TV White Space Coexistence Plan

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Coexistence Lessons Learned – Update
Advertisements

November 2007 Opening Report
Overview of IEEE Date: Authors: August 2014
[ Interim Meetings 2006] Date: Authors: July 2005
Wireless Coexistence TAG Overview
March 2013 Opening Report Date: Authors: March 2013
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
Call for Contribution to IG CUB
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
SG CUB Tentative Timeline
Waveform Generator Source Code
May Opening Report Date: Authors: May 2010
March 2014 Election Results
TV White Space Coexistence Plan
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
November 2007 Opening Report
November Opening Report
November 2013 Opening Report
September 2006 Opening Report
March Opening Report Date: Authors: March 2010
January 2010 Joint 11/19/22 TVWS Meeting
Contribution on Location Privacy
January Opening Report
September 2007 Opening Report
IEEE P Project Status Date: Authors: July 2013
Wireless Coexistence TAG Overview
Decision on SG Formation
November Opening Report
TVWS Coexistence Study Group Extension Request
July Opening Report Date: Authors: July 2009
Reflector Tutorial Date: Authors: July 2006 Month Year
July 2014 Opening Report Date: Authors: July 2014
July 2012 Opening Report Date: Authors: July 2012
July 2015 SG CUB Opening Report
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: July 2005 July 2005
Spectrum Sensing Tiger Team
Decision on SG Formation
May Liaison Report Date: Authors: May 2009
September Opening Report
November 2005 Liaison Report to P1900.2
EC Summary of PAR Development
March 2012 Opening Report Date: Authors: March 2012
Addressing White Spaces Across all of IEEE 802
IEEE P PAR Extension Request
TGy draft 2.0 with changebars from draft 1.0
January 2015 SG CUB Closing Report
November 2014 IG CUB Opening Report
January Opening Report
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
EC Study Group on TV White Space
November Opening Report
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
March Opening Report Date: Authors: March 2011
November 2012 Opening Report
September 2012 Opening Report
Questions to the Contention-based Protocol (CBP) Study Group
January Opening Report
Motion for Study Group on TV White Space Coexistence
July 2015 SG CUB Opening Report
July 2015 SG CUB Closing Report
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: January 2005 January 2005
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: May 2005 May 2005
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: July 2005 July 2005
July 2014 Opening Report Date: Authors: July 2014
July Opening Report Date: Authors: July 2010
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
November 2014 Opening Report
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: July 2005 July 2005
July 2013 Opening Report Date: Authors: July 2013
May 2012 Opening Report Date: Authors: May 2012
Presentation transcript:

TV White Space Coexistence Plan May 2009 TV White Space Coexistence Plan Date: 2009-05-13 Authors: Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE 802.19. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE 802.19. Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures <http:// ieee802.org/guides/bylaws/sb-bylaws.pdf>, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the TAG of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair <shellhammer@ieee.org> as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE 802.19 TAG. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at <patcom@ieee.org>. Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm

May 2009 Abstract At the March 2009 Plenary the executive committee approved formation of an 802.19 Study Group on TV white space coexistence The EC requested a plan containing List of planned deliverables Schedule This document captures the plan Straw Poll on Possible deliverables Deliverables selected Process for developing those deliverables At the May Wireless Interim the study group discussed and agreed upon additional tasks (Slides 8 & 9) Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm

Conference Calls and Straw Poll May 2009 Conference Calls and Straw Poll The Study Group has been holding weekly conference calls to discuss the plan The Study Group developed a list of four possible deliverables An electronic straw poll on these possible deliverables was run from April 14 to April 17 35 people responded to the straw poll Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm

May 2009 Straw Poll Results Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm

Selection of Deliverables May 2009 Selection of Deliverables Deliverable Study Group Plan Use Cases and Coexistence Scenarios Develop Coexistence Metrics Defer Coexistence Mechanisms Incumbent Protection Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm

Development Process May 2009 Receive Contributions (Presentations and Text Documents) On Use Cases and Coexistence Scenarios Discuss Contributions On Use Cases and Coexistence Scenarios Integrate text contributions into a single Document on Use Cases and Coexistence Scenarios Study Group Vote to Approve Document on Use Cases and Coexistence Scenarios Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm

Schedule April & May conference calls and May Wireless Interim Receive and Discuss contributions on Use Cases and Coexistence Scenarios Conference calls between May and July Integrate text contributions into a single document Discuss and revise document July 2009 Plenary Make final edits to document Vote on approval of final document on Use Cases and Coexistence Scenarios Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm

Additional Task agreed to at the May 2009 Wireless Interim April 2009 Additional Task agreed to at the May 2009 Wireless Interim There is recognized value in assessing the feasibility and performance of multiple 802 wireless technologies coexisting in the TV white space and make recommendations to the working groups The SG plans the following tasks Evaluate how well the unaltered 802 standards would coexist in TVWS Receive and review contributions on possible coexistence mechanisms for operation in the TV white space Receive and review contributions on the complexity and effectiveness of the various coexistence mechanisms Provide procedural recommendations to the EC on coexistence in the TVWS Provide technical recommendations, to the working groups considering MAC/PHY projects in the TV white space, on what features could be supported in the drafts to enable coexistence between 802 wireless standards in the TV white space Request and review feedback from the WGs on these recommendations Work with the WGs on incorporating these coexistence mechanisms into the drafts Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm

Schedule for Additional Deliverables April 2009 Schedule for Additional Deliverables May to July Conference Calls Announce to WGs our plan to develop a document on recommendations to the WGs on coexistence mechanisms in the TV white space Receive and review contributions on how well unmodified 802 standards would coexist in the TV white space Receive and review contributions on possible coexistence mechanisms July Plenary Receive and review presentations on the complexity and effectiveness of the various coexistence mechanisms Select which coexistence mechanisms to recommend to the working groups Request an extension of the study group until November July to September Conference Calls Prepare and review a document with recommendation on features required in the drafts to support the recommended coexistence mechanisms September Wireless Interim Review and approve the document with the recommendations for the working groups Deliver the recommendation document to the working groups November Plenary Review feedback from the working groups Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm

May 2009 Future Work After completion of the current tasks the Study Group will consider other tasks Possible future deliverables Coexistence metrics document Incumbent protection document Recommendations to the Executive Committee Development of a PAR on coexistence in the TV white space Other recommendations If needed the study group will request an extension after the November Plenary The current plan is to request an extension at the July plenary Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm