PCI Big Beam Contest Team 1 (XDF) Junfeng Qian Shiyu Wang Qi Wang.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AP STUDY SESSION 2.
Advertisements

1
INTRODUCTION TO MECHANICS FOR SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES
David Burdett May 11, 2004 Package Binding for WS CDL.
Concrete Structures Introduction to design methods in reinforced concrete Sustainable construction – is concrete “green”? Possibilities in concrete structure.
Agenda – Day 1 8:00 am – 8:15 am Introductions and House Keeping
1.
A Fractional Order (Proportional and Derivative) Motion Controller Design for A Class of Second-order Systems Center for Self-Organizing Intelligent.
The SCPS Professional Growth System
Break Time Remaining 10:00.
Results and Statistics on Questionnaire for Foreign Staff Members Human Resources Services Santiago Osorio Alzate September
Turing Machines.
1 Challenge the future Subtitless On Lightweight Design of Submarine Pressure Hulls.
PALESTINE UNIVERSITY BUILDING MATERIAL chapter No.#5 Steel.
Concrete Construction Part 3
Beam Design Beam Design Civil Engineering and Architecture
PP Test Review Sections 6-1 to 6-6
A BYU Civil and Environmental Engineering Capstone Project by: Charles Connors, Andrew Luna, and Jonathon Archer Parallel Engineering Seattle Temple: Bearing.
INTRODUCTION Lesson 1 – Microsoft Word Word Basics
Sample Service Screenshots Enterprise Cloud Service 11.3.
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 7 Modeling Structure with Blocks.
Success with ModelSmart3D Pre-Engineering Software Corporation Written by: Robert A. Wolf III, P.E. Copyright 2001, Pre-Engineering Software Corporation,
Design of Steel Flexural Members
Workshop on Specifications and Producer QC – Ken Day I shall start by spending a few minutes describing some provisions of the Australian Code before inviting.
MaK_Full ahead loaded 1 Alarm Page Directory (F11)
Analysis of Tri-axial Stress-strain Conditions of Pre-stressed Masonry Corner VSB-TU, Faculty of Civil Engineering Radim Cajka Pavlina Mateckova Lucie.
Speak Up for Safety Dr. Susan Strauss Harassment & Bullying Consultant November 9, 2012.
Concrete Construction Part 1
Converting a Fraction to %
Clock will move after 1 minute
Introduction Ultimate Limit States Lead to collapse Serviceability Limit States Disrupt use of Structures but do not cause collapse Recall:
Physics for Scientists & Engineers, 3rd Edition
Select a time to count down from the clock above
Import Tracking and Landed Cost Processing An Enhancement For AS/400 DMAS from  Copyright I/O International, 2001, 2005, 2008, 2012 Skip Intro Version.
3D Analysis with AASHTOWare Bridge Design and Rating
Reinforced Concrete Design-8
Lecture 9 - Flexure June 20, 2003 CVEN 444.
Fraser Centre State College, PA Tyler Strange Structural Option Consultant: Dr. Thomas Boothby April 13, 2011 Tyler StrangeStructural Option Fraser Centre.
PCI 6 th Edition Handbook History. Presentation Outline PCI history Notable modifications to the 6 th Edition General chapter by chapter overview.
Reinforced Concrete Flexural Members
Shear and Diagonal Tension
ONE-WAY SLAB. ONE-WAY SLAB Introduction A slab is structural element whose thickness is small compared to its own length and width. Slabs are usually.
Concrete Condensed1 Cement Production, Composition & Types.
Chapter 3. Obtaining Silica-Fume Concrete  Specifying Silica Fume and SFC  Proportioning SFC  Producing SFC.
Quality Control Testing
Introduction Advantages Dis-advantages Methods of Pre-stressing Mix Design Curing Laboratory Test Visit Report.
George Read Hall The University of Delaware
Hershey Research Park Building One Jonathan Krepps Structural Option Senior Thesis 2013 Faculty Advisor: Dr. Hanagan.
PCI Big Beam Contest New Oriental Junfeng Qian Shiyu Wang Qi Wang.
By Dr. Attaullah Shah Swedish College of Engineering and Technology Wah Cantt. Reinforced Concrete Design-4 Design of doubly reinforced beams.
Bridge Design to AS 5100 Sydney May 25th 2005 Using High Strength Concrete with AS 5100 opportunities and restrictions.
Design of Concrete Structure I Dr. Ali Tayeh First Semester 2009 Dr. Ali Tayeh First Semester 2009.
Dan Donecker BAE/MAE – Structural Option Senior Thesis Project 35 West 21 st Street New York, New York.
Fordham Place Bronx, NY Aric Heffelfinger Structural Option Spring 2006.
Doug Jenkins - Interactive Design Services
1 THE PCI “BIG BEAM CONTEST” – AN EFFECTIVE TEACHING TOOL RICHARD MILLER, FPCI PROFESSOR OF CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI CHAIR, PCI RESEARCH.
Beam Design Beams are designed to safely support the design loads.
John Pillar Hampton Inn & Suites National Harbor, Md Advisor: Dr. Memari Distinguished Speaker Series, Spring 2007.
EAS 453 Pre-stressed Concrete Design Stress Limit of Pre-stressed Concrete 1Dr. NORAZURA MUHAMAD BUNNORI (PhD), USM.
CVL 2407 Faculty of Applied Engineering and Urban Planning Civil Engineering Department 2 nd Semester 2013/2014 Dr. Eng. Mustafa Maher Al-tayeb.
Maturity Method Strength Tests As Good As Concrete Cylinders
An-Najah National University Faculty of Engineering
DURABILITY OF CONCRETE STRUCTURES RURAL POLYTECHNIC TARIHAL
Advisor: Professor M. Kevin Parfitt
SHERINE RAJ AP/CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF SCD
Quality Control Personnel Training
Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute: Big Beam Competition
Reinforced Concrete Design-4 Design of doubly reinforced beams
Devil physics The baddest class on campus IB Physics Pre-IB Physics
Presentation transcript:

PCI Big Beam Contest Team 1 (XDF) Junfeng Qian Shiyu Wang Qi Wang

Outline Introduction Background Problem Statement Design Goals Job Description Field Trip Concrete Mix Beam Design Design Matrix Final Design Fabrication Analysis & Prediction Beam Test Test Results Timeline Conclusion Lessons Learned Recommendations for PCI Big Beam Contest Acknowledge Reference

Introduction PCI Big Beam Contest for academic year Sponsored by Tpac Company A challenge project

Background Pre-stressed concrete is a form of reinforced concrete that builds in compressive stresses during construction to oppose those found when in use.

Problem Statement Prestressed Concrete Beam20 ft. long and tested as a 18 ft. span Beam shall carry a total live load between 32 kips- 39kips Beam shall not crack under a total applied load of 20 kips

Design Goals – Design accuracy – Low cost – Low weight – Largest measured deflection at maximum total applied load – Meet the requirement of ACI and PCI Design Handbook, 7th Edition

Job Description Qi Wang– Project Manager Shiyu Wang– Coordinator Junfeng Qian– Project Engineer

Field Trip

Concrete Mix Self-Consolidating ConcreteLightweight Concrete Pros 1.Easy to achieve high strength transfer and ultimate. 2.Low Water Cement ratio assists with permeability. 3.Easy to place concrete with maximum consolidation. 4.Proven Performance. 5.High shear values at transfer and 28 days. 1.Low unit weight 2.Good to above average 28 day compression strength for lightweight. 3.Low Water Cement ratio assists with permeability. 4.Easy to place concrete with maximum consolidation. 5.High fire rating. Cons 1.High unit weight. 2.No air entrainment for severe weather conditions. 3.Low fire rating. 1.Low shear values at transfer and 28 days. 2.Specific gravity of lightweight material is unstable. 3.Low transfer strengths if proper curing procedures are not used.

Beam Design Cross-SectionI beam, T beam, Box beam Microsoft Excel software 8 design options Adjustments for qualified design options based on weight and cost

Beam Design Cont.

Design Matrix Cost (35%), Max Deflection (30%), Weight (35%) Beam 1Beam 2Beam 3 Type Percentile Measured Value Grade Measured Value Grade Measured Value Grade Cost ($) EI (kip-in2) Weight (lb.) Total (10)

Final Design Cross-Section Details Material cost MaterialsAmountUnit CostCost Normal Weight Concrete0.47 cu yd.$ 100/cu yd.$ 47 Prestressing Strand3*20 ft.$ 0.30/ft.$ 18 A615 #5 Rebar5*20 ft.$ 0.45/lb.$ 47 Welded Mesh25.8 lb.$ 0.50/lb.$ 13 A615 #4 Rebar4*0.7 ft.$ 0.45/lb.$1.5 Total Cost$ 126.5

Fabrication

Analysis & Prediction Prediction: Cracking load, Maximum Deflection, Ultimate Load Cracking Load & Ultimate Load: Excel Spreadsheet Deflection: Response 2000 Computer Software & Excel

Deflection Prediction

Beam Test Visual Indication of Deflection String Potentiometer Video

Test Results The point of load cracking is close to the prediction The maximum point load and deflection at ultimate capacity have a difference to the prediction Data DescriptionPredictedActualPercent Error Point Load Cracking (kips) % Ultimate capacity(kips) % Deflection at Midspan (in) %

Timeline

Conclusion Pros: – Successful Design – Good Cooperation – Gain Knowledge – Familiar with Research Process Cons: – Inaccurate Prediction – Exceed allowable ultimate load

Lessons Learned Enrich the knowledge about concrete design and improve abilities Gets the experience on how to work in a group to study the knowledge of prestressed concrete, computer design, and conduct the beam test Learn how to operate a concrete beam test from this project If the team has another opportunity to participate the team will be carefully notice the operation of Response 2000 program and ultimate load prediction.

Recommendations for PCI Big Beam Contest A discussion of future use of the beam should be required in the contest rules People who have different academic background could participate in this contest The contest committee should assign a technical faculty to each team

Reference Technical Advisor: Dr. Tuchscherer Project Manager: David L. Chapin Sponsor: Tpac Company Acknowledge ACI Code The 7th Edition of the PCI Design Handbook

Questions

Thank you!