November 2010 doc.: IEEE /0800r9 November 2011

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: /04 Submission August 2010 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Slide 1 P802.11REVmb Report to EC on meeting the terms of Conditional.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0674r0 Submission June 2009 Bruce Kraemer, Marvell; Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation Slide 1 P802.11n report to EC on request for.
Doc.: Submission July 2009 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Slide 1 P802.11v Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor.
Doc.: IEEE /0792r0 Submission July 2008 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide TGn Editor Report July 2008 Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1157r0 Submission September 2010 Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks)Slide 1 September 2010 Closing Report -TGmb Date: Authors:
Doc.: Submission July 2011 D. Denteneer (Philips), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Slide 1 P802.11s report to EC on request for approval to proceed to.
Doc.: Submission July 2010 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Slide 1 P802.11v report to EC on request for conditional approval to proceed.
Doc.: IEEE /1468r1 Submission July 2013 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide November 2013 Motions to 802 EC Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0777r0 Report July 2016 Yongho Seok (NEWRACOM)Slide 1 Date: Authors: P802.11ah Report to EC on Approval to forward draft.
P802.11aq Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
November 2008 doc.: IEEE /1437r1 July 2011
P802.11u Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
P802.11s report to EC on request for approval to proceed to RevCom
November 2008 doc.: IEEE /1437r1 July 2011
July 2010 doc.: IEEE /0872r1 July 2010 P802.11u report to EC on request for conditional approval to proceed to RevCom Date: Authors:
P802.11s Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
P802.11s Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
P802.11p Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
November 2008 doc.: IEEE /1437r1 July 2010
P802.11s report to EC on request for approval to proceed to RevCom
November 2008 doc.: IEEE /1437r1 July 2010
P802.11u Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
P802.11n report to EC on request for approval to proceed to RevCom
P802.11s Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
P802.11s Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
P802.11n report to EC on request for approval to proceed to RevCom
November 2010 doc.: IEEE /0872r3 November 2010
November 2008 doc.: IEEE /1437r1 July 2010
P802.11w report to EC on request for approval to proceed to RevCom
P802.11ae Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
P802.11aa Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
P802.11u Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
P802.11p Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
November 2008 doc.: IEEE /1437r1 July 2010
P802.11p Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
P802.11p Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
P802.11aq Report to EC on approval to forward draft to RevCom
P802.11aq Report to EC on approval to forward draft to RevCom
P802.11v Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
P802.11z conditional approval report to ExCom
November 2008 doc.: IEEE /1437r1 July 2010
P802.11z conditional approval report to ExCom
P802.11z Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
November 2008 doc.: IEEE /1437r1 July 2010
P802.11ae Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
P802.11z conditional approval report to ExCom
P802.11ae Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
IEEE TGmb Sept 2010 Agenda Date: Authors:
IEEE Motions at the November Plenary EC Meeting
P802.11w report to EC on request for approval to proceed to RevCom
November 2010 doc.: IEEE /0872r4 November 2010
P802.11w report to EC on request for approval to proceed to RevCom
P802.11w report to EC on request for approval to proceed to RevCom
P802.11z Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
P802.11z Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
July 2010 Closing Plenary Motions
November 2010 doc.: IEEE /0800r9 November 2010
November 2008 doc.: IEEE /1437r1 November 2010
November 2008 doc.: IEEE /1437r1 August 2010
June 2009 r2doc.: IEEE /0674r0 doc.: IEEE /0674r0 April 2010
P802.11u Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
Mar 2010 Closing Plenary Motions
IEEE TGmb Sept 2011 Agenda Date: Authors:
November 2008 doc.: IEEE /1437r1 July 2010
P802.11z Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
TGm Closing Report – May 2010
TGn Editor Report Sept 2008 Date: Authors:
P b to RevCom: Conditional Approval Request
P802.11aq Report to EC on approval to forward draft to RevCom
January 2012 doc.: IEEE /0179r1 Jan 2012
Presentation transcript:

November 2010 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0800r9 November 2011 P802.11 REVmb report to EC on meeting the terms of conditional approval to proceed to RevCom Date: 2011-11-17 Authors: D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

November 2010 November 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1437r1 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0800r9 November 2011 Summary The IEEE 802 Executive Committee (EC) granted conditional approval to P802.11REVmb to proceed to RevCom at its closing plenary on 2011-11-11. P802.11REVmb D12.0 has completed its sixth recirculation ballot, achieving 97% approval and meeting the terms of the conditional approval. This presentation is the report to the IEEE 802 executive committee in support of completion of the requirements for conditional approval to proceed to IEEE-SA RevCom. Slide 2 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Page 2 Bruce Kraemer, Marvell Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Meeting the terms of conditional approval November 2010 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0800r9 November 2011 Meeting the terms of conditional approval As per LMSC OM Clause 14: a) Recirculation ballot is completed. Generally, the recirculation ballot and resolution should occur in accordance with the schedule presented at the time of conditional approval. The Ballot occurred, in accordance with the schedule presented to the EC in document 11-11/1533r1. The recirculation running at the time conditional approval was granted completed on schedule. The additional recirculation shown on the plan was not required. b) After resolution of the recirculation ballot is completed, the approval percentage is at least 75% and there are no new valid DISAPPROVE votes. The approval percentage is 97%. There are no new DISAPPROVE votes. c) No technical changes, as determined by the WG Chair, were made as a result of the recirculation ballot. No changes were made as a result of the recirculation ballot. d) No new valid DISAPPROVE comments on new issues that are not resolved to the satisfaction of the submitter from existing DISAPPROVE voters During the last recirculation, two comments that were marked “not part of a no vote” were received from an APPROVE voter. No new DISAPPROVE comments were received. Slide 3 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Meeting the terms of conditional approval - continued November 2010 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0800r9 November 2011 Meeting the terms of conditional approval - continued e) If the WG Chair determines that there is a new invalid DISAPPROVE comment or vote, the WG Chair shall promptly provide details to the Sponsor. There were no new DISAPPROVE comments or votes. f) The WG Chair shall immediately report the results of the ballot to the Sponsor including: the date the ballot closed, vote tally and comments associated with any remaining disapproves (valid and invalid), the WG responses and the rationale for ruling any vote invalid. The ballot closed on 2011-11-13 at 23:59 ET The vote tally: For: 150, against: 5, abstain: 9. 88.2% return., 96.8% affirmative. The comments associated with remaining disapproves are included in slide 11 of this deck. No new DISAPPROVE comments were received; there are no new unsatisfied comments. The numbers of unsatisfied comments have reduced slightly since R1 of this submission due to feedback from commenters on which comments they consider to be satisfied or unsatisfied, or due to previous “no” voters changing their votes. In addition, one voter changed from “Disapprove” to “Approve” after the ballot closed. No votes have been ruled invalid. Slide 4 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

IEEE 802 Sponsor Ballot Results – P802.11REVmb November 2010 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0800r9 November 2011 IEEE 802 Sponsor Ballot Results – P802.11REVmb Draft Opened Closed Days Pool For Against Abstain Return #Cmnts % 6.00 2010-09-21 2010-11-05 45 186 122 86.5 19 13.5 9 6 150 80.6 454 7.00 2011-02-03 2011-02-18 15 132 90.4 14 9.6 5.8 155 83.3 8.00 2011-03-25 2011-04-14 20 136 91.9 12 8.1 10 6.3 158 84.9 863 9.00 2011-06-02 2011-06-22 139 93 11 7 160 86 208 10.00 2011-08-18 2011-09-07 142 92 13 8 5 164 88 257 11.00 2011-10-07 2011-10-22 147 94 12.00 2011-11-03 2011-11-13 97 3 2 12.00* 151 4 * Post Ballot vote change D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Revision – 802.11 Revision of IEEE Std 802.11™-2007 as amended by November 2010 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0800r9 November 2011 Revision – 802.11 Revision of IEEE Std 802.11™-2007 as amended by IEEE Std 802.11k™-2008 IEEE Std 802.11r™-2008 IEEE Std 802.11y™-2008 IEEE Std 802.11w™-2009 IEEE Std 802.11n™-2009 IEEE Std 802.11p™-2010 IEEE Std 802.11z™-2010 IEEE Std 802.11v™-2011 IEEE Std 802.11u™-2011 IEEE Std 802.11s™-2011 1200 pages to 2910 Pages D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Mandatory Coordination November 2010 June 2009 doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0674r0 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0800r9 November 2011 Mandatory Coordination Coordination Entity Draft Date Status IEEE-SA Editorial (MEC) D11.0 Nov 11 “Meets all editorial requirements. “ Quantities, Units and Letter Symbols (SCC14) Not required Terms and Definitions (SCC10) Registration Authority Committee (RAC) Slide 7 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Page 7 Bruce Kraemer, Marvell Bruce Kraemer, Marvell; Adrian Stephens, Intel

Comments by Ballot – P802.11REVmb November 2010 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0800r9 November 2011 Comments by Ballot – P802.11REVmb Draft Ballot Not part of “no” vote Satisfied Unsatisfied Total 6.00 Initial Sponsor Ballot 54 397 13 464 7.00 First Recirc 45 129 4 178 8.00 Second Recirc 86 481 296 863 9.00 Third Recirc 30 8 216 10.00 Fourth Recirc 65 184 257 11.00 Fifth Recirc 77 11 5 93 12.00 Sixth Recirc 2 359 1380 334 2073 Note, counts are expanded here by comments received from outside the MyBallot system (late comments, comments from ISO and “unpacked” comments from attachments to MyBallot comments) D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Unsatisfied Comments by Commenter November 2010 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0800r9 November 2011 Unsatisfied Comments by Commenter Commenter* Initial R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 Total Fischer, Matthew   2 1 3 Hiertz, Guido 11 Hunter, David 4 295 8 6 315 Kraemer, Bruce 5 Grand Total 13 296 334 * Reflects post ballot vote change D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Analysis of unsatisfied comments – top categories November 2010 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0800r9 November 2011 Analysis of unsatisfied comments – top categories Use of “can” vs “may” – 290 remain unsatisfied Use of “can” in a draft has been validated with editorial staff Assorted MAC – 30 Inclusion of the term “Wireless Distribution System (WDS)” – 11 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

November 2010 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0800r9 November 2011 Unsatisfied comments The composite of all unsatisfied comments and the resolutions approved by the ballot resolution committee during sponsor ballot is attached. Double click on the icons to the right to open. D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

REVmb Timeline 6th Recirculation (Draft 12.0) (completed) Open November 2010 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0800r9 November 2011 REVmb Timeline 6th Recirculation (Draft 12.0) (completed) Open 2011-11-04 Close 2011-11-13 7th Recirculation (Draft 12.0 unchanged) ** 2011-11-21 2011-11-30 RevCom – Submit to continuous process Dec 2011 ** = Not required D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

TGmb Conditional Approval to RevCom May 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/0528r0 November 2011 TGmb Conditional Approval to RevCom Approve document 11-11/1533r1 as the Report to the IEEE 802 Executive Committee (EC) on the requirements for conditional approval to forward P802.11REVmb to RevCom, and Empower the chair to make editorial changes if required, and Request the IEEE 802 Executive Committee to conditionally approve forwarding P802.11REVmb to RevCom. Moved: Dorothy Stanley (on behalf of TGmb) Seconded: Harry Worstell Result: 48-0-0 In TGmb (similar motion on approval of report): Moved: Jon Rosdahl, Seconded: Mike Montemurro Motion passes: Result: 13-0-0 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell