doc.: IEEE <doc#>

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE e submission Kondou (Sony)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission.
Advertisements

March 2011 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: LB67 Channelization Comment Resolution Date.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [Resolution on comment #20,22 and 30]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Name - WirelessHD doc.: IEEE g July 2010
June 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposed Scenarios for Usage Model Document.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> March 2011
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
May 2010 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposed Resolution To The FCC Part
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [Proposed resolution to MIMO CES]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Resolution of CID 139] Date Submitted:
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [Proposed resolution to MIMO CES]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [Resolution on comment #20,22 and 30]
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> March 2015
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
May 2010 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposed Resolution To The FCC Part
Submission Title: [Proposed resolution to CID#133]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE /XXXr0 Sep 19, 2007 June 2009
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [Proposed resolution to CID#133]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [Proposed resolution to MIMO CES]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
July 2010 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Proposal for Radio Specification Comments.
<month year> doc.: IEEE s March 2019
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [Proposed resolution to cid#1064]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
<author>, <company>
Submission Title: [LB 28 Results] Date Submitted: [14 March 2005]
<month year> doc.: IEEE s March 2019
June, 2010 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [OFDM PHY Mode Representation] Date Submitted:
May 2010 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposed Resolution To The FCC Part
July 2017 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Dimming support solutions of PHYs in IEEE
Mar 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Resolution for Comment 70 ] Date Submitted:
Mar 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Resolution for Comment 70 ] Date Submitted:
Doc.: IEEE Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Summary.
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> March 2015
Submission Title: [Common rate resolution]
August 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: CID 422 Proposal Date Submitted: 14 August,
August 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: CID 422 Proposal Date Submitted: 14 August,
August 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: CID 422 Proposal Date Submitted: 14 August,
August 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: CID 422 Proposal Date Submitted: 14 August,
September, 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: CID 422 Proposal Date Submitted: Sept.
August 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: MLME-SOUNDING and MLME-CALIBRATE comment.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> <month year> doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> <Mar. 2016> Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Resolution on comment #42, #44 and #45 for HRCP-SC PHY] Date Submitted: [14 March 2016] Source: [Keitarou Kondou] Company: [Sony Corporation] Address1: [1-7-1 Konan, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-0075] E-Mail1: [Keitarou.Kondou@jp.sony.com] Re: [In response to 15-16-0162-01-003e-lb114-consolidated-comments] Abstract: [This document presents a resolution on comment #42, #44 and #45 for HRCP-SC PHY in 15-16-0162-01-003e-lb114-consolidated-comments.] Purpose: [Resolving the comment #42, #44, #45] Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributors acknowledge and accept that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15. Kondou (Sony) <author>, <company>

Comment #42 and the resolution <Mar. 2016> Comment #42 and the resolution CID Page Sub-clause Line # Comment Proposed Change 42 96 11a.2.3.2.1 12 Should the Frame Length field indicate the MAC frame length not excluding FCS? Correct as needed Accept and change the description as same as that used in the OOK part Current The Frame Length field shall be an unsigned integer equal to the number of octets in the MAC frame body 12 of a regular frame, excluding the FCS. Corrected The Frame Length field shall be an unsigned integer equal to the number of octets in the MAC frame body including frame payload(s), MAC subheader(s) in the aggregated frames, and FCS(s), but not including the frame header and the preamble. Kondou (Sony)

Comment #44 and the resolution <Mar. 2016> Comment #44 and the resolution CID Page Sub-clause Line # Comment Proposed Change 44 99 11a.2.4.1 Considering P2P communication with equal-basis transceivers, allowable EVM for a transmitter seems to be too strict. Referring to page 33 in IEEE802.15-15-0662-01-003e, target EVM balance between transmitter and receiver should be revisited. Target EVM for a transmitter and a receiver has to be confirmed for deciding allowable EVM for a transmitter. Accept in principle, target EVM has been confirmed as below and no change is needed. description Eb/N0 is used at the graph on page 33 in IEEE802.15-15-0662-01-003e. Current values of EVM are derived from SNR* required for the criteria. In case of MCS3, where 16QAM and rate-14/15 LDPC used, threshold for frame-error rate of 8 % is 10.5 dB in Eb/N0 and 15.6 dB in SNR. Current EVM value for MCS3 is –22 dB. If same amount of noise is assumed for both transmitter and receiver, noise level of –19 dB is allowed for each. Then the margin shall be 3.4 dB and seems to be appropriate. *SNR is defined here as the ratio averaged signal power to error power at the received signal. Kondou (Sony)

Comment #45 and the resolution <Mar. 2016> Comment #45 and the resolution CID Page Sub-clause Line # Comment Proposed Change 45 99 11a.2.4.1 There are many possible situations where EVM will be measured via a build-in antenna at 60 GHz band. Proposals for measurement methods should be considered, either in this spec or in a separate conformance test plan. Insert text as follows: when measuring EVM by capturing a transmit signal via an antenna, frequency response of the antenna can be compensated. Reject because current draft refers the measurement method defined at 15.3. Current draft at line 23-24 on page 99 The EVM of a compliant transmitter shall be measured and calculated as defined in 11.1.7 and shall not 23 exceed the values given in Table 11-38 for the indicated mode. - Description in 11.1.7 from line 22 on page 310 (15.3RevA-DF2) The error vector measurement shall be made on baseband I and Q data after recovery through an ideal reference receiver system. An ideal receiver is a receiver that is capable of converting the transmitted signal into a stream of complex samples at sufficient rate or more, with sufficient accuracy in terms of I/Q arm amplitude and phase balance, DC offsets, and phase noise. It shall perform carrier lock, symbol timing recovery and amplitude adjustment while making the measurements. Kondou (Sony)

<Mar. 2016> END Kondou (Sony)