PWR Sump Performance (GSI-191) Industry Workshop

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Westinghouse Owners Group Risk-Informed Repair and Replacement – Implementation of 10 CFR Twelfth International Conference on Nuclear Engineering.
Advertisements

Vermont Yankee Presentation to VSNAP 7/17/13 VY/Entergy Fukushima Response Update Bernard Buteau.
Cyber Security Plan Implementation Presentation to CMBG Glen Frix, Duke Energy June 20,
1 Generic Safety Issue (GSI) 191 Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) Sump Performance Presented by: Donnie Harrison Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Presented.
> NRC Regulatory Information Conference March 12, 2009 AREVA NP Inc. 2 AREVA Perspectives on the Containment Sump Design and Downstream Effects for U.S.
Cumulative Impacts James Slider November 7, 2013.
Licensing of Nuclear Power Plants in Pakistan
Lindy Hughes Fleet Fire Protection Program Engineer Southern Nuclear Operating Company June 4, 2013 Fire Protection.
GSI-191 Status and Lessons Learned Presented by: Donnie Harrison Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Presented at:
NEI Issues & Current Events George Oliver June 22, th Annual RETS – REMP Workshop South Bend, Indiana.
Westinghouse Perspective on New Reactor Sumps
Regulatory Affairs Personnel Training and Qualification (RA T&Q) Overview.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
Nuclear Energy Institute Initiatives NRC Region I/FEMA I, II, & III Joint Scheduling Conference Susan Perkins-Grew Senior Project Manager.
1 Material Control and Accounting (MC&A) Licensing and Planned Rulemaking Activities at NRC Tom Pham – NRC NMMSS Users Annual Training Meeting Denver,
Groundwater Protection Initiative And Other Issues Of Interest George Oliver RETS/REMP Conference Charlotte, NC June 23, 2008.
1 Options to Revise Radiation Protection Regulations SECY Kimyata Morgan Butler, Ph.D. Health Physicist/Project Manager Office of Federal and State.
1 RIC 2009 NFPA 805 Regulatory Infrastructure Development Steven A. Laur, PE Sr. Tech Adv. Risk-Informed Initiatives NRC Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
License Application Status Presented to: National Nuclear Spent Fuel Program Presented by: Joseph D. Ziegler, Director Office of License Application and.
1 RIC 2009 Perspectives on Digital I&C Licensing in the 10 CFR 52 Environment Thomas R. Fredette, PE NRO/DE/ICE2 March 11, 2009.
1 Impact of Revised 10 CFR 50.46(b) ECCS Acceptance Criteria 2009 Regulatory Information Conference Rockville, MD March 12, 2009 Mitch Nissley Westinghouse.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Methodology and Responsibilities for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Perspectives on Technical Support Organizations IAEA Meeting on TSO Challenges Aix-en-Provence, France April.
ISTOG – NRC Update Winter Meeting 2010 – Clearwater, FL Tony McMurtray Chief, Component Performance & Testing Branch Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
ECCS Operability Determination Jim Andrachek Fellow Engineer Westinghouse Electric Company.
Option 2b Template Example Phillip Grissom – Southern Nuclear Based on Vogtle (more or less)
Option 2a Template Example Phillip Grissom – Southern Nuclear Based on Farley (more or less)
Closure Option 1 GSI-191 Workshop October 18-19,2012.
Fukushima Flooding Task Force Jim Riley April 5, 2012.
Standard Design Process Overview
Use and Conduct of Safety Analysis IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decission Making Workshop Information IAEA Workshop Lecturer.
Response to NRC Information Requests for NTTF Recommendation 9.3 Sue Perkins-Grew Director, Emergency Preparedness NEI.
Status Update on the NRC Proposed Rule to Amend 10 CFR Part 61
EPRI Comments Re: NRC “Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal”
Delivering Risk Informed Engineering Programs (50.69) The OG Plan
Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation NRC Order EA
Joe Bellini, Exelon Drew Miller Exelon April 6, 2012
Janet R. Schlueter Senior Director, Radiation and Materials Safety
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards (NMSS)
Industry Guidance on Part 21 Evaluation and Reporting
NRC’s LLW Regulatory Program: Update of Emerging Issues
10 CFR Part 61 Low Level Waste Disposal Rulemaking Update
LLW Forum Meeting October 16, 2017 Alexandria, Virginia
Flooding Walkdown Guidance
Mitigation of Beyond Design Basis Events (MBDBE) Rule Implementation
NRC’s LLW Regulatory Program: Update of Emerging Issues
Pressurized Water Reactor Owners Group
NRC Cyber Security Regulatory Overview
Overview of NRC Low-Level Waste Activities and Initiatives
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Radiation Safety Standards
LLW Forum Meeting October 17, 2017 Alexandria, Virginia
October 23, 2015 LLW Forum Meeting Chicago, IL Melanie Wong,
Moving Forward From Fukushima Near-Term Task Force EP Recommendations
Bypass Testing Paul Leonard.
Research and Test Reactor Safety: The Regulatory Perspective
Industry Input on NRC’s Low-Level Waste Program Strategic Assessment
Regulatory Cooperation Forum (RCF) - Plenary 2018
Adding Nuclear Power to the Grid
Overview of NRC Low-Level Radioactive Waste Activities and Initiatives
Decommissioning Rulemaking
Thomas Koshy, On Behalf of Brian Thomas, Director
TRTR Briefing September 2013
Pressurized Water Reactor Owners Group
RESOLUTION OF GENERIC SAFETY ISSUE 191
License Amendments Patrick Boyle Nuclear Engineer
March 2018 Project: IEEE P MD
Risk-Informing In-Vessel Effects
PWR Sump Performance (GSI-191) Workshop
RESOLUTION OF GENERIC SAFETY ISSUE 191
White Flint North Entrance Feasibility Study
Presentation transcript:

PWR Sump Performance (GSI-191) Industry Workshop Hyatt Regency, Baltimore, Maryland October 18-19, 2012 Mark Richter Senior Project Manager Nuclear Energy Institute

GSI-191 Industry Workshop Workshop Objectives Provide guidance and information to PWR licensees to assist in the resolution and closure of this long-standing issue. Provide the range of closure path options and applicability relative to SECY 12-0093. Provide an opportunity for open discussion with peers and NRC staff to resolve questions and identify remaining issues.

GSI-191 Industry Workshop Workshop Focus Industry and Regulatory Perspectives PWROG Closure Plan, STP Risk-Informed Project, and other coupled deterministic and risk-informed closure options Bypass Testing, Defense-in Depth and Mitigation Strategies, and Operability Determination Closure Option Templates based on options in SECY 12-0093 for Year-End Submittals

GSI-191 Closure Options Option 1: Compliance with 10 CFR 50.46 Based on Approved Models Attributes and Requirements Ideal for low/no fiber plants that meet “Clean Plant Criteria” or plants that can meet the 15 grams per fuel assembly fiber limit associated with WCAP 16793 r. 2 Must demonstrate compliance with 10 CFR 50.46 Must comply with any additional conditions imposed through the anticipated SE for WCAP-16793 r. 2 Additional margin may be achieved later based on current PWROG testing results Required plant actions must be completed within two refueling outages after January 1, 2013

GSI-191 Closure Options Option 2: Deterministic or Risk-Informed Graded approach with actions based on amount of fibrous insulation Plants must implement defense-in-depth and mitigation measures to offset residual risk while testing and/or modifications are completed (Plants may reference the NEI March 5, 2012 letter to NRC summarizing these measures) Option 2 offers a deterministic or risk-informed path for resolution and closure

GSI-191 Closure Options Option 2a: Deterministic Resolution Path Attributes and Requirements Actions taken based on amount of fibrous insulation Apply results of new PWROG test program to provide basis for new in-vessel criteria Anticipate new in-vessel criteria will minimize or eliminate the need for additional plant modifications Testing and plant modifications are to be completed within three refueling outages after January 1, 2013

GSI-191 Closure Options Option 2b: Full Risk-Informed Resolution Path Attributes and Requirements Utilize risk-informed methods piloted by STPNOC-Risk assessment models and plant-specific testing support assumptions Plant-specific resolution schedule established with NRC Anticipate license amendment request submitted by December, 2015. All testing and analysis to support assumptions complete within two RFOs after January 1, 2013 If risk-informed approach is determined to not be feasible, deterministic resolution will be completed by third RFO after January 1, 2013

GSI-191 Closure Options Option 3 Different Regulatory Treatment for Suction Strainer and In-Vessel Effects Attributes and Requirements Separate resolution paths for strainers and in-vessel effects Strainer resolved deterministically, in-vessel resolved by risk-informed or yet to be defined methods Requires identification of defense-in-depth measures to mitigate risk while testing, and modifications are completed Deterministic scope to be complete within two RFOs after January 1, 2013 and the risk-informed scope consistent with the schedule defined by Option 2b. The NRC is interested in identifying a plant(s) to pilot this conceptually defined option

GSI-191 Industry Workshop Topical Agenda Thursday October 18th Introductions and Opening Remarks NRC Perspectives on Closure PWROG Closure Plan PWROG Perspective on Closure GSI-191 Downstream Effects Resolution Path GSI-191 Downstream Effects –Alternate Flow Paths PWROG Closure Plan Panel Discussion w/Q&A Risk-Informed Approach Risk-Informed Approach Panel Discussion w/Q&A Closing Comments

GSI-191 Industry Workshop Topical Agenda Defense-in –Depth, Mitigation Measures Bypass Testing Attributes and Recent Bypass Testing Results Bypass Testing STP Testing with NEI Debris Preparation Bypass Testing NRC Perspective Friday October 19th Opening Remarks: Agenda Review and Re-focus Option 3 (Reg. Guide 1.174 and Other Approaches) Risk-Informing In-Vessel Effects Risk-Informed Approach for GSI-191 Resolution

GSI-191 Industry Workshop Topical Agenda Template Overview for All Closure Options Option 1 – Beaver Valley Option 2a – Farley Option 2b – Vogtle Option 3 – Point Beach Operability Determination Approaches Assuring Regulatory Certainty Through Technical Specifications Operability Determination Template Panel Discussion on Closure Strategies w/Q&A Closing Comments