Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBenedict Briggs Modified over 5 years ago
1
BRIGHT Trial design: Patients undergoing PCI for ACS were randomized in a 1:1:1 fashion to receive either bivalirudin alone, unfractionated heparin (UFH) alone, or UFH + tirofiban. Patients were followed for 1 year. (p < 0.001) Results Composite 30-day NACE endpoint (MACCE + bleeding) for bivalirudin vs. UFH vs. UFH + tirofiban: 8.8% vs. 13.2% vs. 17.0%; p < 0.001 BARC 3-5 (major) bleeding: 0.5% vs. 1.5% vs. 2.1%, p = 0.04; stent thrombosis: 0.6% vs. 0.9% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.77 NACE at 1 year: 12.8% vs. 16.5% vs. 20.5%, p < 0.001 20 17.0 13.2 % 10 8.8 Conclusions Bivalirudin as choice of anticoagulant is superior to UFH and UFH + tirofiban in patients with ACS undergoing PCI; however, there was no increase in the risk of stent thrombosis with bivalirudin monotherapy Controversial topic; UFH dosing in this trial (100 U/kg) higher than conventional dose (70 U/kg) NACE at 30 days Bivalirudin (n = 735) UFH (n = 729) UFH + GPI (n = 730) Presented by Dr. Ya-Ling Han at TCT 2014
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.