 - Applying34 Level 2 - Developing15 Level 1 - Beginning3 Level 0 – Not Using2 Total Elements Used66--- PercentagesD1D2D3D4 Level 418% Level 352% Level 223% Level 15% Level 03% 100%0%

9. Example Step 2: Count the number of ratings at each level for Domain 2 InnovatingApplyingDevelopingBeginningNot Using

10. STATUS SCORE Directions: 1. Using the Domain Forms, count the number of times each scale level has been recorded 2. Enter the frequency in the yellow highlighted cells FrequencyD1D2D3D4 Level 4 - Innovative127 Level 3 - Applying3414 Level 2 - Developing157 Level 1 - Beginning34 Level 0 – Not Using23 Total Elements Used6635-- PercentagesD1D2D3D4 Level 418%20% Level 352%40% Level 223%20% Level 15%11% Level 03%9% 100% 0%

11. Example Step 2: Count the number of ratings at each level for Domain 3 InnovatingApplyingDevelopingBeginningNot Using

12. STATUS SCORE Directions: 1. Using the Domain Forms, count the number of times each scale level has been recorded 2. Enter the frequency in the yellow highlighted cells FrequencyD1D2D3D4 Level 4 - Innovative1274 Level 3 - Applying34148 Level 2 - Developing1575 Level 1 - Beginning343 Level 0 – Not Using232 Total Elements Used663522- PercentagesD1D2D3D4 Level 418%20%18% Level 352%40%36% Level 223%20%23% Level 15%11%14% Level 03%9% 100% 0%

13. Example Step 2: Count the number of ratings at each level for Domain 4 InnovatingApplyingDevelopingBeginningNot Using

14. STATUS SCORE Directions: 1. Using the Domain Forms, count the number of times each scale level has been recorded 2. Enter the frequency in the yellow highlighted cells FrequencyD1D2D3D4 Level 4 - Innovative12743 Level 3 - Applying341486 Level 2 - Developing15754 Level 1 - Beginning3432 Level 0 – Not Using232- Total Elements Used66352215 PercentagesD1D2D3D4 Level 418%20%18%20% Level 352%40%36%40% Level 223%20%23%27% Level 15%11%14%13% Level 03%9% 0% 100%

15. DomainNumber of ElementsWeight 14168% 2814% 358% 4610% Summative Evaluation Configuration for Classroom Teacher Evaluation Model DomainNumber of ElementsWeight 11649% 2721% 3412% 4618% Summative Evaluation Configuration for Non- Classroom Teacher Evaluation Model

16. Score for a Classroom Teacher 3 3 Applying 2.92 14% ?? ?? ?? ?? ???? ?? ?? ?? ??

17. Review Part 1 Q: True or False: All 4 Domains contribute to the calculation of my Overall Status Score A: True. Staff members’ final summative status score will include ratings in all 4 Marzano Domains.

18. Review Part 1 Q: All 4 Domains contribute equal weighting in the calculation of my Overall Status Score. T/F? A: False, Domains with the more elements have a greater weight. Domain 1 has the greatest weight.

19. Score for a Classroom Teacher 3 3 Applying 2.92 14% ?? ?? ?? ?? ???? ?? ?? ?? ??

20. Summative Evaluation Vocabulary Status Score – The whole number score received for each domain. Overall Status Score – The final cumulative score after each domain has been weighted and combined. Proficiency Scale – The “cut score” (or percentage) that determines the Status Score. Category of Teacher – As per Achieve NJ, teachers are divided into three categories based on number of years experience. – Category 1: Non-Tenured, Years 1 & 2 – Category 2: Non-Tenured, Years 3 & 4 – Category 3: Tenured

21. Instructional Practice: Steps for Calculating the Status Score Step 4: For each domain, apply the results from Step 3 to the description for each level on the Proficiency Scale (based on teacher’s experience level/category). This is a domain proficiency score and will be a number between 1 and 4. Category I:1-2 years Category II:3-4 years Category III:tenured

22. Implementation Year Category I (Non-Tenured Teachers in Year 1 or 2) Category II (Non-Tenured Teachers in Year 3 or 4) Category III (Tenured Teachers) Year 155% Year 255% Year 3TBD* *Evaluation of the tool may result in an increase in percentage Summative Evaluation Configuration for Classroom Teacher Evaluation Model Represents the percentage of “Innovative” ratings needed in a Domain to be considered “Innovative” for that Domain in summation. Represents the percentage of combined “Innovative” and “Applying” ratings needed in a Domain to be considered “Applying” for that Domain in summation.

23. CIInnovating (4)Applying (3)Developing (2)Beginning(1) D1: At Least 55% at Level 4 At least 55% at Level 3 or higher Less than 55% at Level 3 or higher and less than 50% at Level 1, 0 Greater than or equal to 50% at Level 1, 0 D2: D3: D4: Proficiency Scale for Category I Teachers The Washington Township District Evaluation Advisory Committee (DEAC) has decided that we will utilize the same proficiency scale for all categories of teachers for the next 2 years. After 2 years, we will review our evaluation data to determine future scales. The scale for all teachers and non-classroom staff members is below: Note: Scores are based on the Marzano scale: Innovating (4), Applying (3), Developing (2), Beginning (1) and Not Using (0)

24. Category 1: Years 1 & 2 CI Innovating (4)Applying (3)Developing (2)Beginning(1) D1: At Least 65% at Level 4At least 65% at Level 3 or higher Less than 65% at Level 3 or higher and less than 50% at Level 1, 0 Greater than or equal to 50% at Level 1, 0 D2: D3: D4: Learning Sciences Recommended Scales: Note: Scores are based on the Marzano scale: Innovating (4), Applying (3), Developing (2), Beginning (1) and Not Using (0) Category 2: Years 3 & 4 CI Innovating (4)Applying (3)Developing (2)Beginning(1) D1: At Least 75% at Level 4At least 75% at Level 3 or higher Less than 75% at Level 3 or higher and less than 50% at Level 1, 0 Greater than or equal to 50% at Level 1, 0 D2: D3: D4: Category 3: Tenured CI Innovating (4)Applying (3)Developing (2)Beginning(1) D1: At Least 85% at Level 4At least 85% at Level 3 or higher Less than 85% at Level 3 or higher and less than 50% at Level 1, 0 Greater than or equal to 50% at Level 1, 0 D2: D3: D4:

25. Review Part 2 Q: Are you in category I, II, or III? A: Non-tenured – year 1 or 2 – Category I Non-tenured – year 3 or 4 – Category II Tenured – Category III

26. Review Part 2 Q: To be “Applying” in a given Domain what combined percentage of “applying” and “innovating” ratings must I earn in that Domain? A: 55% combined.

27. Innovating – 4 Applying – 3 Developing -2 Beginning – 1 Not Using - 0 45 11 7 3 68.18% At Innovating Matches the Rule for Innovating (4): “At Least 55% at Innovating- 4 or Higher” Score if Averaged: 2.7 Innovating Score Sample 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 ScoreCount% Innovating – 44568.18% Applying - 31116.67% Developing -234.55% Beginning – 157.58% Not Using – 023.03% 1

28. Innovating – 4 Applying – 3 Developing -2 Beginning – 1 Not Using - 0 10 36 7 12 69.7% At Applying - 3 or Innovating - 4 Matches the Rule for Applying (3): “At Least 55% at Applying - 3 or Higher” Score if Averaged: 2.7 Applying Score Sample 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 ScoreCount% Innovating – 41015.15% Applying - 33654.55% Developing -21218.18% Beginning – 1710.61% Not Using – 011.52% 1

29. Innovating – 4 Applying – 3 Developing -2 Beginning – 1 Not Using - 0 0 10 24 17 59.09% At Beginning - 1 or Not Using - 0 Matches the Rule for Beginning (1): “50% or more at Beginning -1 or Lower” Score if Averaged: 1.4 Beginning Score Sample 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 ScoreCount% Innovating – 400.00% Applying - 31015.15% Developing -21725.76% Beginning – 12436.36% Not Using – 01522.73% 15

30. Innovating – 4 Applying – 3 Developing -2 Beginning – 1 Not Using - 0 1 15 20 22 24.25% At Applying - 3 or Higher AND 42.42% At Beginning - 1 or Lower Matches the Rule for Developing (2): “Less than 55% at Applying - 3 or Higher and Less than 50% at Beginning -1 or Lower” Score if Averaged: 1.8 Developing Score Sample 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 ScoreCount% Innovating – 411.52% Applying - 31522.73% Developing -22233.33% Beginning – 12030.30% Not Using – 0812.12% 8

31. Score for a Category I Teacher 3 3 0.39 0.30 Applying 2.92 Implement- ation Year Category I (Non- Tenured Teachers in Year 1 or 2) Category II (Non- Tenured Teachers in Year 3 or 4) Category III (Tenured Teachers) Year 155% Year 255% Year 3TBD* *Evaluation of the tool may result in an increase in percentage DomainNumber of Elements Weight 14168% 2814% 358% 4610% Conversion of 5 point scale to 4 point scale InnovatingApplyingDevelopingBeginning 4.0 – 3.53.4 – 2.52.4 – 1.51.4 – 1.0 14% 0.42 2.04 0.42 0.16 0.30 3

32. Score for a Non-Classroom Teacher 3 3 1.47 0.63 0.24 0.54 Applying 2.88 Implementa tion Year Category I (Non- Tenured Teachers in Year 1 or 2) Category II (Non- Tenured Teachers in Year 3 or 4) Category III (Tenured Teachers) Year 155% Year 255% Year 3TBD* *Evaluation of the tool may result in an increase in percentage Conversion of 5 point scale to 4 point scale InnovatingApplyingDevelopingBeginning 4.0 – 3.53.4 – 2.52.4 – 1.51.4 – 1.0 DomainNumber of Elements Weight 11649% 2721% 3412% 4618% Non-Classroom Weights 49% 21% 12% 18% 3

33. Review Part 3 Q. The calculation of a classroom teacher’s Overall Status Score is the same regardless on tenure/non-tenure status. T/F? A: True

34. Review Part 3 Q. The calculation of a staff member’s Overall Status Score is basically a weighted average of their ratings in the 4 Marzano Domains? T/F? A: True, but remember that the 4 Domain Status Scores themselves reflect the 55% threshold for “Applying” and “Innovating.”

35. Review Part 3 Q. The Overall Status Score (2.92 and 2.88 in the examples) is my final AchieveNJ rating. T/F? A: False for teachers as SGP and SGO results are not factored in. True for certified, non-classroom faculty.

36. Achieve NJ Summative Scale IneffectivePartially EffectiveEffectiveHighly Effective 1.01.852.653.5 Remember: 1)This includes SGP and SGO results as applicable. 2)This is the number the state uses to determine educator effectiveness level

37. Any questions?

38. Implementation Year Category I (Non-Tenured Teachers in Year 1 or 2) Category II (Non-Tenured Teachers in Year 3 or 4) Category III (Tenured Teachers) Year 155% Year 255% Year 3TBD* *Evaluation of the tool may result in an increase in percentage DomainNumber of ElementsWeight 14168% 2814% 358% 4610% Conversion of 5 point scale to 4 point scale InnovatingApplyingDevelopingBeginning 4.0 – 3.53.4 – 2.52.4 – 1.51.4 – 1.0 Summative Evaluation Configuration for Classroom Teacher Evaluation Model

39. Instructional Score for a Category I Teacher 33 0.390.160.30 Applying 2.90

40. Summative Weightings for Teachers with an SGP

41. Summative Weightings for Teachers without an SGP

42. Summative Weightings for Non-Classroom Staff