Ischemic Postconditioning

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
STEM-AMI OUTCOME TRIAL STem cElls Mobilization in Acute Myocardial Infarction Outcome Trial   A national, multicentre, randomised, open-label, Phase.
Advertisements

Protection Devices in PCI-Treatment of Myocardial Infarction for Salvage of Endangered Myocardium Study Presented at American College of Cardiology Scientific.
Distal Protection: PRIDE, CAPTIVE Symbiot III, AiMI Dr James Cotton MD MRCP Heart and Lung Centre Wolverhampton.
TOTAL Stroke in the TOTAL trial: Randomized trial of manual aspiration Thrombectomy in STEMI TOTAL Trial Investigators.
University Medical Center Groningen Thrombus aspiration during primary PCI FZ Thrombus Aspiration during Percutaneous coronary intervention in Acute.
PARTNER Objective To compare surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in high-risk patients with severe.
Prasugrel vs. Clopidogrel for Acute Coronary Syndromes Patients Managed without Revascularization — the TRILOGY ACS trial On behalf of the TRILOGY ACS.
Minimise the damage – Pre- and Post-conditioning Dr Derek J Hausenloy The Hatter Cardiovascular Institute, University College London, UK. Myocardial Recovery.
Effect of Switching Antithrombin Agents for Primary Angioplasty in Acute Myocardial Infarction The HORIZONS-SWITCH Analysis HORIZONS AMI Dangas G, et al.
EXAMINATION Objective Assess the safety and performance of a new-generation DES vs. a BMS in the setting of primary PCI for treatment of patients with.
The Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Treatment Strategy for Acute Myocardial Infarction (ASSENT-4 PCI) Trial ASSENT- 4 PCI Trial Presented.
Side Branch Stenting Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Bifurcation Lesions Trial Presented at The American College of Cardiology Scientific Session 2006.
Trial Vignettes 1-3 Mark Mason Harefield Hospital Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust.
The MASTER Trial A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Evaluation of a PET Micronet Mesh Covered Stent (MGuard) in STEMI Sigmund Silber, MD, PhD FESC,
Organization for the Assessment of Strategies for Ischemic Syndromes 6 (OASIS-6) Trial Presented at The American College of Cardiology Scientific Session.
Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Treatment Strategy for Acute Myocardial Infarction (ASSENT-4 PCI) Trial ASSENT- 4 PCI Trial Presented at.
Rationale for TOTAL trial: randomized trial of routine aspiration ThrOmbecTomy with PCI vs. PCI ALone in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI Sanjit.
The American College of Cardiology Presented by Dr. Adnan Kastrati
IRIS Trial design: Patients without diabetes with a history of stroke or TIA within 6 months, with objective evidence of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR value.
PRAGUE-18 Trial design: Patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI were randomized to prasugrel (n = 634) versus ticagrelor (n = 596). Results (p = 0.94)
For the HORIZONS-AMI Investigators
CARIN Trial design: Patients undergoing coronary angiography were randomized in a 1:1:1:1 fashion to CMX mg/kg, 3.6 mg/kg, 4.8 mg/kg, or placebo.
SOCRATES Trial design: Patients with acute ischemic stroke were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive either ticagrelor 180 mg load + 90 mg BID or aspirin.
EARLY-BAMI Trial design: Patients presenting with STEMI with a plan for primary PCI, and without evidence of cardiogenic shock, were randomized to either.
Presented by Dr. Leif Thuesen
Dual Goals for the Management of Stable Ischemic Heart Disease (SIHD)
Disclosures. Evaluating Recent Clinical Trial Data in the Secondary Prevention of ACS.
ATLANTIC Trial design: Participants with STEMI being transported for primary PCI were randomized in the ambulance to ticagrelor 180 mg (n = 909) vs. placebo.
Angiography-guided PCI
Primary endpoint at 1 year
The American College of Cardiology Presented by Dr. Maurits T. Dirksen
American College of Cardiology Presented by Dr. Stephan Windecker
Compare-Acute Trial design: STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI were randomized to fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided complete revascularization (n.
European Society of Cardiology 2003
FAIR Trial design: Patients with SFA in-stent restenosis (ISR) were randomized to either a paclitaxel-coated balloon (DCB) (dose 3.5 μg/mm2) or routine.
TUXEDO–India Trial design: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) and coronary artery disease undergoing PCI were randomized to receive Taxus Element.
Modified Rankin score 0-2
LATITUDE-TIMI 60 Trial design: Patients hospitalized with AMI on guideline-recommended therapy were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to either losmapimod 7.5.
For the HORIZONS-AMI Investigators
For the HORIZONS-AMI Investigators
ILLUMENATE Trial design: Patients with superficial femoral artery (SFA) and/or popliteal arterial stenoses were randomized in a 2:1 fashion to either balloon.
ISAR-SAFE Trial design: Patients with DES PCI received 6 months of open-label DAPT with aspirin and clopidogrel. At 6 months, they were randomized in a.
Impact of clopidogrel loading dose on the safety and effectiveness of bivalirudin in patients undergoing primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction:
Published in the European Heart Journal
ZEUS Trial design: Patients who were deemed uncertain DES candidates due to bleeding, thrombotic, or restenosis risk were randomized to receive either.
EXPLORE Trial design: Patients with STEMI treated with primary PCI and with evidence of noninfarct artery chronic total occlusion (CTO) were randomized.
American College of Cardiology Presented by Dr. Michel R. Le May
RIDDLE-NSTEMI Trial design: Patients with NSTEMI were randomized to either immediate (within 2 hours) intervention or delayed (within 72 hours) intervention.
Ezetimibe/simvastatin
Impedence-guided management
Role of Stenting in Acute MI: PAMI Stent Pilot Trial
Mancini JG, et al. Am J Cardiol.
ACCELERATE Trial design: Patients at high vascular risk were randomized to either evacetrapib 130 mg daily or placebo. They were followed for 30 months.
Overall (n=301) Acute/Subacute (n=149) Late (n=152) p Presentation
ITALIC Trial design: Patients with Xience V (everolimus-eluting stent) PCI were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive 6 or 24 months of dual antiplatelet.
BRIGHT Trial design: Patients undergoing PCI for ACS were randomized in a 1:1:1 fashion to receive either bivalirudin alone, unfractionated heparin (UFH)
Remote ischemic preconditioning
TL-PAS: DAPT Trial design: Patients undergoing PCI with Taxus Liberté PES, receiving prasugrel, without ischemic/bleeding complications, and compliant.
DANAMI 3-DEFER Trial design: Patients presenting with STEMI and in whom the operators could establish TIMI 2-3 flow without stenting or those presenting.
Primary safety endpoint
OPTIDUAL Trial design: Patients who received a drug-eluting stent and were event-free at 12 months were randomized to an additional 36 months of DAPT with.
Chest Pain Choice Trial design: Patients presenting to the ED with low risk chest pain were randomized to either use of a tailored decision aid or routine.
Sirolimus Stent vs. Bare Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial
IMPRESS Trial design: Patients undergoing primary PCI for STEMI and cardiogenic shock were randomized in a 1:1 to either Impella CP or IABP. They were.
Evolution of Myocardial Blush after MI
(p for non-inferiority < 0.001)
The American College of Cardiology Presented by Dr. A. Abazid
NOBLE Trial design: Patients with unprotected left main disease were randomized to either PCI with a drug-eluting stent (DES) (88% biolimus) or CABG. They.
CIRCUS Trial design: Patients with anterior STEMI were randomized to IV cyclosporine 2.5 mg/kg (n = 475) vs. placebo (n = 495) immediately before coronary.
Can the Dual vs Triple Therapy Controversy in Patients With AF Undergoing PCI Be Put to Rest?
Presentation transcript:

Ischemic Postconditioning DANAMI 3-iPOST Trial design: Patients presenting with STEMI and undergoing primary PCI with TIMI 0-1 flow in the infarct vessel were randomized to ischemic postconditioning or conventional PCI. They were followed for 37.5 months. Results (p = 0.66) The primary outcome, MACE, for ischemic postconditioning vs. conventional PCI: 10.5% vs. 11.2%, HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.66-1.30, p = 0.66 All-cause mortality: 6.2% vs. 8.1%, p = 0.18; recurrent MI: 5.4% vs. 4.7%, p = 0.64 LVEF at 18 months: 52.7% vs. 50.8%, p < 0.05 % Conclusions Ischemic postconditioning (with short bursts of balloon occlusion immediately after establishing perfusion) was not superior to conventional primary PCI in patients with STEMI Largest trial on this topic; clinical utility of ischemic postconditioning during routine primary PCI appears low Primary endpoint Ischemic Postconditioning (n = 617) Conventional PCI (n = 617) Presented by Dr. Thomas Engstrøm at ACC 2016