Time-Integrated Particle Measurements : Status in Canada

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MEASUREMENT AND MODELLING OF MOTOR VEHICLE RELATED AIR TOXICS ALONG URBAN STREETS Deniz Karman Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Carleton.
Advertisements

1 PM NAAQS: Update on Coarse Particle Monitoring and Research Efforts Lydia Wegman, Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards, EPA Presentation at the.
1 Policies for Addressing PM2.5 Precursor Emissions Rich Damberg EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards June 20, 2007.
Perspectives in Designing and Operating a Regional Ammonia Monitoring Network Gary Lear USEPA Clean Air Markets Division.
PM 2.5 in the Upper Midwest Michael Koerber Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium.
Sources of PM 2.5 Carbon in the SE U.S. RPO National Work Group Meeting December 3-4, 2002.
Carbon Measurements and Adjustments Measurement of organics by IMPROVE & STN networks, Use of blank data to correct carbon concentration measurements,
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 2008 CAMx Modeling Model Performance Evaluation Summary University of North Carolina.
Evaluation of Secondary Organic Aerosols in Atlanta
Air Quality Impacts from Prescribed Burning Karsten Baumann, PhD. Polly Gustafson.
Recent Finnish PM studies / 2 examples. Characterizing temporal and spatial patterns of urban PM10 using six years of Finnish monitoring data Pia Anttila.
WORKING GROUP I MONITORING DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION TFMM Workshop, Paris, 2006, Nov 29 –Dec 1.
1 Moving Right Along: Transportation, Public Health and Social Equity Sherrill Johnson, PhD Population Health Consultant CPHA, June.
Building a Conceptual Model for PM over Hong Kong: A Weight-of-Evidence Approach to Evaluating Source Apportionment Results Jay Turner, Varun Yadav Washington.
Simulation of European emissions impacts on particulate matter concentrations in 2010 using Models-3 Rob Lennard, Steve Griffiths and Paul Sutton (RWE.
Air Quality Impact Analysis 1.Establish a relationship between emissions and air quality. AQ past = a EM past + b 2.A change in emissions results in an.
Results of Ambient Air Analyses in Support of Transport Rule Presentation for RPO Workshop November 2003.
MODELS3 – IMPROVE – PM/FRM: Comparison of Time-Averaged Concentrations R. B. Husar S. R. Falke 1 and B. S. Schichtel 2 Center for Air Pollution Impact.
25/05/20071 About comparability of measured and modeled metrics Jean-Philippe Putaud Fabrizia Cavalli DG JRC Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Lessons Learned: One-Atmosphere Photochemical Modeling in Southeastern U.S. Presentation from Southern Appalachian Mountains Initiative to Meeting of Regional.
MEASUREMENT OF AIR TOXICS IN THE CABINS OF COMMUTER VEHICLES UNDER SUMMER AND WINTER CONDITIONS IN OTTAWA, CANADA Deniz Karman, Oznur Oguz (*), and Gultekin.
Clinton MacDonald 1, Kenneth Craig 1, Jennifer DeWinter 1, Adam Pasch 1, Brigette Tollstrup 2, and Aleta Kennard 2 1 Sonoma Technology, Inc., Petaluma,
PM2.5 Model Performance Evaluation- Purpose and Goals PM Model Evaluation Workshop February 10, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS.
1 β Attenuation Method PM10/2.5 Automated Dichotomous Monitor SPM-613D β Attenuation Method PM10/2.5 Automated Dichotomous Monitor Model SPM-613D ■SPM.
1/30 2-year observation of Organic Aerosol properties In Cape Corsica J. Sciare, and LSCE.
U.S.-Canada Air Quality Agreement: Transboundary PM Science Assessment Report to the Air Quality Committee June, 2004.
The Use of Source Apportionment for Air Quality Management and Health Assessments Philip K. Hopke Clarkson University Center for Air Resources Engineering.
VISTAS Data / Monitoring Overview Scott Reynolds SC DHEC- Larry Garrison KY DNREP Data Workgroup Co-Chairs RPO National Technical Workgroup Meeting – St.
Analysis Examples and Issues: Identifying Sources Policy Analysis Tools for Air Quality and Health A workshop hosted by NERAM and Pollution Probe Jeffrey.
Data Analysis/Monitoring Session OAQPS Updates Neil Frank RPO National Workgroup Meeting Dallas TX December 3-4, 2002.
Application and assessment of Canadian air quality models in Quebec Region Project team: Gilles Morneau Nedka Pentcheva Jeff Brook Véronique Bouchet/Louis-Philippe.
PM Model Performance & Grid Resolution Kirk Baker Midwest Regional Planning Organization November 2003.
Model Evaluation Comparing Model Output to Ambient Data Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, California.
Operational Evaluation and Comparison of CMAQ and REMSAD- An Annual Simulation Brian Timin, Carey Jang, Pat Dolwick, Norm Possiel, Tom Braverman USEPA/OAQPS.
Identification of Transportation Contributions to Urban PM Levels AQRB Mid-Term Review 2004 J.R. Brook + many contributors MSC.
Smog/Acid Rain Mid Term Review October 25-27, 2004.
Bret A. Schichtel Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend Analysis (CAPITA) Washington University St. Louis, MO, Presented at EPA’s National Exposure.
Evaluation of 2002 Multi-pollutant Platform: Air Toxics, Mercury, Ozone, and Particulate Matter US EPA / OAQPS / AQAD / AQMG Sharon Phillips, Kai Wang,
NPS Source Attribution Modeling Deterministic Models Dispersion or deterministic models Receptor Models Analysis of Spatial & Temporal Patterns Back Trajectory.
1 Preliminary evaluation of the 2002 Base B1 CMAQ simulation: Temporal Analysis A more complete statistical evaluation, including diurnal variations, of.
Fairbanks PM 2.5 Source Apportionment Using the Chemical Mass Balance (CMB) Model Tony Ward, Ph.D. The University of Montana Center for Environmental Health.
Continuous Particulate Matter (PM 2.5 ) Monitoring Tom Dann Luc White, Alain Biron Luc White, Alain Biron Environment Canada, Ottawa Tom Dann Luc White,
Environment Canada, ETC, Ottawa
Elements of a Weight of Evidence Determination
ADAGIO (Atmospheric Deposition Analysis Generated by optimal Interpolation from Observations): Project plans and status A.S. Cole1, A. Robichaud2, M.D.
National Wildlife Refuge
Donna Kenski Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium, Des Plaines, IL
Sunil Kumar TAC, COG July 9, 2007
PMcoarse , Monitoring Budgets, and AQI
Continuous measurement of airborne particles and gases
C.N.R. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
Source identification of aerosols in Mexico City
Calendar.
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
Alison Redington* and Derrick Ryall* Dick Derwent**
A Review of Time Integrated PM2.5 Monitoring Data in the United States
Air Quality research Branch Meteorological Service of Canada
Low-Power Annular Denuder System for Measurement of HNO3, NH3 and PM2
About comparability of measured and modeled metrics
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
TFMM PM Assessment Report
Time-Integrated Sampling
U.S. Perspective on Particulate Matter and Ozone
TFMM Work plan for 2010 Build-up the appropriate framework for the implementation of the revised monitoring strategy Technical support to the Parties.
Michael Moran Air Quality Research Branch
Challenges with Integrated Measurements of OC and BC (or EC)
Measurement Needs for AQ Models
Data Analysis Techniques
WORK OF THE UNITED KINGDOM AIR QUALITY EXPERT GROUP (AQEG)
Presentation transcript:

Time-Integrated Particle Measurements : Status in Canada J. R. Brook, T. F. Dann, R. Vet EMEP Workshop on Particulate Matter Measurement & Modeling New Orleans, LA April 2004

Background Starting in 1970's mass-based PM measurements focused on TSP Major cities covered with 1-in-6 sampling selected trace elements (e.g., Pb) and sulfate determined in some geographic areas. In ~1980 open face filter pack measurements began Sparked by acid deposition issue Regionally-representative sites PM2.5 and PM10 or PMcoarse began in mid 1980s National Air Pollution Surveillance (NAPS) program dichotomous samplers and Provincial SSI hi-vols Major cities, 1-in-6 sampling, relatively advanced chemical characterization from NAPS

Current Status Several Canadian locations have almost a 20 year record of PM2.5 and PMcoarse, plus chemical constituents Chalk River, Ontario, has one of the longest, high-quality daily records of ambient sulfate in North America Periodic special studies have provided additional chemical characterization and more detail on small-scale spatial patterns PM2.5 speciation programs enhanced starting in 2000

Long-Term PM Mass Trend in Canadian Major Cities Victoria, Vancouver, Calgary, Edmonton, Winnipeg, Windsor, Toronto, Ottawa, Montreal, Quebec, Saint John and Halifax

Multi-Year Trend in N-Compounds

Average Seasonal Patterns Egbert, Ontario CAPMoN filter pack (1995-1999)

Average Spatial Patterns Combined CAPMoN CASTNet (USEPA) filter pack (2000-2001)

Urban-Rural Differences Sites are 75-100 km apart in same regional airmass

Characteristics of Air Masses Sutton, Quebec, CAPMoN site 1991-93 PM10 = 15.6 mg m-3 PM2.5 = 12.0 mg m-3 SO42- = 4.4 mg m-3 PM10 = 10.3 mg m-3 PM2.5 = 6.6 mg m-3 SO42- = 1.8 mg m-3

Importance of Sulfate to Summer PM2.5 Episodes NAPS 1995-1998

Main Constituents “Driving” Episodes Montréal Warm Season Sulphate Montréal Cold Season Nitrate Canadian Acid Aerosol Measurement Program 1992-1994

Response to SO2 Emission Reductions during cold season: Nov.-Apr. Concentration (mg m-3) Longwoods, Ontario, CAPMoN site

Main Weaknesses CAPMoN NAPS Special Studies size-cut uncontrolled total mass not determined no measurement of carbon content NAPS not daily sampling nitrate biased low due to analytical protocol Special Studies limited in time and space few carbon measurements

Carbon Fraction Can't be Ignored (especially since health studies tell us fine mass is important!)

SHEMP Study (daily 24 hr data) Vancouver 7.5 mg m-3 Feb. 2000 - June 2002 Toronto 13.2 mg m-3 Feb. 2000 - March 2003

Current PM Speciation Monitoring in Canada Sequential dichot Partisol (R&P) for PM2.5 and PMcoarse Sequential R&P chemcomb cartridge-based sampler for PM2.5 speciation

Seven Filters for Each Integrated Speciation Sample Period NH3 NH4 Chemcomb cartridge

Canadian Locations with Fine and Coarse Mass, Fine Mass Speciation 24 hour integrated samples

Status of Speciation Sites

Gas-to-Particle Partitioning of OM and +’ve & -’ve Artifacts 16 Summer (July 16 to 21), 2001 Winter (March 17 to 24) , 2003 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Mon-D Mon-N Tue-D Tue-N Wed-D Wed-N Thu-D Thu-N Fri-D Fri-N Sat-D Sat-N Sun-D Sun-N IOGAPS-OCQ IOGAPS-SVOC IOGAPS-OC FP-OC OC Concentration (mgC m-3) Downtown Toronto Best measure of OC What a single quartz filter sees Maximum size of +’ve artifact

What is in the OM? Another ~15% could be associated with fungal spores (primary biological organic matter) Concentration (ng m-3)

Summary What have we learned about the PM problems from time-integrated measurements? Trends, spatial and temporal patterns What sort of hypothesis testing is being supported by these measurements? Regional scale source-receptor analyses, contributions from chemical components, changes in composition, interrelationship between constituents What are the most serious issues vis a vis representing what is actually in the air? Mass and carbon are operationally defined, carbon artifacts, especially in cities Are critical variables missing that are needed for the support of hypothesis testing/interpretation of mass and species composition measurements? Organic speciation, collocated measurements of particles and precursors, size-resolved chemical composition

Evaluation of the FNO3 Estimation Technique