Marie Crosson, Executive Director

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evidence Based Practices Lars Olsen, Director of Treatment and Intervention Programs Maine Department of Corrections September 4, 2008.
Advertisements

JUVENILE JUSTICE TREATMENT CONTINUUM Joining with Youth and Families in Equality, Respect, and Belief in the Potential to Change.
Bureau of Justice Assistance JUSTICE AND MENTAL HEALTH COLLABORATIONS Bureau of Justice Assistance JUSTICE AND MENTAL HEALTH COLLABORATIONS Presentation.
Mentor Courts, Training Curriculum, & Legislation Brian Clubb Project Director National Drug Court Institute.
CONNECTICUT SUICIDE PREVENTION STRATEGY 2013 PLANNING NINA ROVINELLI HELLER PH.D. UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT.
Veterans Treatment Courts GEORGIA ACCOUNTABILITY COURTS CONFERENCE JACK OCONNOR BUFFALO VETERANS COURT B.
Best Practices Standards Vol. I: An Overview. OBJECTIVES  Define Best Practices Standards  Identify the need for Best Practices Standards  Briefly.
Denver Family Integrated Drug Court
Role of Drug Court Defense Attorneys and Prosecutors Presented by Mike Loeffler and Liesl Nelson.
Core Competencies. OBJECTIVES Recognize key core competencies Identify the relationship between core competencies and best practices.
REALIGNING RESOURCES TO FUND YOUR DTC CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF DRUG TREATMENT COURT PROFESSIONALS – NATIONAL CONFERENCE BANFF, ALBERTA OCTOBER 24 – 27,
EXCELLENCE AND SUSTAINABILITY BUILDING COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS.
Elmore County Drug and DUI Court
Tammy Westcott, Assistant District Attorney Director of Alternative Courts Tulsa County, Oklahoma.
Outpatient Services Programs Workgroup: Service Provision under Laura’s Law June 11, 2014.
The 10 Key Components of Veteran’s Treatment Court Presented by: The Honorable Robert Russell.
Mental Health and Substance Abuse Needs and Gaps FY 2013.
Medicaid and Behavioral Health – New Directions John O’Brien Senior Policy Advisor Disabled and Elderly Health Programs Group Center for Medicaid and CHIP.
North Carolina TASC Clinical Series Training Module One: Understanding TASC.
Aimed at a reduction in alcohol and drug use and criminal activity.
Justice Grants Administration GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Executive Office of the Mayor 1 Edward “Smitty” Smith, Director.
EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF ADDING THE RECLAIMING FUTURES APPROACH TO JUVENILE TREATMENT DRUG COURTS: RECLAIMING FUTURES/JUVENILE DRUG COURT EVALUATION Josephine.
Understanding TASC Marc Harrington, LPC, LCASI Case Developer Region 4 TASC Robin Cuellar, CCJP, CSAC Buncombe County.
4380 SW Macadam Ave., Ste. 530 Portland, OR Informing policy, improving programs Implementation of the Ten Key Components: Variations.
Icfi.com | Metropolitan Denver Homeless Initiative Regional Planning Meeting September 28, 2012.
National Association of Drug Court Practitioners Anaheim, CA June 2009.
TREATMENT COURTS Inns of Court Presentation By John Markson & Elliott Levine October 17, 2012.
Recovery Support Services and Client Outcomes: What do the Data Tell Us? Recovery Community Services Program Grantee Meeting December 14, 2007.
Coordinator 101 Rose M. Ewing. Drug Court History First Drug Court was implemented in Miami, Florida in Today, there are approximately 2,500 therapeutic.
Bill Hogan, Commissioner Alaska Department of Health and Social Services.
1 Therapeutic Community Treatment in Correctional Settings The Call for An Integrated System George De Leon, Ph.D. Center for Therapeutic Community Research.
8/21/2015 Scott Ronan Idaho Supreme Court Senior Manager, Problem-Solving Courts and Sentencing Alternatives.
Program Improvement from a Provider Perspective Bob Mirel, MSW Senior Associate Peter Gaumond, MA Senior Associate Strategic Planning for Providers to.
Recovery Support Services and Client Outcomes: Results of Two Interim Evaluations in Texas College on Problems of Drug College on Problems of Drug Dependence.
State of California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs State Incentive Grant Project Overview Michael Cunningham Deputy Director, Program Services.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحیم.
Unit 6. Effective Communication and Collaboration This unit focuses on efforts to reduce juvenile delinquency through a collaborative process of community-based,
Key Moments in NADCP History A DULT D RUG C OURT A DULT D RUG C OURT B EST P RACTICE S TANDARDS V OLUME II B EST P RACTICE S TANDARDS V OLUME II “D OING.
State of California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs The Substance Abuse Research Consortium Semi Annual Meeting Improving the Quality, and Effectiveness.
Key Moments in NADCP History J UVENILE D RUG C OURT G UIDELINES J UVENILE D RUG C OURT G UIDELINES “A P REVIEW ” T ERRENCE D. W ALTON, MSW, CSAC C HIEF.
1 Center Mission Statements SAMHSA ? CSAT Improving the Health of the Nation by Bringing Effective Alcohol and Drug Treatment to Every Community CMHS Caring.
 As of July 1, 2014, 61 operational courts: › 28 Adult Drug Courts  5 Hybrid Drug/OWI Courts › 14 OWI Courts › 9 Veterans Treatment Courts › 4 Mental.
 First drug court opened in Miami-Dade, FL in 1989  Goal is to reduce recidivism by using graduated sanctions and incentives combined with treatment.
RSAT and Drug Courts: Working Together Aaron Arnold Director, Drug Court Programs Annie Schachar Associate Director, Drug Court Programs.
History and Concepts of Drug Courts
All Things CACJ Ms. Taylor Jones
Overview – Behavioral Health Care in Utah
Interprofessional Health care Teams
ACT Comprehensive Assessment
Judicial Best Practices in Drug & DUI Court
Intercept 5 Community Supervision
Problem-Solving Approaches in Youth Court
Maryland Healthy Transition Initiative
Accreditation Canada Medicine Accreditation 2016.
RSAT and Drug Courts: Working Together
Youth Advocacy Project
Evaluating the impact of adding the reclaiming futures approach to juvenile treatment drug courts: Reclaiming Futures/Juvenile Drug Court Evaluation Josephine.
SCHOOL-JUSTICE PARTNERSHIP
Developing an Effective Assisted Outpatient Treatment Program
Livingston County Children’s Network: Community Scorecard
LAW ENFORCEMENT SUPPORT TO ACCOUNTABILITY COURTS
Strategies to increase family engagement
Drug Treatment Court.
Senate Health and Human Services Committee
Role of Drug Court Defense Attorneys and Prosecutors
Problem-Solving Courts
Key Moments in NADCP History
Toronto Child & Youth Advocacy Centre (CYAC)
What works across Intercepts
Presentation transcript:

www.tadcptn.org (soon to be www.tarcp.org) Marie Crosson, Executive Director Materials for this presentation adapted from National Drug Court Institute presentations and/or materials found on their website www.ndci.org

WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED IN THE PAST 25+ YEARS? A GENERAL COMPARISON Nearly entirely consistent (thus far . . . ) Key Components State of knowledge as of 1997 Derived from professional experience Measurable performance benchmarks Emphasis on distinguishing characteristics Envisioned 10 of them Never intended as the final word Best Practice Standards State of knowledge as of 2013 and 2015 Derived from empirical threshold of ~50% to 100% improvement in outcomes; research in Commentaries Quantitative benchmarks All contributing elements Envision far more than 10

Evidence-based STandards Target Population based on empirical data Historically disadvantaged groups receive equal treatment DC Judge is well-trained, attends team meetings and interacts with participants Incentives, Sanctions, and Therapeutic Adjustments are fair, predictable, consistent, and predicated on evidence-based principles (i.e., more jail time does not equal more compliance) Substance Abuse Treatment is quality and evidence-based. Tx and social services are complimentary Drug Testing is accurate, timely, and frequent All members of the multidisciplinary team are important Case loads are maintained at best practice standards to provide quality services Program monitoring and evaluation

Key Component #1 Application Standards 2: Equity and Inclusion Drug Courts integrate alcohol and other drug treatment services Drug Courts integrate alcohol and other drug treatment services with justice system case processing. Application Standards 2: Equity and Inclusion 3: Roles and Responsibility of the Judge 4: Incentives, Sanctions, and Therapeutic Adjustments 5: Substance Use Disorder Treatment 8: Multidisciplinary Team 9: Census and Caseload Planning Documentation Speaker Notes: Planning to include criminal justice players, local treatment, funding agencies, and other local community key policy makers (including under-represented groups in your community) Document – write your eligibility criteria, operating procedures, performance measures to ensure they are collaboratively developed, reviewed and agreed upon. Separate and apart, neither treatment nor the justice system could solve the problem of drug abuse. Together, the drug courts are getting results as a result of this new partnership. These systems are not innately interwoven when discussing timelines, tasks, and deadlines. As professionals we must discuss how these systems can best work together to support and hold accountable offenders with addictions.

Key Component #2 Standards Application 2: Equity and Inclusion Using a non -adversarial approach, prosecution and defense counsel promote public safety while protecting participants' due process rights. Standards Application 2: Equity and Inclusion 3: Roles and Responsibility of the Judge 4: Incentives, Sanctions, and Therapeutic Adjustments 8: Multidisciplinary Team Prosecution Defense Attorney Speaker Notes: Planning to include criminal justice players, local treatment, funding agencies, and other local community key policy makers (including under-represented groups in your community) Document – write your eligibility criteria, operating procedures, performance measures to ensure they are collaboratively developed, reviewed and agreed upon. Separate and apart, neither treatment nor the justice system could solve the problem of drug abuse. Together, the drug courts are getting results as a result of this new partnership. These systems are not innately interwoven when discussing timelines, tasks, and deadlines. As professionals we must discuss how these systems can best work together to support and hold accountable offenders with addictions.

Key Component #3 Standards Application 1: Target Population Eligible participants are identified early and promptly placed in the drug court program. Standards Application 1: Target Population 2: Equity and Inclusion High risk and high need Access for all Speaker Notes: Planning to include criminal justice players, local treatment, funding agencies, and other local community key policy makers (including under-represented groups in your community) Document – write your eligibility criteria, operating procedures, performance measures to ensure they are collaboratively developed, reviewed and agreed upon. Separate and apart, neither treatment nor the justice system could solve the problem of drug abuse. Together, the drug courts are getting results as a result of this new partnership. These systems are not innately interwoven when discussing timelines, tasks, and deadlines. As professionals we must discuss how these systems can best work together to support and hold accountable offenders with addictions.

Key component #4 Standards Application 2: Equity and Inclusion Drug courts provide access to a continuum of alcohol, drug and other related treatment and rehabilitation services. Standards Application 2: Equity and Inclusion 4: Incentives, Sanctions, and Therapeutic Adjustments 5: Substance Use Disorder Treatment 8: Complementary Treatment and Social Services 9: Census and Caseload Case Management Clinical Case Management Mental Health Trauma Housing Transportation Medical and Dental Speaker Notes: Our clients have a host of issues that need to be addressed to assist them in the recovery process. We can’t just focus on getting them sober. We must address their mental health, trauma, housing, education, vocational, clothing, etc. needs.

Key component #5 Application Standards Abstinence is monitored by frequent alcohol and other drug testing. Standards Application 4: Incentives, Sanctions, and Therapeutic Adjustments 7: Drug Testing Random Observed Twice per week Speaker Notes: Our clients have a host of issues that need to be addressed to assist them in the recovery process. We can’t just focus on getting them sober. We must address their mental health, trauma, housing, education, vocational, clothing, etc. needs.

Key components #6 Standards Application 2: Equity and Inclusion A coordinated strategy governs drug court responses to participants compliance. Standards Application 2: Equity and Inclusion 4: Incentives, Sanctions, and Therapeutic Adjustments All team members participate Shared Decision Making Speaker Notes: Go to next slide and discuss staffing

Key component #7 Standards Application Ongoing judicial interaction with each drug court participant is essential. Standards Application 3: Role and Responsibility of the Judge 4: Incentives, Sanctions, and Therapeutic Adjustments 8: Multidisciplinary Team Someone in authority cares

Key component #8 Standards Application 2: Equity and Inclusion Monitoring and evaluation measure the achievement of program goals and gauge effectiveness. Standards Application 2: Equity and Inclusion 9: Census and Caseload 10: Monitoring and Evaluation 65% less savings when not using electronic databases 131% greater cost saving by programs that review data and stats to modify program (internal) 100% cost savings when program conduct and evaluation and modify programs (external) Speaker Notes: Collecting data on demographics, number of kids being served, number of families in drug court, combat veteran vs non-combat, conflicts, wars served, etc.

Key component #9 Standards Application On-going training Continuing interdisciplinary education promotes effective drug court planning, implementation, and operations. Standards Application 2: Equity and Inclusion 3: Roles and Responsibility of the Judge 5: Substance Use Disorder Treatment 8: Multidisciplinary Team On-going training Cross training Speaker Notes: Collecting data on demographics, number of kids being served, number of families in drug court, combat veteran vs non-combat, conflicts, wars served, etc.

Key component #10 Standards Applications Community Mapping Forging partnerships among drug courts, public agencies, and community -based organizations generates local support and enhances drug court effectiveness. Standards Applications 2: Equity and Inclusion 5: Substance Use Disorder Treatment 6: Complementary Treatment and Social Services Multidisciplinary Team Community Mapping Speaker Notes: Collecting data on demographics, number of kids being served, number of families in drug court, combat veteran vs non-combat, conflicts, wars served, etc.

Questions? 615.939.2872 Marie.Crosson@tadcptn.org Facebook: #TNDrugCourts Twitter: @tadcptn.org