Jersey Probation and After Care Service

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Walter A. McNeil, Secretary Florida Department of Corrections Criminal and Civil Justice Policy Council February 3, 2009.
Advertisements

Does mentoring work? What the evidence tells us 25th June 2013.
ALTERNATIVES TO IMPRISONMENT TAPIO LAPPI-SEPPÄLÄ NATIONAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF LEGAL POLICY FINLAND.
CASE MANAGEMENT in CORRECTIONS Important Process: Important Features Assess Plan Implement Review Tony Grapes Subject Expert – DOMICE Project.
Delivering the Tri-borough programme YOUTH OFFENDING SERVICE Combining services to tackle common problems, improve people’s lives and make public money.
What is the term that defines the men and women we supervise? Parolee Probationer Offender Supervised Releasee Restored Citizen Returning Citizen Client.
Pre-sentence work – The Jersey experience Brian Heath Chief Probation Officer Jersey Probation and After Care Service
COMPAS is the Pathfinder ! NYS Probation Officers Association Annual Conference August 9, 2012 Presenters: Sharon Lansing, DCJS Nancy Andino, DCJS Gary.
Sacro Alcohol Education Probation Service ▼ a low-cost, effective short-term intervention programme for ‘nuisance’ offenders that works.
Release Lincs Community Chaplaincy Kirstie Clarke Community Chaplain.
Conférence Permanente de la Probation An introduction by Leo Tigges, Secretary General.
Probation A privilege granted by the court to a person convicted of a crime or criminal offense to remain with the community instead of actually going.
Implementing Evidence Based Principles into Supervision March 20,2013 Mack Jenkins, Chief Probation Officer County of San Diego.
Sexual Offender Treatment in Estonia: the Current Situation and Future Perspective Kaire Tamm Ministry of Justice of Estonia Criminal Policy Department.
Evaluation of the Connecticut Judicial Branch’s Three Court-Mandated Family Violence Programs: FVEP, EXPLORE, and EVOLVE Stephen M. Cox, Ph.D, Professor.
The European Probation Rules Rob Canton Professor of Criminal Justice De Montfort University, Leicester.
Prison and probation in cooperation – possibilities for improvement Rait Kuuse Director Prison of Tallinn.
Mentally Ill Offenders and Sex Offenders. The Problem Mental illness and the lack of sufficient mental health care have driven offenders into the CJ system.
Heads of Pacific Youth Courts Juvenile Justice Fiji Status Report.
Department of Correctional POSITION PAPER ON SOCIAL REINTEGRATION DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES Services.
To examine the extent to which offenders with mental health or learning disabilities could, in appropriate cases, be diverted from prison to other services.
Evidence Based Practice in Jersey Channel Islands
1 The MDOC Five Year Plan to Control Prison Growth Phase III: Long Term Policy Options SUMMARY BRIEF SUMMARY BRIEF Preliminary MDOC Proposal Revising Michigan’s.
ANALYSIS OF LOUISIANA PRISON SYSTEM 1 Main Office: 720 Kearney St. Denver, CO Ph Wendy Naro-Ware October2012.
Evidence-Based Reentry Practices in a Jail Setting
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Probation Statistics Part 1 Crime, Justice & Security Statistics Produced in Collaboration between.
Professor Anthea Hucklesby Centre for Criminal Justice Studies, University of Leeds, UK Co-funded by the Criminal Justice Programme.
Jersey Probation and After Care Service (JPACS) Working With Offenders In The Community 29 & 30 November 2011 Lisbon, Portugal Mr David Trott.
HB 3194 CRAIG PRINS3/5/14 OREGON CRIMINAL JUSTICE COMMISSION NEVADA ADVISORY COMMISSION ON THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE.
Crime reduction policies An assessment. Policies Prison Electronic tagging Anti social behaviour orders Community sentencing Intensive Supervision and.
Supporting voluntary organisations that work with offenders and their families Transforming Rehabilitation- what does it mean for prison.
Viola Läänerand & Taavi Kruus
11/01/2016Presentation name111/01/2016Presentation name1 Drug Treatment is focussed on improving recovery capital (housing, training, employment, relationships.
The National Probation Service Who we are and what we do.
1 Department of Correctional Services Vote 19 CURRENT STATE OF EXPENDITURE: 2001/2002.
 State leadership created the bipartisan, inter-branch, inter- governmental Missouri Working Group on Sentencing and Corrections.
Kaplan University Online CJ101 Unit 8 Introduction to the Criminal Justice System.
…Implications for Wales Josie Smith Programme Lead for Substance Misuse, Public Health Wales TOWARDS A HEALTH BASED APPROACH.
Corrections Also known as community-based corrections Community corrections: Refers to a wide range of sentences that depend on correctional resources.
Young offenders. The Youth Court Young offenders between the age of 10 and 17 are dealt with in the Youth Court. Children under 10 cannot be charged with.
Senate Bill 64 Omnibus Crime/Corrections Bill To improve public safety, slow the growth of Alaska’s prison population, and save money. 1.
CRIMINAL LAW 4. Factors Affecting Sentencing Aggravating factors – things that increase the severity of the sentence. previous criminal record leader.
South Dakota: Criminal Justice Reform
Schematic Map of the Probation System
Probation and Community Justice Program Overview
System Map Romania 11th November 2016
System Map Spain 27th January 2017
Prison Population and Prison Closures in Pennsylvania
The second international meeting in Prague
Summit County Probation Services
System Map GREECE 9th February 2016
Justice Division Strategic Planning
Canada’s corrections system
Conditional Release, Community Work & the new Probation Law
CORRECTIONAL SERVICES ESTIMATES OF NATIONAL EXPENDITURE
DCS Presentation to the Portfolio Committee of Justice and Constitutional Development: Implementation of the Child Justice Act : 23 February 2010.
Hepatitis B and C management pathways in prison:
System Map Estonia 8th November 2016
CJA 394 Enthusiastic Study/snaptutorial.com
CJA 394 GUIDE Education Your Life-- cja394guide.com.
CJA 394 GUIDE Lessons in Excellence-- cja394guide.com.
CJA 394 GUIDE Education for Service-- cja394guide.com.
Schematic Map of the Probation System
The Probation Service, Ireland
Evidence Based Practice in Jersey Channel Islands
Criminal Justice Process: Sentencing & Corrections
Jersey Skills Study CREDOS 2010
CURRENT STATE OF EXPENDITURE: 2001/2002
Management and supervision of men convicted of sexual offences
A Decade of Youthful Offender Supervision
Presentation transcript:

Jersey Probation and After Care Service Brian Heath Chief Probation Officer

Implementing “What Works” in a small Jurisdiction Population 88,000 5,000 – 5,500 crimes per annum 35% - 40% detection. 2nd highest GNI per capita in Europe ($57K U.S.) Lowest? public expenditure per head in Europe

Jersey Probation and After Care Service 2008 39 employees (27 Full time equivalent) 24 volunteers £1.5 million revenue budget, 86% staff costs £30,000 budget programmes, grants etc 600 – 700 reports per year Approx 200 Probation Orders per year Approx 200 Community Service Orders per year, 14,500 hours performed in 2007 5 – 10 prisoners being supervised on early release with E.M. at any one time Automatic prison through care since 2006.

“What Works” in Jersey Longstanding commitment to evidence based practice (since early 1990’s). Commitment to research to inform practice. Assessment, individual and group work. Continuity Individual practice underpinned by “Working with Involuntary Clients” Trotter (1999) Bonta (2004) Cardiff paper.

“What Works” in Jersey Jersey 1989 602 Custodial sentences 91% of custodial sentences under 6 months 116 Probation Orders made 64 Community Service Orders imposed

Prison doesn’t work - Probation Service Actions “What Works” in Jersey Prison doesn’t work - Probation Service Actions Not recommending custody. Community Service assessment in all imprisonable cases “Fit for Custody, fit for CS” Stand Down reports introduced Drug awareness course Alcohol Study Group

“What Works” in Jersey? Actions (continued) Drunk and Incapable Unit Promoted Probation 1992 onwards – “What Works” research and associated practice changes

“What Works in Jersey” Assessment using LSI-R locally calibrated Cognitive Behavioural Programmes chosen to meet Risk and need Importance of Individual Probation Officer Client Relationship – “Advise Assist Befriend” Case Management and Information systems (DAISy) and Academic Research, (University of Swansea) feeding back to inform and improve practice

“What Works in Jersey” The Results Custodial Sentences down – From 602 in 1989 to 216 by 1995 and similar levels since. Sentences of under 6 months reduced from 91% to 54% (2006) Probation Orders up from 116 to 172 (2007) Community Service Orders up from 64 to 185 (2007)

“What Works” in Jersey Results (Cont.) Drunk and Incapable Unit – 75 to 130 Police referrals p.a.

“What Works” in Jersey In 2007:- 72% of Probationers reduced their risk of re-offending (measured by LSI-R). 74% of highest risk Probationers (LSI of 24+) showed a reduction in their risk of re-offending. Over 14,000 hours of Community Service performed for the Island by offenders who would otherwise have been imprisoned. Probationers have a higher average risk score than prisoners.

“What Works” in Jersey Probationer Profile 2006. 90% have previous convictions 25% have previously served a custodial sentence.

Prison “Snapshot” June 2006 “What Works” in Jersey Prison “Snapshot” June 2006 Prison population 222 (250 per 100,000) - But Only 3 Prisoners serving sentences of less than 6 months, 8 serving less than 12 months 4 of these had breached community sentences. 1 prisoner aged under 18 years.

“What Works” in Jersey. Successful alternatives to custody “have to be part of a wider initiative to reduce the use of imprisonment and this requires political and judicial support and the absence of negative public reaction” (Walters 2004)

“What Works” in Jersey No significant new legislation No Government Policy or strategy regarding the use of custody – neutral and passive. “Bottom up” strategy Tried to avoid “Managerialism” Marketing and selling the alternatives on offer; taking “customers” with us; measuring success (not in terms of reducing custody) and celebrating success

“What Works” in Jersey As CPO I believe it is vital to use research and local evidence to feed back into practice development and training to ensure that we are giving our service users, the Courts and the public the most effective and efficient service that we can. “What Works” is not a one off change – it is a continuous process which is never finished.