A Paradigm for Utility Coordination

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Development Process (PDP) Structures. PDP – Three Project Levels Major Project ~ 14 Steps Major Project ~ 14 Steps Minor Project ~ 10 Steps Minor.
Advertisements

Planning for Program Delivery Presented By: Michael A. Haithcock, P.E. Assistant State Program Delivery Engineer October 27, 2009.
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 3.1.
S.R. 256 Road Reconstruction Project From City of Austin to S.R. 203 Thursday, February 6, 2014 Austin Elementary School 6:00 p.m.
Coordinating with Project Manager Cindy Kowalski, PMP Utility Coordinator, Parsons December 2013.
Greenfield District Utility/RR Engineer, INDOT
Understanding Right of Way Process Dawn Haecker - Training & Technical Support Supervisor INDOT Trent Newport - VP, CrossRoad Engineers.
Work Plan Development Steve Robinson Highway Utility Engineer, INDOT June 11, 2015.
LPA – Utility Coordination Natalie Parks StructurePoint November 20, 2013.
A New Paradigm for Utility Coordination Kenny Franklin INDOT Director of Utilities and Railroads.
Financing Urban Public Infrastructure
Coordinating with Project Manager Cindy Kowalski, PMP Utility Coordinator, Parsons November 19, 2013.
Oncor Electric Delivery Oncor Electric Delivery Restructure An Engineering & Construction Perspective SWEDE Conference May 11, 2007 San Antonio Mark Burt.
Work Plan Development Aschalew Aberra Highway Utility Engineer, INDOT November 20, 2013.
A New Paradigm for Utility Coordination Kenny Franklin INDOT Director of Utilities and Railroads.
Utility & Rail Coordination in Project Development Jennifer McCleve Utilities & Rail Branch Manager.
HIGHWAY/UTILITY PROGRAM OVERVIEW ROADWAY CONFERENCE APRIL 20, 2009.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco Public 1 Version 4.0 Gathering Network Requirements Designing and Supporting Computer Networks – Chapter.
Research Phase, Indiana 811, Initial Notice, Verification Deborah Porter Project Engineer/Utility Coordinator Clark Dietz, Inc.
Texas Turnpike Authority Division AASHTO Right of Way & Utilities Committee Conference Wednesday – April 22, 2009.
Understanding Right of Way Process Dawn Haecker, Training & Technical Support Supervisor, INDOT Trent Newport, VP, CrossRoad Engineers.
Genesee County Road Commission Fred Peivandi, P.E. County Highway Engineer MTPA July 15, 2011 TIP Project Administration.
Divisional Managers Commitment to the Diagnostic and Unit Rate Study Consultancy Services for Monitoring of Contractors/Consultants Performance And Establishment.
IDM Chapter 104 Utility Coordination Gail Lee Utility and Railroad Engineer, INDOT June 10, 2015.
Highway Utility Engineer, INDOT
Construction Review LaVon M Marshall Greenfield District Utility/RR Engineer, INDOT June 11, 2015.
I-465 at I-65 Interchange Modification Public Meeting 6:00pm Monday, October 1, 2012 South Grove Intermediate School Beech Grove, Indiana.
Project Delivery Performance Improvement Report to the Oregon Transportation Commission Hal Gard, Technical Services, Geo-Environmental Dee Jones, Technical.
Steps 6 to 8 Lesson 4 | The Eight-Step RSA Process 4-86.
PRE-PLANNING FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS. OVERVIEW ASSESSING OWNER CAPABILITIES ANALYSIS OF RESOURCES REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEWING.
Coordinating with Project Managers Cassie Reiter, P.E., ENV SP Utility Coordinator/Project Manager CMT Engineers and Consultants June 2016.
Gantt Charts & Schedules Mike Hoy Utility Engineer, INDOT June 22, 2016.
Construction Review LaVon M. Marshall Greenfield District Utility/RR Engineer, INDOT June 22, 2016.
IDM Chapter 104 Utility Coordination Gail Lee Highway Utility Engineer, INDOT June 21, 2016.
A New Paradigm for Utility Coordination Kenny Franklin VP of SUE Development Blood Hound.
Profession Practices (ECIV-5105)
City of dayton department of economic development
Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World, 4th Edition
Reconstruction site Investigation, Planning, Scheduling, Estimating and Design Eng. Fahmi Tarazi.
Costs and Economics of Construction
(Additional materials)
“Plan the work. Work the plan.” ~ Old Saying
Chapter 3 Managing the Information Systems Project
Quality Management Systems – Requirements
Human Resources Competency Framework
Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment (DSRIP) Collaboration
Engineering Project Tendering.
AX7665D82 Areawide Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Design-Build
BUSINESS OWNER MEETING
General comments: These projects are locally owned and the LPA should be involved and informed throughout the project. The project agreement is between.
Consultation & Participation
Research Phase, Indiana 811, Initial Notice, Verification
Agreements & Cost Estimates
Controlling Project Cost and Schedule
Aschalew Aberra, P.E. Senior Utilities Engineer INDOT June 14, 2017
Construction Review.
Work Plan Development.
Modern Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition
Understanding the Right-of-Way Process
105 Indiana Administrative Code Article 13
Utility Coordination OBJECT FOR THIS MODULE: Learning how soft sills contributes to a successful Utility Coordinator.
Drawing of Sufficient Detail (DOSD)
‘ Causes of Delay During Construction Phase at Palestine ’
Utility Coordination: An Overview
Construction Management Services April 16, 2018
Right of Way Certification
Project Manager / Utility Liaison
Agreements & Cost Estimates
Modern Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition
TOTAL COST CONTROL ON CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
Presentation transcript:

A Paradigm for Utility Coordination Todd May District Deputy Commissioner Greenfield District – INDOT

INDOT Mission & Values INDOT Mission: INDOT Values: INDOT will plan, build, maintain and operate a superior transportation system enhancing safety, mobility and economic growth INDOT Values: Respect Teamwork Accountability Excellence

A Common View of Utility Coordination Utility Coordination is a means to get the utilities out of the way of our road project.

Traditional Utility Coordination Traditional Utility Coordination Survey, 811 Design ticket Notify Utility Companies/verification Follow the letter of 105 IAC 13 Establish the right-of-way Conduct Preliminary Field Check Design the project to 75% plans Bring in the utility companies to finalize coordination between stage 2 & 3 Construct the project

Results of “Our ROW” Approach Unforeseen surprises in costs and time for both utilities and project owners No discussion on practical design alternatives to save time and money Unnecessary relocations Delays = Change Orders = Frustration Lack of responses on future projects

Road Blocks To Success Right-of-way acquisition Utility impacts and subsequent relocations Environmental permitting

Strategic Approach Critical Path Approach Understand critical success factors Identify and understand all partners Obtain accurate information Needs and constraints Align goals Assess risk to achieve CSF Build Critical Path

Perspective If you, the team, and your stakeholders do not have the same understanding of the project, problems will present themselves which introduces unnecessary risk.

Partners

Paradigm for Utility Coordination Treat the utility companies as business partners from the planning of and initial development of every project so that the most cost-effective approach can be delivered for the public interest!

Paradigm for Utility Coordination Live interaction! Not email! Understand what is important to each of our partners with their facilities! QLB picked up in original Survey

Just a Line on the Plans!!

$$$ and Over a Year of Impact!

The ROI is Compelling

Paradigm – continued Avoid utility impacts whenever feasible Obtain a ballpark estimate Provide our Geo-Tech reports Establish which utilities are reimbursable Understand that UTC is collaborative and interactive

Collaborative Operation Independent Operation Project Manager Utility Coordinator Designer Utility

Paradigm – continued Establish a preliminary layout for ROW and placement of utilities Everyone Knows Where Everyone Goes

Paradigm – continued Determine who will acquire ROW Determine who will physically clear ROW Establish the critical path for the ROW

Paradigm Example

Paradigm – continued Develop a Utility Conflict Matrix Submit justification for all impacts to be shared with utilities – Design memo Build in contract whenever feasible Effective constructability reviews Develop quality work plans and drawings in partnership with utilities

Paradigm – continued Complete design through tracings Thorough review of utility work plans, schedules, right-of-way status, and special provisions before letting Coordinate all pre-construction activities for timely relocations Be “On-Point” for Construction

Special Provision Example The facilities of American Electric Power (AEP) Distribution exist within the project limits. The utility could begin to implement their work plan 45 days after receipt of the notice to proceed. The utility will be able to complete its involvement with the contract when the contractor has completed staking and clearing the right-of-way in the location of Sta. 54+00 to Sta. 62+50 “S-3(2)-C” such that the utility may adjust its facilities. It is anticipated that the utility will take approximately 75 calendar days to adjust its facilities in such area. AEP Distribution will need 60 days to obtain materials and 45 days to schedule work crews. If questions arise, Mark Walls of the utility may be contacted at 260-408-1895 or mawalls@aep.com.

Construction Engineering Pay Item Monitoring accurate placement Constructability reviews point out the “risk points” within right-of-way where we need to monitor placement during the utility relocations and our construction. In-house Consultant Contractor

Benefits to this Approach Manage Critical Path-On time delivery! ROW needs are accounted for early and allow for one presentation to the property owner The project “team” controls the schedule and cost! Each project “Changes the culture!”

Critical Path

Preservation Projects Have No Utilities?

Design Build Early Coordination to 30% Design Build Team Take project through Verification Provide any initial conflict points known Provide SUE on all urban jobs Design Build Team Confirms preliminary work Accepts full responsibility to complete coordination following 105 and UC Paradigm Must protect relationships with partners

Partnership

Questions?