Table 1. Descriptive statistics

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Parameters BD PP CP TC (mg. dl-l) ± * ± 5.8

Advertisements

and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1

Intermediate-level learner

Perception of discriminatory organizational relationships

Hospital live Deliveries

Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education

Table 3. Quran memorization students survey responses about App

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Result of intention to use

SON Nurse Practitioner Blackboard Community

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. Descriptive Statistics – All Banks

Table 3. Student’s Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability Description

Teachers Response (N= 11)

Management Philosophy

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

% Asian/Pacific Islander

Table 1. General Characteristics of the Study Subjects

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

Acrylic Type SOV SS df MS F–value p–value

Table 1. Descriptive data of movement form scores

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Student's t–test (Tensile Strength)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Figure 1. Changes of Clinical Symptoms Severity in patients on multi-strain probioticFlorasan-D or Placebo Ivashkin V. et al. The Effect of a Multi-strain.

Test Mean Std. Dev. Mathematics English Language

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 1. Student’s attitude towards technology (%)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Descriptive statistics and reliability coefficients

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Significant (2- tailed)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Contrast equality of group means

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)

Table 1. Characteristics (age, height, and weight) of the participants

Entrapment Efficiency (%) ± S.D.

Table 2. Test of Normality

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 1. Descriptive Statistics

Table 2. Regression statistics for direction a

Table 3. Regression statistics for direction b

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 6. The effect of porosity on pore velocity

Behavioral strategies

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. Correlation of PC, MC, RC & IC at the Supervisory level

chemistry that are involved in peer group

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

post intervention (n=60)

reported practices score pre/post intervention

Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant

Geometry and Mensuration

Table 5. Daily Standard Deviation of Items

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 7. The Result of T Test After Treatment

Table 2. Pre and Post Test Scores for the Plaid Condition(N=16)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Compressive Strength difference at 1 week (MPa)

Twice daily regimen N=45 MDI regimen N=28 P Value

Table 3. The Structure of the Basic Science and Technology Curriculum

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Figure 2. Changes in each parameter

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Gender N Mean S.D Df t-cal P

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Presentation transcript:

Table 1. Descriptive statistics M  SD  Withdrawal 6.95  3.94 .77 Continuance 6.98  3.97 .76 Tolerance 11.01  4.34 .82 Lack of control 6.48  4.32 .88 Reduction in other activities 5.41  3.24 .73 Time 9.07  4.30 .86 Intention 6.67  4.31 .89 Total Exercise Dependence 50.56  21.18 .92 Strength 3.92  1.27 .72 Body Fat 4.66  1.30 .87 Physical Activity 3.95  0.92 Endurance 3.86  1.31 .81 Sports Competence 3.94  0.97 .74 Coordination 4.38  0.97 Health 4.69  0.94 Appearance 4.49  0.96 Flexibility 3.87  1.30 .78 Global Physical 4.46  1.26 .90 Esteem 4.54  0.48 .84 Oliva Patrizia et al. Physical Self-Concept and Its Relationship to Exercise Dependence Symptoms in Young Regular Physical Exercisers. American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 2013, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1-6. doi:10.12691/ajssm-1-1-1 © The Author(s) 2013. Published by Science and Education Publishing.