Charge and Agenda of the 18th TAC meeting

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Linac Front-End R&D --- Systems Integration and Meson Lab Setup
Advertisements

Discussion on Studies at Test Stands Roger Ruber Uppsala University.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Authorization Basis Plan Steven Hoey, ESH Manager NSLS-II Project Advisory Committee Meeting December 10 – 11, 2009.
Introduction and Charge to the Review of ESS Target building and Instrument Hall design requirements Roland Garoby November 2014, Lund
Target Project Progress and Plans Eric Pitcher TAC-10 November 5, 2014.
J. G. Weisend II Deputy Head of Accelerator Projects April 2, 2014 Actions at ACCSYS Resulting from the Recommendations of the Annual Review.
Response to ESS Accelerator Technical Advisory Committee April 2014 Recommendations 5 November 2014 Dave McGinnis.
CLIC Implementation Studies Ph. Lebrun & J. Osborne CERN CLIC Collaboration Meeting addressing the Work Packages CERN, 3-4 November 2011.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.5/1 Design Geoff Vaughan University of Central Lancashire,
Configuration Management Romuald Duperrier Head of Systems Engineering Division April 22, 2015.
Preliminary Functional Analysis of ESS Superconducting Radio-Frequency Linac C. Darve, N. Elias, J. Fydrych, D. Piso European Spallation Source ESS AB,
Welcome and Presentation of Charge Steve Holmes Accelerator Advisory Committee ( May 10-12, 2005.
Global Design Effort - CFS ILC Global Systems Meeting 1 ILC GLOBAL SYSTEMS MEETING CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES AND SITING GROUP STATUS REPORT V. Kuchler,
Accelerator/program Mats Lindroos Head of accelerator April 21, 2015.
LINAC4 COMMISSIONING 1 LESSONS LEARNT DURING MY VISIT AT LINAC4 COMMISSIONING Evangelia Vaena, 02/02/2016.
Global Design Effort Main Linac Technology System Kick-off Meeting Cavity Summary 20 Sept 2007 DESY Marc Ross.
Details on the Accelerator Installation Plan E. Sargsyan & L. Lari 20 April 2016.
Personnel Safety Systems Stuart Birch Senior Engineer, Personnel Safety Systems November 6 th, 2014.
Conventional Facilities integration: Approach and Issues Daniel Piso Fernández WP Leader (WP13 Conventional Facilities Integration Support) November 5,
Accelerator Tunnel Layout (G01) Nick Gazis Senior Mechanical Engineer Review of ESS Accelerator Conventional Facility Design.
ESS Vacuum Standardization
ESS Cooling System - Interface with DTL 1 John Jurns Cooling System Engineer.
Update on the ESS monolith design Rikard Linander Monolith and Handling Group ESS Target Division TAC 10, Lund, Nov 5,
ESS Cooling System - Interface with RFQ 1 John Jurns Cooling System Engineer.
Introduction to the effort on C-ADS accelerator physics and review charges Jingyu Tang For the Joint IHEP-IMP group on the C-ADS Accelerator Physics International.
1. Baseline – from LMC  Presentation by F. Bordry at LHC Machine Committee 5.10 on LS1 Organisation: 1. Linac4 is not going to be connected.
Rob Connatser NSS Instrument Work Packages and XLPM.
Chapter Editor: John Weisend TDR Chapter 6 Cryogenic System, Vacuum System & Test Stands.
ESS Cryomodule Status Meeting – Introduction | | Christine Darve Introduction to Cryomodules for the ESS 2013 January, 9 th Christine Darve.
The ESS Target Station Eric Pitcher Head of Target Division February 19, 2016.
November 12-13, 2007 Super-B Factory: Accelerator Costing, PEP-II Hardware and Schedule J. Seeman SLAC International Review Committee meeting November.
Accelerator Readiness Review October 31, 2006
Cryomodule test stand at ESS site
Spoke section of the ESS linac: - Status of prototypes and CDS-SL
Uppsala Commitment to ESS and FREIA Planning
Overview and System Design for ESS LLRF Systems
BE/RF-IS Contribution to LIU C. Rossi and M. Paoluzzi
Spoke CDS PDR Closeout J. G. Weisend II June 10, 2016.
International Review of the Conceptual Design of the Cold Powering system for the HL-LHC Superconducting Magnets J.Ph. Tock
Cryogenic C&C Scope of work
LCLS Linac Technical Design Review Charge
Optimum cryomodule length at the ESS
Licensing update ESHAC #9, October 2018
Welcome & Charge for the Meeting
Advanced Research Electron Accelerator Laboratory
SPOKE Cavities frequency preparation plan and RF control procedures
ESS Project Status Roland Garoby – Technical Director August 2018.
RF systems introduction
Operations/Control room organization during commissioning
Ciprian Plostinar Workshop on Testing and Commissioning
Licensing requirements for Cryomodules
Conceptual Design of the Central Process Systems
Testing Coordination at ESS
MPS commissioning at ESS
Licensing update TAC 18 October 2018
Review of TDR Chapter 9 “Transition to Operations”
European Spallation Source ERIC
DOE Review of the LCLS Project October 2006
High Level Readiness Reviews
Operation of Target Safety System (TSS)
Test Beamline System Requirements and Charge to PDR Committee
CDS-EL IRR Closeout 28 March 2019 J.G. Weisend II, Chairman.
Status of the ESS High Power RF Systems
RF introduction Anders Sunesson RF group leader
ThomX – Commissioning Meeting – 25/01/2018
ESHAC #8 Safety Readiness Review Thomas Hansson, ESH
Ulf Odén WP Manager Target System
Accelerator Installation Schedule
Welcome and Charge for the Meeting
Project Support Meeting January 9, 2019
Presentation transcript:

Charge and Agenda of the 18th TAC meeting 17-19 October 2018, Lund Roland Garoby https://indico.esss.lu.se/event/1075/

TAC #18 – ESS context The ESS construction project is now > 50% complete and progress has continued at a high pace even during the summer months. Concerning Conventional Facilities, the Target station building has reached the height of the high bay floor, the long distance experimental hall and the logistics building are erected, the A2T connection between accelerator and Target is an advanced stage of construction… For Accelerator, Target and ICS, most components are now in construction, either through in-kind partners or directly in industry. Prototypes are being tested (Spoke cryomodule from IPNO in Uppsala, Elliptical cavity cryomodule in Saclay etc.). Klystrons for the Medium beta section of the linac have started arriving. The infrastructure installation organization is fully operational and it is now focusing on the first 100 meters of the klystron gallery. Beam commissioning of the ion source and LEBT has started in the tunnel… The RF Test Stand in the klystron gallery has started being used… The new baseline which had been prepared during the first half of the year has successfully passed the review held in May and it has been accepted by the ESS Council…

Questions to the TAC for its 18th meeting - Accelerator - a1) Is the planned organization for installation, testing and commissioning likely to result in an operating accelerator that meets its requirements in a timely manner? a2) Are there any suggestions for improving the schedule performance of in-kind partners? a3) Are the schedules for accelerator and utilities installation reasonable? Are there any reasonable strategies for reducing the schedule? a4) Are the presented testing and commissioning plans appropriate? a5) Is the strategy for high level readiness reviews reasonable? a6) Please comment on the experience so far from the ion source and LEBT commissioning and operations. Does this experience and the lessons learned bode well for future linac operations? a7) Have we missed anything?

Questions to the TAC for its 18th meeting - Target - t1) Concerning “Update on Target Station Accident Analyses”: Does the design philosophy and the methodology for dose calculations provide a solid basis for licensing of the Target Station? We also ask the committee to advice on how to improve the efficiency of the procedure for dose calculations t2) Concerning “Monolith inner (water-cooled) shielding”: Will the presented technical solution, for the inner water-cooled monolith shielding, be a reasonable compromise to conflicting and challenging requirements? t3) Concerning “Scheme for beam lines alignment”: Will the envisioned installation scheme, in the end, provide satisfactory alignment precision for the neutron science instrument in cold and hot conditions? t4) Concerning “Update on waste management”: Will the pursued technical solutions for waste management of filters and contaminated water assure safe, efficient and reliable maintenance work within the Target Station? Proper ALARA? t5) Concerning interplay between Controls, MPS, TSS and Control Room: Is the philosophy presented sound and appropriate for a safe and reliable operation of the ESS machine? Operations, Asset Protection and Safety.

Questions to the TAC for its 18th meeting - ICS (1/2) c1) Concerning ICS construction and initial operations activities: Are the presented strategies for ensuring the quality of the control system appropriate? Are the principles for prioritizing and allocating resources to stakeholder activities adequate, what alternatives exist? Have we missed anything - are there any particular difficulties that we could expect? c2) Concerning the operational aspects of ICS: Are the plans for machine modes and timing integration appropriate and complete enough? Please comment on any weaknesses in the planned integration and interaction of machine subsystems with ICS? c3) Concerning the new baseline for the ICS construction project plan: Is the new baseline for the construction project plan appropriate - do you find any particular weaknesses? Is the planning methodology, including planning quality objectives, sufficient and relevant?

Questions to the TAC for its 18th meeting - ICS (2/2) c4) Concerning the ICS platforms for beam instrumentation: Are the use cases for using the ICS technical platforms sufficiently developed? Has anything been missed? Do you have comments to the plan for deploying the ICS platforms for beam instrumentation? c5) Concerning the ESS machine protection system of systems : Is the analysis method and integration strategy appropriate for implementing machine protection into the complex accelerator and target systems? Is the verification and validation strategy for the fast beam interlock system (FBIS) appropriate? What are the issues? Is the integration of machine protection strategies into operations likely to be successful? c6) Concerning the automation of control system configuration : Is the concept for automation of control system configuration valid from an operational/practical point of view? Please comment on any potential issues with the presented automation of control system configuration?

TAC #18 – Additional information The Committee is encouraged to provide also suggestions/comments and recommendations on any other subject it would find relevant. Feedback on the follow-up of former TAC recommendations is welcome. A preliminary version of the TAC report is expected during the close-out session in the afternoon of Friday 19, October. The final report is expected on November 5. The Chairman will orally present the TAC#18 report to the ESS Council on December 3-4.

Agenda TAC#18 Wednesday 17 October 2018 TAC initial session Plenary session TAC session Dinner

Agenda TAC#18 Thursday 18 October 2018 (am) Joint session Parallel sessions

Agenda TAC#18 Thursday 18 October 2018 (pm) tTAC session Site visit (Accelerator + ICS) TAC sessions

Agenda TAC#18 Friday 19 October 2018 TAC sessions Public close-out

Thank you for being here. We look forward to your advice!