Japan’s proposal on the wording for driving-selectable mode

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Report from IWG on Environmental and Propulsion Performance Requirements for Light vehicles (EPPR) 70 th GRPE th January 2015 Geneva Chair: Petter.
Advertisements

Flow chart A,B EMW Test 1 R EMW1 > L Rejected Yes R EMW1 > 0.9 L EMW Test 2 * R EMW2 > L Yes Accepted No EMW : typically tested by TVH with emission worst.
OIL #27 Number of tests Status report 14th of January, 2015 WLTP rev1e.
WLTP Elaborated by the WLTP downscaling issues task force OIL #5 Proposal for modifications of the calculation parameter/coefficients.
Working Paper No. WLTP-09-07e 1 Agenda item 5: Progress report on Downscaling / Gearshifting (OIL #4-9) by H. Steven th WLTP IG meeting, 14.
OIL #27 Number of tests Status report April 2015 JAPAN WLTP rev1e.
Determination of System Equivalency – TaskForce Audi, EA-52, V4.0 WLTP-10-33e.
WLTP Annex 4 and 7, delta cd*A
Determination of System Equivalency – Starting note for WLTP IWG Meeting #8 in Pune, India Audi, EA-52, V2.0 WLTP-08-09e.
Informal document GRPE st GRPE, 8-12 June 2015,
WLTP - 5h DTP Meeting Zuerich DTP Subgroup LabProcICE slide 1 LabProcICE issues on DTP level Zuerich, April 2011.
WLTP N/v tolerance Simulation results and conclusion BMW,
1 WLTP Open Issue Phase 1B Issue: Handling of Manual Mode with Automatic Transmission. ACEA Informal Document WLTP-06-17e.
10/05/2010 UNECE-GFV-DF-power1 HDDF power issues – draft proposals to GFV outcome of the GFV meeting Draft amendments to R85.
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT), Japan Japanese proposal on evapo –gtr 8 Sep JAPAN proposal on EVAP-GTR to add Japanese.
A new UN Global Technical Regulation on Worldwide harmonized Light vehicles Test Procedures (WLTP) Transmitted by the WLTP UN GTR draft manager Informal.
GTR amendments Japan #14 WLTP IWG at Paris WLTP-14-08e.
Amendment proposals for Regulations Nos. 9, 63 and 92 On behalf of the European Commission Transmitted by the expert from the European Commission Informal.
Dual-axis dyno Taskforce Status Report WLTP-IWG meeting April 2016 Iddo Riemersma (T&E) Christoph Lueginger (BMW) WLTP-14-04e.
Possible implementation of WLTP into a UN Regulation WP.29 Secretariat Informal document GRPE rd GRPE, 6-10 June 2016, agenda item 3(b)
India’s Comments on EPPR (Part-B2)
EPPR India comments on B1 Text 15th September 2017
1st Informal Group on WLTP Palais des Nations, Geneva
Attestation Concept additional explanation and implementation proposal
Informal document GRPE-73-21
India proposals on part B1 & B2 text
Improvement of Wind tunnel Measurement Process Status report
Regulation series WLTP-24-03e_Appendix 4
Informal document GRPE-75-18
Gas fuelled vehicles in GTR 15: Bringing WLTP in line with Reg. 83:
Informal document No. GRPE (70th GRPE, January 2015, agenda item 3(b))
Improvement of Family definitions
Informal document GRPE-77-21
Full load curve proposal
Submitted by the expert from OICA
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
Submitted by the experts of OICA
WLTP Informal Working Group
OBD Correspondence Group (CG)
Correlation Improvements
Mode selectable switch
WLTP-25-07e Gearshift Issues Heinz Steven
HDV CO2 certification CoP provisions
Drafting Coordinator Report
Background During last GRPE meeting, EU, Japan and Korea requested the creation of an RDE IWG The GRPE accepted the proposal during its June 2018 meeting.
Working Paper No. WLTP-05-12
Outline of UN Regulation No.0 third draft
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 February 5, 2015.
Full load curve proposal
Status report of the cycle and gearshift issues task force (GSTF)
WLTP Annex 4 and 7, delta cd*A
Japan’s proposal for EPPR-11-15e-Rev.1
Japan’s proposal for EPPR-11-15e-Rev.1
JAPAN AUTOMOBILE STANDARDS INTERNATIONALIZATION CENTER
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 6/10/2019.
Informal document GRPE-79-08e
Note by the secretariat
Status Report of New Issues TF –CFD* sub wg
Adolfo Perujo (IWG chairman)
Status Report of New Issues TF –CFD* sub wg
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 8/20/2019.
Japan’s proposal on the wording for driving-selectable mode
Request of clarification on
WLTP-27-02e Informal document GRPE-79-xxe
India Proposal on part B4 GTR-2 Amendment Criteria for % CO2 variation
Japan’s proposal for EPPR-11-15e-Rev.1
JAPAN AUTOMOBILE STANDARDS INTERNATIONALIZATION CENTER
Comments on tyre choosing of UN Regulation No
Japan’s proposal for EPPR-16-09
Request for Clarifications by IWG-IWVTA
Presentation transcript:

Japan’s proposal on the wording for driving-selectable mode 17 18 Oct 2017 JAPAN AUTOMOBILE STANDARDS INTERNATIONALIZATION CENTER http://www.jasic.org

Aim and background of the amendment of wording for driving-selectable mode Background With respect to India’s proposal of “Using predominant mode during certification test“, Japan proposes the prescription for the following vehicles The vehicles which do not have predominant mode. The vehicles which predominant mode is not agreed by the responsible authority. Solution For these vehicles, the prescription in WLTP(GTR15 Annex6 2.6.6. (see GRPE-75-23)) could be applicable. The proposed text based on WLTP is shown in the next slide.

The Idea for Predominant Mode and Proposed Text by Japan proposal 3.4.5.1.2. Driver-selectable modes 3.4.5.1.2.1. Vehicles equipped with a predominant mode shall be tested in that mode. At the request of the manufacturer, the vehicle may also be tested with the driver-selectable mode in the worst-case position for emissions. 3.4.5.1.2.2. The manufacturer shall provide evidence to the responsible authority of the existence of a mode that fulfils the requirements of paragraph 4.5.6. of this UN GTR. With the agreement of the responsible authority, the predominant mode may be used as the only mode for the determination of criteria emissions. 3.4.5.1.2.3. If the vehicle has no predominant mode or the requested predominant mode is not agreed by the responsible authority as being a predominant mode, the vehicle shall be tested in the best case mode and worst case mode for criteria emissions. Worst case modes shall be identified by the evidence provided on the emissions in all modes. At the request of the manufacturer, the vehicle may also be tested with the driver-selectable mode in the worst case position for emissions. 3.4.5.1.2.4 On the basis of technical evidence provided by the manufacturer and with the agreement of the responsible authority, the dedicated driver-selectable modes for very special limited purposes shall not be considered (e.g. maintenance mode, crawler mode). All remaining modes used for forward driving shall be considered and the criteria emissions limits shall be fulfilled in all these modes. 3.4.5.1.2.5 Paragraphs 3.4.5.1.2.1. to 3.4.5.1.2.4. inclusive of this annex shall apply to all vehicle systems with driver-selectable modes, including those not solely specific to the transmission. Notes: Driver-selectable modes in the latest WLTP are determined considering CO2 and fuel economy values, but it is not necessary for WMTC. So the prescription regarding CO2 and fuel efficiency in the WLTP text is removed. Thank you