Central Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Baltimore, Carroll, Harford, and Howard DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January 2017.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative (JDAI)
Advertisements

Public Safety Performance Project October 2, 2012 Less Crime at Lower Costs Special Council on Criminal Justice Reform for Georgians.
Pretrial Procedures Transfer hearings Detention Intake Diversion
PROCESSING OF YOUTHFUL AND JUVENILE OFFENDERS IN NORTH CAROLINA Youth Accountability Planning Task Force December 10, 2009.
A Presentation by the Technical Assistance Resource Center (TARC) at New Mexico State University. Updated June 2009.
NORTH CAROLINA SENTENCING AND POLICY ADVISORY COMMISSION Report on Study of Youthful Offenders Pursuant to Session Law , Sections 34.1 and 34.2.
Strengthening Probation as the Sanction of Choice In order for Probation to be a meaningful sanction, it must be adequately funded. Probation is the sanction.
Mandatory Transfer to Superior Court 13 through 15 years old Class A felony offense 2 juveniles in FY 2004/05.
November 3 1.What is an action committed by a juvenile called that would be considered a crime if committed by an adult? a. intake b. truancy c. status.
Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Michael Thompson, Director Council of State Governments Justice Center July 28, 2014 Washington, D.C. Measuring.
Chapter 15: Part 3 Young People and the Law ©2005 Clairmont Press Georgia and the American Experience.
Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Graphs from Chapter 7: Juvenile Offenders in.
DIVISION OF JUVENILE JUSTICE: WHAT WE DO AND HOW WE’RE DOING. March 10, 2014 Anchorage Youth Development Coalition JPO Lee Post.
Give Your Assessment of the philosophy behind your state’s approach to Judicial Waiver “To provide a program of supervision, care and rehabilitation.
Understanding the “System”
PRESENTED BY: LORI ALBIN, DIRECTOR FISCAL POLICY CENTER NATIONAL JUVENILE JUSTICE NETWORK How Much Does it Cost to Put Johnny in Jail?
Crossover Youth: Research, Policy and Practice CYPM Overview
Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Michael Thompson, Director June 22,
Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Michael Thompson, Director June 22,
11 Beyond the Bench 2013 “Juvenile Justice Reform– where are we now?” CALIFORNIA JUVENILE JUSTICE TRENDS UPDATE December 2, 2013 – Anaheim, CA Presented.
Chapter 16: Juvenile Justice
Ojjdp.gov Raise The Age Presented by Toni Walker.
Peeling Back the Data “Onion” Presented by Karen Tucker, Union County DMC Project Coordinator.
Data Analysis and Forecasting Project – Interim Report Delivered to the DJJ January 2008 Jennifer Lewis Priestley, Ph.D. Shan Muthersbaugh, MS Candidate.
Georgia and the American Experience
Lori Albin, Director Fiscal Policy Center National Juvenile Justice Network July 2011 Show Us the Money: Calculating the Cost of Juvenile Justice.
Steps in the Adult Criminal Justice Process
NC Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission RECIDIVISM OF 16 AND 17 YEAR OLD AND JUVENILE OFFENDERS: FINDINGS FROM TWO STUDIES Presented to Youth Accountability.
Harvey J. Reed, Director Linda S. Janes, Assistant Director Presentation and Update to the Ohio Criminal Sentencing Commission.
Navigating the Juvenile Justice System.  Taxpayers save $2 million for each child who is prevented from beginning a life of crime  20% of teens live.
The Eckerd Family Foundation Florida’s Juvenile Justice System: An Overview DRAFT.
Understanding Disproportionate Minority Contact in Onondaga County A project to reduce racial disparities in Onondaga County’s Juvenile Justice System.
Raise the Age Lessons from the first 2 years. Background: CT added 16-year-olds to the juvenile system January 1, 2010.
State of Connecticut Judicial Branch Court Support Services Division RBA Report Card – Adult Probation November 10, 2010 Update to the Criminal Justice.
Juvenile Corrections Population Forecasting Advisory Committee September 1, 2010 DAS Exec. Building 155 Cottage, BAM Conference Torri Lynn (Chair)Linn.
\. 2 Expediting Court Process As bureaucracies advance red-tape bureaucratization tends to develop Opportunities to expedite can occur at various points.
Georgia and the American Experience Chapter 15: Government of the Empire State Section 3 Judicial Branch ©2005 Clairmont Press.
Juvenile Justice Week 1 CJ420.
Muskie School of Public Service 2008 Maine Crime and Justice Data Book March, 2009.
Yavapai County Jail Planning Services Presentation to: Yavapai County Board of Supervisors January 6, 2016.
Disproportionate Minority Contact in Connecticut’s Juvenile Justice System  A presentation to the  Commission on Racial & Ethnic Disparity in the Criminal.
Oregon Youth Authority Meeting the Challenge through Collaboration and Partnerships Oregon´s juvenile justice system is composed of a network of local.
JUVENILE JUSTICE In Minnesota. History of Juvenile Law  Originally, juvenile offenders were treated the same as adult criminals  Beginning in 1899,
National Center for State Courts DETENTION ASSESSMENT.
Chapter 16: Part 2. Procedures in Juvenile Court  Custody: Juveniles can be taken into custody for criminal and status offenses ○ Running away, truancy,
Race and the Relationship to Juvenile Adjudication
Lesson 6: Juvenile Justice (Chapter 15 Section 4)
Probation and Community Justice Program Overview
Challenges in Determining Whether Treatment Programs are Effective
Juvenile Justice Reform in Kentucky
Juvenile Justice in Georgia
Juvenile Justice system
Dependency Court Flowchart
TEXAS STUDY USED MORE THAN 1
Overview of the Juvenile Justice System
Understanding the Criminal Justice System
The Juvenile Justice System in Georgia
Wake County Child Welfare EOY Report
Maryland Juvenile Services Long Term Trends FY 2007 – FY December 2016
LESSON OBJECTIVES Unit 4-3: Adjudication in Juvenile Court
Metro Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Montgomery and Prince George’s DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January 2017.
Baltimore City Juvenile Services Long Term Trends
24-hours a day 7-days a week 365 days per year
Raise the Age Implementation
Eastern Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Caroline, Cecil, Dorchester, Kent, Queen Anne’s, Somerset, Talbot, Wicomico, and Worcester.
Southern Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Anne Arundel, Calvert, Charles, and St. Mary’s DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January.
Western Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Allegany, Frederick, Garrett and Washington DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January.
Prince George’s County Juvenile Services Long Term Trends
CHAPTER 1 Juvenile Justice: Definitions, Measurements and Process
Presentation transcript:

Central Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Baltimore, Carroll, Harford, and Howard DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January 2017

Central Region Juvenile Complaints Have Declined Significantly Central Region complaints referred to DJS Intake declined 51.9% in ten years. Statewide complaints declined 56.1% over the same period. Data Source: DJS ASSIST, complaints referred to DJS Intake. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST

Juvenile Complaints in Central Region Have Declined for All Race/Ethnicities Since FY07 Complaints for Central Region African American youth declined 34.1%, and declined 71.7% for white youth. African American youth comprise 67.9% of Central Region complaints. African American youth comprise 24.4% of the general population. Data Source: DJS ASSIST, complaints referred to DJS Intake in fiscal year. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST

The Percent of Cases Referred to Juvenile Court by Central Region has Declined Over the Past Two Years 53% of Central Region complaints were referred to court by DJS Intake in FY16, 3.4% less than in FY14. Statewide 48.2% were referred to court. 12.1% of Central Region complaints were diverted to an informal (pre-court) DJS, and 35% were resolved or determined to have no jurisdiction. Statewide 15.8% were diverted. Data Source: DJS ASSIST, complaints referred to DJS Intake. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST

Central Region Detention Population Has Declined Significantly Central Region daily population in DJS detention declined 41.4% in ten years, to 41 in FY16. The statewide detention population declined 39.1% over the same period. Cases detained for the Adult Court now make up 23.6% of the DJS detained population in Central Region. Data Source: DJS ASSIST, detention admissions for Central Region youth. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST

Central Region Youth Population In Detention Pre-Disposition Has Declined Significantly The Central Region Pre-Dispositional Juvenile Court ADP declined 47.8% in ten years to 21.5 youth in FY 2016. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST

Central Region Pre-Disposition Detention Placements Have Decreased for All Complaint Types Youth detained pending disposition for misdemeanors has decreased 60% over ten years. Youth detained pending disposition for crimes of violence has decreased 26% over ten years.

Crimes of Violence Make Up an Increasing Proportion of Detention Placement Offenses Youth detained pre-disposition for Crimes of Violence now make up over a third of detention placements (36%) which is up from 23% in FY 2007.

Detention Placements for Non-Violent Felonies are Declining The proportion of youth detained pre-disposition for Non-Violent Felony complaints has decreased 4 percentage points over ten years. The detained population is increasingly comprised of youth with violent crimes complaints.

Central Region Pre-D Detention Population

Central Region Youth In Detention Pending a Committed Placement Has Declined Dramatically Juvenile court pending placement population declined 66.8% in ten years to 9.6 youth in FY 2016. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST

Juvenile Probation and Commitment Orders Have Declined Central Region Juvenile probation orders declined 39.7% in ten years. Statewide probation orders declined 51.9% over the same period. Central Region juvenile commitments declined 37% in ten years. Statewide commitments declined 48.2% over the same period. Data Source: DJS ASSIST, legal action tables. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST

Average Committed Out of Home Population Has Declined Significantly in the Central Region The overall daily population of Central Region youth committed by the juvenile court to out of home placement declined 56.8% over ten years, from 180.0 in FY07 to 77.7 in FY16. Statewide average committed population declined 39.1% over the same period. Data Source: DJS ASSIST, committed program admissions. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST

Central Region Committed Youth Population Has Declined for All Facility Types Overall committed out-of-home population has declined 56.8% since FY07. DJS-Operated ADP decreased 48.7%, and Private In-State has declined 58.9% since FY07. Out of State committed average population declined from the high of 14 youth in FY13, to just 5 in FY16. Data Source: DJS ASSIST, average population of committed facilities. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST

The Rate of Juveniles Committed for Low-Level Offenses Has Declined The proportion of new commitments for misdemeanor and other low-level offenses declined over ten years. The proportion of new commitments for violations of probation has begun to decline in the last year.

The Rate of Juveniles Committed for Crimes of Violence has Increased in the Central Region Crimes of Violence make up a quarter of new commitments in FY 2016. The rate of juveniles committed for Non-Violent Felonies has decreased at a much lower pace than commitments for Crimes of Violence in the Central Region.

The Rate of Juveniles Committed for Crimes of Violence has Increased in the Central Region Crimes of Violence make up a quarter of new commitments in FY 2016 in the Central Region.

The Rate of Juveniles Committed for Non-Violent Felonies has Decreased in Central Region

The Rate of Juveniles Committed for Violations of Probation has Declined in the Central Region After increasing from FY 2007 through FY 2013, the rate of new commitments for Violations of Probation has decreased 10 percentage points to 35% in FY 2016.

Recidivism Rates for Central Region DJS Committed Youth Have Decreased in Recent Years 22.5% of Central Region youth released from committed placement in FY15 had a new offense within a year that resulted in a delinquent adjudication or criminal conviction, a decrease of 2.1 percentage points from FY14 and 3.4 percentage points from FY13. The Statewide rate was 16.7% in FY15, down 4.1 percentage points from FY14. Data Source: DJS Data Resource Guide FY2015. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST, and CJIS for adult convictions

Recidivism Rates for Central Region DJS Probation Youth Have Declined in The Past Year 18.6% of Central Region youth placed on probation for the first time in FY15 had a new offense within a year that resulted in a delinquent adjudication or criminal conviction, a decrease of 1.9 percentage points from FY14. The Statewide rate was 17.6% in FY15, down 1.4 percentage points from FY14. Data Source: DJS Data Resource Guide FY2015. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST, and CJIS for adult convictions