Collecting Library Statistics for Management Decision-making

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The annual SCONUL Statistics Philip Payne JIBS workshop on management data in higher education libraries 1 st. June 2009.
Advertisements

The LibQual+ CUL Assessment Working Group Jeff Carroll Joanna DiPasquale Joel Fine Andy Moore Nick Patterson Jennifer Rutner Chengzhi Wang January.
Common Statistics Programs and Projects in Canadian Academic Libraries Sylvie Belzile Université de Sherbrooke Statistiques de bibliothèques au 21 e siècle:
LibQUAL+ in the UK & Ireland: five years experience J. Stephen Town and Selena Lock, Cranfield University.
Listening To Our Users Queen’s 2010
Using Assessment Data to Improve Library Services Christopher Stewart Dean of Libraries, Illinois Institute of Technology Charles Uth, Head of Collection.
Tailoring Technical Services Data to Fit the Changing Needs of Academic Liaisons Heath Martin & Ashley Tussing University of Kentucky Libraries OVGTSL.
Colorado State University Libraries Where we are, Where we're going
Library Statistics: what’s needed and what’s new Lynn Copeland Simon Fraser University Library Thurs. March 15, 2007 Vancouver Ass’n of Law Libraries.
The Digital Journal Collection in Libraries -what Libraries Are doing -Impact on Scientists Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee
Evaluating and Purchasing Electronic Resources- The University of Pittsburgh Experience Sarah Aerni Special Projects Librarian University of Pittsburgh.
LibQUAL Tales from Past Participants Vanderbilt University Library Flo Wilson, Deputy University Librarian
LibQUAL+ ® Survey Results Presented by: Selena Killick ARL/SCONUL LibQUAL+ Administrator Cranfield University Introduction to LibQUAL+
Outcome Assessment Tools for the Library of the Future ACRL Conference 2005 April 7, 2005 Minneapolis, MN Martha Kyrillidou Director, ARL Statistics.
Reliability and Validity of 2004 LibQUAL+™ Scores for Different Language Translations Martha Kyrillidou Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson ALA Annual Conference.
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY LibQUAL+ ® Training Practical Lessons Drawn From Ten Years of Library Service Quality in a Research Library ALA Boston Midwinter 2010.
New Ways of Listening To Our Users: LibQUAL+ Queen’s.
Data Summary July 27, Dealing with Perceptions! Used to quantifiable quality (collection size, # of journals, etc.) Survey of opinions or perceptions.
LibQual 2013 Concordia University Montréal, Québec.
Project URL – TM LibQUAL+ ™ Introduction Seattle / London January, 2007 Presented by: Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson.
Frank Haulgren Collection Services Manager & Assessment Coordinator Western Libraries Lite 2010 Survey Results.
LibQUAL+ ® Survey Results American Library Association (ALA) Midwinter Meeting Philadelphia, PA January 14, 2008 Martha Kyrillidou, Director Statistics.
Project URL – TM Score Norms 17 th Greek Academic Libraries Conference 24 September, 2008 Presented by: Bruce Thompson, M. Kyrillidou.
ARL Statistics In recognition of Kendon Stubbs’ contributions Webcast Washington, DC October 9, 2003 Martha Kyrillidou Senior Program Officer.
A SSOCIATION OF R ESEARCH L IBRARIES Measure Matters, and Measures that Matter Martha Kyrillidou ARL Statistics and Measurement Program FEDLINK.
College Library Statistics: Under Review Teresa A. Fishel Macalester College Iowa Private Academic Libraries March 22, 2007 Mount Mercy College, Iowa.
Re-Visioning the Future of University Libraries and Archives through LIBQUAL+ Cynthia Akers Associate Professor and Assessment Coordinator ESU Libraries.
June 25, 2007 ALA Washington, DC Emmanuel d’Alzon Library Assumption College Using Your LibQUAL+ Results Dr. Dawn Thistle Director of Library Services.
Le New Measures Initiative de l’American Library Association (ARL) A CREPUQ 1 février 2005 Montreal, Canada Martha Kyrillidou Director, ARL.
Budget-Reduction Planning: The University of Miami Experience Sharyn J. Ladner ARL Library Assessment Forum ALA Midwinter January 23,
Avenues of Advocacy: Using Standards to Make a Difference Carla J. Funk Executive Director Medical Library Association.
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES Colleen Cook, Texas A&M University Martha Kyrillidou, Association of Research Libraries.
Measurement and Assessment of Library Programs and Services Eileen E. Hitchingham Dean, University Libraries Virginia Tech The Changing.
LibQUAL+ ® Survey Administration LibQUAL+® Exchange Northumbria Florence, Italy August 17, 2009 Presented by: Martha Kyrillidou Senior Director, Statistics.
MINES for Libraries™ Presented by Martha Kyrillidou Director of the ARL Statistics and Service.
The Digital Journal Collection in Libraries - What Libraries Are Doing -Impact on Scientists Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee
of Research Libraries Where's the Money Libraries … Going, Going, … Martha Kyrillidou SSP 25th Annual Meeting, May 28-30, 2003,
Your LibQUAL+ ® Community: A Results Meeting American Library Association (ALA) Annual Conference Washington, DC June 25, 2007 Martha Kyrillidou, Director.
LibQUAL+ ® Survey Results Presented by: Martha Kyrillidou Senior Director, Statistics and Service Quality Programs Association of Research.
ACRL Academic Library Trends and Statistics Editorial Board June 27, 2015.
Wasted Words? Current Trends in CD Policies Matt Torrence / Audrey Powers / Megan Sheffield University of South Florida Charleston Conference 2012.
Our 2005 Survey Results. “….only customers judge quality; all other judgments are essentially irrelevant” Delivering Quality Service : Balancing Customer.
Project URL – TM LibQUAL+ ™ Introduction Martha Kyrillidou Bruce Thompson National Library for Health London, UK August 26, 2005.
How to participate in LibQUAL+ and effectively utilise the data.
A half decade of partnership and the love affair continues….. LibQual+: A Total Market Survey with 22 Items and a Box ALA Midwinter Meeting January 17,
LibQUAL+® Survey Administration American Library Association
Data Collection and Beyond Assessment at the U.Va. Library
Library Assessment Tools & Technology
How to participate LibQUAL+
Results and Comparisons for SCONUL
Overview and Introduction to Alma Analytics
LibQUAL+ in the UK & Ireland: five years experience
What Do Users Think of Us? Mining Three Rounds of Cornell LibQUAL Data
Score Norms 17th Greek Academic Libraries Conference
Amie Freeman, University of south Carolina
LibQUAL+™ Results Meeting
Facts and Data Search on the Web
Reading Radar Charts.
How to Evaluate a Library Service: Methods and Examples
Standards for Use Measures for Electronic Resources
The Story Behind the Numbers: Measuring the Impact of Networked Electronic Services (MINES) and the Assessment of the Ontario Council of University Libraries’
LibQUAL+TM : A Total Market Survey
LibQUAL+® Survey Results
Your LibQUAL+® Community: A Results Meeting
LibQUAL+ v LibQUAL Lite at the University of Glasgow
LibQual+ Survey Results 2002
QUANTITATIVE EVIDENCE
LibQUAL+™: Brief Overview
The Association of Research Libraries
Presentation transcript:

Collecting Library Statistics for Management Decision-making Sarah Aerni Special Projects Librarian University of Pittsburgh 12 April 2005

Overview of this Presentation Summary of major U.S. library organizations to whom we report statistics. An introduction to the statistics we keep. Some examples of how these numbers are interpreted. A discussion of how statistics are kept for Wuhan University libraries and for other libraries in China.

People and Organizations to whom we report Statistics American Library Association (ALA) Association of Research Libraries (ARL) National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) The Board of Directors of the University of Pittsburgh

Association of Research Libraries The main library organization who collects statistics on research libraries It has 123 members, of which 113 are university libraries. There are 16 Canadian libraries and 107 U.S. Research Institutions.

ARL Statistics Statistics have been collected and published annually for the members of ARL since 1961-62. These data are available on the Web at: http://www.arl.org/stats There are also annual statistics for university libraries for the years 1907-1961 that were collected by James Gerould.

Standards for Library Statistics There is a standard for library statistics (NISO Z39.7-2002) that is used by ARL. The standards are modified slightly to accommodate electronic resources. Problems with adhering to, and variations from, the standard are common in libraries.

Types of Data reported to ARL Counts of materials (print and electronic) Counts of Services provided Expenditures Demographics of the library, university and student body LibQual survey measures service gaps

Counts of Materials (print and electronic) Volumes in library Volumes added in most recent year Current Serials purchased Microform units held Audio and Video (film) materials Archives and Manuscripts

Counts of Services Provided Library presentations to groups Participants in group presentations Reference Transactions Initial Circulation Transactions Total Circulation Transactions Inter-library loan (items loaned and items borrowed)

Expenditures Monographs Current Serials Binding of materials Salaries and Wages Other operating expenditures Total library expenditures

Demographic Information Number of library employees Number of students at the University (broken down by undergraduate & graduate) Number of faculty at the University Full-time and part-time students

What can you do with these numbers? Trends Analysis – looks at how your library has changed over time. Comparative Benchmarking – compares your library to certain other libraries. The selection of the comparison partners is an important decision to consider. Longitudinal Analysis – evaluates your library compared to others over time.

LibQual+ Survey designed to measure library users perceptions of service quality. It measures the gaps between the desired, perceived and minimum expectations of service. In 2003, over 300 libraries participated. Developed by the ARL New Measures Initiatives Program.

LibQual+ 25 core questions make up the main survey, and they deal with these themes: effect of service, library as place, personal control and access to information. A “gap analysis” is sent to you as a result. Your library receives individual data, and some summary data for benchmarking purposes.

For more information ARL Statistics 2002-2003. Compiled and Edited by Martha Kyrillidou and Mark Young. ARL: Washington DC, 2004. “Library Assessment as a Collaborative Enterprise” Martha Kyrillidou. Resource Sharing and Information Networks special issue (preprint from 9/7/2004). http://www.libqual.org

Discussion and Questions How are library statistics collected at the library here at Wuhan University? Are these numbers reported to anyone else outside the library? To whom? How do you collaborate with other libraries on data standards? What types of analysis do you do with the numbers? What else could we investigate to test how libraries are performing?

Thank you very much for coming and participating today!