R. D. Shelton and P. Foland WTEC Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Río de Janeiro 18 July 2009 Science & Technology Indicators for EULARINET Indicators for bi-regional cooperation comparison Documents analysed: OST: S&T.
Advertisements

The US-EU Race for Leadership of S&T: Qualitative and Quantitative Indicators Duane Shelton and Geoff Holdridge WTEC, Inc. Baltimore, Maryland, USA To.
Why is Europe so efficient at producing scientific papers, and does this explain the European Paradox? Patricia Foland and R. D. Shelton WTEC 11th International.
1 “China’s Remarkable Progress in Science and Technology” Akito Arima P resident of Japan Science Foundation, Former Minister of Science and Technology.
Irwin/McGraw-Hill © Andrew F. Siegel, 1997 and l Chapter 12 l Multiple Regression: Predicting One Factor from Several Others.
L Bini-Smaghi Aspen Dialogue on World Economy, 8-9 July Can reform be successful without growth? Aspen Dialogue on World Economy, 8-9 July 2005.
Scientometrics and the Diplomacy of Science R. D. Shelton and Lance Miller WTEC PICoSEP 2011 Pyongyang.
The Race for World Leadership of Science and Technology: Status and Forecasts R. D. Shelton and P. Foland WTEC Baltimore, Maryland, USA Word version in.
ESTIME – Amman - April 2005 ESTIME project --- Elaboration of country leaflets Françoise Laville, Jean Thèves Observatory of Science and Technology (OST),
1 “European R&D Benchmarking (2002) “European R&D Benchmarking (2002)” Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Student Presentations Students: Miguel.
European Long-Term Growth and the Euro Crisis Uri Dadush New York University, Stern School of Business October 8,
International Comparison. Economy 2 Basic Facts Country Population, million (2011) Currency GDP, billion $ (2011) GDP per capita (PPP), $ (2011) Corporate.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Percentage Change SECTION 6.1.
The importance of scholarly information in the research process Endre Béky Account Manager ELSEVIER B.V. Date: April 14, 2009.
Relations Between National Research Investment Input and Publication Output: Application to an American Paradox R. D. Shelton Sponsored by a sabbatical.
The Emerging High Tech Competitors from Asia, Contrasts between the national systems of innovation and its performance of China and India Professor Sunil.
DIGEST OF KEY SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING INDICATORS 2008 Presentation Slides National Science Board.
Changing Engines of Growth in China: From FDI and Privatization to Innovation and Knowledge Furong Jin, Keun Lee, and Yee-Kyoung Kim Dep’t of Economics,
Why the US lost leadership in scientific papers, and will soon lose in other indicators R. D. Shelton and Lance Miller WTEC Sponsored by NSF coop agreement.
1 UK MONETARY POLICY: THE INTERNATIONAL CONTEXT Rachel Lomax Deputy Governor, Bank of England APCIMS Annual Conference 17 October 2005.
9. Fundamental Concepts of Macroeconomics 1.Objectives and Methods of Macroeconomics 2.Economic Growth 3.National Accounting.
1 Chapter 12 Simple Linear Regression. 2 Chapter Outline  Simple Linear Regression Model  Least Squares Method  Coefficient of Determination  Model.
Crimea Konek Day From reading to writing - how to be noticed in the world of scientific publishing '
Causal Connections Between Scientometric Indicators R. D. Shelton, Tarek Fadel, Patricia Foland Which Ones Best Explain High-Technology Manufacturing Outputs?
ICEG E uropean Center Anita HALÁSZ: Hungary: relative position of ICT and IST developments compared to NMS and EU Trends and Prospects in the Information.
Outline 4: Exchange Rates and Monetary Economics: How Changes in the Money Supply Affect Exchange Rates and Forecasting Exchange Rates in the Short Run.
Measuring Innovation Professor Sunil Mani Centre for Development Studies Trivandrum Kerala, India.
Do New SCI Journals Have a Different National Bias? R. D. Shelton, Patricia Foland, and Roman Gorelskyy Sponsored by a sabbatical from Loyola and NSF Grant.
WP3 – Alternative Scenarios of Growth Trends in Demography, Economy and Trade D. Tsamboulas External Consultant.
Brian Cabianca Partner Squire Patton Boggs. Amy Hillman Dean W. P. Carey School of Business.
Europe – the lost continent? Howard Davies Director, LSE KR Narayanan Memorial Lecture Indian Council of World Affairs 8 April 2010.
Which Scientometric Indicators Best Explain National Performance of High-Tech Outputs? R. D. SheltonTarek Fadel WTEC ITRI Presented at the Collnet Conference,
Regression. Outline of Today’s Discussion 1.Coefficient of Determination 2.Regression Analysis: Introduction 3.Regression Analysis: SPSS 4.Regression.
GDP that is measured at current prices is called GDP that has been adjusted for any price changes over time is called Let’s see how it works through one.
Bibliometric evidence for empirical trade-offs in national funding strategies Duane Shelton and Loet Leydesdorff ISSI 2011 Durban.
Economic growth Unit content: causes of growth and Unit content: output gaps Students should be able to: Distinguish between actual and potential.
Publication Pattern of CA-A Cancer Journal for Clinician Hsin Chen 1 *, Yee-Shuan Lee 2 and Yuh-Shan Ho 1# 1 School of Public Health, Taipei Medical University.
Federal Planning Bureau Economic analyses and forecasts Economic budget 2008 Evaluation of risks and uncertainties.
How do we measure economic performance?. 2.1 Unit content Four topics: Economic growth (see topic 2.5) Inflation Employment and unemployment.
The swedish research barometer 2016
Monetary Policy in Turbulent Times
New Annual National Accounts Publication
Section 7 - Module Economic Growth.
American Leadership of Science and Technology: Reality or Myth?
Trends in African Agricultural Trade
MAT 150 Algebra 1-7 Modeling Linear Functions
R. D. Shelton and Hassan B. Ali WTEC
Economic growth Learning outcome V Define economic growth
Bibliometric Analysis of Water Research
Scientometrics and the Diplomacy of Science
Introduction to the UK Economy
R. D. (Duane) Shelton ITRI & WTEC Baltimore, Maryland, USA
An Investigation into the Impact of the Medium-Term Expenditure Framework on Budgetary Outcomes Jim Brumby World Bank.
Ag.7a) Annual Adjustment
Why is Europe so efficient at producing scientific papers, and does this explain the European Paradox? Patricia Foland and R. D. Shelton WTEC 11th International.
The decline of research in corporate research and development (R&D)
The United States is Failing to Keep Pace With Competitors’ Investments in R&D As China’s intensity (black) rapidly grows by an average of 8 percent per.
Overview of the development of Life Sciences in ASEAN and relevance of biosecurity awareness.
Bibliometric Analysis of Process Safety and Environmental Protection
National Efficiencies in Publishing Scientific Papers
Comparing your papers to the rest of the world
R. D. Shelton Tarek Fadel WTEC ITRI
Key findings of the Country Report for Slovenia 2019
Duane Shelton and Geoff Holdridge WTEC, Inc. Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Econometric Tests of Copyright Openness
South Asia Challenges and benefits of research collaboration in a diverse region March 2019 Maria de Kleijn-Lloyd.
The Federal Investment in Basic Research, 1975–2012
The United States is Failing to Keep Pace With Competitors’ Investments in R&D As China’s intensity (black) rapidly grows by an average of 8 percent per.
Is Private Investment in Advanced Economies Too Low?*
South Asia Challenges and benefits of research collaboration in a diverse region March 2019 Maria de Kleijn-Lloyd.
Presentation transcript:

The Race for World Leadership of Science and Technology: Status and Forecasts R. D. Shelton and P. Foland WTEC Baltimore, Maryland, USA Word version in Proceedings of the 12th International Conference On Scientometrics and Informetrics, pp. 369-380. Rio de Janeiro, July 14-17, 2009. Both posted at itri2.org/Rpaper/

Outline Purposes Input Indicators (Table 1 in paper) Output Indicators (Table 2) Current National Positions with Extrapolation Forecasts Focus on Forecasting Scientific Paper Shares Conclusions

Purposes Provide a set of indicators to evaluate current national leadership of S&T (2005 data mostly). Provide forecasts based on recent trends to predict which country will lead in the near future. Provide detailed forecasts of numbers of scientific publications in SCI, with confirmation from other databases.

Model of a National Scientific Enterprise “The Black Box” S&T Outputs Resources In Indicators measure inputs and outputs Multiple linear regression can identify which inputs are most important

S&T Input Indicators (2005) U.S. EU27 PRC Units 1. Population 297 (1.0%) 492 (0.4%) 1308 (0.6%) Millions 2. Researchers 1388 (1.0%) 1300 (3.1%) 1119 (10.6%) Thousands 3. GDP 12376 (5.5%) 13031(4.4%) 5333 (12.9%) Billions, PPP, current dollars 4. GERD 324 (1.7%) 227 (2.2%) 71 (18.9%) Billions, PPP, current dollars, (percentage in constant dollars) 5. GERD Share 36 (-2.0%) 26 (-1.5%) 7.8 (14.7%) Percent of OECD Group Number of researchers and GERD are key INPUTS, but can drive outputs, like publications. GERD is much more significant than researchers. Average annual percentage rates of change in parentheses. Red emphasizes very rapid growth. Data from OECD (2008/1).

Population (thousands)

Researchers OECD This pattern will be seen in several indicators: the US and EU curves are close together, with China below, but gaining quickly.

GDP, Constant Year 2000 $, PPP This format de-emphasizes China’s rapid gain compared to the other two. Its GDP has trebled over this interval.

GERD, Constant Year 2000$, PPP (R&D Investments)

GERD SHARE of OECD Group “World” share of R&D investment China’s gain comes at the expense of the other two. This is a key driver for scientific publication share, since both are zero-sum.

GERD Real Increases Over the Previous Year China’s spectacular increases in R&D investments make its rapid gains in output indicators more understandable.

GERD Share With Forecasts Based on 5-year Average This is based on a linear extrapolation of GERD, then shares of all OECD countries are constrained to add to 100%.

S&T Output Indicators (2005) US EU27 China Source 1. Quantity of Papers (SCI) 205,320 (1.5%) 234,868 (1.3%) 41,596 (17.0%) NSB, 2008 2. Relative Impacts 1.47 (0.6%) 1.09 (1.1%) 0.63 (2.3%) ISI, 2006 3. Triadic Patents 15,774 (1.2%) 14,571 (0.9%) 356(35.1%) OECD, 2008 4. S&E Ph.D. Production 26,275 (1.6%) 45,398 (2%) 14,858 (17.3%) NSB, 2008 Moguerou, 2006 5. Nobel Prizes (1950-2008) 168 260 3 Nobel, 2008, by birth 6. High-Tech Exports, World Market Share in Percent 19 (-3%) 17 (0%) 15 (30%) EC, 2007 7. Trade Balance (Goods in Billion Euros, current) - 666 (5%) - 127 (9%) 82 (45%) Eurostat, 2009 Average annual percentage rates of change in parentheses. Red emphasizes rapid growth.

SCI Publications (Fractional Count) From NSF S&EI 2008. NSF thinks U.S. plateau has ended; I disagree.

S&E Doctoral Degrees EU = Germany and UK only; EU27 curve would be far above the US one.

Increase of S&E Doctoral Degrees Over the Previous Year

Triadic Patent Share

PRC Triadic Patent Share Growing fast from a very small base.

Hi-Tech Exports (Market Share) EC (2007) EU-27 doesn’t include BG and RO

Summary of National Positions Who’s ahead depends on indicators chosen In 2005 data the leader was: US: GERD, researchers, impacts, patents, hi-tech exports EU: papers in SCI, S&E PhDs, Nobels PRC: trade balance But linear forecasts show the PRC will gain: Lead hi-tech exports and researchers by 2010 Pass EU in GERD by 2015 (US will still lead) Pass US in S&E PhDs by 2015 (EU will still lead) Lead in papers in SCI by 2017 (more later) 2005 snapshot shows US leading, as the gurus have stated, BUT…

Focus on Scientific Papers While growing fast in the Science Citation Index (SCI), China is far behind, however the Shelton Model forecasts that it will soon pass the US and EU to lead the world Some confirmation comes from other databases, where China is already a contender: Inspec Scopus Compendix

More Detailed Model of Publication System (Inside the Black Box) $ Inputs Papers Published p1 g1 US EU Journal Editors AT ROW G (total) P (total) mi = pi/P Paper share wi = gi/G GERD share National Research Systems -- Fairly Independent Highly Interdependent Paper Selection

A Simple Model for Country i mi = k iwi mi is share of papers published (fractional basis) wi is the share of GERD for the OECD Group k i is a "constant" of proportionality; it differs by country. k i is also the efficiency of country i in producing papers per $1 million in GERD, normalized by the OECD average efficiency. For data in a single year the equation is an identity, but it is most useful over a range of years when k i is approximately constant

Since 1998, ki Has Been Fairly Constant for THESE Countries Ki Relative Efficiency 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 US 0.8 EU27 PRC 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 EU is 40% more efficient than average. US and PRC are not so different, at about 20% below average.

Paper Share in Science Citation Index Forecast Based on Shelton Model The PRC is likely to soon lead the world in scientific publications. This is based on R&D investments ( the GERD share driver), not an linear forecast of publications.

Scientific Publications INSPEC China is already taking the lead in this physical science database.

Scientific Publications SCOPUS China has already passed the EU in this database.

Scientific Publications COMPENDEX China is already taking the lead in this physical science database.

Conclusions 2005 indicators show the US and EU about even, with China well below However, China is growing rapidly Linear forecasts predict that China will soon pass the US and EU in key indicators Perhaps most significant to scientometricians is the forecast that they will soon lead the world in the SCI I predict that, if present trends continue, the PRC will lead the world in S&T by 2017.

Appendix: Extra Slides More info at http://itri2.org/Rpaper/

Demonstration that the end of U. S Demonstration that the end of U.S. plateau in publications is an artifact of the increases in the total SCI database

Linear Extrapolation Details Some indicators are zero sum--GERD share, for example. Results need to be constrained to add to 100%.