A Community of Education Technology Professionals

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quality Assurance of ICT in Education NAACE is the professional association for those who are concerned with advancing education through the appropriate.
Advertisements

Planning for Learning and Teaching, Assessment and Moderation
Creating the Map To Set the Direction. Educational Positioning System (EPS – a play on GPS)
Estyns New Common Inspection Framework Outcomes Provision Leadership.
Competencies for beginning teachers
Australian Teacher Performance and Development Framework
Head of Learning: Job description
The SEDA Teacher Accreditation Scheme James Wisdom Visiting Professor in Educational Development, Middlesex University
Inclusion Quality Mark for Wales
Northampton – Development Opportunities a framework for enabling positive change.
BECTA ICT Self Review Framework Neil Clode November 15 th 2007.
Be a Part of Something Great! Learning Communities at Wayne State.
Who or what needs to be ready? Leaders Teachers Classroom support Administration Premises staff Children
Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in Early Education.
CPD4k Skills Competitions, CIF & PS
Northampton – Development Opportunities a framework for enabling positive change.
Impact & Evidence Primary Sport Premium
Information Management Strategy framework and data security
Building Our Curriculum
The common inspection framework: education, skills and early years.
Curriculum for Excellence Aberdeenshire November 2008.
1 “So who wants to lead a mathematics department?” Developing Future Secondary Subject Leaders for Mathematics – Collaborative Action Research Project.
1 School Inspection Update Key Changes since January 2014 Updates continued 17 June 2014 Name Farzana Aldridge – Strategic Director & Caroline Lansdown.
Training and development Education Evaluation: Benefits to Trust and its Learners Learning Beyond Registration Education Quality Team May 2014 Training.
HEALTH PROMOTING SCHOOL IN CONTEXT. HMIe Self Evaluation Series The Health Promoting School - Nov 2004 The characteristics of the Being Well-Doing Well.
CHANGES EXPLAINED STIMULATING MINDS (22/10/13). In 2012 the framework was revised to make it clearer and easier to use, with a clear focus on developing.
1 School Inspection Update Key Changes since January 2014 …continued 17 June 2014 Name Farzana Aldridge – Strategic Director Caroline Lansdown – Senior.
ICT in Schools Conference – 27 th April 2006 Primary Update Local and National Ian Brewer
Important Information Have you got a username and password for the school SRF account? If your school has not registered before then you can do this if.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
Outline for the session
Partnership in ISCs and examples of good practice Sue Preece HMI February 10 th 2010.
1 Health and Wellbeing For All. 2 Katie Paterson Programme Officer - Education NHS Health Scotland.
The Quality Standards for resource provisions For deaf children and young people in mainstream school.
Governor Training Safeguarding & Risk taking Substance mis-use supporting schools to become Outstanding.
BECTA ICT Self Review Framework Neil Clode October 23rd 2007.
Buckstone Primary School School Improvement Plan Summary A copy of the full Standards and Quality Report and the full Improvement Plan are available on.
Australian Teacher Performance and Development Framework Consultation proposal.
Developing people, improving young lives The QTS* Standards Bath Spa University 8 September 2009 Sheila Steer Training and Development Agency for Schools.
Ofsted Common Inspection Framework Mapping to Career Ready September 2015.
ICT Strategic Leader Forums Ian Brewer. ICT Strategic Leader Forums Outcomes Key outcomes: Improved capacity of Subject Leaders to ensure more effective.
Building Schools for the Future Transforming the Learning Landscape in Birmingham.
Advancing teaching: inspiring able learners every day Meeting the Challenge 14 th November 2012.
Raising standards improving lives The revised Learning and Skills Common Inspection Framework: AELP 2011.
Session 4: Self review framework- reviewed and renewed.
OfSTED Inspection 7th and 8th December 2016 Feedback to Parents
Support for English, maths and ESOL Module 5 Integrating English, maths and ICT into apprenticeship programmes.
Collaborative Learning
Jeff Smith Anson Primary School, Brent
Student Voice Our contribution to our school community is centred on the following values.
IMPLEMENTATION - JANUARY 2013
Let you light shine before all
Mariya International School
NAACEmark : the ten criteria
The Mentoring Process Martha Majors.
Exploring the Personal and Social Capability for Secondary schools
Exploring the Personal and Social Capability for Primary schools
Building the future Workshop 3 24 November 2017
Training and Development Agency for Schools (TDA)
Coventry University Framework for Professional Accreditation
Standard for Teachers’ Professional Development July 2016
Council for Learning Outside the Classroom
Competencies for beginning teachers
HEA Fellowship Workshop
Towards a Common Evaluation Framework Ken Dyson HMI
An Introduction to LiFE
Univ. Prof Dr Viktor Jakupec
OTLA Report Writing Training
PE and Sports Premium statement
Experienced Headteacher Development Programme
Presentation transcript:

A Community of Education Technology Professionals Delighted to be present Know us from the SRF, ICT Mark and perhaps the Third Millennium Learning Award Some of the exciting things we are doing in the future and right now.

Better outcomes through self-review Self-review Framework Some schools will be here 1. Advanced Maturity and IMPACT All good schools should be here 2. Capable 3. Implementing Your actions Where is your school? Some schools will be here 4. Developing The ICT Mark is not set at a level of excellence. The ICT Mark thresholds are set within each aspect at a level that any good school making effective use of technology should be able to achieve. This is the level all schools should be achieving. All schools should be making effective use of technology and improving. The challenge of the ICT Mark is to achieve this threshold in all the different elements and strands that make up the self-review framework. The benefit for schools and support providers of the self-review framework is as a tool to be able to position themselves within the model and the understanding and confidence in knowing where to go next. 5. Starting out Schools take actions to become more mature and capable in their use of technology….

A little history 2001: Naace develop review framework with local authority advisors 2003: NaaceMark available for schools 2006: Self-review Framework & ICT Mark 2008: SRF and ICT Mark used in Wales 2008: ICT Mark schools used in SLICT 2010: SRF fully revised 2012: New online tool launched 2012: 3rd Millennium Learning Award developed

SRF Steering Committee Teachers

OECD studies (not including UK) show that use of technology has very mixed impact! Flipped or flopped? Empower learning Develop thinking skills Encourage independence Create and produce content Co-construct knowledge Deepen quality of feedback Engage parents vs. Distract from learning vs. Enable lazy thinking vs. Reinforce dependence vs. Consume content vs. Spoon fed knowledge vs. Shallower feedback vs. Distancing parents

The Naace Self-review Framework Are you sure……. … you are continuing to take the right steps to: Benefit from your technology investments. Safeguard learners and protect their data. The Naace Self-review Framework

Better outcomes through self-review Self-review Framework Some schools will be here 1. Advanced Maturity and IMPACT All good schools should be here 2. Capable 3. Implementing Your actions Where is your school? Some schools will be here 4. Developing The ICT Mark is not set at a level of excellence. The ICT Mark thresholds are set within each aspect at a level that any good school making effective use of technology should be able to achieve. This is the level all schools should be achieving. All schools should be making effective use of technology and improving. The challenge of the ICT Mark is to achieve this threshold in all the different elements and strands that make up the self-review framework. The benefit for schools and support providers of the self-review framework is as a tool to be able to position themselves within the model and the understanding and confidence in knowing where to go next. 5. Starting out Schools take actions to become more mature and capable in their use of technology….

Safeguarding changes to the Naace self-review elements Actions supported by the leadership team determine educational and safeguarding outcomes 1) Leadership and Management ( ..and consider how they are protecting and educating children about digital safeguarding. Schools must train staff on e-safety and ensure online resources and communications are safe… 2) Teaching and Learning Impact on learners and outcomes 5) Professional Development (Combined with use in the curriculum) 3) Assessing digital capability 6) Resources 4) Digital Safeguarding

RAG reporting of Aspects in Elements www.naacesrf.com

Aspects with level descriptors

Aspect information and links

Suggested Evidence for Aspect

Suggested Action Planning for Aspect

Professional Development 5a - Evaluating and developing digital capability Aspect What does “good” look like? 5a-1 Managing professional development needs A regular comprehensive evaluation of staff use of technology in learning, teaching and management processes takes place. This informs the school’s strategic plans and priorities and is incorporated as part of performance management of staff. 5a-2 Identifying development needs Staff are encouraged to learn from other schools and participate in wider communities of practice to identify both individual and whole school education technology development needs. 5a-3 Provision and evaluation of training Staff have access to a wide range of professional development opportunities such as in-house support, purchased training, practitioner research, professional and academic qualifications and participation in wider communities of practice. Development activities are systematically evaluated for effectiveness and value for money. 5a-4 Use of technology and learning communities The school makes use of face-to-face, online and blended training as well as participation in learning communities to develop staff capabilities. 5a-5 Mentoring and coaching Systematic support through coaching and mentoring is part of planned professional development.

Professional Development 5b - Developing and sharing new and safe digital practices Aspect What does “good” look like? 5b-1 Developing new practices Many staff engage in the research and development of new practices with education technology. Outcomes are frequently incorporated into the curriculum and are reflected in whole school priorities. 5b-2 Sharing developments with all staff Clear processes are in place for recognising and routinely sharing effective use of education technology within school. 5b-3 Professional development with other schools Effective practice and professional development opportunities are shared with other schools and wider communities of learning and practice. 5b - 4 Meeting e-Safety training requirements The school has clear and effective training arrangements for all staff and governors in respect of digital safeguarding and changing technologies. 5b - 5 New e-Safety training Involvement with wider communities of practice is used to understand and assess the risks associated with emerging technologies and the developing practice and associated training in other schools. 5b - 6 Sharing e-Safety professional development Most staff can provide guidance to others in relation to the appropriate use and associated risks of information technology within and beyond school.

Join Naace Become part of the EdTech community Share ideas and benefit from others ideas Contribute to improving education Better together? www.naace.co.uk/join